Karen S. Gilbert

Antitumor drug cross-resistance in vivo in a cisplatin-resistant murine P388 leukemia.

SummarySince 1978, over 50 clinically useful antitumor drugs or new candidate antitumor agents have been evaluated in vivo against cisplatin-resistant P388 leukemia (P388/DDPt) in our laboratories. Analysis of this data base has yielded insights into the cross-resistance, collateral sensitivity, and mechanisms of resistance of P388/DDPt. P388/DDPt was cross-resistant or marginally crossresistant to eight agents [carmethizole·HCl, rhizoxin, dibromodulcitol, spirohydantoin mustard, hepsulfam, arabinosyl-5-azacytosine (ara-AC), tiazofurin, and deoxyspergualin]. Of these eight agents, the latter six have entered various phases of clinical trials. For these trials, it may be important to exclude or to monitor with extra care patients who have previously been treated with cisplatin. P388/DDPt was collaterally sensitive to six agents [fludarabine phosphate (2-F-ara-AMP), amsacrine (AMSA), mitoxantrone, etoposide (VP-16), batracylin, and flavone acetic acid] and, possibly, to two others (merbarone and echinomycin). These observations of collateral sensitivity suggest that a combination of cisplatin plus any one of these drugs might exhibit therapeutic synergism. Therapeutic synergism has been observed in animal models for combinations of cisplatin plus VP-16, AMSA, or mitoxantrone. The observation of collateral sensitivity for P388/DDPt to four agents (AMSA, mitoxantrone, merbarone, and VP-16) that have been reported to interact with DNA topoisomerase II suggests the possible involvement of the latter in cisplatin resistance. Both the increased sensitivity of P388/DDPt to these agents and a portion of its resistance to cisplatin could be the result of an increase in DNA topoisomerase II activity.

Preclinical antitumor activity of 4′-thio-β-d-arabinofuranosylcytosine (4′-thio-ara-C)

Purpose4′-Thio-β-d-arabinofuranosylcytosine (4′-thio-ara-C), which has shown significant cytotoxicity against a panel of human tumor lines, was evaluated for antitumor activity against a spectrum of human tumor systems in mice.MethodsAntitumor activity was evaluated in 15 subcutaneously implanted human tumor xenografts. 4′-Thio-ara-C was administered intraperitoneally using either q1d×9 (daily treatment for nine consecutive days) or q4h×3/q1d×9 (three treatments each day separated by 4-h intervals for nine consecutive days).Results4′-Thio-ara-C exhibited an excellent spectrum of activity. Treatment with the compound was curative against HCT-116 colon, SW-620 colon, NCI-H23 NSCL, and CAKI-1 renal tumors and resulted in partial/complete regressions in the DLD-1 colon, NCI-H522 NSCL, DU-145 prostate, and PANC-1 pancreatic tumor models. Tumor stasis was noted for HT29 colon and NCI-H460 NSCL tumors. Tumor inhibition was observed for A549 NSCL, PC-3 prostate, LNCAP prostate, and MDA-MB-435 breast tumors. Of the 15 tumors examined, only CFPAC-1 pancreatic was unresponsive to the compound. In contrast, 1-β-d-arabinofuranosylcytosine was minimally active at best against CAKI-1 renal, HCT-116 colon, NCI-H460 NSCL, and SW-620 colon tumors. Schedule- and route-dependency studies were conducted using the NCI-H460 NSCL tumor. The activity of 4′-thio-ara-C was independent of schedule when comparing q2d×5 (every other day for five treatments), q1d×9, and q4h×3/q1d×9 treatment schedules. 4′-Thio-ara-C was equally effective by the intravenous and intraperitoneal routes of administration, with the oral route being less efficacious.ConclusionsOn the basis of these results, 4′-thio-ara-C appears to have a profile distinct from other nucleoside antitumor agents and is being advanced to clinical trials.

Cross-resistance of drug-resistant murine P388 leukemias to toxol in vivo

SummaryThe antimicrotubule agent taxol (NSC 125973) has shown clinical antitumor activity against several classically refractory tumors. We developed a drug-resistance profile for taxol using ten drug-resistant P388 leukemias to identify potentially useful guides for patient selection for further clinical trials of taxol and possible non-cross-resistant drug combinations with taxol. Multidrug-resistant P388 leukemias exhibited either clear (leukemia resistant to amsacrine) or marginal cross-resistance (leukemias resistant to doxorubicin, actinomycin D, and mitoxantrone) to taxol. Leukemias resistant to vincristine (non-multidrug-resistant leukemia), camptothecin, melphalan, cisplatin, 1-β-d-arabinofuranosylcytosine, and methotrexate were not cross-resistant to taxol. The data suggest that (1) it may be important to exclude or to monitor with extra care patients who have previously been treated with amsacrine, doxorubicin, actinomycin D, or mitoxantrone and (2) a combination of one of the non-cross-resistant drugs and taxol might exhibit therapeutic synergism.

Lack of in vivo crossresistance with gemcitabine against drug-resistant murine P388 leukemias.

Abstract Gemcitabine, a novel pyrimidine nucleoside antimetabolite, has shown clinical antitumor activity against several tumors (breast, small-cell and non-small-cell lung, bladder, pancreatic, and ovarian). We have developed a drug-resistance profile for gemcitabine using eight drug-resistant P388 leukemias in order to identify potentially useful guides for patient selection for further clinical trials of gemcitabine and possible noncrossresistant drug combinations with gemcitabine. Multidrug-resistant P388 leukemias (leukemias resistant to doxorubicin or etoposide) exhibited no crossresistance to gemcitabine. Leukemias resistant to vincristine (not multidrug resistant), cyclophosphamide, melphalan, cisplatin, and methotrexate were also not crossresistant to gemcitabine. Only the leukemia resistant to 1-β-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine was crossresistant to gemcitabine. The results suggest that (1) it may be important to exclude or to monitor with extra care patients who have previously been treated with 1-β-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine and (2) the lack of crossresistance seen with gemcitabine may contribute to therapeutic synergism when gemcitabine is combined with other agents.

Isolation and Characterization of a Murine P388 Leukemia Line Resistant to Clofarabine

A murine P388 leukemia line fully resistant to clofarabine was obtained after only two courses of intraperitoneal treatment (three times a day for nine consecutive days). The resistance was stable for at least 13 weeks without treatment. The subline was as sensitive to 5-fluorouracil, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, melphalan, BCNU, doxorubicin, etoposide, irinotecan, vincristine, and docetaxel as was the parental P388/0 line but was cross-resistant to five antimetabolites [palmO-ara-C, 4′-thio-ara-C, fludarabine phosphate, cladribine, and gemcitabine—all of which require deoxycytidine kinase for activation] and paclitaxel. The subline had less than 1% of the deoxycytidine kinase activity in comparison to P388/0.

Lack of in vivo cross-resistance with 4'-thio-ara-C against drug-resistant murine P388 and L1210 leukemias.

Purpose4′-Thio-β-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine (4′-thio-ara-C), which has shown a broad spectrum of antitumor activity against human tumor systems in mice and is undergoing clinical trials, was evaluated for cross-resistance to seven clinical agents in order to identify potentially useful guides for patient selection for further clinical trials of 4′-thio-ara-C and possible noncross-resistant drug combinations with 4′-thio-ara-C.MethodsA drug resistance profile for 4′-thio-ara-C, which was administered intraperitoneally daily for nine consecutive days, was obtained using seven drug-resistant P388 and L1210 leukemias that were implanted intraperitoneally in mice.ResultsMultidrug-resistant P388 leukemias (leukemias resistant to doxorubicin, etoposide, or paclitaxel) exhibited no cross-resistance to 4′-thio-ara-C. Leukemias resistant to camptothecin, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil were also not cross-resistant to 4′-thio-ara-C. Only the leukemia resistant to 1-β-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine was cross-resistant to 4′-thio-ara-C.ConclusionsThe data suggest that (1) it may be important to exclude or to monitor with extra care patients who have previously been treated with 1-β-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine and (2) the lack of cross-resistance seen with 4′-thio-ara-C may contribute to therapeutic synergism when 4′-thio-ara-C is combined with other agents.

Preclinical Combination Therapy of Thiarabine Plus Various Clinical Anticancer Agents

Thiarabine is undergoing clinical trials. In support of that effort combination therapy of thiarabine plus six clinical anticancer agents was evaluated using various human tumor xenograft models. The antitumor activity of thiarabine in combination appeared to be greater than additive with irinotecan (DLD-1 colon), paclitaxel (PC-3 prostate), cisplatin (PC-3 prostate), or cyclophosphamide (RL lymphoma), additive with irinotecan (NCI-H460 NSCLC), cisplatin (NCI-H460 NSCLC) or methotrexate (CCRF-CEM leukemia), and less than additive with irinotecan (HT29 colon), paclitaxel (NCI-H460 NSCLC) or cisplatin (NCI-H23 NSCLC). Combining thiarabine with irinotecan, paclitaxel, cisplatin, or cyclophosphamide should receive consideration in the clinical treatment of cancer.

Preclinical Combination Therapy of Clofarabine Plus Radiation

Clofarabine, an approved anticancer drug, was evaluated in combination with radiation in six subcutaneously implanted human tumor xenograft models. Clofarabine had no effect on the growth of SF-295 glioblastoma, which was not enhanced by radiation. There was no difference between clofarabine with and without radiation in the DU-145 prostate model. The combined effect on NCI-H460 lung tumors appeared to be additive. SR475 head and neck, PANC-1 pancreatic, and HCT-116 colon tumors were radiomodified by clofarabine. The radiomodifying capacity of clofarabine was superior to that for gemcitabine in two models (PANC-1 and HCT-116) and was comparable in the other four models.

Preclinical antitumor activity of thiarabine in human leukemia and lymphoma xenograft models.

Thiarabine was evaluated for antitumor activity in seven human leukemia, lymphoma, and myeloma xenograft models to explore the activity in hematological malignancies. Thiarabine was active against all of the human leukemia and lymphoma lines tested, being curative against HL-60 leukemia and AS283 lymphoma and effecting tumor regressions in CCRF-CEM, MOLT-4, and K-562 leukemia and RL lymphoma models, but did not exhibit any appreciable activity against RPMI-8226 myeloma. For the leukemia/lymphoma models, thiarabine was more efficacious than ara-C/palmO-ara-C (four models), clofarabine (three models), fludarabine monophosphate (five models), cladribine (four models), and gemcitabine (six models). Thiarabine warrants future clinical trials with leukemias/lymphomas.