Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Karen Voigt is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Karen Voigt.


BMC Family Practice | 2013

General practitioners’ views on polypharmacy and its consequences for patient health care

Juliane Köberlein; Mandy Gottschall; Kathrin Czarnecki; Alexander Thomas; Antje Bergmann; Karen Voigt

BackgroundMultimorbidity is defined as suffering from coexistent chronic conditions. Multimorbid patients demand highly complex patient-centered care which often includes polypharmacy, taking an average of six different drugs per day. Adverse drug reactions, adverse drug events and medication errors are all potential consequences of polypharmacy. Our study aims to detect the status quo of the health care situation in Saxony’s general practices for multimorbid patients receiving multiple medications. We will identify the most common clinical profiles as well as documented adverse drug events and reactions that occur during the treatment of patients receiving multiple medications. We will focus on exploring the motives of general practitioners for the prescription of selected drugs in individual cases where there is evidence of potential drug-drug-interactions and potentially inappropriate medications in elderly patients. Furthermore, the study will explore general practitioners’ opinions on delegation of skills to other health professions to support medical care and monitoring of patients receiving multiple medications.Methods/designThis is a retrospective cross sectional study using mixed methods. Socio-demographic data as well as diagnoses, medication regimens and clinically important events will be analyzed retrospectively using general practitioners documentation in patients’ records. Based on these data, short vignettes will be generated and discussed by general practitioners in qualitative telephone interviews.DiscussionTo be able to improve outpatient health care management for patients receiving multiple medications, the current status quo of care, risk factors for deficient treatment and characteristics of concerned patients must be investigated. Furthermore, it is necessary to understand the physicians’ decision making process regarding treatment.


American Journal of Infection Control | 2015

Current vaccination status regarding measles among university students in Dresden, Germany.

Henna Riemenschneider; Jeannine Schübel; Antje Bergmann; Joachim Kugler; Karen Voigt

Germany aimed to eliminate measles by 2015, but vaccination coverage is still insufficient, especially in respect to adolescents and young adults. A cross-sectional survey with 711 students studying a range of subjects showed a high acceptance regarding vaccination. Actual self-reported vaccination rates were lower; only 65.5% of medical students and 25.3%-39.4% of other student groups reported complete vaccination against measles. Of the students, 12.6%-45% did not know their vaccination status. Vaccination acceptance did not correlate with vaccination behavior: accessible vaccination opportunities at universities should be offered.


Gesundheitswesen | 2016

Facharztpräferenzen von Medizinstudierenden im Kontrast zum Bedarf an Allgemeinmedizinern in Sachsen

Axel Bartels; Karen Voigt; Henna Riemenschneider; M. Nitschke-Bertaud; Antje Bergmann

Aim of the study: Especially in the rural areas of Germany, there are not enough general practitioners (GPs) for primary care. Preferred medical specialties of medical students can help get an estimate of the number of future GPs. This study compares this estimate to the current need for GPs in Saxony. Methods: 587 medical students at the second, sixth and tenth semester were invited to take part in an anonymous cross-sectional study regarding their specialty preferences at the Technical University Dresden. Based on the data of the medical requirements for Saxony, 4 model calculations were generated for comparison of the estimated numbers of future GPs and the current need for GPs. Results: The most commonly preferred medical specialties were surgery (19.1%), internal medicine (12.9%), pediatrics (11.6%) and general practice (9.9%). A significant increase in specialist preference for GP was observed from the sixth (4.9%) to the tenth semester (14.0%). The model calculations show that approximately 29% to 111% of the open positions for GPs could be filled by the potential new GPs from Dresden. Conclusion: Currently, medical students planning to become GPs cannot meet the corresponding need for GPs. Future studies should include the points of view of students, continuing education assistants, GPs and patients.


