Karin Walter

18F-Deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for the planning of radiotherapy in lung cancer: high impact in patients with atelectasis

PURPOSE 18F-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is increasingly applied in the staging of lung cancer (LC). This study analyzes the potential contribution of PET in radiotherapy planning for LC with special respect to tumor-associated atelectasis. METHODS AND MATERIALS Thirty-four patients with histologically confirmed LC, who had been examined by PET during pretreatment staging, were included. All were irradiated after CT-based therapy planning with anterior/posterior (AP) portals encompassing the primary tumor and the mediastinum (CT portals, CP). The result of the PET examination was unknown in treatment planning. In retrospect, a PET portal (PP) was delineated and compared with the CP. RESULTS In 12/34 cases, the shape and/or size of the portals were changed, primarily (n = 10) the size of the fields was reduced. The median area of CP was 182 cm2 versus 167 cm2 of PP. Seventeen of 34 patients had dys- or atelectasis caused by a central primary tumor. In these cases, differences between CP and PP were significantly more frequent than in the other patients (8/17 vs. 3/17, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION In this retrospective analysis, the information provided by FDG-PET would have contributed to a substantial reduction of the size of radiotherapy portals. This applies particularly for patients with tumor-associated dys- or atelectasis.

Prognostic factors in brain metastases: should patients be selected for aggressive treatment according to recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classes?

PURPOSE To determine whether or not Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) derived prognostic classes for patients with brain metastases are generally applicable and can be recommended as rational strategy for patient selection for future clinical trials. Inclusion of time to non-CNS death as additional endpoint besides death from any cause might result in further valuable information, as survival limitation due to uncontrolled extracranial disease can be explored. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of prognostic factors for survival and time to non-CNS death in 528 patients treated at a single institution with radiotherapy or surgery plus radiotherapy for brain metastases. For this purpose, patients were divided into groups with Karnofsky performance status (KPS) <70% and KPS > or =70%, as proposed by the RTOG. RESULTS Median overall survival was 2.9 months (2.0 months for patients with KPS <70% and 3.6 months for patients with KPS > or =70%, p < 0.001). We did not find other variables splitting patients with KPS <70% in different prognostic groups. However, advanced age, multiple brain metastases, presence of extracranial metastases, and uncontrolled primary tumor each predicted shorter survival in patients with KPS > or =70%. When grouped into the original RTOG RPA classes, our data set split into three subgroups with different prognosis and median survival times of 10.5, 3.5, and 2 months, respectively (p < 0.05). Only 3% of patients fell into the most favorable group. Median time to non-CNS death was 4.1 months (12.9 months in RPA class I, 4.9 months in RPA class II, and 3.8 months in RPA class III, respectively, p > 0.05 for RPA class II versus III). However, it was 8.5 months in RPA class II patients with controlled primary tumor, which was found to be the only prognostic factor for time to non-CNS death in patients with KPS > or =70%. In patients with KPS <70%, no statistically significant prognostic factors were identified for this endpoint. CONCLUSIONS Despite some differences, this analysis essentially confirmed the value of RPA-derived prognostic classes, as published by the RTOG, when survival was chosen as endpoint. RPA class I patients seem to be most likely to profit from aggressive treatment strategies and should be included in appropriate clinical trials. However, their number appears to be very limited. Considering time to non-CNS death, our results suggest that certain patients in RPA class II also might benefit from increased local control of brain metastases.

Rapid course radiation therapy vs. more standard treatment: A randomized trial for bone metastases

PURPOSE In a prospective randomized trial we examined whether radiotherapy of painful bone metastases can be shortened using larger single doses without impairing effectivity. METHODS AND MATERIALS One hundred patients with painful bone metastases having no prior surgical intervention or treatment with x-ray therapy and had a median follow-up of 12 months were analyzed. The primary tumor was located in the breast in 43%, in the lung in 24%, and in the prostate in 14%. The most frequent sites of metastases were the pelvis (31%), the vertebral column (30%), and the ribs (20%). Further percentages of sites were: lower extremity 11%, upper extremity 6%, and skull 2%. Fifty-one patients received a short course radiotherapy with a total dose of 20 Gy in 1 week (daily dose 4 Gy), and 49 patients received 30 Gy in 3 weeks (daily dose 2 Gy). RESULTS There were no significant differences in frequency, duration of pain relief, improvement of mobility, recalcification, frequency of pathologic fractures nor survival. There was a light trend favoring 30 Gy in frequency of pain relief and recalcification. Survival was mostly influenced by primary tumor site, Karnofsky performance status, and possibly by the response to radiotherapy (pain relief). CONCLUSIONS Because of the very short life expectancy of patients with metastatic bone disease, we now use 20 Gy in 1 week as our standard to reduce hospital stay.

A palliative accelerated irradiation regimen for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer vs. conventionally fractionated 60 Gy : Results of a randomized equivalence study

PURPOSE Radiation oncologists are often faced with patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), who are not suitable candidates for state-of-the-art radical treatment, but who also are not judged to have a very short life expectancy. Some physicians treat these patients palliatively, whereas others advocate more intensive treatment. To find out if there is a substantial difference in outcome between these approaches, we performed a randomized prospective study. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 1994 and 1998, 152 eligible patients with advanced NSCLC Stage III (n = 121) or minimal Stage IV (n = 31) were randomized to receive conventionally fractionated (cf; A: 60 Gy, 6 weeks, n = 79) or short-term treatment (PAIR; B: 32 Gy, 2 Gy b.i.d.; n = 73) of tumor and mediastinum. RESULTS One-year survival rate for all patients was 37% with no significant difference between the two treatment arms (A: 36%; B: 38%; p = 0.76). As far as can be judged from limited data available, palliation was adequate and similar for the two treatment arms. Apart from expected differences in the time course of esophagitis, acute side effects were moderate and equally distributed. No severe late effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS In the present randomized trial, survival and available data on palliation were not different after cf to 60 Gy compared to the palliative PAIR regimen. Therefore, for patients who are not suitable for radical treatment approaches, the prescription of a palliative short-term irradiation appears preferable compared to cf over several weeks.

2-Deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography in target volume definition for radiotherapy of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE To discuss the potential contribution of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in radiotherapy planning for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) considering new concepts on target volume definition. PROCEDURES Recent investigations on the topic are reviewed with regard to current concepts of target volume definition for NSCLC. RESULTS As intrathoracic recurrence is the leading cause of death after primary radiotherapy of NSCLC, there is a need for improving local control by escalating treatment intensity to gross disease. The value of elective nodal irradiation (ENI), resembling prophylactic irradiation of macroscopically unaffected parts of the mediastinum, is being considered. CONCLUSION As FDG-PET has been shown to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography (CT), and to have a potentially high impact on the identification of malignant tissue, it should be implicated in prospective clinical trials on dose escalation and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, especially in those including a reduction of target volumes.

Relation between local result and total dose of radiotherapy for brain metastases

PURPOSE Some studies published recently focused on the improvement of the treatment results of patients with brain metastases who underwent radiation therapy. They evaluated survival as a measure for the expected improvement, but failed to demonstrate a significant benefit from an increased total dose of radiotherapy. This study was targeted to investigate the effect of dose escalation with a different endpoint, the local response. METHODS AND MATERIALS As a first step, a retrospective analysis of 164 patients treated with a standard regimen of 10 x 3 Gy was performed to find factors correlating with the local result. All patients were systematically followed and underwent regular computed tomography (CT) examinations of the brain after irradiation. The second step was to compare, with respect to local control and survival, 39 patients treated with a total dose of 40-60 Gy with 39 patients treated with the standard regimen selected by means of a matched cohort pairs method. RESULTS The retrospective analysis showed a dependence of the local result after irradiation on three parameters: diameter of brain metastases, primary tumor, and tumor histology. Small-cell and adenocarcinoma were found to be more radiosensitive than squamous-cell carcinoma. The highest radiosensitivity was found in breast cancer metastases. The matching procedure was performed with respect to those parameters and also the number of brain metastases and total cerebral tumor volume. The resulting groups were absolutely equivalent and differed only with regard to the total dose applied. The local response (complete or partial remission) was 48-52% after 30 Gy vs. 77% after 40-60 Gy (p < or = 0.05). Survival was not significantly different. A further analysis of the dose-response relationships showed the tendency of control probability to increase with total dose. CONCLUSION This study suggests that there is a rationale for dose escalation in the treatment of brain metastases with radiotherapy, when local control is the aim. However, it seems questionable whether an improvement in survival results.

Ten years disease-free survival after solitary brain metastasis from breast cancer.

The unique case of a 51-year-old woman who developed a solitary brain metastasis as the first site of systemic disease 11 months after a total mastectomy for an undifferentiated infiltrating ductal carcinoma of her right breast is described. After surgery for the pT2pN0 carcinoma, the patient received radiotherapy of the internal mammary and supraclavicular lymph nodes. The brain metastasis was treated with surgery and adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy to a total dose of 30 Gy in December 1984 and January 1985. Afterwards a hormonal treatment with tamoxifen was initiated, which still continues. Since then no further distant or lymph node metastases have developed. The patient is under regular after-care and undergoes various apparative examinations every 6 months. She is generally well and suffers only from a postoperatively persistent hemianopsia. This is the first case in which a disease-free survival for more than 10 years after brain metastases from breast cancer has been reported. It illustrates the specific biological behaviour of this tumour type and the chance of achieving long-term survival in very selected cases.

Dose/effect relationships for brain metastases.

Purpose: Only in selected patients with brain metastases, e.g. those with controlled or absent extracranial tumour, may application of higher total doses of radiotherapy improve survival. However, local control is the prerequisite for long-term survival. This study aimed to answer the question whether or not local control can be improved by dose escalation. Methods: Computed tomography scans of 322 patients were analysed in order to evaluate the best local result after radiotherapy and the time to local progression. Total doses of 25–60 Gy were administered (single doses 1.8–5 Gy). The biologically effective dose (BED10) was calculated for statistical evaluation according to the linear-quadratic model assuming an α/β-value of Gy. It ranged between 37.5 Gy and 72 Gy. Results: The best local result was dependent on the number of brain metastases, BED and the histology of the primary tumour (small-cell and breast carcinoma had higher remission rates than squamous-cell carcinoma, non-breast adenocarcinoma and others). Partial remission rates significantly increased with BED, whereas complete remission rates did not improve. Histology was the only significant factor in multivariate tests. The 1-year-failure rate improved with increased BED from 44% to 31% (P > 0.05). Overall survival (median 3 months) was not dependent on total dose. Conclusions: Previous studies suggested that a prolongation of survival can be achieved through better local management (e.g. surgery plus radiotherapy, radiosurgery). However, it is still uncertain whether conventional external-beam radiotherapy with higher total doses leads to comparable results. The optimum dose level still has to be established. For squamous-cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma a BED of at least 72 Gy seems to be necessary, for small-cell and breast carcinoma, doses between 48 Gy and 60 Gy might be sufficient. The important influence of tumour histology on local remission and progression-free survival should be considered when planning future clinical trials.

MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC ANALYSIS OF DOSE-EFFECT RELATIONSHIP AND LATENCY OF RADIOMYELOPATHY AFTER HYPERFRACTIONATED AND CONVENTIONALLY FRACTIONATED RADIOTHERAPY IN ANIMAL EXPERIMENTS

PURPOSE We examined in rats whether the radiation tolerance of spinal cord is enhanced by using hyperfractionated radiotherapy compared to a conventional schedule. Higher tolerable doses to the spinal cord would allow dose escalation to the tumor and thus possibly lead to higher cure rates, especially in tumors with high cell proliferation. METHODS AND MATERIALS Cervical spinal cord of 276 healthy rats was irradiated over 6 weeks hyperfractionally with single doses ranging from 0.75-2.5 Gy up to total doses ranging from 45-150 Gy (60 fractions) and conventionally with single doses of 1.5-4.0 Gy up to total doses of 45-120 Gy (30 fractions). The rats were examined neurologically and sacrificed when paralysis of the hind legs occurred. After fixation, spinal cord was removed and examined histologically. Dose-effect relationship and latency from the beginning of radiotherapy to the onset of paralysis were computed and analyzed using a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS The model fitted the observed data excellently. There were highly significant effects both for the dose level and for the treatment regimen. Latency analysis showed earlier and more intense acute side effects after hyperfractionation but radiomyelopathy occurred markedly later. CONCLUSIONS The sparing effect of hyperfractionation on spinal cord as predicted by radiobiologists could be confirmed in our experiments. Thus, it seems possible to escalate tumor doses using hyperfractionation without enhanced risk to spinal cord but with higher probability of tumor cure.

Dose-response relationships for radiotherapy of brain metastases : Role of intermediate-dose stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole-brain radiotherapy

The effects of intermediate-dose radiotherapy consisting of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT, 10 fractions of 3 Gy) plus stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) were studied prospectively. Twenty-five adult patients with 31 brain metastases received WBRT plus linear accelerator (LINAC)-based single dose SRS with fixed treatment parameters (10 Gy at the isocenter, target volume enclosed by the 90% isodose). Median age was 63 years, median Karnofsky performance status 80%, and median diameter of brain metastases 2.4 cm. Fifteen patients had non-small-cell lung cancer. Because of some early deaths, only 26 lesions could be evaluated for response. We observed 1 complete and 15 partial remissions. Median time to progression inside or outside the SRS volume was 4.5 months. Actuarial local control of SRS-treated lesions was 61% at 1 year. At that time, only 37% of patients were free from new lesions outside the SRS volume. Median survival and cause-specific survival were 2.3 and 4.5 months, respectively (1-year survival rate 8% and 21%). Ten patients died of progressive brain metastases, 13 from extracranial disease progression (unknown cause of death in 2 cases). Comparable to SRS studies with higher doses, the majority of brain failures occurred outside the SRS volume and more patients died of extracranial progression than of uncontrolled brain metastases. Failure to improve survival can be explained by the high percentage of patients with extracranial metastases (52%). However, the present results appear less favorable than those of previous studies of SRS with 15 Gy to 16 Gy (1-year actuarial local control rates of 66-89%). Therefore, we recommend SRS with 15 Gy to 16 Gy for patients whose favorable prognostic factors justify a boost after WBRT.