Karen T. Britton

Anxiolytic-Like Action of Neuropeptide Y: Mediation by Y1 Receptors in Amygdala, and Dissociation from Food Intake Effects

Evidence from animal and human studies suggests that neuropeptide Y (NPY) may be a potent endogenous anxiolytic. The anatomic structures mediating this action of the peptide remain unknown. Furthermore, in addition to its anxiolytic-like effects, intracerebroventricular administration of NPY induces food intake through hypothalamic mechanisms, making the anxiolytic-like action of the peptide more difficult to interpret. The purpose of this study was to examine the anatomic substrate for the effects of NPY on anxiety, and to characterize the NPY receptors mediating these effects. Intracerebroventricular injection of NPY produced increased food intake in free-feeding animals, and dose-dependent anticonflict/anxiolytic-like effects in an established animal model of anxiety, the Geller-Seifter punished responding test. In contrast, microinjection of NPY into the central nucleus of the amygdala did not increase food intake in free-feeding animals, did not affect unpunished lever pressing for food, but did reproduce the anticonflit/anxiolytic-like effect with high potency. The selective NPY-Y1 agonist, p[Leu31, Pro34]NPY was approximately equipotent with native NPY in the conflict paradigm, and markedly more potent than the Y2 agonist, NPY13-36. Intrastriatal injections had no effect on conflict behavior. Thus, activation of Yl receptors in the central nucleus of the amygdala produces effects similar to established anxiolytics without affecting food intake, suggesting that Yl-receptors in the amygdala may be a substrate for anxiolytic actions of NPY.

Corticotropin-releasing factor antagonist reduces emotionality in socially defeated rats via direct neurotropic action.

Introduction of a socially naive male rat into the home territory of a resident counterpart results in agonistic interactions, leading to the rapid social defeat of the intruder. Exposure to the aggressive resident produces a stress-response profile consisting of neuroendocrine activation and coping behaviors such as submission. The present studies examined the dependence of these adaptive responses on endogenous brain Corticotropin-Releasing Factor (CRF), a peptide hormone known to coordinate neuronally mediated- and pituitary-adrenal responses to stress. The Elevated Plus-Maze was employed as an animal model of emotionality in which stressors reduce subsequent exploration of open maze arms without walls in favor of enclosed maze arms. A CRF antagonist, alpha-hel CRF9-41, administered intracerebroventricularly (5 and 25 micrograms i.c.v.) immediately post-stress and 5 min prior to maze testing reversed the heightened emotionality produced by the resident exposure stressor. This action paralleled that of an anxiolytic dose of the short-acting benzodiazepine, midazolam (1.5 mg/kg i.p.). Intra-amygdaloid administration of lower doses of the CRF antagonist (125, 250 and 500 ng i.c.) also reversed, dose-dependently, the effect of exposure to an aggressive resident without altering the behavior of unstressed control animals. Further, the enhanced release of ACTH and corticosterone following social conflict was not modified over the short term by the intra-amygdaloid dose of CRF antagonist (250 ng i.c.) which was effective in reversing stress-induced hyper-emotionality. These results suggest that limbic system CRF substrates exert an anxiogenic effect on the exploratory behavior of socially defeated rats via a pituitary-adrenal-independent mechanism.

CRF antagonist reverses the "anxiogenic" response to ethanol withdrawal in the rat

The role of the neuropeptide corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) in mediating the behavioral effects of ethanol withdrawal in the rat was examined using the elevated plus-maze test. In Experiment 1, CRF (0.5 µg ICV) reduced the percentage of time spent on the open arms of the elevated plus-maze, consistent with an “anxiogenic-like” effect. CRF also reduced the total number of arm entries, indicating a reduction in general activity. Low doses (5 and 25 µg ICV) of the CRF antagonist, alpha-helical CRF produced no behavioral effects in the elevated plus-maze, while a higher dose (50 µg ICV) elicited CRF-like activity. In experiment 2, rats were maintained for 2–3 weeks on a liquid diet containing ethanol (8.5–11.5% v/v) or sucrose. Eight hours after withdrawal from the ethanol diet rats displayed “anxiogenic-like” responses as well as a reduction in general activity in the elevated plus-maze compared with rats withdrawn from control diet. Alpha-helical CRF significantly antagonized the “anxiogenic-like” effects of ethanol withdrawal in the plus-maze. General activity and physical signs of ethanol withdrawal such as tail stiffness, body tremor and ventromedial distal flexion were unaffected by alpha-helical CRF. Blood Alcohol Levels (BALs) determined immediately after removal of the ethanol diet showed no group differences in ethanol consumption. These results suggest that increased activity of central CRF systems may mediate the anxiogenic effects of ethanol withdrawal.