Applied Nursing Research | 2016

Factors influencing sleep quality among nursing staff: Results of a cross sectional study

K. Kunzweiler; Karen Voigt; Joachim Kugler; K. Hirsch; Antje Bergmann; Henna Riemenschneider

PURPOSE Given the intense physical and mental demands placed on nurses and other caregivers, getting sufficient sleep is essential to maintaining both individual health and professional performance. The goal of our study is to describe and analyze the self-reported sleep quality of nursing staff and identify which factors have an influence on it. METHODS The sample was comprised of 153 female nurses over the age of 20 years who completed written surveys regarding their health status and health behavior. Their responses were subjected to ANOVA analysis with post hoc follow-up tests and logit regression was used. RESULTS 33% of female nursing staff reported poor quality sleep. Lower quality of life, tachycardia and unequal distribution of work load were most strongly associated with poor sleep quality. CONCLUSION Our study indicates that reducing workplace stress is a good place to start in developing a proactive strategy. A comprehensive prevention strategy should include both behavioral and situational prevention elements. Future studies should focus on identifying causal factors and developing prevention strategies.


BMC Family Practice | 2014

Gaining information about home visits in primary care: methodological issues from a feasibility study

Karen Voigt; Stephanie Taché; Andreas Klement; Thomas Fankhaenel; Stefan Bojanowski; Antje Bergmann

BackgroundHome visits are part of general practice work in Germany. Within the context of an expanding elderly population and a decreasing number of general practitioner (GPs), open questions regarding the organisation and adequacy of GPs’ care in immobile patients remain. To answer these questions, we will conduct a representative primary data collection concerning contents and organisation of GPs’ home visits in 2014. Because this study will require considerable efforts for documentation and thus substantial involvement by participating GPs, we conducted a pilot study to see whether such a study design was feasible.MethodsWe used a mixed methods design with two study arms in a sample of teaching GPs of the University Halle. The quantitative arm evaluates participating GPs and documentation of home visits. The qualitative arm focuses on reasons for non-participation for GPs who declined to take part in the pilot study.ResultsOur study confirms previously observed reasons for non-response of GPs in the particular setting of home visits including lack of time and/or interest. In contrast to previous findings, monetary incentives were not crucial for GPs participation. Several factors influenced the documentation rate of home visits and resulted in a discrepancy between the numbers of home visits documented versus those actually conducted. The most frequently reported problem was related to obtaining patient consent, especially when patients were unable to provide informed consent due to cognitive deficits.ConclusionsThe results of our feasibility study provide evidence for improvement of the study design and study instruments to effectively conduct a documentation-intensive study of GPs doing home visits. Improvement of instructions and questionnaire regarding time variables and assessment of the need for home visits will be carried out to increase the reliability of future data. One particularly important methodological issue yet to be resolved is how to increase the representativeness of home visit care by including the homebound patient population that is unable to provide informed consent.


Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen | 2013

Entwicklung und Bewertung von Qualitätsindikatoren aus den Leitlinien Halsschmerzen, Nackenschmerzen und Demenz der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Allgemeinmedizin und Familienmedizin (DEGAM)

Martin Scherer; Anja Wollny; Horst Christian Vollmar; Jean-François Chenot; Erika Baum; Anne Barzel; Martin Beyer; Günther Egidi; Petra Kaufmann-Kolle; Armin Mainz; Uwe Popert; Guido Schmiemann; Karen Voigt; Hans-Otto Wagner; Joachim Szecsenyi

A debate on the application of quality indicators (QIs) arose among the members of the German College of General Practitioners and Family Physicians (DEGAM) when two QI systems for ambulatory care (QISA and AQUIK) were published in a short time interval. A research question that emanated from this discussion was whether appropriate QI might be developed based on German general practice guidelines. In spring 2010, the DEGAM guideline committee (SLK) decided to conduct a project on guideline-based development of QIs using the DEGAM guidelines for dementia, neck pain and sore throat. All members of the SLK were invited to participate in the development process which comprised three face-to-face meetings and four paper-pencil ratings. Finally, 17 QIs for the three guidelines on dementia (n=8), neck pain (n=7) and sore throat (n=2) emerged. These QIs received different ratings in the dimensions relevance, practicability, and appropriateness for public reporting as well as for pay for performance. In this project, guideline authors themselves developed QIs based on German general practice guidelines for the first time ever. Not before practice administration systems facilitate the availability of data in the context of clinical documentation, the practicability of the new QIs can be proven in real every-day practice.


