Karen Yeates

Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis are associated with similar outcomes for end-stage renal disease treatment in Canada

BACKGROUND There were 35 265 patients receiving renal replacement therapy in Canada at the end of 2007 with 11.0% of patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) and 48.9% on hemodialysis (HD) and a remaining 40.1% living with a functioning kidney transplant. There are no contemporary studies examining PD survival relative to HD in Canada. The objective was to compare survival outcomes for incident patients starting on PD as compared to HD in Canada. METHODS Using data from the Canadian Organ Replacement Register, the Cox proportional hazards (PH) model was employed to study survival outcomes for patients initiating PD as compared to HD in Canada from 1991 to 2004 with follow-up to 31 December 2007. Comparisons of outcomes were made between three successive calendar periods: 1991-95, 1996-2000 and 2001-04 with the relative risk of death of incident patients calculated using an intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis with proportional and non-PH models using a piecewise exponential survival model to compare adjusted mortality rates. RESULTS In the ITT analysis, overall survival for the entire study period favored PD in the first 18 months and HD after 36 months. However, for the 2001-04 cohort, survival favored PD for the first 2 years and thereafter PD and HD were similar. Among female patients > 65 years with diabetes, PD had a 27% higher mortality rate. CONCLUSIONS Overall, HD and PD are associated with similar outcomes for end-stage renal disease treatment in Canada.

Suboptimal initiation of dialysis with and without early referral to a nephrologist

BACKGROUND Our objective was to examine patients who initiate renal replacement therapy (RRT) at 10 representative Canadian centers, characterize their initiation as inpatient or outpatient and describe their initial type of dialysis access, duration of pre-dialysis care and clinical status at the time of dialysis initiation. We also examined the impact of an optimal dialysis start (i.e. initiated as an outpatient with an arteriovenous fistula, arteriovenous graft or peritoneal dialysis catheter) on subsequent health outcomes. METHODS Charts of consecutive incident RRT patients were identified from 1 July to 31 December 2006. Information was collected until 6 months after the initiation or until death, transplant or transfer. RESULTS Three hundred and thirty-nine incident RRT patients were studied: 39.6% initiated as an inpatient; 54% started hemodialysis (HD) with a central venous catheter; 15.3% had <1 month predialysis care, while 64.6% had >1 year. Optimal starts occurred in 39.5% of patients. For HD patients, optimal starts occurred in 19.8%. Suboptimal starts were noted in patients referred <12 months prior to end-stage renal disease (44%) and in patients referred earlier (56%). The composite end point of death, transfusion or subsequent hospitalization was significantly reduced with an optimal start [hazard ratio 0.47 (95% confidence interval 0.32-0.68), P = 0.0001]. CONCLUSIONS Suboptimal initiation of dialysis is common in patients referred early or late. The benefits of early referral are lost if dialysis is initiated suboptimally. There is a need to identify factors that lead to suboptimal initiation despite early referral.

The global burden of women's cancers: a grand challenge in global health.

Every year, more than 2 million women worldwide are diagnosed with breast or cervical cancer, yet where a woman lives, her socioeconomic status, and agency largely determines whether she will develop one of these cancers and will ultimately survive. In regions with scarce resources, fragile or fragmented health systems, cancer contributes to the cycle of poverty. Proven and cost-effective interventions are available for both these common cancers, yet for so many women access to these is beyond reach. These inequities highlight the urgent need in low-income and middle-income countries for sustainable investments in the entire continuum of cancer control, from prevention to palliative care, and in the development of high-quality population-based cancer registries. In this first paper of the Series on health, equity, and womens cancers, we describe the burden of breast and cervical cancer, with an emphasis on global and regional trends in incidence, mortality, and survival, and the consequences, especially in socioeconomically disadvantaged women in different settings.

Death and renal transplantation among Aboriginal people undergoing dialysis

Background: Despite the increase in the number of Aboriginal people with end-stage renal disease around the world, little is known about their health outcomes when undergoing renal replacement therapy. We evaluated differences in survival and rate of renal transplantation among Aboriginal and white patients after initiation of dialysis. Methods: Adult patients who were Aboriginal or white and who commenced dialysis in Alberta, Saskatchewan or Manitoba between Jan. 1, 1990, and Dec. 31, 2000, were recruited for the study and were followed until death, transplantation, loss to follow-up or the end of the study (Dec. 31, 2001). We used Cox proportional hazards models to examine the effect of race on patient survival and likelihood of transplant, with adjustment for potential confounders. Results: Of the 4333 adults who commenced dialysis during the study period, 15.8% were Aboriginal and 72.4% were white. Unadjusted rates of death per 1000 patient-years during the study period were 158 (95% confidence interval [CI] 144–176) for Aboriginal patients and 146 (95% CI 139–153) for white patients. When follow-up was censored at the time of transplantation, the age-adjusted risk of death after initiation of dialysis was significantly higher among Aboriginal patients than among white patients (hazard ratio [HR] 1.15, 95% CI 1.02–1.30). The greater risk of death associated with Aboriginal race was no longer observed after adjustment for diabetes mellitus and other comorbid conditions (adjusted HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.77–1.02) and did not appear to be associated with socioeconomic status. During the study period, unadjusted transplantation rates per 1000 patient-years were 62 (95% CI 52–75) for Aboriginal patients and 133 (95% CI 125–142) for white patients. Aboriginal patients were significantly less likely to receive a renal transplant after commencing dialysis, even after adjustment for potential confounders (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.35–0.53). In an additional analysis that included follow-up after transplantation for those who received renal allografts, the age-adjusted risk of death associated with Aboriginal race (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.21–1.52) was higher than when follow-up after transplantation was not considered, perhaps because of the lower rate of transplantation among Aboriginals. Interpretation: Survival among dialysis patients was similar for Aboriginal and white patients after adjustment for comorbidity. However, despite universal access to health care, Aboriginal people had a significantly lower rate of renal transplantation, which might have adversely affected their survival when receiving renal replacement therapy.

Indigenous people in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States are less likely to receive renal transplantation

In Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States indigenous people have high rates of chronic kidney disease but poor access to effective therapies. To more fully define these issues, we compared the demographics of renal transplantation of indigenous patients in these 4 countries. Data encompassing 312,507 indigenous and white patients (18-64 years of age) who initiated dialysis within an 11-year period ending in 2005 were obtained from each countrys end-stage kidney disease registry. By the studys end, 88,173 patients had received a renal transplant and 130,261 had died without receiving such. Compared with white patients, the adjusted likelihood of receiving a transplant for indigenous patients was significantly lower in Australia (hazard ratio (HR) 0.23), Canada (HR 0.34), New Zealand (HR 0.23), and the United States (HR 0.44). In all four countries, indigenous patients had significantly longer overall median waiting times compared to white patients. Our study shows that despite marked differences in health care delivery systems, indigenous patients are less likely than white patients to receive a renal transplant in these countries. Understanding and addressing barriers to renal transplantation of indigenous patients remains an important concern.

Peritoneal Dialysis for Acute Kidney Injury

Renal Unit,1 Greys Hospital, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa; Renal and Intensive Care Units,2 Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, United Kingdom; Pediatric Nephrology Unit,3 Soba University Hospital, University of Khartoum, Sudan; Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences and Madras Medical Mission,4 Chennai, India; Department of Medicine,5 Botucatu School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil; Division of Nephrology-Hypertension,6 University of California, San Diego, USA; Division of Pediatric Nephrology,7 Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Pediatric Nephrology Unit,8 Instituto da Criança of the Hospital das Clinicas of the University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil; Pediatric Nephrology Department,9 Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; Department of Surgery,10 Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; School of Medicine,11 Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Parana, Curitiba, Brazil; Division of Pediatric Nephrology,12 University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, USA; Division of Nephrology,13 Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada; and Yale University,14 New Haven, USA ispd guidelines/ReCOMMendATiOns

Outcome of Acute Peritoneal Dialysis in Northern Tanzania

Data on the burden of acute kidney injury (AKI) in resource-poor countries such as Tanzania are minimal because of a lack of nephrology services and an inability to recognize and diagnose AKI with any certainty. In the few published studies, high morbidity and mortality are reported. Improved nephrology care and dialysis may lower the mortality from AKI in these settings. Hemodialysis is expensive and technically challenging in resource-limited settings. The technical simplicity of peritoneal dialysis and the potential to reduce costs if consumables can be made locally, present an opportunity to establish cost-effective programs for managing AKI. Here, we document patient outcomes in a pilot peritoneal dialysis program established in 2009 at a referral hospital in Northern Tanzania.

