Karl P. Nightingale

Methylation at arginine 17 of histone H3 is linked to gene activation

The nuclear hormone receptor co‐activator CARM1 has the potential to methylate histone H3 at arginine residues in vitro. The methyltransferase activity of CARM1 is necessary for its co‐activator functions in transient transfection assays. However, the role of this methyltransferase in vivo is unclear, given that methylation of arginines is not easily detectable on histones. We have raised an antibody that specifically recognizes methylated arginine 17 (R17) of histone H3, the major site of methylation by CARM1. Using this antibody we show that methylated R17 exists in vivo. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis shows that R17 methylation on histone H3 is dramatically upregulated when the estrogen receptor‐regulated pS2 gene is activated. Coincident with the appearance of methylated R17, CARM1 is found associated with the histones on the pS2 gene. Together these results demonstrate that CARM1 is recruited to an active promoter and that CARM1‐mediated R17 methylation on histone H3 takes place in vivo during this active state.

Critical Role for the Histone H4 N Terminus in Nucleosome Remodeling by ISWI

ABSTRACT The ATPase ISWI can be considered the catalytic core of several multiprotein nucleosome remodeling machines. Alone or in the context of nucleosome remodeling factor, the chromatin accessibility complex (CHRAC), or ACF, ISWI catalyzes a number of ATP-dependent transitions of chromatin structure that are currently best explained by its ability to induce nucleosome sliding. In addition, ISWI can function as a nucleosome spacing factor during chromatin assembly, where it will trigger the ordering of newly assembled nucleosomes into regular arrays. Both nucleosome remodeling and nucleosome spacing reactions are mechanistically unexplained. As a step toward defining the interaction of ISWI with its substrate during nucleosome remodeling and chromatin assembly we generated a set of nucleosomes lacking individual histone N termini from recombinant histones. We found the conserved N termini (the N-terminal tails) of histone H4 essential to stimulate ISWI ATPase activity, in contrast to other histone tails. Remarkably, the H4 N terminus, but none of the other tails, was critical for CHRAC-induced nucleosome sliding and for the generation of regularity in nucleosomal arrays by ISWI. Direct nucleosome binding studies did not reflect a dependence on the H4 tail for ISWI-nucleosome interactions. We conclude that the H4 tail is critically required for nucleosome remodeling and spacing at a step subsequent to interaction with the substrate.

Cross-talk between Histone Modifications in Response to Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors MLL4 LINKS HISTONE H3 ACETYLATION AND HISTONE H3K4 METHYLATION

Histones are subject to a wide variety of post-translational modifications that play a central role in gene activation and silencing. We have used histone modification-specific antibodies to demonstrate that two histone modifications involved in gene activation, histone H3 acetylation and H3 lysine 4 methylation, are functionally linked. This interaction, in which the extent of histone H3 acetylation determines both the abundance and the “degree” of H3K4 methylation, plays a major role in the epigenetic response to histone deacetylase inhibitors. A combination of in vivo knockdown experiments and in vitro methyltransferase assays shows that the abundance of H3K4 methylation is regulated by the activities of two opposing enzyme activities, the methyltransferase MLL4, which is stimulated by acetylated substrates, and a novel and as yet unidentified H3K4me3 demethylase.

Histone acetylation facilitates RNA polymerase II transcription of the Drosophila hsp26 gene in chromatin.

A number of activators are known to increase transcription by RNA polymerase (pol) II through protein acetylation. While the physiological substrates for those acetylases are poorly defined, possible targets include general transcription factors, activator proteins and histones. Using a cell‐free system to reconstitute chromatin with increased histone acetylation levels, we directly tested for a causal role of histone acetylation in transcription by RNA pol II. Chromatin, containing either control or acetylated histones, was reconstituted to comparable nucleosome densities and characterized by electron microscopy after psoralen cross‐linking as well as by in vitro transcription. While H1‐containing control chromatin severely repressed transcription of our model hsp26 gene, highly acetylated chromatin was significantly less repressive. Acetylation of histones, and particularly of histone H4, affected transcription at the level of initiation. Monitoring the ability of the transcription machinery to associate with the promoter in chromatin, we found that heat shock factor, a crucial regulator of heat shock gene transcription, profited most from histone acetylation. These experiments demonstrate that histone acetylation can modulate activator access to their target sites in chromatin, and provide a causal link between histone acetylation and enhanced transcription initiation of RNA pol II in chromatin.

Two-step synergism between the progesterone receptor and the DNA-binding domain of nuclear factor 1 on MMTV minichromosomes.

In contrast to its behavior as naked DNA, the MMTV promoter assembled in minichromosomes can be activated synergistically by the progesterone receptor and NF1 in a process involving ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling. The DNA-binding domain of NF1 is required and sufficient for stable occupancy of all receptor-binding sites and for functional synergism. Activation of purified minichromosomes is observed in the absence of SWI/SNF and can be enhanced by recombinant ISWI. Receptor binding to minichromosomes recruits ISWI and NURF38, but not brahma. We propose a two-step synergism in which the receptor triggers a chromatin remodeling event that facilitates access of NF1, which in turn stabilizes an open nucleosomal conformation required for efficient binding of further receptor molecules and full transactivation.

Global Transcription Regulators of Eukaryotes

We would like to thank all speakers at the workshop for help in preparing this report and apologize to those whose work we could not describe in full detail because of space constraints. We are grateful to the organizers of the workshop, Pierre Chambon, Toshio Fukasawa, and Roger Kornberg, as well as to Lars Thelander for careful reading of the manuscript and to Patricia Ridgway for help with tables.

MAP kinase-mediated phosphorylation of distinct pools of histone H3 at S10 or S28 via mitogen- and stress-activated kinase 1/2

ERK and p38 MAP kinases, acting through the downstream mitogen- and stress-activated kinase 1/2 (MSK1/2), elicit histone H3 phosphorylation on a subfraction of nucleosomes – including those at Fos and Jun – concomitant with gene induction. S10 and S28 on the H3 tail have both been shown to be phospho-acceptors in vivo. Both phospho-epitopes appear with similar time-courses and both occur on H3 tails that are highly sensitive to TSA-induced hyperacetylation, similarities which might suggest that MSK1/2 phosphorylates both sites on the same H3 tails. Indeed, on recombinant histone octamers in vitro, MSK1 efficiently phosphorylates both sites on the same H3 tail. However, sequential immunoprecipitation studies show that antibodies against phosphorylated S10-H3 recover virtually all this epitope without depletion of phosphorylated S28-H3, and vice versa, indicating that the two phospho-epitopes are not located on the same H3 tail in vivo. Confocal immunocytochemistry confirms the clear physical separation of the two phospho-epitopes in the intact mouse nucleus. Finally, we used transfection-based experiments to test models that might explain such differential targeting. Overexpression and delocalisation of MSK1 does not result in the breakdown of targeting in vivo despite the fact that the ectopic kinase is fully activated by external stimuli. These studies reveal a remarkable level of targeting of S10 and S28 phosphorylation to distinct H3 tails within chromatin in the interphase mouse nucleus. Possible models for such exquisite targeting are discussed.

Recruitment of the Nucleolar Remodeling Complex NoRC Establishes Ribosomal DNA Silencing in Chromatin

ABSTRACT The rRNA gene cluster consists of multiple transcription units. Half of these are active, while the other half are transcriptionally inactive. Previously, in vivo studies have demonstrated that silencing of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) is mediated by the chromatin remodeling NoRC (nucleolar remodeling complex). To explore the mechanisms underlying NoRC-directed silencing of rDNA transcription, we investigated the effect of recombinant NoRC on RNA polymerase I transcription on reconstituted chromatin templates. We show that NoRC interacts with the transcription terminator factor (TTF-I), and this interaction is required both for the binding of TTF-I to its promoter-proximal target site and for the recruitment of NoRC to the promoter. After association with the rDNA promoter, NoRC alters the position of the promoter-bound nucleosome, thereby repressing RNA polymerase I transcription. This NoRC-directed rDNA repression requires the N terminus of histone H4. Repression is effective before preinitiation complex formation and as such is unable to exert an effect upon activated rDNA genes. Furthermore, the early steps of rDNA repression do not depend on DNA and histone modifications. These results reveal an important role for TTF-I in recruiting NoRC to rDNA and an active role for NoRC in the establishment of rDNA silencing.

Reconstitution of Human β-Globin Locus Control Region Hypersensitive Sites in the Absence of Chromatin Assembly

ABSTRACT The human β-globin genes are regulated by the locus control region (LCR), an element composed of multiple DNase I-hypersensitive sites (HS sites) located 5′ to the genes. Various functional studies indicate that the LCR confers high-level, position-independent, and copy number-dependent expression to linked globin genes in transgenic mice. However, the structural basis for LCR function is unknown. Here we show that LCR HS sites can be reconstituted in an erythroid cell-specific manner on chromatin-assembled LCR templates in vitro. Surprisingly, HS2 and HS3 are also formed with erythroid proteins in the absence of chromatin assembly, indicating that sensitivity to nucleases is not simply a consequence of nucleosome reorganization. The generation of LCR HS sites in the absence of chromatin assembly leads to the formation of S1- and KMnO4-sensitive regions in HS2 and HS3. These sites are also sensitive to S1 nuclease in erythroid cells in vivo, suggesting a distorted DNA structure in the LCR core enhancer elements. Finally, we show that RNA polymerase II initiates transcription in the HS2 and HS3 core enhancer regions in vitro. Transcription in both HS2 and HS3 proceeds in a unidirectional manner. Taken together, the data suggest that erythroid proteins interact with the core enhancer elements, distort the DNA structure, and recruit polymerase II transcription complexes. These results further our understanding of the structural basis for LCR function and provide an explanation for why the LCR core regions are so extremely sensitive to nucleases in erythroid cells.

The Human Histone Acetyltransferase P/CAF is a Promiscuous Histone Propionyltransferase

The histone-code hypothesis suggests that specific histone protein modifications act as “marks” in chromatin and determine gene expression. These marks are brought about by covalent modification (for example, acetylation, methylation, and phosphorylation) of the histone N-terminal tails. The resulting epigenetic pattern defines transcriptional activation and silencing by the recruitment of specific effector proteins which have structural or enzymatic consequences for the surrounding region of chromatin. The acetylation of lysine residues on all four core histones, one of the most abundant and highly characterised modifications, is associated with transcriptionally active regions of chromatin, though this acetylation also plays roles in chromatin assembly and repair. In common with all histone modifications, the location and abundance of histone acetylation is dynamically regulated by two opposing classes of enzymes, histone acetyltransferases (HAT) and histone deacetylases (HDAC). These activities are typically found in multisubunit complexes, which are recruited to their target loci by interactions with transcriptional activators or repressors, respectively. This is consistent with the distribution of many ACHTUNGTRENNUNGactivating histone modifications, which are typically restricted to the promoter regions of actively transcribed genes. Histone acetylation exerts its functional effect by two mechanisms. The charge neutralisation associated with lysine acetylation (see Scheme 1) reduces the interaction of histone tails