Deutsches Arzteblatt International | 2017

Latent Hypothyroidism in Adults

Jeannine Schübel; Joachim Feldkamp; Antje Bergmann; Wolfgang Drossard; Karen Voigt

BACKGROUND The prevalence of latent/subclinical hypothyroidism is between 3% and 10%, according to epidemiologic studies that have been carried out in the USA, the United Kingdom, and Denmark. As persons with latent hypo - thyroidism are often asymptomatic, the diagnosis is often made incidentally in routine laboratory testing. METHODS This review is based on a selective search in PubMed for publications on the diagnosis and treatment of latent hypothyroidism. All pertinent articles and guidelines published from 1 January 2000 to 31 July 2016 were included. RESULTS The diagnosis of latent hypothyroidism is generally assigned after repeated measurement of a TSH concentration above 4.0 mU/L in a person whose fT4 concentration is in the normal range. The most common cause is autoimmune thyroiditis, which can be detected by a test for autoantibodies. L-thyroxin supplementation is a controversial matter: its purpose is to prevent the development of overt hypothyroidism, but there is a danger of overtreatment, which increases the risk of fracture. To date, no benefit of L-thyroxin supplementation has been demonstrated with respect to morbidity and mortality, health-related quality of life, mental health, cognitive function, or reduction of overweight. There is, however, evidence of a beneficial effect on cardiac function in women, and on the vascular system. At present, treatment is generally considered indicated only if the TSH level exceeds 10.0 mU/L. CONCLUSION Limited data are available on the relevant clinical endpoints and undesired side effects of supplementation therapy. Physicians should advise patients about the indications for such treatment on an individual basis after due consideration of the risks and benefits.


BMJ Open | 2016

Home visits in primary care: contents and organisation in daily practice. Study protocol of a cross-sectional study

Karen Voigt; Stefan Bojanowski; Stephanie Taché; Roger Voigt; Antje Bergmann

Introduction Medical care of homebound patients by home visits is an integral part of primary care in Germany and other industrialised countries. Owing to the sociodemography and changes in the health system, the need for home visits is projected to increase rather than decrease. Our study will provide information on content and organisation of home visits. This evidence is needed to assure sufficient medical care for homebound patients. Germany is one of the European nations with highest proportions of elderly age groups, so that our results will be indicative for other European countries with comparable organisation of primary care. Methods and analysis This cross-sectional study is conducted over a period of 12 months. All home visits of each participating family practice are documented within a 1-week time period. The anonymous documentation of home visits is carried out by the family practitioner or medical assistant conducting the home visit. All Saxon Family practitioners received study information and were personally invited to participate in our study. Almost 303 (of 2677) family practitioners expressed their interest to participate to generate data on the content and organisational characteristics of home visits. Data analysis of more than 4000 home visits will take into account several patient-related and system-related parameters. Descriptive and multivariate analysis will be carried out by using non-parametric methods. Regarding expected cluster structure of the data, a multilevel analysis will be necessary. Ethics and dissemination The study received ethical approval by the Ethical Commission of the TU Dresden and adheres to the Declaration of Helsinki. Considering that the results of our project will be indicative for ageing societies with comparable organisation of primary care, we will publish them in international open access journals concerned with healthcare and primary care research and disseminate them by a final symposium and at national/international scientific events.


The Aging Male | 2012

Health related quality of life in male patients with osteoporosis: results of a cross sectional study

Karen Voigt; Stephanie Taché; Matthias Hofer; Carsten Straßberger; Henna Riemenschneider; Peter Peschel; Joachim Kugler; Antje Bergmann

Introduction: Osteoporosis is one of the most common diseases affecting elderly persons. Male patients with osteoporosis have rarely been the focus of earlier studies. This study explores health related quality of life (HRQoL) indicators in a sample of German male patients with osteoporosis to determine potential avenues for clinical practice changes. Methods: This cross-sectional study describes two HRQoL indicators (EQ5D and QUALEFFO-41) in a sample of male patients being treated for osteoporosis. Questionnaires were sent to all male patients being treated at the Dresden University Hospital outpatient endocrine clinic. Of the 344 patients invited to participate in the study 155 (57.2%) were included. Results: Overall HRQoL EQ-5D-scores for male patients with osteoporosis were greater than those of comparable groups of the German population. Patients with ≥2 fractures had the highest level of impairment in HRQoL. Of all the dimensions of EQ-5D-scores, pain/discomfort was the most affected. Better HRQoL (median values <10.0/QUALEFFO-41 scores) were detected in the whole sample for jobs around the house, activities of daily living and mobility compared to other dimensions. The highest levels of impairment were observed in the QUALEFFO-41 domains of general health perception, mental function and pain. Conclusion: This analysis confirms the association between number of fractures and worse estimation of HRQoL in male patients. Because men are 3 times less likely to suffer from osteoporosis than women, the specific HRQoL characteristics of male patients with this disease can often be overlooked. Clinicians should consider mental health referral especially for osteoporotic male patients having experienced ≥2 fractures.


Trials | 2018

Effect of a combined brief narrative exposure therapy with case management versus treatment as usual in primary care for patients with traumatic stress sequelae following intensive care medicine: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial (PICTURE)

Jochen Gensichen; Susanne Schultz; Christine Adrion; Konrad Schmidt; Maggie Schauer; Daniela Lindemann; Natalia Unruh; Robert P. Kosilek; Antonius Schneider; Martin Scherer; Antje Bergmann; Christoph Heintze; Stefanie Joos; Josef Briegel; André Scherag; Hans-Helmut König; Christian Brettschneider; Thomas G. Schulze; Ulrich Mansmann; Klaus Linde; Dagmar Lühmann; Karen Voigt; Sabine Gehrke-Beck; Roland Koch; Bernhard Zwissler; Gerhard Schneider; Herwig Gerlach; Stefan Kluge; Thea Koch; Andreas Walther

BackgroundTraumatic events like critical illness and intensive care are threats to life and bodily integrity and pose a risk factor for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). PTSD affects the quality of life and morbidity and may increase health-care costs. Limited access to specialist care results in PTSD patients being treated in primary care settings. Narrative exposure therapy (NET) is based on the principles of cognitive behavioral therapy and has shown positive effects when delivered by health-care professionals other than psychologists.The primary aims of the PICTURE trial (from “PTSD after ICU survival”) are to investigate the effectiveness and applicability of NET adapted for primary care with case management in adults diagnosed with PTSD after intensive care.Methods/designThis is an investigator-initiated, multi-center, primary care-based, randomized controlled two-arm parallel group, observer-blinded superiority trial conducted throughout Germany. In total, 340 adult patients with a total score of at least 20 points on the posttraumatic diagnostic scale (PDS-5) 3 months after receiving intensive care treatment will be equally randomized to two groups: NET combined with case management and improved treatment as usual (iTAU). All primary care physicians (PCPs) involved will be instructed in the diagnosis and treatment of PTSD according to current German guidelines. PCPs in the iTAU group will deliver usual care during three consultations. In the experimental group, PCPs will additionally be trained to deliver an adapted version of NET (three sessions) supported by phone-based case management by a medical assistant. At 6 and 12 months after randomization, structured blinded telephone interviews will assess patient-reported outcomes.The primary composite endpoint is the absolute change from baseline at month 6 in PTSD symptom severity measured by the PDS-5 total score, which also incorporates the death of any study patients. Secondary outcomes cover the domains depression, anxiety, disability, health-related quality-of-life, and cost-effectiveness. The principal analysis is by intention to treat.DiscussionIf the superiority of the experimental intervention over usual care can be demonstrated, the combination of brief NET and case management could be a treatment option to relieve PTSD-related symptoms and to improve primary care after intensive care.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03315390. Registered on 10 October 2017.German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00012589. Registered on 17 October 2017.

Collaboration


Dive into the Karen Voigt's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Antje Bergmann

Dresden University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Henna Riemenschneider

Dresden University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeannine Schübel

Dresden University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joachim Kugler

Dresden University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mandy Gottschall

Dresden University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge