Karl-Axel Johansson

Outcome in a prospective phase II trial of medically inoperable stage I non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.

PURPOSE The impact of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) on 3-year progression-free survival of medically inoperable patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was analyzed in a prospective phase II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifty-seven patients with T1NOMO (70%) and T2N0M0 (30%) were included between August 2003 and September 2005 at seven different centers in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark and observed up to 36 months. SBRT was delivered with 15 Gy times three at the 67% isodose of the planning target volume. RESULTS Progression-free survival at 3 years was 52%. Overall- and cancer-specific survival at 1, 2, and 3 years was 86%, 65%, 60%, and 93%, 88%, 88%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in survival between patients with T1 or T2 tumors. At a median follow-up of 35 months (range, 4 to 47 months), 27 patients (47%) were deceased, seven as a result of lung cancer and 20 as a result of concurrent disease. Kaplan-Meier estimated local control at 3 years was 92%. Local relapse was observed in four patients (7%). Regional relapse was observed in three patients (5%). Nine patients (16%) developed distant metastases. The estimated risk of all failure (local, regional, or distant metastases) was increased in patients with T2 (41%) compared with those with T1 (18%) tumors (P = .027). CONCLUSION With a 3-year local tumor control rate higher than 90% with limited toxicity, SBRT emerges as state-of-the-art treatment for medically inoperable stage I NSCLC and may even challenge surgery in operable instances.

Factors important for efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy of medically inoperable stage I lung cancer. A retrospective analysis of patients treated in the Nordic countries

We reviewed results of SBRT treatment of 138 patients with medically inoperable stage I NSCLC treated during 1996–2003 at five different centres in Sweden and Denmark. Mean age was 74 years (range 56–90) with 69 men and 72 women. SBRT was delivered using a 3D conformal multifield technique and a stereotactic body frame. Doses delivered were 30–48 Gy (65% isodose at the periphery of planning target volume, PTV) in 2–4 fractions. Equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) was in the range of 50–100 Gy. Mean gross tumour volume (GTV) was 39 cm3 (2–436), and planning target volume was 101 cm3 (11–719). Overall response rate (CR, PR) was 61% (84/138). SD was noted in 36% (50/138). During a median follow-up period of 33 months (1–107), 16 (12%) local failures occurred, ten of which also included distant metastases. Local failure was associated with tumour size, target definition and central or pleura proximity. Distant metastases occurred in 25% (35/138) of the patients. Ninety-one (65%) patients died during follow-up of which 55 patients (60%) died of other causes than lung cancer. Three- and 5-year overall survival was 52 and 26% respectively. Lung cancer specific 3- and 5-year overall survival was 66 and 40% respectively. Fifty nine percent (83/138) of the patients had no side effects. Fourteen patients experienced grade 3–4 toxicity according to radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG). EQD2 (> v.s.<55.6 Gy) showed a statistically significant benefit survival for the higher doses. SBRT for stage I NSCLC results in favourable local control not inferior to fractionated RT and with acceptable toxicity.

Soft tissue sarcoma after treatment for breast cancer--a Swedish population-based study.

The aim was to quantify the risk of post-treatment sarcoma in breast cancer patients. All 122,991 women with a breast cancer from 1958 to 1992 in the Swedish Cancer Register were followed up for soft tissue sarcomas and 116 were found, giving a standardised incidence ratio of 1.9 (95% CI 1.5-2.2). The absolute risk was 1.3 per 10(4) person-years. The sarcomas were located in the breast region or on the ipsilateral arm in 63% (67/106). There were 40 angiosarcomas and 76 sarcomas of other types. In a case-control study, angiosarcoma correlated significantly with lymphoedema of the arm, odds ratio (OR) 9.5 (95% CI 3.2-28.0), but no correlation with radiotherapy was observed. For other types of sarcoma there was a correlation with the integral dose. The dose-response relationship indicated that the risk increased linearly with the integral dose to 150-200 J and stabilised at higher energies. The OR was 2.4 (95% CI 1.4-4.2) for an energy of 50 J, approximately corresponding to the radiation of the breast after breast-conserving surgery. Thus, only oedema of the arm correlated with angiosarcoma, but for other types of sarcoma the integral dose of radiotherapy was a predictor of the risk.

Radiation-induced rib fractures after hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy of non-small cell lung cancer: A dose– and volume–response analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The aim of this study is to analyse the dose-response and the volume-response of radiation-induced rib fractures after hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS During the period 1998-2005, 68 patients with medically inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were treated with hypofractionated SBRT to 45 Gy in 3 fractions. Among the 33 patients with complete treatment records and radiographic follow-up exceeding 15 months (median: 29 months), 13 fractures were found in seven patients. Identifying all ribs receiving at least 21 Gy, 81 ribs (13 with and 68 without fracture) in 26 patients were separately contoured and their dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were obtained. The DVHs were assessed with the mean dose and cut-off models. Maximum likelihood estimation was used to fit dose-response and volume-response curves to each model. RESULTS It was possible to quantify the risk of radiation-induced rib fracture using response curves and information contained in the DVHs. Absolute volumes provided better fits than relative volumes and dose-response curves were more suitable than volume-response curves. For the dose given by the 2 cm(3) cut-off volume, D(2 cm(3)), the logistic dose-response curve for three fractions was parameterised by D(50)=49.8 Gy and gamma(50)=2.05. Consequently, for a median follow-up of 29 months, if D(2 cm(3))<3 x 7.0 Gy the risk is close to 0, and the 5% and 50% risks are given by D(2 cm(3))=3 x 9.1 Gy and 3 x 16.6 Gy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In this group of patients, the risk for radiation-induced rib fracture following hypofractionated SBRT was related to the dose to 2 cm(3) of the rib.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for medically inoperable patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer – A first report of toxicity related to COPD/CVD in a non-randomized prospective phase II study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS In a retrospective study using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in medically inoperable patients with stage I NSCLC we previously reported a local control rate of 88% utilizing a median dose of 15Gyx3. This report records the toxicity encountered in a prospective phase II trial, and its relation to coexisting chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cardio vascular disease (CVD). MATERIAL AND METHODS Sixty patients were entered in the study between August 2003 and September 2005. Fifty-seven patients (T1 65%, T2 35%) with a median age of 75 years (59-87 years) were evaluable. The baseline mean FEV1% was 64% and median Karnofsky index was 80. A total dose of 45Gy was delivered in three fractions at the 67% isodose of the PTV. Clinical, pulmonary and radiological evaluations were made at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 36 months post-SBRT. Toxicity was graded according to CTC v2.0 and performance status was graded according to the Karnofsky scale. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 23 months, 2 patients had relapsed locally. No grade 4 or 5 toxicity was reported. Grade 3 toxicity was seen in 12 patients (21%). There was no significant decline of FEV1% during follow-up. Low grade pneumonitis developed to the same extent in the CVD 3/17 (18%) and COPD 7/40 (18%) groups. The incidence of fibrosis was 9/17 (53%) and pleural effusions was 8/17 (47%) in the CVD group compared with 13/40 (33%) and 5/40 (13%) in the COPD group. CONCLUSION SBRT for stage I NSCLC patients who are medically inoperable because of COPD and CVD results in a favourable local control rate with a low incidence of grade 3 and no grade 4 or 5 toxicity.

Does electron and proton therapy reduce the risk of radiation induced cancer after spinal irradiation for childhood medulloblastoma? A comparative treatment planning study

Aim The aim of this treatment planning comparison study was to explore different spinal irradiation techniques with respect to the risk of late side-effects, particularly radiation-induced cancer. The radiotherapy techniques compared were conventional photon therapy, intensity modulated x-ray therapy (IMXT), conventional electron therapy, intensity/energy modulated electron therapy (IMET) and proton therapy (IMPT). Material and methods CT images for radiotherapy use from five children, median age 8 and diagnosed with medulloblastoma, were selected for this study. Target volumes and organs at risk were defined in 3-D. Treatment plans using conventional photon therapy, IMXT, conventional electron therapy, IMET and IMPT were set up. The probability of normal tissue complication (NTCP) and the risk of cancer induction were calculated using models with parameters-sets taken from published data for the general population; dose data were taken from dose volume histograms (DVH). Results Similar dose distributions in the targets were achieved with all techniques but the absorbed doses in the organs-at-risk varied significantly between the different techniques. The NTCP models based on available data predicted very low probabilities for side-effects in all cases. However, the effective mean doses outside the target volumes, and thus the predicted risk of cancer induction, varied significantly between the techniques. The highest lifetime risk of secondary cancers was estimated for IMXT (30%). The lowest risk was found with IMPT (4%). The risks associated with conventional photon therapy, electron therapy and IMET were 20%, 21% and 15%, respectively. Conclusion This model study shows that spinal irradiation of young children with photon and electron techniques results in a substantial risk of radiation-induced secondary cancers. Multiple beam IMXT seems to be associated with a particularly high risk of secondary cancer induction. To minimise this risk, IMPT should be the treatment of choice. If proton therapy is not available, advanced electron therapy may provide a better alternative.

Soft tissue sarcoma after treatment for breast cancer

In a register study all women in the West of Sweden Health Care Region with a breast cancer diagnosed between 1960 and 1980 (n = 13,490) were followed up in the Swedish Cancer Register to the end of 1988 for later occurrence of a soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Nineteen sarcomas were reported, whereas 8.7 were expected and the relative risk (RR) was 2.2 (CI 95% 1.3-3.4). The absolute risk was 1.7/10(4) person years (PY) in comparison with 0.8 expected. To obtain a more detailed analysis of the associations between arm lymphoedema, radiotherapy and STS development, and to control the quality of the register data, a case control study was also performed. Clinical records from the different hospitals in the region were collected for all the 19 cases as well as for three selected controls per case. The histopathology of the cases were reviewed, and one of the cases was reclassified as a malignant melanoma and excluded from further analysis. Thirteen of the cases were clustered around the treated breast area. To quantify the exposure to radiotherapy, the integral dose was estimated. The presence of lymphedema was included as a binary variable in the analysis. The exact conditional randomisation test indicated a significant correlation between the integral dose and the development of an STS (p = 0.008) and this association was still significant after stratification for arm oedema. A conditional logistic regression analysis with STS as the dependent variable and the integral dose as the explanatory variable gave an odds ratio (OR) of 5.2/100 J (CI 95% 1.3-21.2), and if this regression was restricted only to the STS developing in the radiation fields the OR was 3.2/100 J (CI 95% 0.8-12.9). Thus, the excess of STS in this breast cancer cohort was very low (0.9/10(4) PY). However the integral dose correlates well to the development of STS and can be useful in quantifying even small risks of secondary malignancies in the breast cancer population.

Potential advantages of protons over conventional radiation beams for paraspinal tumours

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Conformal treatment planning with megavoltage X-rays and protons was studied in an attempt to determine if there are advantage of boost therapy with protons instead of X-rays for a patient with a tumour growing around the cervical spinal cord. MATERIALS AND METHODS A patient with a Ewing sarcoma was selected for the model study. The proton boost plan was realised with a six beam patched technique. Several X-ray boost techniques were planned, some not yet practically realisable. The techniques giving the best dose distributions and the best tumour control probabilities in the absence of significant late toxicity were looked for. The boost techniques were added to two large lateral X-ray beams covering the planning target volume (PTV) and the main risk organ, the spinal cord. The evaluation was made with two biological models, i.e. the tumour control probability (TCP) model, proposed by Webb and Nahum (Webb, S. and Nahum, A.E. A model for calculating tumour control probability in radiotherapy including the effect of inhomogeneous distributions of dose and clonogenic cell density. Phys. Med. Biol. 38: 653-666, 1993), and the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model, first derived by Lyman (Lyman, J.T. Complication probability as assessed from dose-volume histograms. Radiat. Res. 104: s13-s19, 1985). RESULTS The comparison showed small but clear advantages of protons for the boost. At 1% NTCP in the spinal cord, the calculated TCP was on average 5% higher. However, depending on the values of the parameters chosen in the biological models, the gain for protons varied from 0-10%. The smallest gains were seen in radiosensitive tumours for which the TCP was close to 100% with any of the techniques and in radioresistant tumours for which neither technique resulted in any appreciable probability of local cure. CONCLUSION Protons appear to have therapeutic advantages over conventional radiotherapy in tumours with relatively high radiosensitivity situated close to the spinal cord.

A review of the impact of photon and proton external beam radiotherapy treatment modalities on the dose distribution in field and out-of-field; implications for the long-term morbidity of cancer survivors

The use of untraditional treatment modalities for external beam radiotherapy such as intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and proton beam therapy is increasing. This review focuses on the changes in the dose distribution and the impact on radiation related risks for long-term cancer survivors. We compare conventional radiotherapy, IMRT, and proton beam therapy based on published treatment planning studies as well as published measurements and Monte Carlo simulations of out-of-field dose distributions. Physical dose parameters describing the dose distribution in the target volume, the conformity index, the dose distribution in organs at risk, and the dose distribution in non-target tissue, respectively, are extracted from the treatment planning studies. Measured out-of-field dose distributions are presented as the dose equivalent as a function of distance from the treatment field. Data in the literature clearly shows that, compared with conventional radiotherapy, IMRT improves the dose distribution in the target volume, which may increase the probability of tumor control. IMRT also seems to increase the out-of-field dose distribution, as well as the irradiated non-target volume, although the data is not consistent, leading to a potentially increased risk of radiation induced secondary malignancies, while decreasing the dose to normal tissues close to the target volume, reducing the normal tissue complication probability. Protons show no or only minor advantage on the dose distribution in the target volume and the conformity index compared to IMRT. However, the data consistently shows that proton beam therapy substantially decreases the OAR average dose compared to the other two techniques. It is also clear that protons provide an improved dose distribution in non-target tissues compared to conventional radiotherapy and IMRT. IMRT and proton beam therapy may significantly improve tumor control for cancer patients and quality of life for long-term cancer survivors.

Quality assurance control in the EORTC cooperative group of radiotherapy. 3. Intercomparison in an anatomical phantom

Two papers concerning the quality control study organised by the EORTC (European Organisation for Research on Treatment of Cancer) Cooperative Group on Radiotherapy have been published. The medical profile (part 1) and the dosimetric intercomparison (part 2) of the participating institutions were presented. This part (paper 3) presents an integrated clinical and dosimetric investigation in an anatomical phantom. A tonsillar tumour and a homolateral subdigastric node were marked in an anatomical phantom. The institutions were asked to treat the phantom once like an ordinary patient. The phantom was loaded with dosimeters and irradiated. From the results obtained, it can be concluded that we did not find any major dosimetric problem related to absorbed dose calibration or calculation in the phantom. However, several major problems were related to non-optimal planning, treatment technique and dose distribution. The investigation shows the importance of a quality assurance programme for cooperative groups.