Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Karl Kieburtz is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Karl Kieburtz.


Neurology | 2007

Projected number of people with Parkinson disease in the most populous nations, 2005 through 2030

E. R. Dorsey; Radu Constantinescu; Joel P. Thompson; Kevin M. Biglan; Robert G. Holloway; Karl Kieburtz; Frederick Marshall; Bernard Ravina; Giovanni Schifitto; Andrew Siderowf; Caroline M. Tanner

Based on published prevalence studies, we used two different methodologies to project the number of individuals with Parkinson disease (PD) in Western Europe’s 5 most and the world’s 10 most populous nations. The number of individuals with PD over age 50 in these countries was between 4.1 and 4.6 million in 2005 and will double to between 8.7 and 9.3 million by 2030.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2014

Phase 3 Trials of Solanezumab for Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer's Disease

Rachelle S. Doody; Ronald G. Thomas; Martin R. Farlow; Takeshi Iwatsubo; Bruno Vellas; Steven Joffe; Karl Kieburtz; Rema Raman; Xiaoying Sun; Paul S. Aisen; Eric Siemers; Hong Liu-Seifert; Richard C. Mohs

BACKGROUND Alzheimers disease is characterized by amyloid-beta plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, gliosis, and neuronal loss. Solanezumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody, preferentially binds soluble forms of amyloid and in preclinical studies promoted its clearance from the brain. METHODS In two phase 3, double-blind trials (EXPEDITION 1 and EXPEDITION 2), we randomly assigned 1012 and 1040 patients, respectively, with mild-to-moderate Alzheimers disease to receive placebo or solanezumab (administered intravenously at a dose of 400 mg) every 4 weeks for 18 months. The primary outcomes were the changes from baseline to week 80 in scores on the 11-item cognitive subscale of the Alzheimers Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-cog11; range, 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating greater cognitive impairment) and the Alzheimers Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living scale (ADCS-ADL; range, 0 to 78, with lower scores indicating worse functioning). After analysis of data from EXPEDITION 1, the primary outcome for EXPEDITION 2 was revised to the change in scores on the 14-item cognitive subscale of the Alzheimers Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-cog14; range, 0 to 90, with higher scores indicating greater impairment), in patients with mild Alzheimers disease. RESULTS Neither study showed significant improvement in the primary outcomes. The modeled difference between groups (solanezumab group minus placebo group) in the change from baseline was -0.8 points for the ADAS-cog11 score (95% confidence interval [CI], -2.1 to 0.5; P=0.24) and -0.4 points for the ADCS-ADL score (95% CI, -2.3 to 1.4; P=0.64) in EXPEDITION 1 and -1.3 points (95% CI, -2.5 to 0.3; P=0.06) and 1.6 points (95% CI, -0.2 to 3.3; P=0.08), respectively, in EXPEDITION 2. Between-group differences in the changes in the ADAS-cog14 score were -1.7 points in patients with mild Alzheimers disease (95% CI, -3.5 to 0.1; P=0.06) and -1.5 in patients with moderate Alzheimers disease (95% CI, -4.1 to 1.1; P=0.26). In the combined safety data set, the incidence of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities with edema or hemorrhage was 0.9% with solanezumab and 0.4% with placebo for edema (P=0.27) and 4.9% and 5.6%, respectively, for hemorrhage (P=0.49). CONCLUSIONS Solanezumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds amyloid, failed to improve cognition or functional ability. (Funded by Eli Lilly; EXPEDITION 1 and 2 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00905372 and NCT00904683.).


Journal of NeuroVirology | 2002

HIV-associated cognitive impairment before and after the advent of combination therapy

Ned Sacktor; Michael P. McDermott; Karen Marder; Giovanni Schifitto; Ola A. Selnes; Justin C. McArthur; Yaakov Stern; S. M. Albert; Donna Palumbo; Karl Kieburtz; Joy A. De Marcaida; Bruce A. Cohen; Leon Epstein

The objective of this study was to describe the occurrence of HIV dementia and neuropsychological testing abnormalities in a new cohort of HIV-seropositive individuals at high risk for HIV dementia and to compare these results to a cohort before the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). HAART has been associated with improvements in cognitive performance in some HIV-infected patients. However, it is uncertain whether HAART has changed the frequency of specific neurocognitive abnormalities. Baseline data from 272 HIV-seropositive subjects in the Dana cohort recruited from January, 1994, to December, 1995, and 251 HIV-seropositive subjects in the Northeastern AIDS Dementia Consortium (NEAD) cohort recruited from April, 1998, to August, 1999, were compared. Participants in both cohorts received nearly identical assessments. After adjusting for differences in age, education, gender, race, and CD4 count between the two cohorts, there were no differences in the occurrence of HIV dementia or abnormalities either 1 SD or 2 SDs below established norms for any of the neuropsychological tests. Even though HAART has reduced the incidence of HIV dementia, HIV-associated cognitive impairment continues to be a major clinical problem among individuals with advanced infection.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2013

A Phase 3 Trial of Semagacestat for Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease

Rachelle S. Doody; Rema Raman; Martin R. Farlow; Takeshi Iwatsubo; Bruno Vellas; Steven Joffe; Karl Kieburtz; Feng He; Xiaoying Sun; Ronald G. Thomas; Paul S. Aisen; Eric Siemers; Gopalan Sethuraman; Richard C. Mohs

BACKGROUND Alzheimers disease is characterized by the presence of cortical amyloid-beta (Aβ) protein plaques, which result from the sequential action of β-secretase and γ-secretase on amyloid precursor protein. Semagacestat is a small-molecule γ-secretase inhibitor that was developed as a potential treatment for Alzheimers disease. METHODS We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which 1537 patients with probable Alzheimers disease underwent randomization to receive 100 mg of semagacestat, 140 mg of semagacestat, or placebo daily. Changes in cognition from baseline to week 76 were assessed with the use of the cognitive subscale of the Alzheimers Disease Assessment Scale for cognition (ADAS-cog), on which scores range from 0 to 70 and higher scores indicate greater cognitive impairment, and changes in functioning were assessed with the Alzheimers Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) scale, on which scores range from 0 to 78 and higher scores indicate better functioning. A mixed-model repeated-measures analysis was used. RESULTS The trial was terminated before completion on the basis of a recommendation by the data and safety monitoring board. At termination, there were 189 patients in the group receiving placebo, 153 patients in the group receiving 100 mg of semagacestat, and 121 patients in the group receiving 140 mg of semagacestat. The ADAS-cog scores worsened in all three groups (mean change, 6.4 points in the placebo group, 7.5 points in the group receiving 100 mg of the study drug, and 7.8 points in the group receiving 140 mg; P=0.15 and P=0.07, respectively, for the comparison with placebo). The ADCS-ADL scores also worsened in all groups (mean change at week 76, -9.0 points in the placebo group, -10.5 points in the 100-mg group, and -12.6 points in the 140-mg group; P=0.14 and P<0.001, respectively, for the comparison with placebo). Patients treated with semagacestat lost more weight and had more skin cancers and infections, treatment discontinuations due to adverse events, and serious adverse events (P<0.001 for all comparisons with placebo). Laboratory abnormalities included reduced levels of lymphocytes, T cells, immunoglobulins, albumin, total protein, and uric acid and elevated levels of eosinophils, monocytes, and cholesterol; the urine pH was also elevated. CONCLUSIONS As compared with placebo, semagacestat did not improve cognitive status, and patients receiving the higher dose had significant worsening of functional ability. Semagacestat was associated with more adverse events, including skin cancers and infections. (Funded by Eli Lilly; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00594568.)


Lancet Neurology | 2010

Gene delivery of AAV2-neurturin for Parkinson's disease: a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial

William J. Marks; Raymond T. Bartus; Joao Siffert; Charles S Davis; Andres M. Lozano; Nicholas M. Boulis; Jerrold L. Vitek; Mark Stacy; Dennis A. Turner; Leonard Verhagen; Roy A. E. Bakay; Raymond G. Watts; Barton L. Guthrie; Joseph Jankovic; Richard K. Simpson; Michele Tagliati; Ron L. Alterman; Matthew B. Stern; Gordon H. Baltuch; Philip A. Starr; Paul S. Larson; Jill L. Ostrem; John G. Nutt; Karl Kieburtz; Jeffrey H. Kordower; C. Warren Olanow

BACKGROUND In an open-label phase 1 trial, gene delivery of the trophic factor neurturin via an adeno-associated type-2 vector (AAV2) was well tolerated and seemed to improve motor function in patients with advanced Parkinsons disease. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of AAV2-neurturin in a double-blind, phase 2 randomised trial. METHODS We did a multicentre, double-blind, sham-surgery controlled trial in patients with advanced Parkinsons disease. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) by a central, computer generated, randomisation code to receive either AAV2-neurturin (5·4 × 10¹¹ vector genomes) injected bilaterally into the putamen or sham surgery. All patients and study personnel with the exception of the neurosurgical team were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to 12 months in the motor subscore of the unified Parkinsons disease rating scale in the practically-defined off state. All randomly assigned patients who had at least one assessment after baseline were included in the primary analyses. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00400634. RESULTS Between December, 2006, and November, 2008, 58 patients from nine sites in the USA participated in the trial. There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint in patients treated with AAV2-neurturin compared with control individuals (difference -0·31 [SE 2·63], 95% CI -5·58 to 4·97; p=0·91). Serious adverse events occurred in 13 of 38 patients treated with AAV2-neurturin and four of 20 control individuals. Three patients in the AAV2-neurturin group and two in the sham surgery group developed tumours. INTERPRETATION Intraputaminal AAV2-neurturin is not superior to sham surgery when assessed using the UPDRS motor score at 12 months. However, the possibility of a benefit with additional targeting of the substantia nigra and longer term follow-up should be investigated in further studies. FUNDING Ceregene and Michael J Fox Foundation for Parkinsons Research.


Progress in Neurobiology | 2011

The Parkinson Progression Marker Initiative (PPMI)

Kenneth Marek; Danna Jennings; Shirley Lasch; Andrew Siderowf; Caroline M. Tanner; Tanya Simuni; Christopher S. Coffey; Karl Kieburtz; Emily Flagg; Sohini Chowdhury; Werner Poewe; Brit Mollenhauer; Todd Sherer; Mark Frasier; Claire Meunier; Alice Rudolph; Cindy Casaceli; John Seibyl; Susan Mendick; Norbert Schuff; Ying Zhang; Arthur W. Toga; Karen Crawford; Alison Ansbach; Pasquale de Blasio; Michele Piovella; John Q. Trojanowski; Les Shaw; Andrew Singleton; Keith A. Hawkins

The Parkinson Progression Marker Initiative (PPMI) is a comprehensive observational, international, multi-center study designed to identify PD progression biomarkers both to improve understanding of disease etiology and course and to provide crucial tools to enhance the likelihood of success of PD modifying therapeutic trials. The PPMI cohort will comprise 400 recently diagnosed PD and 200 healthy subjects followed longitudinally for clinical, imaging and biospecimen biomarker assessment using standardized data acquisition protocols at twenty-one clinical sites. All study data will be integrated in the PPMI study database and will be rapidly and publically available through the PPMI web site- www.ppmi-info.org. Biological samples including longitudinal collection of blood, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and urine will be available to scientists by application to an independent PPMI biospecimen review committee also through the PPMI web site. PPMI will rely on a partnership of government, PD foundations, industry and academics working cooperatively. This approach is crucial to enhance the potential for success of this ambitious strategy to develop PD progression biomarkers that will accelerate research in disease modifying therapeutics.


Neurology | 2002

Treatment of ADHD in children with tics: A randomized controlled trial

Roger Kurlan; C. G. Goetz; Michael P. McDermott; Sandra Plumb; Harvey Singer; Leon S. Dure; Peter Como; Floyd R. Sallee; Cathy L. Budman; Barbara Coffey; Jorge Juncos; Jonathan W. Mink; Glenn T. Stebbins; Paul Tuite; Lauren Seeberger; William E. Pelham; Donna Palumbo; Joseph Giuliano; Madeline Krieger; Jane B. Lane; Nancy Pearson; Lauren Sine; Kathy Parsons; Sara Peters; Denise Thorne-Petrizzi; Ken Parks; Grace Kim; Kathleen Craddock; Colleen Wood; Jennifer Randle

BACKGROUND The treatment of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and Tourette syndrome (TS) has been problematic because methylphenidate (MPH)--the most commonly used drug to treat ADHD--has been reported to worsen tics and because clonidine (CLON)--the most commonly prescribed alternative--has unproven efficacy. METHODS The authors conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial in which 136 children with ADHD and a chronic tic disorder were randomly administered CLON alone, MPH alone, combined CLON + MPH, or placebo (2 x 2 factorial design). Each subject participated for 16 weeks (weeks 1-4 CLON/placebo dose titration, weeks 5-8 added MPH/placebo dose titration, weeks 9-16 maintenance therapy). RESULTS Thirty-seven children were administered MPH alone, 34 were administered CLON alone, 33 were administered CLON + MPH, and 32 were administered placebo. For our primary outcome measure of ADHD (Conners Abbreviated Symptom Questionnaire--Teacher), significant improvement occurred for subjects assigned to CLON (p < 0.002) and those assigned to MPH (p < 0.003). Compared with placebo, the greatest benefit occurred with combined CLON + MPH (p < 0.0001). CLON appeared to be most helpful for impulsivity and hyperactivity; MPH appeared to be most helpful for inattention. The proportion of individual subjects reporting a worsening of tics as an adverse effect was no higher in those treated with MPH (20%) than those being administered CLON alone (26%) or placebo (22%). Compared with placebo, measured tic severity lessened in all active treatment groups in the following order: CLON + MPH, CLON alone, MPH alone. Sedation was common with CLON treatment (28% reported moderate or severe sedation), but otherwise the drugs were tolerated well, including absence of any evident cardiac toxicity. CONCLUSIONS Methylphenidate and clonidine (particularly in combination) are effective for ADHD in children with comorbid tics. Prior recommendations to avoid methylphenidate in these children because of concerns of worsening tics are unsupported by this trial.


Neurology | 2005

The role of radiotracer imaging in Parkinson disease

Bernard Ravina; David Eidelberg; J. E. Ahlskog; Roger L. Albin; David J. Brooks; Maren Carbon; Vijay Dhawan; Andrew Feigin; Stanley Fahn; Mark Guttman; Katrina Gwinn-Hardy; Henry F. McFarland; Robert B. Innis; R. G. Katz; Karl Kieburtz; Stephen J. Kish; N. Lange; J. W. Langston; Kenneth Marek; L. Morin; Claudia S. Moy; Declan Murphy; Wolfgang H. Oertel; G. Oliver; Yuko Y. Palesch; William J. Powers; John Seibyl; Kapil D. Sethi; Clifford W. Shults; P. Sheehy

Radiotracer imaging (RTI) of the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system is a widely used but controversial biomarker in Parkinson disease (PD). Here the authors review the concepts of biomarker development and the evidence to support the use of four radiotracers as biomarkers in PD: [18F]fluorodopa PET, (+)-[11C]dihydrotetrabenazine PET, [123I]β-CIT SPECT, and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET. Biomarkers used to study disease biology and facilitate drug discovery and early human trials rely on evidence that they are measuring relevant biologic processes. The four tracers fulfill this criterion, although they do not measure the number or density of dopaminergic neurons. Biomarkers used as diagnostic tests, prognostic tools, or surrogate endpoints must not only have biologic relevance but also a strong linkage to the clinical outcome of interest. No radiotracers fulfill these criteria, and current evidence does not support the use of imaging as a diagnostic tool in clinical practice or as a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials. Mechanistic information added by RTI to clinical trials may be difficult to interpret because of uncertainty about the interaction between the interventions and the tracer.


Neurology | 2000

Rate of functional decline in Huntington’s disease

Karen Marder; Hongwei Zhao; Richard H. Myers; Merit Cudkowicz; Elise Kayson; Karl Kieburtz; Constance Orme; Jane S. Paulsen; John B. Penney; Eric Siemers; Ira Shoulson

Objective: To determine the rate of functional decline in a large cohort of patients with Huntington’s disease (HD) followed at 43 sites by the Huntington Study Group (HSG). Methods: The annual rate of functional decline was measured using the Total Functional Capacity Scale (TFC) and the Independence Scale (IS) in 960 patients with definite HD followed prospectively for a mean of 18.3 months. All patients were rated with the Unified Huntington’s Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS). Sample size calculations for hypothetical clinical trials were calculated. Results: A factor analysis of the UHDRS at baseline yielded 15 factors accounting for 77% of the variance. The TFC score declined at a rate of 0.72 units/year (standard error [SE] 0.04) and the IS score declined at a rate of 4.52 units/year (SE 0.23). Lower TFC score at baseline, indicating more severe impairment, was associated with less rapid annual decline in TFC score, perhaps reflecting the floor effect of the scale. The annual rate of decline for 575 patients with baseline TFC scores of 7 to 13 was 0.97 (SE 0.06), was 0.38 (SE 0.08) for 270 patients with baseline TFC scores of 3 to 6, and was 0.06 (SE 0.1) for 101 patients with TFC scores of 0 to 2. In multivariate analysis (n = 960), longer disease duration and better cognitive status at baseline were associated with a less rapid rate of decline in TFC score, whereas depressive symptomatology was the only factor associated with more rapid decline on the IS score. Age at onset of HD, sex, weight, and education did not affect decline on either score. Conclusions: The comparable rates of decline on the TFC and the IS scores with other published studies suggest that these estimates of functional decline are representative of HD patients who are evaluated at HSG research sites. In longitudinal analysis, longer disease duration and better neuropsychological performance at baseline were associated with a less rapid rate of decline in TFC score, whereas depressive symptomatology at baseline was associated with a more rapid decline in the IS score. These rates of functional decline and the covariates that modify them should be considered in estimating statistical power and designing future therapeutic trials involving HD patients with early or moderately severe disease.


Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2003

Gabapentin’s effects on hot flashes in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial☆

Thomas Guttuso; Roger Kurlan; Michael P. McDermott; Karl Kieburtz

OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether treatment with the anticonvulsant gabapentin may be effective in reducing hot flash frequency and severity. METHODS A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 59 postmenopausal women with seven or more hot flashes per day examining the effects of gabapentin 900 mg per day on hot flash frequency after 12 weeks of treatment. Subsequently, study patients were enrolled in a 5-week, open-label treatment phase, during which patients could increase the dose of gabapentin to 2700 mg per day, if needed. RESULTS After 12 weeks of double-blind treatment, intention-to-treat analysis showed that gabapentin 900 mg per day was associated with a 45% reduction in hot flash frequency and a 54% reduction in hot flash composite score (frequency and severity combined into one score) from baseline, compared with 29% (P = .02) and 31% (P = .01) reductions, respectively, for placebo. Four patients (13%) in the gabapentin group and one (3%) in the placebo group withdrew from the double-blind study because of adverse events. Fifteen patients (50.0%) in the gabapentin group reported at least one adverse event, compared with eight patients (27.6%) in the placebo group. Higher, open-label gabapentin dosing was associated with 54% and 67% reductions in hot flash frequency and composite score from baseline, respectively. CONCLUSION Gabapentin is effective in reducing hot flash frequency and severity in postmenopausal women.

Collaboration


Dive into the Karl Kieburtz's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ira Shoulson

University of Rochester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Oakes

University of Rochester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C. Warren Olanow

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Scott Y. H. Kim

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge