Karin R. Aubrey

N[3‐(4′‐fluorophenyl)‐3‐(4′‐phenylphenoxy)propyl]sarcosine (NFPS) is a selective persistent inhibitor of glycine transport

The regulation of glycine concentrations within excitatory synapses is poorly understood and it has been proposed that the GLYT1 subtypes of glycine transporters play a critical role in determining resting concentrations of glycine. Selective GLYT1 inhibitors may provide pharmacological tools to probe the dynamics of synaptic glycine concentrations, which may influence the activation properties of NMDA receptor activity. We have characterized the selectivity and mechanism of action of the glycine transport inhibitor N[3‐(4′‐fluorophenyl)‐3‐(4′‐phenylphenoxy)propyl]sarcosine (NFPS). The glycine transporters, GLYT1a, b and c and GLYT2a were expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes and two electrode voltage clamp techniques and radiolabelled 3H‐glycine flux measurements were used to characterize the effects of NFPS on glycine transport. NFPS inhibits glycine transport by the GLYT1a, b and c subtypes of glycine transporters, but has no effect on the GLYT2a subtype of transporter. We show that NFPS does not attain its specificity via an interaction with the Na+, Cl− or glycine site, nor does it act at an intracellular site. NFPS inhibition of glycine transport is time and concentration dependent and inhibition of transport by NFPS persists after washout of NFPS from the bath solution, which suggests that inhibition by NFPS is long lasting.

The Glycine Transporter GlyT2 Controls the Dynamics of Synaptic Vesicle Refilling in Inhibitory Spinal Cord Neurons

At inhibitory synapses, glycine and GABA are accumulated into synaptic vesicles by the same vesicular transporter VGAT/VIAAT (vesicular GABA transporter/vesicular inhibitory amino acid transporter), enabling a continuum of glycine, GABA, and mixed phenotypes. Many fundamental aspects of the presynaptic contribution to the inhibitory phenotypes remain unclear. The neuronal transporter GlyT2 is one of the critical presynaptic factors, because glycinergic transmission is impaired in knock-out GlyT2−/− mice and mutations in the human GlyT2 gene slc6a5 are sufficient to cause hyperekplexia. Here, we establish that GlyT2-mediated uptake is directly coupled to the accumulation of glycine into recycling synaptic vesicles using cultured spinal cord neurons derived from GlyT2–enhanced green fluorescent protein transgenic mice. Membrane expression of GlyT2 was confirmed by recording glycine-evoked transporter current. We show that GlyT2 inhibition induces a switch from a predominantly glycine to a predominantly GABA phenotype. This effect was mediated by a reduction of glycinergic quantal size after cytosolic depletion of glycine and was entirely reversed by glycine resupply, illustrating that the filling of empty synaptic vesicles is tightly coupled to GlyT2-mediated uptake. Interestingly, high-frequency trains of stimuli elicit two phases of vesicle release with distinct kinetic requirements for glycine refilling. Thus, our results demonstrate the central role played by GlyT2 in determining inhibitory phenotype and therefore in the physiology and pathology of inhibitory circuits.

N-Arachidonyl-glycine inhibits the glycine transporter, GLYT2a

N‐arachidonyl‐glycine is one of a series of N‐arachidonyl‐amino acids that are derived from arachidonic acid. N‐arachidonyl‐glycine is produced in a wide range of tissues with greatest abundance in the spinal cord. Here we report that N‐arachidonyl‐glycine is a reversible and non‐competitive inhibitor of glycine transport by GLYT2a, but has little effect on glycine transport by GLYT1b or γ‐amino butyric acid transport by GAT1. It has previously been reported that the activity of GLYT2a is down‐regulated by protein kinase C and therefore we investigated whether the actions of N‐arachidonyl‐glycine on GLYT2a are mediated by second messenger systems that lead to the activation of protein kinase C. However, the protein kinase C inhibitor, staurosporine, had no effect on the actions of N‐arachidonyl‐glycine on GLYT2a. Thus, the actions of N‐arachidonyl‐glycine are likely to be mediated by a direct interaction with the transporter. We have further defined the pharmacophore by investigating the actions of other N‐arachidonyl amino acids as well as the closely related compounds arachidonic acid, anandamide and R1‐methanandamide. Arachidonic acid, anandamide and R1‐methanandamide have no effect on glycine transport, but N‐arachidonyl‐l‐alanine has similar efficacy at GLYT2a to N‐arachidonyl‐glycine, and N‐arachidonyl‐γ‐amino butyric acid is less efficacious. These observations define a novel recognition site for the N‐arachidonyl amino acids.

The Transporters GlyT2 and VIAAT Cooperate to Determine the Vesicular Glycinergic Phenotype

The mechanisms that specify the vesicular phenotype of inhibitory interneurons in vertebrates are poorly understood because the two main inhibitory transmitters, glycine and GABA, share the same vesicular inhibitory amino acid transporter (VIAAT) and are both present in neurons during postnatal development. We have expressed VIAAT and the plasmalemmal transporters for glycine and GABA in a neuroendocrine cell line and measured the quantal release of glycine and GABA using a novel double-sniffer patch-clamp technique. We found that glycine is released from vesicles when VIAAT is coexpressed with either the neuronal transporter GlyT2 or the glial transporter GlyT1. However, GlyT2 was more effective than GlyT1, probably because GlyT2 is unable to operate in the reverse mode, which gives it an advantage in maintaining the high cytosolic glycine concentration required for efficient vesicular loading by VIAAT. The vesicular inhibitory phenotype was gradually altered from glycinergic to GABAergic through mixed events when GABA is introduced into the secretory cell and competes for uptake by VIAAT. Interestingly, the VIAAT ortholog from Caenorhabditis elegans (UNC-47), a species lacking glycine transmission, also supports glycine exocytosis in the presence of GlyT2, and a point mutation of UNC-47 that abolishes GABA transmission in the worm confers glycine specificity. Together, these results suggest that an increased cytosolic availability of glycine in VIAAT-containing terminals was crucial for the emergence of glycinergic transmission in vertebrates.

Subunit-specific modulation of glycine receptors by cannabinoids and N-arachidonyl-glycine

Glycine receptors (GlyRs) mediate inhibitory neurotransmission in spinal cord motor and pain sensory neurons. Recent studies demonstrated apparently contradictory (potentiating versus inhibitory) effects of the endocannabinoid anandamide on these receptors. The present study characterised the effects of cannabinoid agonists on alpha1, alpha1beta, alpha2 and alpha3 GlyRs recombinantly expressed in HEK293 cells with the aims of reconciling effects of cannabinoids on these receptor subtypes and to establish the potential of different GlyR isoforms as novel physiological or analgesic targets for cannabinoids. The compounds investigated were anandamide, HU-210, HU-308, WIN55,212-2 and the endogenous non-cannabinoid, N-arachidonyl-glycine. The latter compound was chosen due to the structural similarity with anandamide and known analgesic actions in the spinal cord. Recombinant alpha1 and alpha1beta GlyRs were potentiated by anandamide and HU-210 at submicromolar concentrations, whereas WIN55,212-2 had no effect and HU-308 produced only weak inhibition. By contrast, N-arachidonyl-glycine exerted complex effects including both potentiation and inhibition. Anandamide had no effect at alpha2 or alpha3 GlyRs although the other cannabinoids produced potent inhibition. On alpha2 GlyRs, the inhibitory potency sequence was HU-210=WIN55,212-2>HU-308>N-arachidonyl-glycine but on alpha3 GlyRs it was HU-210=WIN55212=HU-308>N-arachidonyl-glycine. These results suggest that alpha1, alpha2 and alpha3 containing GlyRs exhibit distinct pharmacological profiles for cannabinoids. We conclude that cannabinoid agonists may be useful as pharmacological tools for selectively inhibiting alpha2 and alpha3 GlyRs. Our results also establish GlyRs as potential novel targets for endogenous and exogenous cannabinoids.

Arachidonic acid and anandamide have opposite modulatory actions at the glycine transporter, GLYT1a

The GLYT1 subtypes of glycine transporter are expressed in glia surrounding excitatory synapses in the mammalian CNS and may regulate synaptic glycine concentrations required for activation of the NMDA subtypes of glutamate receptor. In this report we demonstrate that the rate of glycine transport by GLYT1 is inhibited by arachidonic acid. The cyclo‐oxygenase and lipoxygenase inhibitors indomethacin and nordihydroguaiaretic acid, and the protein kinase C inhibitor staurosporine, had no effect on the extent of arachidonic acid inhibition of transport, which suggests that the inhibitory effects of arachidonic acid result from a direct interaction with the transporter. In contrast to arachidonic acid, its amide derivative, anandamide, and the more stable analogue R1‐methanandamide stimulate glycine transport. This stimulation is unlikely to be a secondary effect of cannabinoid receptor stimulation because the cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN 55 212–2 had no effect on transport. We suggest that the stimulatory effects of anandamide on GLYT1 are due to a direct interaction with the transporter.

Glycine transport inhibitors as potential antipsychotic drugs

Current antipsychotic drugs are only partially effective in treating schizophrenia and there is a clear need to develop better therapies. An alternative approach to develop new antipsychotics has come from the NMDA receptor hypofunction model for schizophrenia. It has been hypothesised that stimulation of NMDA receptors with glycine site agonists may be therapeutic, and a number of clinical trials of glycine together with standard antipsychotic drugs have been recently been conducted. Modest improvements in negative symptoms have been reported in some studies but a potentially more effective treatment is to use inhibitors of the GLYT1 subtype of glycine transporters. Expression of GLYT1 within the brain correlates with NMDA receptor expression patterns and it has been suggested that GLYT1 may regulate synaptic glycine concentrations. With the development of selective and potent non-transported inhibitors of GLYT1 it should be possible to elevate synaptic glycine concentrations more effectively and thereby to increase NMDA receptor activity. Recent in vitro studies demonstrate that the glycine transport inhibitor, N[3-(4-fluorophenyl)-3-(4’-phenylphenoxy)] propylsarcosine, enhances NMDA receptor activity and the use of this class of compounds in clinical studies is eagerly awaited.

Cytosolic Transmitter Concentration Regulates Vesicle Cycling at Hippocampal GABAergic Terminals

Sustained synaptic transmission requires vesicle recycling and refilling with transmitter, two processes considered to proceed independently. Contrary to this assumption, we show here that depletion of cytosolic transmitter at GABAergic synapses reversibly reduces the number of recycling vesicles. Using paired recordings in hippocampal cultures, we show that repetitive activity causes two phases of reduction of the postsynaptic response. The first involves the classical depletion of the readily releasable and recycling pools, while the second reflects impairment of vesicle filling as GABA is consumed, since it can only be reversed by uptake of GABA or its precursors, glutamate or glutamine. Surprisingly, this second phase is associated with reduced quantal release, a faster depression rate and lower FM5-95 labeling, suggesting that the size of the cycling vesicular pool is regulated by cytosolic transmitter availability. Regulation of vesicular cycling may represent a general mechanism of presynaptic plasticity, matching synaptic release to transmitter supply.

Endocannabinoids control vesicle release mode at midbrain periaqueductal grey inhibitory synapses.

The midbrain periaqueductal grey (PAG) forms part of an endogenous analgesic system which is tightly regulated by the neurotransmitter GABA. The role of endocannabinoids in regulating GABAergic control of this system was examined in rat PAG slices. Under basal conditions GABAergic neurotransmission onto PAG output neurons was multivesicular. Activation of the endocannabinoid system reduced GABAergic inhibition by reducing the probability of release and by shifting release to a univesicular mode. Blockade of endocannabinoid system unmasked a tonic control over the probability and mode of GABA release. These findings provides a mechanistic foundation for the control of the PAG analgesic system by disinhibition.

Presynaptic control of inhibitory neurotransmitter content in VIAAT containing synaptic vesicles

In mammals, fast inhibitory neurotransmission is carried out by two amino acid transmitters, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glycine. The higher brain uses only GABA, but in the spinal cord and brain stem both GABA and glycine act as inhibitory signals. In some cases GABA and glycine are co-released from the same neuron where they are co-packaged into synaptic vesicles by a shared vesicular inhibitory amino acid transporter, VIAAT (also called vGAT). The vesicular content of all other classical neurotransmitters (eg. glutamate, monoamines, acetylcholine) is determined by the presence of a specialized vesicular transporter. Because VIAAT is non-specific, the phenotype of inhibitory synaptic vesicles is instead predicted to be dependent on the relative concentration of GABA and glycine in the cytosol of the presynaptic terminal. This predicts that changes in GABA or glycine supply should be reflected in vesicle transmitter content but as yet, the mechanisms that control GABA versus glycine uptake into synaptic vesicles and their potential for modulation are not clearly understood. This review summarizes the most relevant experimental data that examines the link between GABA and glycine accumulation in the presynaptic cytosol and the inhibitory vesicle phenotype. The accumulated evidence challenges the hypothesis that vesicular phenotype is determined simply by the competition of inhibitory transmitter for VIAAT and instead suggest that the GABA/glycine balance in vesicles is dynamically regulated.