Karin Mattson

Prospective Randomized Trial of Docetaxel Versus Best Supportive Care in Patients With Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy

PURPOSE To evaluate whether treatment with single-agent docetaxel would result in longer survival than would best supportive care in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who had previously been treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Secondary end points included assessment of response (docetaxel arm only), toxicity, and quality of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with performance statuses of 0 to 2 and stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer with either measurable or evaluable lesions were eligible for entry onto the study if they had undergone one or more platinum-based chemotherapy regimens and if they had adequate hematology and biochemistry parameters. They were excluded if they had symptomatic brain metastases or if they had previously been treated with paclitaxel. Patients were stratified by performance status and best response to cisplatin chemotherapy and were then randomized to treatment with docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) (49 patients) or 75 mg/m(2) (55 patients) or best supportive care. Patients in both arms were assessed every 3 weeks. RESULTS One hundred four patients (103 of whom were eligible for entry onto the study) were well balanced for prognostic factors. Of 84 patients with measurable lesions, six (7. 1%) achieved partial responses (three patients at each dose level). Time to progression was longer for docetaxel patients than for best supportive care patients (10.6 v 6.7 weeks, respectively; P <.001), as was median survival (7.0 v 4.6 months; log-rank test, P =.047). The difference was more significant for docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) patients, compared with corresponding best supportive care patients (7.5 v 4.6 months; log-rank test, P =.010; 1-year survival, 37% v 11%; chi(2) test, P =.003). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 11 patients treated with docetaxel 100 mg/m(2), three of whom died, and in one patient treated with docetaxel 75 mg/m(2). Grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicity, with the exception of diarrhea, occurred at a similar rate in both the docetaxel and best supportive care groups. CONCLUSION Treatment with docetaxel is associated with significant prolongation of survival, and at a dose of 75 mg/m(2), the benefits of docetaxel therapy outweigh the risks.

Randomized, multinational, phase III study of docetaxel plus platinum combinations versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: The TAX 326 Study Group

PURPOSE To investigate whether docetaxel plus platinum regimens improve survival and affect quality of life (QoL) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared with vinorelbine plus cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients (n = 1,218) with stage IIIB to IV NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (DC); docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and carboplatin area under the curve of 6 mg/mL * min every 3 weeks (DCb); or vinorelbine 25 mg/m2/wk and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 every 4 weeks (VC). RESULTS Patients treated with DC had a median survival of 11.3 v 10.1 months for VC-treated patients (P =.044; hazard ratio, 1.183 [97.2% confidence interval, 0.989 to 1.416]). The 2-year survival rate was 21% for DC-treated patients and 14% for VC-treated patients. Overall response rate was 31.6% for DC-treated patients v 24.5% for VC-treated patients (P =.029). Median survival (9.4 v 9.9 months [for VC]; P =.657; hazard ratio, 1.048 [97.2 confidence interval, 0.877 to 1.253]) and response (23.9%) with DCb were similar to those results for VC. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, infection, and febrile neutropenia were similar with all three regimens. Grade 3 to 4 anemia, nausea, and vomiting were more common (P <.01) with VC than with DC or DCb. Patients treated with either docetaxel regimen had consistently improved QoL compared with VC-treated patients, who experienced deterioration in QoL. CONCLUSION DC resulted in a more favorable overall response and survival rate than VC. Both DC and DCb were better tolerated and provided patients with consistently improved QoL compared with VC. These findings demonstrate that a docetaxel plus platinum combination is an effective treatment option with a favorable therapeutic index for first-line treatment of advanced or metastatic NSCLC.

Activity of gemcitabine in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A multicentre, extended phase II study

Gemcitabine is a novel nucleoside analogue with activity in solid tumours. This study assessed the objective response rate to gemcitabine given weekly intravenously at a dose of 1250 mg/m2 for 3 weeks followed by 1 week of rest (one cycle) in chemonaive patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). 161 patients with NSCLC were recruited from 10 sites in nine countries. Most patients had stage IIIb (31.3%) or IV (64.6%) disease, and 93.8% had a performance status of 0 or 1 according to the WHO scale. Of 151 evaluable patients, there were 3 complete responses and 30 partial responses lasting at least 4 weeks for an objective response rate of 21.8% (95% CI 15.5-29.3%). All responses were validated by an extramural Oncology Review Board. The mean duration of response was 8.8 months. The mean survival for all patients (16.1% of patients still alive 26 months after last patient started treatment) was 11.5 months. Improvements were also observed in secondary efficacy parameters such as performance status, weight, analgesic requirement, pain, and other disease-related symptoms including cough, dyspnoea, haemoptysis, anorexia, somnolence and hoarseness. Haematological and non-haematological toxicity was mild given the biological activity of gemcitabine. This study confirms gemcitabine as one of the most active agents in NSCLC with the added benefit of a modest toxicity profile and ease of administration on an out-patient basis. Gemcitabine is a suitable candidate for combination chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC.

High pre‐treatment serum level of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is associated with poor outcome in small‐cell lung cancer

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is an important regulator of angiogenesis and vascular permeability. Increased serum VEGF concentrations (S‐VEGF) have been found in patients with various types of human cancer, including cancer of the lung. However, the clinical and prognostic significance of S‐VEGF in cancer is unknown. We measured S‐VEGF, using enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay, in sera taken from 68 untreated patients with small‐cell lung cancer (SCLC) at the time of diagnosis. The patients were treated with 6 cycles of cisplatin and etoposide, and were randomly assigned to receive recombinant interferon, leukocyte interferon or neither. S‐VEGF ranged from 70 to 1 738 pg/ml (mean, 527 pg/ml). The patients who achieved partial or complete response to treatment had lower pre‐treatment S‐VEGF than the non‐responding patients (p = 0.0083, Mann‐Whitney test). High (>527 pg/ml) S‐VEGF was associated with poor survival (p = 0.012, Log Rank Test), and all 3‐year survivors had lower than mean pre‐treatment S‐VEGF. In a multivariate analysis, S‐VEGF and stage were the only independent prognostic factors, and the estimated 3‐year survival of the patients with limited stage disease and low pre‐treatment S‐VEGF (n = 17, 25% of all patients) was 41% (p = 0.0055, log rank test). These data show that high pre‐treatment S‐VEGF is associated with poor response to treatment and unfavourable survival in patients with SCLC treated with combination chemotherapy with or without interferon. Int. J. Cancer (Pred. Oncol.) 79:144–146, 1998.© 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

A controlled study of postoperative radiotherapy for patients with completely resected nonsmall cell lung carcinoma

Postoperative radiotherapy is commonly used to treat patients with completely resected nonsmall cell lung carcinoma, but its effect on overall survival has not been established.

Inoperable non-small cell lung cancer: Radiation with or without chemotherapy

We report a randomized multicentre study of split-course radiotherapy (RT), with or without combination chemotherapy (CT), in 238 patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), previously untreated, confined to one hemithorax and the mediastinal nodes. In both treatment groups RT consisted of 55 Gy in 20 F given over 7 weeks with a 3-week rest interval. CT consisted of the 3-drug regimen CAP: C = cyclophosphamide 400 mg/m2, A = adriamycin 40 mg/m2, P = cisplatin 40 mg/m2; 2 cycles of CAP given before RT, one during the rest interval and six after RT. Seventy per cent in the RT arm and 67% in the RT-CT arm had epidermoid carcinoma. No significant difference was apparent between the RT and the RT-CT arms with respect to objective response rates (CR + PR) (44 and 49%, respectively), median duration of response (278 and 320 days), local failure (31 and 20%), distant progression (23 and 20%) or median survival (311 and 322 days). The survival figures showed an almost significant (P = 0.05) therapeutic advantage of the combined regimen with stage IIIM0 disease. Progressive disease was the cause of death in 92% and 88%. We conclude that chemotherapy did not contribute significantly to either local control or survival as compared to radiotherapy alone.

Adjuvant chemotherapy after radical surgery for non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized study.

PURPOSE The aims of this study were to assess the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on overall survival, disease-free survival, and relapse pattern, as well as its toxicity in patients who underwent radical surgery for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred ten patients with T1-3N0 (World Health Organization [WHO] 1981) NSCLC underwent radical surgery during the period of 1982 through 1987. After surgery, the patients were randomized to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 54) (cyclophosphamide 400 mg/m2, doxorubicin 40 mg/m2, and cisplatin 40 mg/m2 [CAP] for six cycles) or no active treatment (n = 56). RESULTS After 10 years from the start of the study, 61% of patients were alive in the chemotherapy group and 48% were alive in the control group (P = .050). Seventeen patients (31%) in the CAP group and 27 patients (48%) in the control group had a recurrence during the follow-up period (P = .01). The 5-year survival rate was 67% in the chemotherapy group and was 56% in the control group (P = .050). The patients in the chemotherapy group who completed the planned treatment had a slightly better 5-year survival than those whose chemotherapy was discontinued (72.5% v 50.3%; P = .15). Chemotherapy-related gastrointestinal toxicity grade 3 to 4 (WHO) occurred in 63% and was the main reason why patients refused further planned therapy. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that patients with NSCLC at pathologic stage I who have undergone radical surgery benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

DNA gains in 3q occur frequently in squamous cell carcinoma of the lung, but not in adenocarcinoma

We performed a comparative genomic hybridization study on 25 samples of adenocarcinoma and 19 samples of squamous cell carcinoma of the lung to detect recurrent changes in the genetic material. DNA copy number changes were found in 16 squamous cell carcinoma samples and 17 adenocarcinoma samples. The most common changes were gains of DNA sequences in 3q (43%), 1q (34%), 8q (32%), 5p, (30%), 7p (25%), and 12p (25%). Of the squamous cell carcinoma samples with DNA copy number changes, 94% (15/16) had a gain in 3q (minimal common region of overlap q24‐qter), whereas only 24% (4/17) of the adenocarcinoma samples with DNA copy number changes showed a gain in 3q (q22‐qter) (P< 0.001). Six high‐level amplifications in 3q (q26.2‐q26.3) were detected in the squamous cell carcinoma samples but none were observed in the adenocarcinoma samples. Our results suggest that amplification of genes in 3q may be important in the tumorigenesis of squamous cell carcinoma but not necessarily of adenocarcinoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 22:79–82, 1998.

Differentially expressed genes in nonsmall cell lung cancer: expression profiling of cancer-related genes in squamous cell lung cancer

The expression patterns of cancer-related genes in 13 cases of squamous cell lung cancer (SCC) were characterized and compared with those in normal lung tissue and 13 adenocarcinomas (AC), the other major type of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). cDNA array was used to screen the gene expression levels and the array results were verified using a real-time reverse-transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Thirty-nine percent of the 25 most upregulated and the 25 most downregulated genes were common to SCC and AC. Of these genes, DSP, HMGA1 (alias HMGIY), TIMP1, MIF, CCNB1, TN, MMP11, and MMP12 were upregulated and COPEB (alias CPBP), TYROBP, BENE, BMPR2, SOCS3, TIMP3, CAV1, and CAV2 were downregulated. The expression levels of several genes from distinct protein families (cytokeratins and hemidesmosomal proteins) were markedly increased in SCC compared with AC and normal lung. In addition, several genes, overexpressed in SCC, such as HMGA1, CDK4, IGFBP3, MMP9, MMP11, MMP12, and MMP14, fell into distinct chromosomal loci, which we have detected as gained regions on the basis of comparative genomic hybridization data. Our study revealed new candidate genes involved in NSCLC.

Computed tomography screening for lung cancer in asbestos-exposed workers

We conducted a computed tomography (CT) screening for lung cancer in a high-risk population. Six hundred and two workers (38-81 years, 97% smokers) with asbestos-related occupational disease were screened using spiral CT and chest radiography. The national cancer registry was checked for possible false negative cases. The screening detected 111 patients with non-calcified nodules >0.5 cm in diameter and 66 of them were referred for further hospital examination. We found five lung cancers (106 false positive cases) with a histological spectrum similar to the national, natural occurrence of the disease (two adeno, one squamous cell, one anaplastic and one metastatic carcinoma) and one peritoneal mesothelioma. Three cases were potentially operable (stage I-II). Unfortunately there was one false negative fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) with misinterpretation of the follow-up CT scan and another patient who refused further investigations after an inadequate FNAB. In the end only one patient with adenocarcinoma underwent surgery. After 3 years of follow-up two new lung cancers were reported to the cancer registry with no evidence of tumour in the retrospective analysis of the screening CT scan. The sensitivity of CT screening was 100%. CT was capable of detecting early lung cancer in asbestos-exposed patients with a lot of confusing pulmonary and pleural pathology. Due to the high number of positive findings attention should be paid to patient compliance and the follow-up protocols and patient selection in future screening programmes.