Kari G. Chaffee
Mayo Clinic
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Kari G. Chaffee.
Cancer Discovery | 2016
Nicholas J. Roberts; Alexis L. Norris; Gloria M. Petersen; Melissa L. Bondy; Randall E. Brand; Steven Gallinger; Robert C. Kurtz; Sara H. Olson; Anil K. Rustgi; Ann G. Schwartz; Elena M. Stoffel; Sapna Syngal; George Zogopoulos; Syed Z. Ali; Jennifer E. Axilbund; Kari G. Chaffee; Yun-Ching Chen; Michele L. Cote; Erica J. Childs; Christopher Douville; Fernando S. Goes; Joseph M. Herman; Christine A. Iacobuzio-Donahue; Melissa Kramer; Alvin Makohon-Moore; Richard McCombie; K. Wyatt McMahon; Noushin Niknafs; Jennifer Parla; Mehdi Pirooznia
UNLABELLED Pancreatic cancer is projected to become the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States by 2020. A familial aggregation of pancreatic cancer has been established, but the cause of this aggregation in most families is unknown. To determine the genetic basis of susceptibility in these families, we sequenced the germline genomes of 638 patients with familial pancreatic cancer and the tumor exomes of 39 familial pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Our analyses support the role of previously identified familial pancreatic cancer susceptibility genes such as BRCA2, CDKN2A, and ATM, and identify novel candidate genes harboring rare, deleterious germline variants for further characterization. We also show how somatic point mutations that occur during hematopoiesis can affect the interpretation of genome-wide studies of hereditary traits. Our observations have important implications for the etiology of pancreatic cancer and for the identification of susceptibility genes in other common cancer types. SIGNIFICANCE The genetic basis of disease susceptibility in the majority of patients with familial pancreatic cancer is unknown. We whole genome sequenced 638 patients with familial pancreatic cancer and demonstrate that the genetic underpinning of inherited pancreatic cancer is highly heterogeneous. This has significant implications for the management of patients with familial pancreatic cancer.
Nature Genetics | 2015
Erica J. Childs; Evelina Mocci; Daniele Campa; Paige M. Bracci; Steven Gallinger; Michael Goggins; Donghui Li; Rachel E. Neale; Sara H. Olson; Ghislaine Scelo; Laufey Amundadottir; William R. Bamlet; Maarten F. Bijlsma; Amanda Blackford; Michael Borges; Paul Brennan; Hermann Brenner; H. Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Federico Canzian; Gabriele Capurso; Giulia Martina Cavestro; Kari G. Chaffee; Stephen J. Chanock; Sean P. Cleary; Michelle Cotterchio; Lenka Foretova; Charles S. Fuchs; Niccola Funel; Maria Gazouli; Manal Hassan
Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer death in the developed world. Both inherited high-penetrance mutations in BRCA2 (ref. 2), ATM, PALB2 (ref. 4), BRCA1 (ref. 5), STK11 (ref. 6), CDKN2A and mismatch-repair genes and low-penetrance loci are associated with increased risk. To identify new risk loci, we performed a genome-wide association study on 9,925 pancreatic cancer cases and 11,569 controls, including 4,164 newly genotyped cases and 3,792 controls in 9 studies from North America, Central Europe and Australia. We identified three newly associated regions: 17q25.1 (LINC00673, rs11655237, odds ratio (OR) = 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.19–1.34, P = 1.42 × 10−14), 7p13 (SUGCT, rs17688601, OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.84–0.92, P = 1.41 × 10−8) and 3q29 (TP63, rs9854771, OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.85–0.93, P = 2.35 × 10−8). We detected significant association at 2p13.3 (ETAA1, rs1486134, OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.09–1.19, P = 3.36 × 10−9), a region with previous suggestive evidence in Han Chinese. We replicated previously reported associations at 9q34.2 (ABO), 13q22.1 (KLF5), 5p15.33 (TERT and CLPTM1), 13q12.2 (PDX1), 1q32.1 (NR5A2), 7q32.3 (LINC-PINT), 16q23.1 (BCAR1) and 22q12.1 (ZNRF3). Our study identifies new loci associated with pancreatic cancer risk.
Journal of Oncology Practice | 2015
Tait D. Shanafelt; Bijan J. Borah; Heidi D. Finnes; Kari G. Chaffee; Wei Ding; Jose F. Leis; Asher Chanan-Khan; Sameer A. Parikh; Susan L. Slager; Neil E. Kay; Tim G. Call
PURPOSE To evaluate the impact of approval of ibrutinib and idelalisib on pharmaceutical costs in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) at the societal level and assess individual out-of-pocket costs under Medicare Part D. METHODS Average wholesale price of commonly used CLL treatment regimens was ascertained from national registries. Using the population of Olmsted County, Minnesota, we identified the proportion of patients with newly diagnosed CLL who experience progression to the point of requiring treatment. Using these data, total pharmaceutical cost over a 10-year period after diagnosis was estimated for a hypothetic cohort of 100 newly diagnosed patients under three scenarios: before approval of ibrutinib and idelalisib (historical scenario), after approval of ibrutinib and idelalisib as salvage therapy (current scenarios A and B), and assuming use of ibrutinib as first-line treatment (potential future scenario). RESULTS Estimated 10-year pharmaceutical costs for 100 newly diagnosed patients were as follows:
American Journal of Hematology | 2015
Sameer A. Parikh; Thomas M. Habermann; Kari G. Chaffee; Timothy G. Call; Wei Ding; Jose F. Leis; William R. Macon; Susan M. Schwager; Kay Ristow; Luis F. Porrata; Neil E. Kay; Susan L. Slager; Tait D. Shanafelt
4,565,929 (approximately
Haematologica | 2015
Paolo Strati; Samih H. Nasr; Nelson Leung; Curtis A. Hanson; Kari G. Chaffee; Susan M. Schwager; Sara J. Achenbach; Timothy G. Call; Sameer A. Parikh; Wei Ding; Neil E. Kay; Tait D. Shanafelt
45,659 per newly diagnosed patient and
Leukemia & Lymphoma | 2017
Tait D. Shanafelt; Sameer A. Parikh; Peter A. Noseworthy; Valentin Goede; Kari G. Chaffee; Jasmin Bahlo; Timothy G. Call; Susan M. Schwager; Wei Ding; Barbara Eichhorst; Kirsten Fischer; Jose F. Leis; Asher Chanan-Khan; Michael Hallek; Susan L. Slager; Neil E. Kay
157,446 per treated patient) for the historical scenario,
Carcinogenesis | 2016
Samuel O. Antwi; Ann L. Oberg; Nitin Shivappa; William R. Bamlet; Kari G. Chaffee; Susan E. Steck; James R. Hébert; Gloria M. Petersen
7,794,843 (approximately
Cancer | 2015
Sameer A. Parikh; Jose F. Leis; Kari G. Chaffee; Timothy G. Call; Curtis A. Hanson; Wei Ding; Asher Chanan-Khan; Deborah J. Bowen; Michael Conte; Susan M. Schwager; Susan L. Slager; Daniel L. Van Dyke; Diane F. Jelinek; Neil E. Kay; Tait D. Shanafelt
77,948 per newly diagnosed patient and
American Journal of Hematology | 2015
Sameer A. Parikh; Thomas M. Habermann; Kari G. Chaffee; Timothy G. Call; Wei D Ding; Jose F. Leis; William R. Macon; Susan M. Schwager; Kay Ristow; Luis F. Porrata; Neil E. Kay; Susan L. Slager; Tait D. Shanafelt
268,788 per treated patient) for current scenario A,
Science Translational Medicine | 2017
Jungsun Kim; William R. Bamlet; Ann L. Oberg; Kari G. Chaffee; Greg Donahue; Xing Jun Cao; Suresh T. Chari; Benjamin A. Garcia; Gloria M. Petersen; Kenneth S. Zaret
6,309,162 (approximately