A Validation Study of the Canadian Organ Replacement Register

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Accurate and complete documentation of patient characteristics and comorbidities in renal registers is essential to control bias in the comparison of outcomes across groups of patients or dialysis facilities. The objectives of this study were to assess the quality of data collected in the Canadian Organ Replacement Register (CORR) compared with the patients medical charts. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS This cohort study of a representative sample of adult, incident patients registered in CORR in 2005 to 2006 examined the prevalence, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and κ of comorbid conditions and agreement in coding of patient demographics and primary renal disease between CORR and the patients medical record. The effect of coding variation on patient survival was evaluated. RESULTS Medical records on 1125 patients were reviewed. Agreement exceeded 97% for health card number, date of birth, and sex and 71% (range 46.6 to 89.1%) for the primary renal disease. Comorbid conditions were under-reported in CORR. Sensitivities ranged from 0.89 (95% confidence interval 0.80, 0.92) for hypertension to 0.47 (0.38, 0.55) for peripheral vascular disease. Specificity was >0.93 for all comorbidities except hypertension. Hazard ratios for death were similar whether calculated using data from CORR or the medical record. CONCLUSIONS Comorbid conditions are under-reported in CORR; however, the associated risks of mortality were similar whether using the CORR data or the medical record data, suggesting that CORR data can be used in clinical research with minimal concern for bias.

Cardioprotective medication use in hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality in patients with renal failure, accounting for more than 50% of deaths in end-stage renal disease. Risk factor modification with the use of cardioprotective medications such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), beta-adrenergic antagonists (beta-blockers), acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) has been shown to reduce mortality in the general population. OBJECTIVE To determine the extent of use of these medications in a hemodialysis population. METHODS This was a cross-sectional study of a cohort of 185 prevalent hemodialysis patients. The inclusion criterion was dialysis dependence and there were no exclusion criteria. Data collection was by chart review. Contraindications to individual medication classes were not obtained. RESULTS There were 185 patients enrolled, the mean age was 63.42+/-15.1 years and 126 (68.1%) were male. Sixty-six (35.7%) patients had diabetes and 89 (48.1%) patients had established coronary artery disease (CAD). Forty-six (24.9%) patients were on ACEIs or angiotensin II receptor blockers, 59 (31.9%) were on beta-blockers, 70 (37.8%) were on ASA and 84 (45.4%) were on statins. Although these medications were used in fewer than 60% of patients, those with CAD were more likely to be prescribed an ACEI or an angiotensin II receptor blocker (P=0.026), a beta-blocker (P<0.001), ASA (P<0.001) or a statin (P=0.001) than those without CAD. There were no differences in the use of these medications between diabetic and nondiabetic patients. CONCLUSIONS Many hemodialysis patients are not prescribed cardioprotective medications. Given the high cardiovascular mortality in this high-risk population, more attention to reducing cardiovascular risk is warranted.

Interventions to close the divide for women with breast and cervical cancer between low-income and middle-income countries and high-income countries

Breast and cervical cancers are the commonest cancers diagnosed in women living in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), where opportunities for prevention, early detection, or both, are few. Yet several cost-effective interventions could be used to reduce the burden of these two cancers in resource-limited environments. Population- wide vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) linked to cervical screening, at least once, for adult women has the potential to reduce the incidence of cervical cancer substantially. Strategies such as visual inspection with acetic acid and testing for oncogenic HPV types could make prevention of cervical cancer programmatically feasible. These two cancers need not be viewed as inevitably fatal, and can be cured, particularly if detected and treated at an early stage. Investing in the health of girls and women is an investment in the development of nations and their futures. Here we explore ways to lessen the divide between LMICs and high-income countries for breast and cervical cancers.