Corticotropin-releasing factor and neuropeptide Y: role in emotional integration.

The amygdala complex integrates stressful stimuli and is critical in transducing their aversive value into autonomic, endocrine and behavioural responses. Stimulation within the amygdala complex produces signs of fear without a relevant external object, while lesions in this region abolish normal fear responses. In a manner characteristic of phylogenetically old limbic brain areas, the complex neurochemical anatomy of the amygdala involves a large number of phylogenetically old peptide mediators. The distribution and connectivity of these peptide systems have been extensively studied, but less is known about their functional role. Recent evidence suggests that two neuropeptides, corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and neuropeptide Y (NPY) exert a reciprocal regulation of responsiveness to stressful stimuli, possibly via an interaction of these two systems in the amygdala.

The anxiolytic-like effects of the neurosteroid allopregnanolone: interactions with GABAA receptors

The neurosteroid 3alpha-hydroxy-5alpha-pregnan-20-one (allopregnanolone) was administered systemically to rats which were tested in the Geller-Seifter conflict paradigm, an established animal model of anxiety. Allopregnanolone was found to produce significant anxiolytic-like effects at a dose of 8 mg/kg. When three ligands that function at different sites on the gamma-aminobutyric acid/benzodiazepine receptor-chloride ionophore complex (GABA(A) receptors) were examined in conjunction with allopregnanolone, the anti-conflict effects of allopregnanolone were effectively reversed only by the benzodiazepine receptor inverse agonist RO15-4513 (ethyl-8-azido-5,6-dihydro-5-methyl-6-oxo-4H-imidazo [1,5-alpha]-[1,4]benzodiazepine-3-carboxylate). Since this inverse agonist has been reported to inhibit the GABA(A)-activated chloride flux in neuronal membranes, it is likely that the stimulation of the chloride channel in GABA(A) receptors is an important component of the effects of allopregnanolone. In contrast, the benzodiazepine receptor antagonist flumazenil (ethyl-8-fluoro-5,6-dihydro-5-methyl-6-oxo-4H-imidazo [1,5-alpha]-[1,4]benzodiazepine-3-carboxylate) did not block the anxiolytic-like actions of allopregnanolone, indicating that allopregnanolone does not bind at the benzodiazepine site directly. Isopropylbicyclophosphate, which binds at the picrotoxinin site on the GABA(A) receptors and blocks the behavioral actions of ethanol, also dose-dependently reversed the anti-conflict effect of this neurosteroid. The results suggest that allopregnanolone may be working either at a site specific for the benzodiazepine receptor inverse agonist RO15-4513 or at the picrotoxinin site to produce its potent anxiolytic-like behavioral effects.

Corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) receptor antagonist blocks activating and ‘anxiogenic’ actions of CRF in the rat

The effectiveness of a recently synthesized corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) antagonist, alpha-helical CRF9-41, in reversing the locomotor activating and proconflict effects of CRF was evaluated. The CRF receptor antagonist (50, 100 and 200 micrograms, i.c.v.) produced a dose-related attenuation of the response-suppressing effects of CRF in a conflict model of anxiety. The antagonist also effectively suppressed the marked locomotor activation produced by CRF. No discernible intrinsic effects on behavior were noted when the antagonist was administered alone. These results suggest that the behavioral effects of CRF are receptor-mediated phenomena and point to the potential usefulness of a CRF antagonist in understanding the function of endogenous CRF in mediating responses to stressful stimuli.

