Karin Linnanmäki
Åbo Akademi University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Karin Linnanmäki.
Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research | 2012
Johan Korhonen; Karin Linnanmäki; Pirjo Aunio
This study investigated the connection between language (i.e., word comprehension, reading comprehension and spelling skills) and mathematical performance. The sample consisted of grade nine students (N = 810) in 14 lower secondary schools in the Swedish speaking areas of Finland. Standardized tests for reading and writing skills, and mathematical performance were used. Based on the mathematics test the students were categorized into eight performance groups. Many students had problems in both mathematics and language performance. On the whole data level reading skills were a powerful predictor for math performance, the reading factor explained 52% of the variance in the model. Hence, the reading skills focusing on understanding of the text are important in solving mathematical tasks at the end of compulsory school.
Education inquiry | 2012
Mikaela Nyroos; Johan Korhonen; Karin Linnanmäki; Camilla Svens-Liavåg
The education systems in Sweden and Finland have different formal and informal testing traditions. A recognised possible adverse effect of testing is test anxiety among pupils and students which may have a negative impact on examination performance. Research into which factors of testing practice affect the levels of test anxiety in younger pupils in real classroom settings is a neglected area internationally yet holds great importance for school practitioners. A cross-national study was conducted to determine whether there are any differences in test anxiety between groups of young pupils in Sweden and Finland, as measured by the Children’s Test Anxiety Scale (the CTAS), and whether these differences are ‘real’ differences or a result of differential item functioning. The dimensionality of the CTAS construct is further examined. Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling was used to analyse the data obtained. Partial measurement invariance with respect to nationality and gender was achieved, demonstrating that the CTAS accurately measures latent constructs such as thoughts, autonomic reactions and off-task behaviours in boys and girls, and Swedish and Finnish pupils. No differences were found in the levels of test anxiety experienced by Swedish and Finnish pupils. Girls reported higher levels of autonomic reactions related to test anxiety, but no gender differences in thoughts and off-task behaviours were identified. Methodological limitations and the future implications of the results obtained are discussed.
International journal of school and educational psychology | 2015
Mikaela Nyroos; Johan Korhonen; Aihui Peng; Karin Linnanmäki; Camilla Svens-Liavåg; Anette Bagger; Gunnar Sjöberg
While test anxiety has been studied extensively, little consideration has been given to the cultural impacts of childrens experiences and expressions of test anxiety. The aim of this work was to examine whether variance in test anxiety scores can be predicted based on gender and cultural setting. Three hundred and ninety-eight pupils in Grade 3 in China, Finland, and Sweden, each of which has different testing realities, completed the Childrens Test Anxiety Scale (CTAS). Exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) results indicated that the Chinese sample scored more highly on the autonomic reactions component, whereas the Nordic sample scored higher on the off-task behaviors component. Significant interaction effects between gender and culture were also observed: The Nordic girls exhibited higher levels of autonomic reactions, but the opposite was seen in the Chinese sample, with boys reporting higher levels of the cognitive component. The conceptualization of test anxiety encompassing the off-task behaviors component does not appear to be universal for children. It is also suggested that gender differences vary as a function of culture.
European Journal of Special Needs Education | 2015
Ulrika Ekstam; Karin Linnanmäki; Pirjo Aunio
In 2011, there was a legislative reform regarding educational support in Finland, with a focus on early identification, differentiation and flexible arrangement of support using a multi-professional approach, the three-tier support model. The main aim of this study was to investigate what educational support practices are used with low-performing lower secondary students. An additional aim was to determine how the change in legislation has affected the work of special education and mathematics teachers with regard to mathematics education for low-performing students. Electronic questionnaires were sent to all principals in Swedish-speaking schools in Finland (55 schools, grades 7–9) to be answered by the special education and mathematics teachers. Twenty-seven answers were received from the special education teachers and 42 from the mathematics teachers. The results showed that ‘pull out of the classroom’ was considered the most common way to support the mathematically low-performing students. Teachers were quite satisfied with the efficiency of support and the amount of extra resources for the low-performing students in mathematics. There was almost no change in collaboration or working strategies for either teacher groups due to the change in legislation. The teachers did not experience much change in educational practice after the legislation reform.
Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs | 2018
Ulrika Ekstam; Johan Korhonen; Karin Linnanmäki; Pirjo Aunio
Educational reforms during the last decade have led to a more inclusive environment for students with different needs and have placed demands on teachers’ readiness to instruct diverse students in the general classroom. Previous research has ascertained that student achievement is correlated with teacher quality and teachers’ efficacy beliefs. Today, basic competence in mathematics is more important than ever for managing routine day-to-day activities and therefore, identifying and educationally supporting students with low performance in mathematics is necessary. The aim of the study was to investigate the perceived teacher efficacy beliefs of special education and mathematics teachers when teaching mathematics to low-performing middle school students. Results indicated that special education teachers had higher teacher efficacy beliefs than mathematics teachers. Teacher experience, certification or gender had no effect on teachers’ efficacy beliefs. Furthermore, subject teachers reported high pedagogical knowledge for teaching low-performing students, and special education teachers reported having moderate mathematical subject knowledge.
Learning and Individual Differences | 2014
Johan Korhonen; Karin Linnanmäki; Pirjo Aunio
Learning and Instruction | 2016
Johan Korhonen; Anna Tapola; Karin Linnanmäki; Pirjo Aunio
Teaching and Teacher Education | 2017
Ulrika Ekstam; Johan Korhonen; Karin Linnanmäki; Pirjo Aunio
Archive | 2014
Mikaela Nyroos; Johan Korhonen; Aihui Peng; Karin Linnanmäki; Camilla Svens-Liavåg; Anette Bagger; Gunnar Sjöberg
LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education | 2017
Ulrika Ekstam; Karin Linnanmäki; Pirjo Aunio