Karine Lacombe

Towards an HBV cure: state-of-the-art and unresolved questions—report of the ANRS workshop on HBV cure

HBV infection is a major cause of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Although HBV infection can be efficiently prevented by vaccination, and treatments are available, to date there is no reliable cure for the >240 million individuals that are chronically infected worldwide. Current treatments can only achieve viral suppression, and lifelong therapy is needed in the majority of infected persons. In the framework of the French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis ‘HBV Cure’ programme, a scientific workshop was held in Paris in June 2014 to define the state-of-the-art and unanswered questions regarding HBV pathobiology, and to develop a concerted strategy towards an HBV cure. This review summarises our current understanding of HBV host-interactions leading to viral persistence, as well as the roadblocks to be overcome to ultimately address unmet medical needs in the treatment of chronic HBV infection.

Campylobacter Bacteremia: Clinical Features and Factors Associated with Fatal Outcome

BACKGROUND Campylobacter bacteremia is uncommon. The influence of underlying conditions and of the impact of antibiotics on infection outcome are not known. METHODS From January 2000 through December 2004, 183 episodes of Campylobacter bacteremia were identified in 23 hospitals in the Paris, France, area. The medical records were reviewed. Characteristics of bacteremia due to Campylobacter fetus and to other Campylobacter species were compared. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for fatal outcome within 30 days. RESULTS Most affected patients were elderly or immunocompromised. C. fetus was the most commonly identified species (in 53% of patients). The main underlying conditions were liver disease (39%) and cancer (38%). The main clinical manifestations were diarrhea (33%) and skin infection (16%). Twenty-seven patients (15%) died within 30 days. Compared with patients with bacteremia due to other Campylobacter species, patients with C. fetus bacteremia were older (mean age, 69.5 years vs. 55.6 years; P = .001) and were more likely to have cellulitis (19% vs. 7%; P = .03), endovascular infection (13% vs. 1%; P = .007), or infection associated with a medical device (7% vs. 0%; P = .02). Independent risk factors for death were cancer (odds ratio [OR], 5.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-20.8) and asymptomatic infection (OR, 6.7; 95% CI, 1.5-29.4) for C. fetus bacteremia, the absence of prescription of appropriate antibiotics (OR, 12.2; 95% CI, 0.9-157.5), and prescription of third-generation cephalosporins (OR, 10.2; 95% CI, 1.9-53.7) for bacteremia caused by other species. CONCLUSIONS Campylobacter bacteremia occurs mainly in immunocompromised patients. Clinical features and risk factors of death differ by infection species.

HIV and viral hepatitis coinfections: advances and challenges

With a prevalence affecting over 30% of HIV infected patients, coinfection with hepatitis B (HBV) or C (HCV) virus remains one of the most frequent comorbidities in this population, with a significant impact in terms of morbidity and mortality associated with liver disease. Recent findings in the physiopathology of HIV in the liver have confirmed that it may contribute, along with hepatotoxicity of antiretrovirals and the burden of metabolic diseases, to a more rapid progression of liver fibrosis, especially when there is underlying chronic hepatitis coinfection. Both fields of research and clinical appraisal of HBV and HCV coinfection are rapidly evolving and prompt a change in the former paradigms of clinical care and management of chronic hepatic coinfection in the context of HIV. The advent of anti-HCV direct antiviral agents has indeed completely shaken up the treatment guidelines for HCV, and the tricky management of these new agents with antiretrovirals means referring patients to specialised centres. In HBV coinfection, therapeutic options have not changed recently but new challenges have emerged regarding the management of low replicating HBV-DNA in optimally treated patients and long term exposure to antivirals. Finally, the global increase in life expectancy in HIV infected patients has been accompanied in coinfected patients by a higher risk of emergence of end stage liver diseases for which access to orthotopic liver transplantation and innovative procedures such as targeted hepatocellular carcinoma therapies should be facilitated.

Major role of hepatitis B genotypes in liver fibrosis during coinfection with HIV.

Background:Little is know about the determinants of liver fibrosis progression and genomic variability in hepatitis B virus (HBV) in HIV/HBV-coinfected patients. Methods:A cross-sectional analysis examined common characteristics of HBV infection in an ongoing cohort study of 308 patients with both HIV-1-positive Western blot and plasma HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) seropositivity. Risk factors for liver fibrosis were studied in a subset of 104 patients for whom liver biopsy and complete HBV genomic analysis were available. Analysis was performed by exact multiple regression analysis. Results:Mean age of the study population was 40.3 years, with a ratio male to female of 5.3 and a mean duration of HIV infection of 9.3 years. In the subset of 104 patients, plasma HBV e antigen (HBeAg) in HBV-replicative patients could not be detected in 28.4% and lamivudine-resistant mutants were detected in 67.8%. HBV genotype A was the most frequent genotype (73/104) and 25 patients were infected by the usually rare genotype G. METAVIR fibrosis score was rated F2–F4 in 70 patients. After adjustment for the most common known determinants of liver fibrosis, HBV genotype G [odds ratio (OR), 12.60; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.72–infinite; P < 0.009], efavirenz exposure (OR, 3.55; 95% CI, 1.14–12.14; P < 0.03), and the duration of HIV infection (3.86; 95% CI, 1.27–12.64; P < 0.01) were strongly associated with the risk of grade F2–F4 fibrosis. Conclusion:HBV genotype G is a determinant of liver fibrosis in HIV/HBV-coinfected patients and HBV genotyping should be considered as part of the management of patients with multiple risk factors for rapid progression of liver fibrosis.

Long-term hepatitis B virus dynamics in HIV-hepatitis B virus-co-infected patients treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate

Background:The long-term impact of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) on hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication has not yet been studied in HIV–HBV-co-infected patients. Methods:We conducted a prospective study of HBV-DNA decay kinetics in 28 HIV–HBV-co-infected patients treated by TDF. HBV dynamics were studied using mixed linear models, and baseline factors affecting them were analysed using Cox models. Results:The HBV-DNA load declined by a mean of 4.6 log copies/ml during follow-up (mean 71 weeks), and fell below the detection limit (200 copies/ml) in 21 patients. Inhibition of viral replication by TDF was associated with a decrease in alanine aminotransferase levels (125 versus 68 IU, P < 0.05). HBV-DNA decay was biphasic, with an rapid fall followed by a gradual decline. Baseline factors associated with a steeper first slope in the HBV-DNA decrease were high HBV load, positive hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and YMDD mutations. Baseline factors increasing the time to reach an HBV-DNA level less than 200 copies/ml were high HBV load (150 days when HBV-DNA < 108 log, 316 days when HBV-DNA > 108 log) and positive HBeAg. Previous exposure to lamivudine or TDF–lamivudine did not modify HBV-DNA decrease under therapy in this population with a high prevalence of YMDD mutations. Conclusion:The long-term decline in HBV DNA under TDF is biphasic and is primarily influenced by the initial HBV load. However, the clinical significance of such an association remains moderate, and TDF can be efficiently included in the highly active antiretroviral therapy regimen of HIV–HBV-co-infected patients, regardless of HBV strains and their degree of replication.

Missed opportunities for HIV testing in newly-HIV-diagnosed patients, a cross sectional study

BackgroundIn France, 1/3 HIV-infected patients is diagnosed at an advanced stage of the disease. We describe missed opportunities for earlier HIV testing in newly-HIV-diagnosed patients.MethodsCross sectional study. Adults living in France for ≥1 year, diagnosed with HIV-infection ≤6 months earlier, were included from 06/2009 to 10/2010. We collected information on patient characteristics at diagnosis, history of HIV testing, contacts with healthcare settings, and occurrence of HIV-related events 3 years prior to HIV diagnosis. During these 3 years, we assessed whether or not HIV testing had been proposed by the healthcare provider upon first contact in patients notifying that they were MSM or had HIV-related conditions.Results1,008 newly HIV-diagnosed patients (mean age: 39 years; male: 79%; MSM: 53%; diagnosed with an AIDS-defining event: 16%). During the 3-year period prior to HIV diagnosis, 99% of participants had frequented a healthcare setting and 89% had seen a general practitioner at least once a year. During a contact with a healthcare setting, 91/191 MSM (48%) with no HIV-related conditions, said being MSM; 50 of these (55%) did not have any HIV test proposal. Only 21% (41/191) of overall MSM who visited a healthcare provider received a test proposal. Likewise, 299/364 patients (82%) who sought care for s had a missed opportunity for HIV testing.ConclusionsUnder current screening policies, missed opportunities for HIV testing remain unacceptably high. This argues in favor of improving risk assessment, and HIV-related conditions recognition in all healthcare facilities.

Performance of 11 biomarkers for liver fibrosis assessment in HIV/HBV co-infected patients.

BACKGROUND/AIMS The aim of this study was to compare the performance of 11 biochemical scores to estimate liver fibrosis in HIV/HBV co-infection. METHODS Performance was evaluated using the Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve method. The Kappa index was used to study overall agreement with liver biopsy results. Interpretative algorithms were established by optimizing sensitivity and specificity and the percentage of correctly classified patients. RESULTS One hundred and eight patients (F0-F1, n = 47; F2, n = 28; F3, n = 17; F4, n = 16) were considered for the evaluation of serum biomarker performance. The AUROCs of the Fibrotest, Hepascore, Fibrometer, and Zengs scores ranged from 0.74 to 0.77 for significant fibrosis (> or = F2), from 0.79 to 0.84 for advanced fibrosis (> or = F3) and from 0.87 to 0.92 for cirrhosis (F4). Thresholds defined for each stage of fibrosis were close to those previously published for the Fibrotest and Hepascore. Strict concordance with biopsies correctly classified 50% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS Fibrotest, Fibrometer, Hepascore, and Zengs score were the most accurate non-invasive biochemical scores for liver fibrosis assessment in HIV/HBV co-infection. Global performance of biomarkers was not significantly improved by a decision tree combining the results of two biochemical scores.

Epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of chronic hepatitis B in HIV-infected patients (EPIB 2005 STUDY).

Objective:To describe the characteristics of hepatitis B (HBV) infection in HIV-infected patients and the impact of anti-HBV treatments. Patients and methods:All the patients with past or present chronic HBV infection seen in October 2005 in 17 French hospitals were included. Data were retrospectively collected from their first visit in a time-dependent manner, through a detailed standardized questionnaire. Results:Among 477 HBV-infected patients, 261 (55%) were co-infected with HIV. The HBV–HIV co-infected patients underwent fewer serological, virological and histological evaluations. Initial positive HBe antigenemia (HBe Ag) was more frequent in these patients (57.9 versus 28.6%; P < 10−4), as was cirrhosis on the initial liver biopsy (17.9 versus 7.6%; P = 0.05). Throughout the mean 5-year follow-up, HBe Ag loss was less frequent (P = 0.04), as was HBe seroconversion (incidence rate 2.6 versus 10/100 patient-years; P < 10−3). HBe Ag loss was associated with fibrosis improvement (METAVIR score −0.5 ± 0.4 versus +0.2 ± 0.6 if persistent positive HBe Ag, P = 0.01). In co-infected patients on tenofovir, adefovir or interferon, HBe seroconversions were seen in patients on combined HBV treatment, the use of which is increasing (58% in 2005). Nevertheless, no significant difference in virological, immunological or biochemical evolution was observed between these different treatments. Conclusions:In HBV–HIV co-infected patients, the assessment of HBV infection still needs to be improved, the HBV wild-type remains predominant, and HBe Ag loss is rare and associated with a better histological evolution. There is insufficient evidence of the superiority of combined HBV treatment, and this still needs be demonstrated in long term studies.

Reducing the neglected burden of viral hepatitis in Africa: Strategies for a global approach

The burden of liver disease may dramatically increase in the near future in Africa, where screening and access to care and treatment are hampered by inadequate disease surveillance, lack of high-quality tools to assess chronic liver disease, and underestimated needs for human and financial resources. Chronic hepatitis may be considered as silent and neglected killer, fuelled by many years of global inertia from stakeholders and policy makers alike. However, the global battle against viral hepatitis is facing a new era owing to the advent of highly effective drugs, innovative tools for screening and clinical follow-up, and recent signs that governments, advocacy groups and global health organizations are mobilizing to advocate universal access-to-treatment. This review details the barriers to prevention, screening and treatment of viral hepatitis on the African continent, focuses on the urgent need for operational and research programmes, and suggests integrated ways to tackle the global epidemic.

HIV/hepatitis B virus co-infection: current challenges and new strategies

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, which affects 7%-10% of HIV-infected patients, is associated with an increased frequency of AIDS-related and non-AIDS-related clinical endpoints, such as end-stage liver diseases including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Broad access to a very efficient antiviral therapy containing nucleos(t)ide analogues with dual activity against HBV and HIV reverse transcriptases has initiated a transition in the paradigm of HBV control in the context of HIV-induced immunosuppression. The control of viral replication is not currently such a problem, but preventing the emergence of HBV polymerase and surface gene mutants after prolonged exposure to nucleos(t)ides and their consequences in terms of HBV vaccine escape are the next long-term challenges. Another challenge is the prevention of end-stage liver disease in an ageing population, in whom non-invasive markers of liver fibrosis, although used more frequently as a substitute for liver biopsy, are not the panacea. Finally, access to prevention, diagnosis, care and treatment of HBV infection remains a major issue in developing countries, including most regions of Africa and Asia, where HBV is endemic and the epidemic of HIV infection is still thriving.