Chlordiazepoxide attenuates response suppression induced by corticotropin-releasing factor in the conflict test

The role of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) in mediating the stress response was studied using a behavioral test in which anxiety or conflict influence performance. Rats implanted with intraventricular cannulae were tested in a Geller-Seifter conflict test modified for incremental shock. CRF produced a dose-dependent attenuation of punished and nonpunished responding in the conflict test. Chlordiazepoxide increased punished, but not unpunished, responding and produced a dose-dependent reversal of CRF-induced response suppression. CRF had no effect on tail flick or hot-plate analgesia tests. The results support the hypothesis that CRF produces behavioral effects consistent with “anxiety” or an increased responsiveness to stress.

A sensitive open field measure of anxiolytic drug activity.

Anxiolytic drugs including diazepam (DZP), chlordiazepoxide (CDX), pentabarbitol (PB) and ethanol (EtOH) produce specific alterations in the behavior of fasted rats given access to a single food pellet secured in the center of a novel open field environment. These drugs increase the total amount of food eaten in a 15 min test and the mean amount eaten per approach to the food pedestal. This latter effect appears to be the more sensitive index of anxiolytic drug action and occurs at doses which have no effect on rearing or grooming. DZP was effective following either acute or chronic (15 day) treatment at doses which have no effect on the food consumption by fasted rats tested in their home cages. The effects of the sedative benzodiazepine, flurazepam, were similar to those of DZP but were not statistically significant. Behavioral effects similar to those of DZP were seen in animals receiving additional handling prior to testing or in animals habituated to the open field. Neither the anti-psychotic haloperidol nor morphine mimicked the actions of DZP.

The amygdala mediates the anxiolytic-like effect of the neurosteroid allopregnanolone in rat

The neurosteroid allopregnanolone (3alpha-hydroxy-5alpha-pregnan-20-one) possesses clear anxiolytic-like effects. Other neurosteroids namely pregnenolone sulfate (PREG-S) and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) influence anxiety-related behavior differently. In the present study, the implication of the amygdala, a key structure in mechanisms of fear and anxiety, was investigated as a potential neural substrate for the effects of neurosteroids on anxiety-like behavior in rat. Animals implanted with bilateral cannulae aimed at the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) and infused with neurosteroids, were tested in two animal models of anxiety. Allopregnanolone (8 microg/side) produced a significant increase in responding suppressed by punishment in the conflict test. In the elevated plus maze, allopregnanolone (8 microg/side) induced a significant increase in the time spent and the number of entries in open arms compared with the vehicle-infused controls. No significant changes in punished and unpunished responding of the conflict test were observed with PREG-S (0.001-8 microg/side) and DHEA-S (2-8 microg/side) administered into the CeA or into the lateral ventricle (1-20 microg). The results reveal the lack of activity of PREG-S and DHEA-S in the operant conflict test, but suggest that the central nucleus of the amygdala is a key region involved in the mechanisms underlying the anxiolytic-like action of allopregnanolone.

The Role of CRF in Behavioral Aspects of Stress

CRF in the central nervous system appears to hve activating properties on behavior and to coordinate behavioral responses to stressors. These behavioral effects of CRF appear to be independent of the pituitary-adrenal axis and can be reversed by CRF antagonists. CRF antagonist administration reverses not only decreases in behavior associated with stress, but also increases in behavior associated with stress, thus suggesting that the role of CRF is stress dependent and not intrinsic to a given behavioral response. Further, microinjection of alpha-helical CRF 9-41 and immunotargeting of CRF neurons in separate brain compartments reveal a link between the anatomical sites that contain CRF and the nature of the behavioral response to stressors that can be modified by suppression of endogenous CRF activity therein. These actions of CRF in coordinating coping responses to stress at several bodily levels are consistent with a role for CRF similar to the dual role of other hypothalamic releasing factors in integrating hormonal and neural mechanisms by acting both as secretagogues for anterior pituitary hormones and as extrapituitary peptide neurotransmitters. Moreover, dysfunction in such a fundamental homeostatic system may be the key to a variety of pathophysiological conditions including mental disorders.