Kari Korpilahti

Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in Octogenarians: Long-Term Outcome Can Be Better Than Expected

BACKGROUND We have reviewed our experience with octogenarians undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS A consecutive series of 274 patients age 80 years or greater out of 3,474 patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. We have assessed the intrinsic risk aged 80 years or greater by comparing them with a propensity score-matched cohort of younger patients with similar operative risk (other than age). RESULTS Thirty-day mortality (4.7% vs 1.3%, p<0.0001), combined adverse event rates (13.1% vs 6.6%, p<0.0001), and five-year survival (76.6% vs 90.4%, p<0.0001) were significantly poorer among patients aged 80 years or greater as compared with younger patients. These figures were, however, better than estimates of a recent systematic review by McKellar and colleagues (McKellar SH, Brown ML, Frye RL, Schaff HV, Sundt TM III. Comparison of coronary revascularization procedures in octogenarians: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2008;5:738-46) (30-day mortality 7.2%, and five-year survival, 68%). When octogenarians were compared with 273 propensity score-matched patients aged less than 80 years, the 30-day mortality (4.8% vs 2.6%, p=0.17) and combined adverse event rates (13.2% vs 10.6%, p=0.36) did not significantly differ. Five-year survival, despite statistical significance, was not remarkably lower than that of propensity-matched patients aged less than 80 years (77.0% vs 81.3%, p=0.009). The decrease in survival of octogenarians was evident only during the first few months after surgery, but not later on. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study suggest that immediate and five-year survival of octogenarians undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting may be even better than previously estimated. Survival of octogenarians may be suboptimal only during the first few months after surgery, whereas at five years may not differ remarkably from younger patients with otherwise similar operative risk.

Effects of five years of cardiac rehabilitation after coronary artery bypass grafting on coronary risk factors

Coronary risk factors were studied in 119 patients randomly assigned to cardiac rehabilitation and compared with 109 patients receiving standard care alone after coronary artery bypass grafting. The long-term impact of rehabilitation on risk factors was modest in patients undergoing elective coronary surgery.

HRQoL after coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention for stable angina

Objectives. To assess the health related quality of life (HRQoL) and the change in the NYHA class after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the management of stable coronary artery disease (CAD). The study was non-randomized. CABG group consisted of 240 patients and 229 patients were treated with PCI. HRQoL was measured prospectively by the 15D instrument. Results. Three-year survival was 95.0 and 95.6% (NS). The HRQoL improved statistically in both groups until 6 months after treatment but deteriorated towards the end of the follow-up of 36 months. Clinically evident improvement of the HRQoL and decrease of the NYHA class took place more frequently among CABG patients. Conclusions. Despite initially more serious preoperative state and more demanding procedure CABG patients achieve equal level of HRQoL when compared with PCI patients. CABG patients may also obtain better relief from symptoms in mid-term follow-up. HRQoL cannot be the only factor to determine outcome after invasive treatment of CAD but it has to be placed in the context of the overall situation.

Comparison of 30-day and 5-year outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients aged≤50 years (the Coronary aRtery diseAse in younG adultS Study).

Data on the outcome of young patients after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are scarce. Data on 2,209 consecutive patients aged≤50 years who underwent CABG or PCI were retrospectively collected from 15 European institutions. PCI and CABG had similar 30-day mortality rates (0.8% vs 1.4%, p=0.27), late survival (at 5 years, 97.8% vs 94.9%, p=0.082), and freedom from stroke (at 5 years, 98.0% and 98.0%, p=0.731). PCI was associated with significantly lower freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (at 5 years, 73.9% vs 85.0%, p<0.0001), repeat revascularization (at 5 years, 77.6% vs 92.5%, p<0.0001), and myocardial infarction (at 5 years, 89.9% vs 96.6%, p<0.0001) compared with CABG. These findings were confirmed in propensity score-adjusted and matched analyses. Freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events after PCI was particularly low in diabetics (at 5 years, 58.0% vs 75.9%, p<0.0001) and in patients with multivessel disease (at 5 years, 63.6% vs 85.1%, p<0.0001). PCI in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction was associated with significantly better 5-year survival (97.5% vs 88.8%, p=0.001), which was driven by its lower 30-day mortality rate (1.5% vs 6.0%, p=0.017). In conclusion, patients aged≤50 years have an excellent immediate outcome after either PCI or CABG with similar long-term survival when used according to the current clinical practice. PCI was associated with significantly lower freedom from myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization.

Angiographic Changes in Saphenous Vein Grafts and Atherosclerosis Risk Factors: A 5-year Study with Serial Measurements of Serum Lipids and Lipoproteins

The association between cardiovascular risk factors and stenosis or occlusion of saphenous vein grafts was analysed in a prospective 5-year study of 176 unselected patients with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods included serial measurements of serum lipids and lipoproteins, determination of apolipoprotein E phenotype, lipoprotein (a) levels 5 years postoperatively, and subcutaneous fat biopsy to determine the fatty acid composition before and one year after CABG. Graft angiography with quantitative analysis of angiograms was performed at the end of follow-up. A coronary artery with diameter < or = 1.5 mm was associated with occlusion of vein grafts (p < 0.01). The mean levels of serum lipids and lipoproteins, other traditional risk factors for atherosclerosis, and subcutaneous fatty acid composition were similar in patients with and without graft occlusion, and similar when the maximum diameter of non-occluded grafts was < 50% vs > or = 50%, and < 25% vs > or = 25%. High lipoprotein (a) concentration tended to be associated with obstructive changes in vein grafts. Our data indicate that, because lipids, lipoproteins and other traditional cardiovascular risk factors do not predict occlusion or stenosis of saphenous vein grafts five years after CABG, it is not currently possible to predict directly from the levels of these risk factors which patients are likely to benefit from pharmacological or other interventions.

Prognosis and disease progression in patients under 50 years old undergoing PCI: the CRAGS (Coronary aRtery diseAse in younG adultS) study.

OBJECTIVE Young patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are generally considered at low procedural risk, but the potentially aggressive nature of coronary artery disease and long expectancy of life expose them to a high risk of recurrent coronary events. The extent and determinants of disease progression in this patient subset remain largely unknown. The aim of the present study was to evaluate general risk factors for late outcomes among patients ≤50 years old who underwent PCI. METHODS Coronary aRtery diseAse in younG adults (CRAGS) is a multicenter European retrospective registry that enrolled 1617 patients (age ≤50 years) who underwent PCI over the years 2002-2012. The median follow-up was 3.0 years. RESULTS The majority of patients were smokers who were nevertheless prescribed adequate secondary prevention medication, including statins, aspirin, beta blockers and/or ACE inhibitors/AT blockers. At 5 years, survival was 97.8%, while freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events was 74.1%, from repeat revascularization 77.8% and from myocardial infarction 89.9%. Altogether 13.5% of patients exhibited disease progression that indicated a need for repeat revascularization. Other indications for repeat revascularization were restenosis (7.1%) and stent thrombosis (2.1%) at the 5-year follow-up. Independent post-PCI predictors of disease progression were multivessel disease, diabetes and hypertension. CONCLUSION PCI is associated with excellent survival in patients ≤50 years old. Nevertheless, despite guideline-adherent medication, every eighth patient underwent repeat revascularization due to disease progression diagnosed at the median follow-up of three years, underscoring the need for more effective secondary prevention than currently available.

Permanent work disability in patients ≤50 years old after percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting (the CRAGS study)

Background The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of permanent working disability (PWD) in young patients after percutaneous or surgical coronary revascularization. Methods and Results The study included 1035 consecutive patients ≤50 years old who underwent coronary revascularization [910 and 125 patients in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) groups, respectively] between 2002 and 2012 at 4 Finnish hospitals. The median follow-up time was 41 months. The overall incidence of PWD was higher after CABG compared to PCI (at 5 years, 34.8 vs. 14.7%, P < 0.001). Freedom from PWD in the general population aged 45 was 97.2% at 4 years follow-up. Median time to grant disability pension was 11.6 months after CABG and 24.4 months after PCI (P = 0.018). Reasons for PWD were classified as cardiac (35.3 vs. 36.9%), psychiatric (14.7 vs. 14.6%), and musculoskeletal (14.7 vs. 15.5%) in patients undergoing CABG vs. PCI. Overall freedom from PWD was higher in patients without major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) (at 5 years, 85.6 vs. 71.9%, P < 0.001). Nevertheless, rate of PWD was high also in patients without MACCE and patients with preserved ejection fraction during follow-up. Conclusions Although coronary revascularization confers good overall survival in young patients, PWD is common especially after CABG and mostly for cardiac reasons even without occurrence of MACCE. Supportive measures to preserve occupational health are warranted concomitantly with coronary revascularization at all levels of health care.

Repeat intervention after invasive treatment of coronary arteries

OBJECTIVE Patients who undergo successful revascularisation either with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may subsequently require repeat invasive procedures. METHODS A cohort of 662 coronary artery diseased (CAD) patients was retrospectively reviewed. Follow-up was 36 months. RESULTS Thirty-day mortality was 1.0% in the CABG group (n=302) and 0% in the PCI group (n=360) (p=0.094). Overall 3-year survival for the cohort was 95.0% (NS). In addition to repeat angiographies (cumulative frequency 57.7% for PCI vs 4.3% for CABG, p<0.001) patients underwent both repeat PCI (20.7% vs 3.2%, p<0.001) and repeat CABG (6.9% vs 0.7%, p<0.001) during the follow-up. In Cox regression analysis hazard ratio (HR) for repeat PCI after initial PCI was 8.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.7-19.5, p<0.001 and for repeat CABG 9.5, CI 2.2-40.0, p=0.002 in comparison to initial CABG. In-stent restenosis and progression of atherosclerotic plaques in native vessels were reasons for repeat intervention among the PCI patients. Complications with bypass grafts together with progression of the underlying disease were factors for re-interventions after CABG. CONCLUSIONS PCI is far less invasive and may have lower in-hospital mortality rates than CABG. However, the highly likely need for repeat invasive procedures and revascularisation has to be taken into consideration when choosing an invasive approach for multi vessel CAD patients.