Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Karim Chamie is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Karim Chamie.


Cancer | 2011

Overtreatment of men with low-risk prostate cancer and significant comorbidity

Timothy J. Daskivich; Karim Chamie; Lorna Kwan; Jessica Labo; Roland Palvolgyi; Atreya Dash; Sheldon Greenfield; Mark S. Litwin

Men with low‐risk prostate cancer and significant comorbidity are susceptible to overtreatment. The authors sought to compare the impact of comorbidity and age on treatment choice in men with low‐risk disease.


Cancer | 2011

Compliance with guidelines for patients with bladder cancer: variation in the delivery of care.

Karim Chamie; Christopher S. Saigal; Julie Lai; Jan M. Hanley; Claude Messan Setodji; Badrinath R. Konety; Mark S. Litwin

Clinical practice guidelines for the management of patients with bladder cancer encompass strategies that minimize morbidity and improve survival. In the current study, the authors sought to characterize practice patterns in patients with high‐grade non–muscle‐invasive bladder cancer in relation to established guidelines.


Cancer | 2011

Comorbidity and competing risks for mortality in men with prostate cancer

Timothy J. Daskivich; Karim Chamie; Lorna Kwan; Jessica Labo; Atreya Dash; Sheldon Greenfield; Mark S. Litwin

Accurate estimation of life expectancy is essential for men deciding between aggressive and conservative treatment of prostate cancer. The authors sought to assess the competing risks of nonprostate cancer and prostate cancer mortality among men with differing Charlson comorbidity index scores and tumor risks.


European Urology | 2014

Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy cancer control

Jim C. Hu; Giorgio Gandaglia; Pierre I. Karakiewicz; Paul L. Nguyen; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Ya Chen Tina Shih; Firas Abdollah; Karim Chamie; Jonathan L. Wright; Patricia A. Ganz; Maxine Sun

BACKGROUND Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) remains controversial, and no improvement in cancer control outcomes has been demonstrated over open radical prostatectomy (ORP). OBJECTIVE To examine population-based, comparative effectiveness of RARP versus ORP pertaining surgical margin status and use of additional cancer therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This was a retrospective observational study of 5556 RARP and 7878 ORP cases from 2004 to 2009 from Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare linked data. INTERVENTION RARP versus ORP. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Propensity-based analyses were performed to minimize treatment selection biases. Generalized linear regression models were computed for comparison of RP surgical margin status and use of additional cancer therapy (radiation therapy [RT] or androgen deprivation therapy [ADT]) by surgical approach. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS In the propensity-adjusted analysis, RARP was associated with fewer positive surgical margins (13.6% vs 18.3%; odds ratio [OR]: 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-0.75), largely because of fewer RARP positive margins for intermediate-risk (15.0% vs 21.0%; OR: 0.66; 95% CI, 0.59-0.75) and high-risk (15.1% vs 20.6%; OR: 0.70; 95% CI, 0.63-0.77) disease. In addition, RARP was associated with less use of additional cancer therapy within 6 mo (4.5% vs 6.2%; OR: 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69-0.81), 12 mo (OR: 0.73; 95% CI, 0.62-0.86), and 24 mo (OR: 0.67; 95% CI, 0.57-0.78) of surgery. Limitations include the retrospective nature of the study and the absence of prostate-specific antigen levels to determine biochemical recurrence. CONCLUSIONS RARP is associated with improved surgical margin status relative to ORP for intermediate- and high-risk disease and less use of postprostatectomy ADT and RT. This has important implications for quality of life, health care delivery, and costs. PATIENT SUMMARY Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RP) versus open RP is associated with fewer positive margins and better early cancer control because of less use of additional androgen deprivation and radiation therapy within 2 yr of surgery.


The Journal of Urology | 2012

Histopathology of surgically treated renal cell carcinoma: Survival differences by subtype and stage

Kirk A. Keegan; Clayton W. Schupp; Karim Chamie; Nicholas J. Hellenthal; Christopher P. Evans; Theresa M. Koppie

PURPOSE Previous studies of the impact of renal cell carcinoma histopathology on survival are conflicting and generally limited to institutional analyses. Thus, we determined the role of renal cell carcinoma histopathology on the stage specific survival rate in a large population based cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used the 2000 to 2005 National Cancer Institute SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results) database to identify 17,605 patients who underwent surgery for renal cell carcinoma and met study inclusion criteria. Patients were stratified by histological subtype (clear cell, papillary, chromophobe, collecting duct and sarcomatoid differentiation) and pathological stage. We performed Cox proportional hazard modeling and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to determine overall and cancer specific survival. RESULTS Patients with papillary and chromophobe pathology were less likely to present with T3 or greater disease (17.6% and 16.9%, respectively) while patients with collecting duct and sarcomatoid variants were more likely to present with T3 or greater disease (55.7% and 82.8%, respectively) compared to those with clear cell histology (p <0.001). On multivariate analysis histology was significantly associated with overall and cancer specific survival. Patients with chromophobe pathology had improved survival (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40-0.78) while those with collecting duct and sarcomatoid variants had worse survival (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.44-2.97 and 2.26, 95% CI 1.93-2.64, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Renal cell carcinoma histological subtype predicts overall and cancer specific survival. Patients with collecting duct and sarcomatoid variants of renal cell carcinoma have poor survival, even those who present with low stage disease. These data suggest inherent differences in renal cell carcinoma biology and may ultimately form the basis of future histologically targeted therapies.


