Karine L. Clearie

Fluticasone reverses oxymetazoline-induced tachyphylaxis of response and rebound congestion.

RATIONALE Chronic use of intranasal decongestants, such as oxymetazoline, leads to tachyphylaxis of response and rebound congestion, caused by alpha-adrenoceptor mediated down-regulation and desensitization of response. OBJECTIVES We evaluated if tachyphylaxis can be reversed by intranasal fluticasone propionate, and the relative alpha(1)- and alpha(2)-adrenoceptor components of tachyphylaxis using the alpha(1)-antagonist prazosin. METHODS In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design, 19 healthy subjects received intranasal oxymetazoline, 200 microg three times a day for 14 days, followed by the addition of fluticasone, 200 microg twice a day for a further 3 days. At Days 1, 14, and 17, participants received a single dose of oral prazosin, 1 mg, or placebo with measurements made before and 2 hours later. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Outcomes evaluated were peak nasal inspiratory flow, nasal resistance, blood flow, and oxymetazoline dose-response curve (DRC). On Day 14 versus Day 1, inspiratory flow decreased (mean difference, 95% confidence interval) (-47.9 L x min(-1); -63.9 to -31.9; P < 0.001) and the DRC shifted downward (24.8 L x min(-1); 20.3-29.3; P < 0.001). On Day 17 versus Day 14, after fluticasone, inspiratory flow increased (45 L x min(-1); 30-61; P < 0.001) and the DRC shifted upward (26.2 L x min(-1); 21.7-30.7; P < 0.001). On Day 1, prazosin reduced inspiratory flow (-52.6 L x min(-1); -19.2 to -86) compared with baseline. This effect was abolished on Day 14 (7.9 L x in(-1); -41.3 to 25.5). CONCLUSIONS Oxymetazoline-induced tachyphylaxis and rebound congestion are reversed by intranasal fluticasone. Further studies are indicated to evaluate if combination nasal sprays of decongestant and corticosteroid are an effective strategy to obviate tachyphylaxis and rebound in rhinitis. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 00487032).

A randomized primary care trial of steroid titration against mannitol in persistent asthma: STAMINA trial.

BACKGROUND We compared titrating inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) against mannitol airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) or a reference strategy (control) based on symptoms, reliever use, and lung function in primary care. METHODS One hundred sixty-four patients with persistent asthma were randomized in parallel group fashion following an initial ICS tapering. Subsequent ICS doses (as ciclesonide) were titrated against either the provocative dose of mannitol causing a 10% fall in FEV(1) (PD(10)) (AHR strategy) or a control group (reference strategy) over a 1-year period. RESULTS One hundred nineteen participants (n = 61 AHR, n = 58 control) completed the study. Time to first mild exacerbation was not significantly different: hazard ratio, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.716-2.31; P = .40. Although there were 27% fewer total number of mild exacerbations over 12 months in AHR vs control groups (n = 84 vs n = 115, P = .03), there was no difference in severe exacerbations (n = 12 vs n = 13). No other significant differences were seen between groups with the exception of mannitol PD(10) and ICS dose. There was a 1.52 (95% CI, 0.61-2.42; P = .001) doubling dose difference in mannitol PD(10) between AHR vs control groups. The final mean daily ciclesonide dose was higher (P < .0001) in AHR vs control groups (514 μg vs 208 μg), with no associated significant suppression of overnight urinary cortisol/creatinine. Significant improvements were seen within the AHR group but not the control group for the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) (P < .05), salivary eosinophilic cationic protein (P < .05), exhaled nitric oxide (P < .05), symptoms (P < .005), and reliever use (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Mannitol challenge was well tolerated in a primary care setting. Using mannitol resulted in exposure to a higher dose of ciclesonide, which was associated with equivocal effects on exacerbations without associated adrenal suppression. Large-scale trials using mannitol in patients with more severe disease may now be warranted to further define its role. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01216579; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Fluticasone/Salmeterol Combination Confers Benefits in People With Asthma Who Smoke

BACKGROUND Smoking induces airway inflammation and relative resistance to inhaled steroids. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects on airway hyperresponsiveness of adding salmeterol to fluticasone vs doubling the dose of fluticasone in patients with asthma who smoked and patients with asthma who did not smoke. METHODS Sixteen patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma who did not smoke and 15 such patients who smoked completed a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study. They received either a fluticasone/salmeterol combination (FP/SM) (125/25 μg) two puffs bid (plus fluticasone placebo), or active fluticasone (250 μg) two puffs bid (plus FP/SM placebo), for 2 weeks each, with baselines after 1-week to 2-week run-in and washout periods. The primary outcome was the change from baseline in the provocative concentration of methacholine required to produce a 20% fall in FEV(1) (PC(20)). RESULTS In the patients who did not smoke, there were similar improvements in the methacholine PC(20) with the use of fluticasone and FP/SM. The patients who smoked gained a benefit from FP/SM but not fluticasone, amounting to a PC(20) difference of 1.6 doubling dilutions (95% CI, 1.0-2.2), P < .01. The provocative dose of mannitol required to produce a 15% fall in FEV(1) (PD(15)) showed greater improvements with FP/SM than fluticasone in both patients who smoked and did not smoke. Similar differences in airway caliber between those who smoked and did not smoke were observed in FEV(1) and airway resistance. CONCLUSIONS FP/SM confers greater improvements in airway hyperresponsiveness and airway caliber in patients with asthma who smoke compared with double the dose of fluticasone. We hypothesize that in the presence of relative steroid resistance, the smooth muscle stabilization conferred by salmeterol is of greater clinical importance in patients who smoke than in those who do not smoke. TRIAL REGISTRY ClinicalTrials.gov: No.: NCT00830505; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Airway dysfunction in nasal polyposis: a spectrum of asthmatic disease?

Background Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) represents an interesting model to investigate the existence of a non‐allergic unified airway. The factors associated with airway dysfunction in CRSwNP are not fully understood.

Effects of chlorine and exercise on the unified airway in adolescent elite Scottish swimmers

To cite this article: Clearie KL, Vaidyanathan S, Williamson PA, Goudie A, Short P, Schembri S, Lipworth BJ. Effects of chlorine and exercise on the unified airway in adolescent elite Scottish swimmers.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparison of hydrofluoroalkane and chlorofluorocarbon formulations of budesonide

AIMS A hydrofluoroalkane formulation of budesonide pressurized metered-dose inhaler has been developed to replace the existing chlorofluorocarbon one. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of both formulations. METHODS Systemic bioavailability and bioactivity of both hydrofluoroalkane and chlorofluorocarbon pressurized metered-dose inhaler formulations at 800 µg twice daily was determined during a randomized crossover systemic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study at steady state in healthy volunteers. Measurements included the following: plasma cortisol AUC(24h) [area under the concentration-time curve (0-24 h)], budesonide AUC(0-12h) and C(max) . Clinical efficacy was determined during a randomized crossover pharmacodynamic study in asthmatic patients receiving 200 µg followed by 800 µg budesonide via chlorofluorocarbon or hydrofluoroalkane pressurized metered-dose inhaler each for 4 weeks. Methacholine PC(20) (primary outcome), exhaled nitric oxide, spirometry, peak expiratory flow and symptoms were evaluated. RESULTS In the pharmacokinetic study, there were no differences in cortisol, AUC(0-12h) [area under the concentration-time curve (0-12 h)], T(max) (time to maximum concentration) or C(max) (peak serum concentration) between the hydrofluoroalkane and chlorofluorocarbon pressurized metered-dose inhaler. The ratio of budesonide hydrofluoroalkane vs. chlorofluorocarbon pressurized metered-dose inhaler for cortisol AUC(24h) was 1.02 (95% confidence interval 0.93-1.11) and budesonide AUC(0-12h) was 1.03 (90% confidence interval 0.9-1.18). In the asthma pharmacodynamic study, there was a significant dose response (P < 0.0001) for methacholine PC(20) (provocative concentration of methacholine needed to produce a 20% fall in FEV(1) ) with a relative potency ratio of 1.10 (95% confidence interval 0.49-2.66), and no difference at either dose. No significant differences between formulations were seen with the secondary outcome variables. CONCLUSIONS Hydrofluoroalkane and chlorofluorocarbon formulations of budesonide were therapeutically equivalent in terms of relative lung bioavailability, airway efficacy and systemic effects.

Supervised step-down of inhaled corticosteroids in the community – An observational study

INTRODUCTION Current asthma guidelines recommend step-down of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) to the minimum dose required for control of symptoms. AIM To determine if supervised step-down of (ICS) in the community has any effect on asthmatic inflammation. METHODS 119 Community based asthmatics underwent progressive step-down of therapy until they became unstable or reached an (ICS) dose of ≤200 μg beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) or equivalent. Once unstable, participants stepped back up to the last stable dose of ICS. Exhaled nitric oxide (NO) and mannitol challenge were performed at the start and end of step-down. Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) and spirometry were recorded at each step-down visit. RESULTS The median (interquartile range) BDP equivalent dose was significantly higher pre vs. post step-down: 400 μg (400-800) and 250 μg (200-400) per day respectively (P < 0.05). Examination of change in PD(10) in individual patients revealed that 34% had an improvement (>+1 dd), 47% had no change (±-1 dd), and 19% had a worsening (<-1 dd). The geometric mean fold ratio in NO for pre vs. post was 0.96 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.06, P = 0.43). Mean (SEM) values for FEV(1) were 86.2% (1.51) vs. 84.5% (1.46) (P = 0.04). There was a significant improvement in AQLQ. CONCLUSIONS We have demonstrated that a significant reduction in ICS dose may be achieved in a community setting without any worsening of airways inflammation or lung function, and with an associated improvement quality of life in the majority of patients. This apparent disconnect may reflect enhanced adherence due to supervision of step-down.

Disconnect between standardized field-based testing and mannitol challenge in Scottish elite swimmers.

Background Elite swimmers have high rates of rhinoconjunctivitis and exercise‐induced bronchoconstriction. Moreover, exposure to chlorine and chlorine metabolites is known to induce bronchial hyper‐reactivity.

Relationship between fractional exhaled nitric oxide and nasal nitric oxide in airways disease

BACKGROUND Invasive techniques show evidence of a unified allergic airway. Nitric oxide is measured noninvasively from the lungs (fractional exhaled nitric oxide [FeNO]) and nose (nasal nitric oxide [nNO]). OBJECTIVE To investigate the relationship between FeNO and nNO in different airway conditions. METHODS A total of 227 participants were assessed: 41 healthy volunteers (HVs), 33 patients with asthma, 52 patients with allergic rhinitis (AR), 63 with unified airway disease (UAD), and 38 with nasal polyposis (NP). Correlation and multiple linear regression analyses were performed. RESULTS Geometric means (95% confidence intervals) for FeNO were as follows: 14.7 (12.4-17.5) ppb for HVs, 29.0 (22.5-37.4) ppb for asthma patients, 23.1 (19.0-28.1) for AR patients, 27.2 (23.0-32.4) for UAD patients, and 28.5 (21.5-37.8) for NP patients. For nNO, the values were as follows: 878.1 (807.0-955.6) ppb for HVs, 674.1 (557.4-815.1) for asthma patients, 853.3 (778.8-934.8) ppb for AR patients, 763.4 (694.1-839.5) for UAD patients, and 388.6 (317.9-474.9) for NP patients. The nNO was lower in the NP group than the other groups (P < .001). The nNO and FeNO were correlated in the AR patients (r = 0.56; P < .0001) and HVs (r = 0.44; P = .004) but not significantly in the other groups. Multiple linear regression of the whole cohort demonstrated that after diagnosis, age, sex, and inhaled corticosteroids were taken into account nNO had a significant association with FeNO (P = .02). CONCLUSION Reduced nNO in NP patients is due to ostiomeatal complex obstruction. FeNO is sensitive to suppression by inhaled corticosteroids. The AR and HV groups have no such confounders; hence, correlation is most evident. Exclusion of confounders reveals a correlation between upper and lower airway inflammation with noninvasive techniques.

Systemic bioavailability of hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) formulations of fluticasone/salmeterol in healthy volunteers via pMDI alone and spacer

AIM To compare a test version of HFA fluticasone/salmeterol (FP/SM) combination inhaler (Neolab, UK) with the reference product Seretide (GlaxoSmithKline, UK). METHODS An in vitro Anderson cascade impactor was used to compare the fine particle dose (<4.7 microm). Two separate randomized cross-over studies were performed to compare the systemic bioavailability of test vs. reference (T vs. R) formulations of FP/SM 250/25 microg pMDI in healthy volunteers. In study 1 blood pharmacokinetic analysis using oral charcoal block was performed over 24 h following a single dose of four puffs via pMDI alone. In study 2 systemic bioactivity was measured following single doses of four and eight puffs via a spacer device: serum potassium (K(+)) to reflect SM, and overnight urinary cortisol : creatinine (OUCC) for FP. An early pharmacokinetic profile was also assessed over 120 min. RESULTS The in vitro fine particle dose was similar for test vs. reference pMDI alone and via spacer. The results of both studies were consistent: No significant differences between formulations were seen in terms of FP kinetics. Analysis of SM kinetics revealed superiority of the test product. No significant dose-response or difference in T : R ratio was noted for OUCC. Fall in K(+) revealed a significant dose-response with a non-significant T : R ratio. CONCLUSIONS The in vitro fine particle dose may not predict pharmacokinetic and systemic pharmacodynamic outcomes. Single dosing studies with fluticasone/salmeterol 250/25 microg via pMDI or with spacer showed pharmacokinetic equivalence with FP, but not SM. No significant difference between formulations was seen with either adrenal suppression or hypokalaemia.