Karina L. Bienfait

A controlled trial of antidepressants in patients with Parkinson disease and depression

Background: Parkinson disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disease affecting up to 1 million individuals in the United States. Depression affects up to 50% of these patients and is associated with a variety of poor outcomes for patients and their families. Despite this, there are few evidence-based data to guide clinical care. Methods: An NIH-funded, randomized, controlled trial of paroxetine CR, nortriptyline, and placebo in 52 patients with PD and depression. The primary outcomes were the change in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) and the percentage of depression responders at 8 weeks. Results: Nortriptyline was superior to placebo for the change in HAM-D (p < 0.002); paroxetine CR was not. There was a trend for superiority of nortriptyline over paroxetine CR at 8 weeks (p < 0.079). Response rates favored nortriptyline (p = 0.024): nortriptyline 53%, paroxetine CR 11%, placebo 24%. In planned contrasts of response rates, nortriptyline was superior to paroxetine CR (p = 0.034). Nortriptyline was also superior to placebo in many of the secondary outcomes, including sleep, anxiety, and social functioning, while paroxetine CR was not. Both active drug treatments were well tolerated. Conclusions: Though relatively modest in size, this is the largest placebo-controlled trial done to date in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) and depression. Nortriptyline was efficacious in the treatment of depression and paroxetine CR was not. When compared directly, nortriptyline produced significantly more responders than did paroxetine CR. The trial suggests that depression in patients with PD is responsive to treatment and raises questions about the relative efficacy of dual reuptake inhibitors and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. ARR = absolute risk reduction; DSM-IV = Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition; HAM-A = Hamilton Anxiety Scale; HAM-D = Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination; NNT = number needed to treat; PD = Parkinson disease; PDQ = Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire; PSQI = Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; SCID = Structured Clinical Interview; SSRI = selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor; TCA = tricyclic antidepressant; UPDRS = Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale.

Cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression in Parkinson's disease: a randomized, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE Despite the negative effects of depression in Parkinsons disease, there is currently no evidence-based standard of care. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of individually administered cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), relative to clinical monitoring (with no new treatment), for depression in this medical population. METHOD Eighty depressed (based on DSM-IV criteria) patients with Parkinsons disease participated in a randomized, controlled trial of CBT relative to clinical monitoring (1:1 ratio) in an academic medical center from April 2007 to July 2010. All patients continued to maintain stable medication regimens under the care of their personal physicians. The 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) total score was the primary outcome. CBT was modified to meet the unique needs of the Parkinsons disease population and provided for 10 weeks. Assessments were completed by blind raters at baseline and 5 (midpoint), 10 (end of treatment), and 14 weeks (follow-up evaluation) postrandomization. RESULTS The CBT group reported greater reductions in depression (change in HAM-D score) than the clinical monitoring group. At week 10, the mean HAM-D score change was 7.35 for CBT relative to 0.05 for clinical monitoring. CBT was also superior to clinical monitoring on several secondary outcomes (i.e., Beck Depression Inventory scores, anxiety, quality of life, coping, Parkinsons disease symptom ratings). There were more treatment responders in the CBT group than the clinical monitoring group (56% versus 8%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS CBT may be a viable approach for the treatment of depression in Parkinsons disease. Further research is needed to replicate and extend these findings.

Sleep Disturbances in Parkinson's Disease

Sleep disturbances are very common in patients with PD and are associated with a variety of negative outcomes. The evaluation of sleep disturbances in these patients is complex, as sleep may be affected by a host of primary sleep disorders, other primary medical or psychiatric conditions, reactions to medications, aging or the neuropathophysiology of PD itself. In this article, we review the evaluation of the common disturbances of sleep seen in PD. This includes the primary sleep disorders, the interaction of depression and insomnia, the impact that medications for PD have on sleep, as well as the role of factors such as nocturia, pain, dystonia, akinesia, difficulty turning in bed, and vivid dreaming. The treatment of sleep disturbances in PD is largely unstudied but recommendations based on clinical experience in PD and research studies in other geriatric populations can be made. Important principles include, diagnosis, treating the specific sleep disorder or co‐occurring disorder, and control of the motor aspects of PD.

The impact of treatment of depression on quality of life, disability and relapse in patients with Parkinson's disease†

Parkinsons disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disease affecting up to one million individuals in the United States. Depression is found in 40 to 50% of these patients and is associated with a variety of poor outcomes for both patients and their families. Despite this, there are few evidence‐based data to guide clinical care. This was an NIH‐funded, randomized, controlled trial of paroxetine, nortriptyline, and placebo. It included an 8 week acute phase and a 16 week blind extension phase. This report details the impact of depression treatment on quality of life (QoL) and disability in the acute and extension phase of this study. Secondary outcomes included relapse, tolerability, safety, and the impact of depression treatment on PD physical functioning. Patients who had improvement in depression, compared with those who did not, had significant gains in measures of QoL and disability (PDQ‐8, P = 0.0001; SF‐36, P = 0.0001) at 8 weeks and maintained their gains in the extension phase. Patients who were on active drug were significantly less likely to relapse in the extension phase than those on placebo (P = 0.041). Though relatively modest in size, this trial provides the first controlled data on the impact of treatment of depression on QoL and disability in PD. It suggests that successfully treating depression in PD leads to important, sustained improvements in these outcomes and that patients who improve on antidepressants are less likely to relapse than are patients who initially improve on placebo.

Treatment of insomnia in Parkinson's disease: A controlled trial of eszopiclone and placebo†

Parkinsons disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disease affecting up to 1 million individuals in the United States. Sleep disturbances, typically in sleep maintenance, are found in up to 88% of these individuals and are associated with a variety of poor outcomes. Despite being common and important, there are few data to guide clinical care. We conducted a 6‐week, randomized, controlled trial of eszopiclone and placebo in 30 patients with PD and insomnia. Patients with other primary sleep disorders (PSG defined) were excluded. The primary outcome was total sleep time (TST), and secondary measures included wake after sleep onset (WASO), number of awakenings, and quality of sleep, among others. The groups did not significantly differ on TST, but significant differences, favoring eszopiclone, did emerge in number of awakenings (P = 0.035), quality of sleep (P = 0.018), and in physician‐rated CGI improvement (P = 0.035). There was also a trend toward significance in WASO (P = 0.071). There were no significant differences between groups in measures of daytime functioning. The drug was well tolerated, with 33% of patients on eszopiclone and 27% of patients on placebo reporting adverse events. Although modest in size, this is the first controlled study of the treatment of insomnia in patients with PD. Eszopiclone did not increase TST significantly but was superior to placebo in improving quality of sleep and some measures of sleep maintenance, which is the most common sleep difficulty experienced by patients with PD. Definitive trials of the treatment of sleep disorders in this population are warranted.

Ramelteon for the treatment of insomnia in menopausal women

Objective Sleep disturbances have been reported to be one of the most troubling manifestations of menopause. While hormone replacement therapy (HRT) has historically been considered a first-line treatment for menopausal insomnia, many women are now seeking alternative treatments due to concerns about the risks and side-effects of HRT. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of ramelteon, a selective melatonin receptor agonist, for the treatment of menopausal insomnia. Study design A total of 20 healthy peri- and postmenopausal women with insomnia participated in this six-week, prospective, open-label trial of ramelteon (8 mg) at an academic medical centre. Participants completed sleep–wake diaries on a daily basis for six weeks. Self-report measures of sleep impairment, daytime functioning, quality of life and mood were also completed on a bi-weekly basis. Results Significant improvements in latency to sleep onset, total sleep time and sleep efficiency were observed in diary data while gains in sleep quality, sleep impairment, daytime functioning, quality of life and mood were found in self-report measures. There was no evidence of tolerance or rebound over the course of the trial. Conclusions Overall, results suggest that ramelteon is an effective non-hormonal approach for the treatment of insomnia in menopause. Randomized-controlled trials are needed to further evaluate the efficacy of this intervention.

CBT for the treatment of depression in Parkinson’s disease: a promising nonpharmacological approach

Depression is very common in Parkinson’s disease (PD) and linked with a faster progression of physical symptoms, greater cognitive decline and poorer quality of life. Nonpharmacological approaches, such as cognitive–behavioral therapy (CBT), for the treatment of depression in PD (dPD) have received little experimental attention despite strong demonstrated efficacy in other geriatric and medical populations. Depressed PD patients often differ from the depressed non-PD elderly in that they present with increased rates of both executive dysfunction and comorbid psychiatric diagnoses, may differ in their depressive symptom presentation and typically have caregivers who are highly involved in their treatment. Therefore, it is not possible to conclude that empirically validated treatments in the depressed aged will generalize to those with PD. In order to be most effective for PD patients, CBT should be tailored to their unique needs. Additional controlled research is needed to further explore the efficacy of CBT for dPD.

Depression in Parkinson's Disease: Symptom Improvement and Residual Symptoms After Acute Pharmacologic Management

OBJECTIVE Parkinsons disease (PD) is frequently complicated by depression and there is a paucity of controlled research that can inform the management of this disabling nonmotor complaint. A randomized controlled trial of nortriptyline, paroxetine, and placebo for the treatment of depression in PD (dPD) was recently completed. The purpose of this article is to describe the baseline pattern of depressive symptom presentation in PD, the specific symptoms of dPD that improve with pharmacotherapy, and the residual symptoms that remain in patients who meet a priori criteria for response or remission after acute treatment (8 weeks). SETTING The Departments of Psychiatry and Neurology at Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Jersey. PARTICIPANTS : Fifty-two depressed patients (major depression or dysthymia based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th edition criteria) with Parkinsons disease (by research criteria). DESIGN/INTERVENTION A randomized controlled trial of nortriptyline, paroxetine, and placebo. MEASUREMENT The four subscales (core mood, anxiety, insomnia, and somatic) and individual items from the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17 were the focus of this study. These measures were assessed at baseline and Week 8. RESULTS Baseline depressive symptoms were unrelated to motor functioning. Treatment response was associated with significant improvements in the core mood, anxiety, insomnia, and somatic symptoms seen in dPD. Residual symptoms, such as sadness and loss of interest, persisted in treatment responders in a milder form than was initially present. CONCLUSIONS Antidepressants may influence all symptoms of dPD, including those that share great overlap with the physical disease process. Additional research regarding adjunctive interventions is needed to help optimize the management of dPD.