Cancer | 2013

Recurrence of high‐risk bladder cancer: A population‐based analysis

Karim Chamie; Mark S. Litwin; Jeffrey C. Bassett; Timothy J. Daskivich; Julie Lai; Jan M. Hanley; Badrinath R. Konety; Christopher S. Saigal

Patients with bladder cancer are apt to develop multiple recurrences that require intervention. The recurrence, progression, and bladder cancer–related mortality rates were examined in a cohort of individuals with high‐grade non–muscle‐invasive bladder cancer.


Urology | 2014

The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Delineating Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer

Karim Chamie; Geoffrey A. Sonn; David S. Finley; Nelly Tan; Daniel Margolis; Steven S. Raman; Shyam Natarajan; Jiaoti Huang; Robert E. Reiter

OBJECTIVE To determine whether multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging might improve the identification of patients with higher risk disease at diagnosis and thereby reduce the incidence of undergrading or understaging. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 115 patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging before radical prostatectomy. We used Epsteins criteria of insignificant disease with and without a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameter (apparent diffusion coefficient) to calculate sensitivity, specificity, as well as negative and positive predictive values [NPV and PPV] across varying definitions of clinically significant cancer based on Gleason grade and tumor volume (0.2 mL, 0.5 mL, and 1.3 mL) on whole-mount prostate specimens. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the incremental benefit of MRI in delineating significant cancer. RESULTS The majority had a prostate-specific antigen from 4.1-10.0 (67%), normal rectal examinations (90%), biopsy Gleason score ≤ 6 (68%), and ≤ 2 cores positive (55%). Of the 58 patients pathologically staged with Gleason 7 or pT3 disease at prostatectomy, Epsteins criteria alone missed 12 patients (sensitivity of 79% and NPV of 68%). Addition of apparent diffusion coefficient improved the sensitivity and NPV for predicting significant disease at prostatectomy to 93% and 84%, respectively. MRI improved detection of large Gleason 6 (≥ 1.3 mL, P = .006) or Gleason ≥ 7 lesions of any size (P <.001). CONCLUSION Integration of MRI with existing clinical staging criteria helps identify patients with significant cancer. Clinicians should consider utilizing MRI in the decision-making process.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2012

Impact of a Bladder Cancer Diagnosis on Smoking Behavior

Jeffrey C. Bassett; John L. Gore; Amanda C. Chi; Lorna Kwan; William H. McCarthy; Karim Chamie; Christopher S. Saigal

PURPOSE Bladder cancer is the second most common tobacco-related malignancy. A new bladder cancer diagnosis may be an opportunity to imprint smoking cessation. Little is known about the impact of a diagnosis of bladder cancer on patterns of tobacco use and smoking cessation among patients with incident bladder cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS A simple random sample of noninvasive bladder cancer survivors diagnosed in 2006 was obtained from the California Cancer Registry. Respondents completed a survey on history of tobacco use, beliefs regarding bladder cancer risk factors, and physician influence on tobacco cessation. Respondents were compared by smoking status. Those respondents smoking at diagnosis were compared with general population controls obtained from the California Tobacco Survey to determine the impact of a diagnosis of bladder cancer on patterns of tobacco use. RESULTS The response rate was 70% (344 of 492 eligible participants). Most respondents (74%) had a history of cigarette use. Seventeen percent of all respondents were smoking at diagnosis. Smokers with a new diagnosis of bladder cancer were almost five times as likely to quit smoking as smokers in the general population (48% v 10%, respectively; P < .001). The bladder cancer diagnosis and the advice of the urologist were the reasons cited most often for cessation. Respondents were more likely to endorse smoking as a risk factor for bladder cancer when the urologist was the source of their understanding. CONCLUSION The diagnosis of bladder cancer is an opportunity for smoking cessation. Urologists can play an integral role in affecting the patterns of tobacco use of those newly diagnosed.


Cancer | 2013

Recurrence of high-risk bladder cancer

Karim Chamie; Mark S. Litwin; Jeffrey C. Bassett; Timothy J. Daskivich; Julie Lai; Jan M. Hanley; Badrinath R. Konety; Christopher S. Saigal

Patients with bladder cancer are apt to develop multiple recurrences that require intervention. The recurrence, progression, and bladder cancer–related mortality rates were examined in a cohort of individuals with high‐grade non–muscle‐invasive bladder cancer.


Cancer | 2012

Quality of care in patients with bladder cancer: A case report?

Karim Chamie; Christopher S. Saigal; Julie Lai; Jan M. Hanley; Claude Messan Setodji; Badrinath R. Konety; Mark S. Litwin

Although there is level I evidence demonstrating the superiority of intravesical therapy in patients with bladder cancer, surveillance strategies are primarily founded on expert opinion. The authors examined compliance with surveillance and treatment strategies and the pursuant impact on survival in patients with high‐grade disease.

Collaboration


Dive into the Karim Chamie's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark S. Litwin

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lorna Kwan

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge