Karin Olson
University of Alberta
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Karin Olson.
Psycho-oncology | 2000
Paul Taenzer; Barry D. Bultz; Linda E. Carlson; Michael Speca; Theo DeGagne; Karin Olson; Richard Doll; Zeev Rosberger
The purpose of this paper was to determine if providing patient specific Quality of Life (QL) information to clinic staff before a clinic appointment improved patient care in a lung cancer outpatient clinic. Patients were sequentially assigned to either a usual care control group or the experimental group, which completed a computerized version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ‐C30 questionnaire in order to provide the clinic staff with QL information prior to the clinic appointment. The control group completed the EORTC QLQ‐C30 paper version after the clinic appointment. Outcome measures were patient satisfaction, the degree to which issues identified on the QL questionnaire were addressed in the appointment, and a chart audit, which measured charting of QL issues and actions taken by the clincian relating to QL. In the experimental group, more QL issues identified by the patient on the EORTC QLQ‐C30 were addressed during the clinic appointment than in the control group. As well, marginally more categories were charted and a trend towards more actions being taken was seen in the experimental group. Patients reported being equally and highly satisfied with the treatment in both groups. The clinical implication is that the computerized administration of the EORTC QLQ‐C30 questionnaire and providing staff with a report highlighting patient‐specific QL deficits is a simple, time‐effective and acceptable means of improving patient–provider communication in a busy outpatient clinic. Large trials studying its effectiveness in different patient populations and regions would further elucidate the nature of this effect and potentially improve the overall quality of care that patients receive.
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management | 2003
Karin Olson; John Hanson; M. Michaud
This trial compared pain, quality of life, and analgesic use in a sample of patients with cancer pain (n=24) who received either standard opioid management plus rest (Arm A) or standard opioid management plus Reiki (Arm B). Participants either rested for 1.5 hr on Days 1 and 4 or received two Reiki treatments (Days 1 and 4) one hour after their first afternoon analgesic dose. Visual analogue scale (VAS) pain ratings, blood pressure, heart rate, and respirations were obtained before and after each treatment/rest period. Analgesic use and VAS pain scores were reported for 7 days. Quality of life was assessed on Days 1 and 7. Participants in Arm B experienced improved pain control on Days 1 and 4 following treatment, compared to Arm A, and improved quality of life, but no overall reduction in opioid use. Future research will determine the extent to which the benefits attributed to Reiki in this study may have been due to touch.
Head and Neck-journal for The Sciences and Specialties of The Head and Neck | 2009
Catherine Kubrak; Karin Olson; Naresh Jha; Louise Jensen; Linda J. McCargar; Hadi Seikaly; J. R. Harris; Rufus Scrimger; Matthew Parliament; Vickie E. Baracos
Our aim was to evaluate the prevalence and relationship of symptoms with reduced dietary intake, weight, and functional capacity in patients with head and neck cancer.
Integrative Cancer Therapies | 2007
Kathy Tsang; Linda E. Carlson; Karin Olson
Fatigue is an extremely common side effect experienced during cancer treatment and recovery. Limited research has investigated strategies stemming from complementary and alternative medicine to reduce cancer-related fatigue. This research examined the effects of Reiki, a type of energy touch therapy, on fatigue, pain, anxiety, and overall quality of life. This study was a counterbalanced crossover trial of 2 conditions: (1) in the Reiki condition, participants received Reiki for 5 consecutive daily sessions, followed by a 1-week washout monitoring period of no treatments, then 2 additional Reiki sessions, and finally 2 weeks of no treatments, and (2) in the rest condition, participants rested for approximately 1 hour each day for 5 consecutive days, followed by a 1-week washout monitoring period of no scheduled resting and an additional week of no treatments. In both conditions, participants completed questionnaires investigating cancer-related fatigue (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Fatigue subscale [FACT-F]) and overall quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy, General Version [FACT-G]) before and after all Reiki or resting sessions. They also completed a visual analog scale (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System [ESAS]) assessing daily tiredness, pain, and anxiety before and after each session of Reiki or rest. Sixteen patients (13 women) participated in the trial: 8 were randomized to each order of conditions (Reiki then rest; rest then Reiki). They were screened for fatigue on the ESAS tiredness item, and those scoring greater than 3 on the 0 to 10 scale were eligible for the study. They were diagnosed with a variety of cancers, most commonly colorectal (62.5%) cancer, and had a median age of 59 years. Fatigue on the FACT-F decreased within the Reiki condition (P=.05) over the course of all 7 treatments. In addition, participants in the Reiki condition experienced significant improvements in quality of life (FACT-G) compared to those in the resting condition (P <.05). On daily assessments (ESAS) in the Reiki condition, presession 1 versus postsession 5 scores indicated significant decreases in tiredness (P <.001), pain (P <.005), and anxiety (P<.01), which were not seen in the resting condition. Future research should further investigate the impact of Reiki using more highly controlled designs that include a sham Reiki condition and larger sample sizes.
Annals of Oncology | 2014
D. Howell; T. K. Oliver; Sue Keller-Olaman; Judith R. Davidson; Sheila N. Garland; Charles Samuels; Josée Savard; Cheryl Harris; Michèle Aubin; Karin Olson; Jonathan Sussman; James MacFarlane; Claudette Taylor
Sleep disturbance is prevalent in cancer with detrimental effects on health outcomes. Sleep problems are seldom identified or addressed in cancer practice. The purpose of this review was to identify the evidence base for the assessment and management of cancer-related sleep disturbance (insomnia and insomnia syndrome) for oncology practice. The search of the health literature included grey literature data sources and empirical databases from June 2004 to June 2012. The evidence was reviewed by a Canadian Sleep Expert Panel, comprised of nurses, psychologists, primary care physicians, oncologists, physicians specialized in sleep disturbances, researchers and guideline methodologists to develop clinical practice recommendations for pan-Canadian use reported in a separate paper. Three clinical practice guidelines and 12 randomized, controlled trials were identified as the main source of evidence. Additional guidelines and systematic reviews were also reviewed for evidence-based recommendations on the assessment and management of insomnia not necessarily in cancer. A need to routinely screen for sleep disturbances was identified and the randomized, controlled trial (RCT) evidence suggests benefits for cognitive behavioural therapy for improving sleep quality in cancer. Sleep disturbance is a prevalent problem in cancer that needs greater recognition in clinical practice and in future research.Sleep disturbance is prevalent in cancer with detrimental effects on health outcomes. Sleep problems are seldom identified or addressed in cancer practice. The purpose of this review was to identify the evidence base for the assessment and management of cancer-related sleep disturbance (insomnia and insomnia syndrome) for oncology practice. The search of the health literature included grey literature data sources and empirical databases from June 2004 to June 2012. The evidence was reviewed by a Canadian Sleep Expert Panel, comprised of nurses, psychologists, primary care physicians, oncologists, physicians specialized in sleep disturbances, researchers and guideline methodologists to develop clinical practice recommendations for pan-Canadian use reported in a separate paper. Three clinical practice guidelines and 12 randomized, controlled trials were identified as the main source of evidence. Additional guidelines and systematic reviews were also reviewed for evidence-based recommendations on the assessment and management of insomnia not necessarily in cancer. A need to routinely screen for sleep disturbances was identified and the randomized, controlled trial (RCT) evidence suggests benefits for cognitive behavioural therapy for improving sleep quality in cancer. Sleep disturbance is a prevalent problem in cancer that needs greater recognition in clinical practice and in future research.
Current Oncology | 2013
Doris Howell; S. Keller-Olaman; T.K. Oliver; Thomas F. Hack; L. Broadfield; K. Biggs; J. Chung; D. Gravelle; E. Green; M. Hamel; T. Harth; P. Johnston; Deborah McLeod; N. Swinton; A. Syme; Karin Olson
PURPOSE The purpose of the present systematic review was to develop a practice guideline to inform health care providers about screening, assessment, and effective management of cancer-related fatigue (crf) in adults. METHODS The internationally endorsed adapte methodology was used to develop a practice guideline for pan-Canadian use. A systematic search of the literature identified a broad range of evidence: clinical practice guidelines, systematic reviews, and other guidance documents on the screening, assessment, and management of crf. The search included medline, embase, cinahl, the Cochrane Library, and other guideline and data sources to December 2009. RESULTS Two clinical practice guidelines were identified for adaptation. Seven guidance documents and four systematic reviews also provided supplementary evidence to inform guideline recommendations. Health professionals across Canada provided expert feedback on the adapted recommendations in the practice guideline and algorithm through a participatory external review process. CONCLUSIONS Practice guidelines can facilitate the adoption of evidence-based assessment and interventions for adult cancer patients experiencing fatigue. Development of an algorithm to guide decision-making in practice may also foster the uptake of a guideline into routine care.
Supportive Care in Cancer | 2008
Karin Olson; A. Robert Turner; Kerry S. Courneya; Catherine J. Field; Godfrey C.W. Man; Marilyn Cree; John Hanson
GoalsIn this theoretical paper, we present the Edmonton Fatigue Framework (EFF), a new framework for the study of tiredness, fatigue, and exhaustion in advanced cancer.Materials and methodsThe Fatigue Adaptation Model (FAM), the starting point for the EFF, was drawn from a literature review pertaining to fatigue in depression, chronic fatigue syndrome, cancer, shift workers, and athletes published in the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), PubMed, PsychINFO, SPORTdiscus, and CancerLit between 1995 and 2004, and from seven qualitative studies conducted by our group. The EFF, an elaboration of the FAM, was constructed after an expansion of our literature review to 2006 and team discussion. The EFF provides new insights into possible links between behavioral and physiological indices of tiredness, fatigue, and exhaustion as they occur in both ill and non-ill states. In this paper, however, we consider only possible links in advanced cancer.ConclusionsWe propose that stressors associated with advanced cancer and its supportive treatment trigger declines in four systems—cognitive function, sleep quality, nutrition, and muscle endurance—and that these declines reduce one’s ability to adapt. While these systems each likely has its own effect on adaptation, we propose that the most important and serious effects arise from interactions among declines in cognitive function, sleep quality, nutrition, and muscle endurance.ConclusionsInterventions for fatigue have been limited by a lack of understanding about its etiology. Hypotheses arising from the EFF` suggest a new direction for further study that focuses on interactions among cognitive function, sleep quality, nutrition, and muscle endurance.
Cancer Nursing | 2007
Karin Olson; Amanda Krawchuk; Taeed Quddusi
Fatigue is associated with cancer, but it also occurs in other illnesses and in work and leisure activities. This article is a report of part of a project comparing fatigue across ill and non-ill populations aimed at identifying the unique features of fatigue in individuals with cancer. The first stage of this work suggested that fatigue is 3 distinct but related concepts-tiredness, fatigue, and exhaustion-which led to the development of the Fatigue Adaptation Model. In this article, the authors report the findings of a qualitative study of fatigue in individuals with advanced cancer in active treatment and palliative settings. It is the first in a series of 5 papers intended to make the boundaries between tiredness, fatigue, and exhaustion more explicit. Here, the authors show that although tiredness, fatigue, and exhaustion are all manifested by the same 5 attributes (changes in emotional, cognitive, and muscular function; decreasing control over body processes; and decreased social interaction), the qualitative differences in the manifestations support the assertion that they are distinct states. This distinction is important, as interventions that could prevent, or at least delay, progression from tiredness to fatigue may be inappropriate for the prevention or delay of progression from fatigue to exhaustion.
Head and Neck-journal for The Sciences and Specialties of The Head and Neck | 2013
Catherine Kubrak; Karin Olson; Naresh Jha; Rufus Scrimger; Matthew Parliament; Linda J. McCargar; Sheryl Koski; Vickie E. Baracos
We aimed to determine the effects of systemic inflammation and symptoms of head and neck cancer patients on dietary intake and weight in relation to mode of treatment.
Critical Reviews in Oncology Hematology | 2013
Tanadech Dechaphunkul; Lisa W. Martin; Cathy Alberda; Karin Olson; Vickie E. Baracos; Leah Gramlich
PURPOSE OF RESEARCH A state of the science review to assess how nutritional status and malnutrition are defined by the community of researchers studying head & neck cancer (HNC) patients. PRINCIPAL RESULTS In 117 publications, nutritional status was described diversely, ranging from merely one to all six of the following features: weight loss, body composition, quantity/type of food intake, symptoms impacting oral intake, inflammation and altered metabolism. Methods of assessment of each feature were inconsistent. Cancer- and treatment-related symptoms impacting oral intake were a prominent theme. Metabolic changes potentially related to weight loss and efficacy of nutritional therapy were rarely described (<15% of articles). There were 24 different explicit definitions for malnutrition. CONCLUSION Consensus is needed regarding the criteria to adequately describe HNC-associated malnutrition. Standardization of assessments will permit aggregation of data, and integration into clinical practice-specifically, development of consensus criteria for implementation and termination of nutrition therapies.