Karl Stoffel
University of St. Gallen
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Karl Stoffel.
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma | 2007
Karl Stoffel; Kai-Uwe Lorenz; Markus S. Kuster
Objective: We compared the biomechanical stability of bone-plate constructs using a compression plate (CP), an internal fixator (IF), and a combination plate (CP/IF). Methods: Standardized simulated shaft fractures with a segmental defect in composite bones (n = 60) and intraarticular distal femur fractures with a comminuted supracondylar zone in fresh frozen cadaveric femurs (n = 36) were stabilized by CP, IF, and CP/IF. Construct stiffness, plastic deformation, and fixation strength were measured under axial compression and torsion using a biaxial testing machine. Results: The experimental results indicate for the distal femur fracture model that IF has less loss of reduction by plastic deformation under axial load compared to CP (IF 61% of CP). Under torsion, the CP showed significantly (P < 0.05) decreased plastic deformation compared to the IF (CP 51% of IF). The combination (CP/IF) of the 2 fixation principles generally resulted in a higher load to failure under axial compression and torsion (145% failure load of CP and 118% of IF under axial compression, 88% of CP and 109% of IF under torsion). Results were similar between the 2 fracture models. Conclusions: Under compression, IF provides similar fixation in comminuted fractures and was better than the CP for avoiding loss of reduction, whereas under torsional loading, CP was more important for stiffness, plastic deformation, and load to failure than IF. However, combination (CP/IF) fixation seems advisable in intraarticular and extraarticular fractures of long bones with a metaphyseal comminution. These data may be utilized by surgeons to build a more specific treatment plan in patients with these fracture types.
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma | 2011
Boyko Gueorguiev; B. Ockert; Karsten Schwieger; Dirk Wähnert; Matthew Lawson-Smith; Markus Windolf; Karl Stoffel
Objectives: To compare mechanical stability of angle-stable locking construct with four screws with conventional five screw locking in intramedullary nailed distal tibia fractures under cyclic loading. Methods: Ten pairs of fresh-frozen human cadaveric tibiae were intramedullary nailed and assigned to either an angle-stable locking construct consisting of four screws or conventional five-screw locking. After simulating an unstable distal two-fragmental 42-A3.1 fracture, the specimens were mechanically tested under quasistatic and cyclic sinusoidal axial and torsional loading. Results: Bending stiffness of the angle-stable and the conventional fixation was 644.3 N/° and 416.5 N/°, respectively (P = 0.075, power 0.434). Torsional stiffness of the angle-stable locking (1.91 Nm/°) was significantly higher compared with the conventional one (1.13 Nm/°; P = 0.001, power 0.981). Torsional play of the angle-stable fixation (0.08°) was significantly smaller compared with the conventional one (0.46°; P = 0.002, power 0.965). The angle-stable locking revealed significantly less torsional deformation in the fracture gap after one cycle (0.74°) than the conventional one (1.75°; P = 0.005, power 0.915) and also after 1000 cycles (angle-stable: 1.56°; conventional: 2.51°; P = 0.042, power 0.562). Modes of failure were fracture of the distal fragment, loosening of distal locking screws, nail breakage, and their combination, equally distributed between the groups (P = 0.325). Conclusions: Both the angle-stable locking technique using four screws and conventional locking consisting of five screws showed high biomechanical properties. Hence, angle-stable locking reflects a potential to maintain fixation stability while reducing the number of locking screws compared with conventional locking in intramedullary nailed unstable distal tibia fractures.
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma | 2004
Karl Stoffel; Gwidon Stachowiak; Thomas Forster; A. Gächter; Markus S. Kuster
Objective: To test the hypothesis that oblique screws at the ends of a plate provide increased strength of fixation as compared to standard screw insertion. Design: Biomechanical laboratory study in synthetic bone test medium. Methods: Narrow 4.5-mm stainless steel low-contoured dynamic compression plates were anchored with cortical screws to blocks of polyurethane foam. The fixation strength in cantilever bending (gap closing mode) and torsion was quantified using a material testing system. Different constructs were tested to investigate the effect of the screw orientation at the end of the plate (straight versus oblique at 30°), the plate, and bridging length as well as the number of screws. Results: An oblique screw at the plate end produced an increased strength of fixation in all tests; however, the difference was more significant in shorter plates and in constructs with no screw omission adjacent to the fracture site. Both longer plates and increased bridging length produced a significantly stronger construct able to withstand higher compression loads. Under torsional loading, the fixation strength was mainly dependent on the number of screws. Conclusions: The current data suggest that when using a conventional plating technique, plate length is the most important factor in withstanding forces in cantilever bending. With regard to resisting torsional load, the number of screws is the most important factor. Furthermore , oblique screws at the ends of a plate increase fixation strength.
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma | 2012
Johannes Erhardt; Karl Stoffel; Jorg Kampshoff; Nicole Badur; Piers Yates; Markus S. Kuster
Objectives: Screw perforation of the humeral head in locking plate osteosynthesis occurs in up to 30% of cases. The current study compared different fixation possibilities (eg, number and position of screws) to reduce screw perforation in the humeral head. Methods: A humeral head fracture with a missing medial support was created in 30 fresh-frozen cadavers and fixed with a polyaxial locking plate (NCB PH; Zimmer, Warsaw, IN). The constructs were loaded with increasing force and the number of cycles until screw perforation was recorded. Four different fixation methods were tested: group 1 five screws with fixed angle, group 2 five screws in polyaxial position according to bone strength, group 3 three screws, and group 4 five screws with 1 as an inferomedial support screw. Results: More screws in the humeral head significantly increased the number of cycles before screw perforation. An inferomedial support screw further increased the number of cycles. Polyaxial screw placement compared with fixed-angle placement had no effect on the screw perforation phenomenon. Conclusions: We recommend to position an inferomedial support screw, and at least 5 screws in the head fragment, when using a locking plate in proximal humerus fractures with disrupted medial hinge.
Journal of Arthroplasty | 2014
Karlmeinrad Giesinger; Lukas Ebneter; Robert E. Day; Karl Stoffel; Piers Yates; Markus S. Kuster
Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) are a serious complication after total hip arthroplasty. Plate fixation with screws perforating the cement mantle is a common treatment option. The study objective was to investigate hip stem stability and cement mantle integrity under dynamic loading. A cemented hip stem was implanted in 17 composite femur models. Nine bone models were osteotomised just distal to the stem and fixed with a polyaxial locking plate the other eight constructs served as the control group. All specimens were tested in a bi-axial material testing machine (100000 cycles). There were no statistically significant differences in axial nor in medial (varus) stem migration. No cement cracks were detected in both groups. Plate fixation of a PFF with a stable, cemented prosthesis did not lead to cement mantle failure in this in vitro study.
Hip International | 2013
Johannes B. Erhardt; Paul Khoo; Karl Stoffel; Piers Yates
Background Predictable patterns of periprosthetic fracture have been observed around polished double tapered stems. Finite element studies have suggested that triple-tapered stems cause less cement strain in torsion compared to double-tapered stems. Hence, we hypothesised that the in vitro behaviour of implanted double- and triple-tapered polished stems, like the CPT (Zimmer, Warsaw, USA) or C-Stem (DePuy, Leeds, UK) when subjected to pathological torsional loads may cause different patterns of periprosthetic fractures. Methods Ten double-tapered stems (CPT) and ten triple-tapered stems (C-Stem) were cemented into synthetic femur bones. A constant axial compression load of 100 N and a torsional pre-load of 0.1 N.m were applied using a biaxial testing machine. The distal femur was then loaded in external rotation at 45 degrees until failure. Results Seven of the 10 CPT stems fractured at the level of the stem body while fracturing the cement mantle at the same level. In three of ten of the CPT stems and all ten C-Stems, the synthetic bone fractured at the tip of the prosthesis while the cement mantle remained intact. This was significant for the resulting fracture pattern (P=0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups for either torque (P=0.13) or angle at failure (P=0.49). Interpretation This biomechanical study indicates that the CPT and C-Stem create a different fracture pattern under the same loading condition. The C-Stem (a triple tapered stem) may produce lower strain in torsion to the cement mantle of a cemented THA. However, fractures that do occur may be more difficult to treat than those produced around a stem like the CPT subjected to comparable loading.
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma | 2017
Karl Stoffel; Ivan Zderic; Florian Gras; Christoph Sommer; Ursula Eberli; David Mueller; Martin Oswald; Boyko Gueorguiev
Objectives: To evaluate the biomechanical performance of femoral neck system (FNS) in comparison with established methods for fixation of femoral neck fractures in a cadaveric model. Methods: Twenty pairs of fresh-frozen human cadaveric femora were instrumented either with dynamic hip screw and antirotation screw (DHS-screw), DHS-blade, 3 cannulated screws (3CS) or with FNS in a partially paired design. The specimens were randomized to 2 paired treatment groups based on the bone mineral density (BMD), namely DHS-screw/DHS-blade and FNS/3CS. A reduced unstable femoral neck fracture with postero-caudal comminution, OTA/AO 31–B2.3, 70 degrees Pauwels III, was simulated by cutting 30 degrees distal and 15 degrees posterior wedges. Cyclic axial loading was applied in 16 degrees adduction, starting at 500 N and with progressive peak force increase of 0.1 N/cycle until construct failure. Axial stiffness was measured in the third loading cycle. Femoral neck and leg shortening, and varus tilting and implant migration were calculated by means of optical motion tracking. Results: Mean axial stiffness was 688.8 ± 132.6 N/mm for DHS-screw, 629.1 ± 94.1 N/mm for DHS-blade, 748.9 ± 211.4 N/mm for FNS, and 584.1 ± 156.6 N/mm for 3CS, with no statistical significances. Cycles until 15-mm leg shortening were comparable for DHS-Screw (20,542 ± 7465), DHS-blade (19,161 ± 3793) and FNS (17,372 ± 2996), however significantly higher than for 3CS (7293 ± 2819), P < 0.001. Similarly, cycles until 15 mm femoral neck shortening were comparable between DHS-screw (20,846 ± 7339), DHS-blade (18,974 ± 4032) and FNS (18,171 ± 2585), and significantly higher than 3CS (8039 ± 2778), P < 0.001. Conclusions: From a biomechanical point of view, the femoral neck system is a valid alternative to treat unstable femoral neck fractures, representing the advantages of a minimally invasive implant with comparable stability to the 2 DHS systems and superior to cannulated screws.
Hip International | 2018
Bertram Rieger; Thomas Ilchmann; Lilianna Bolliger; Karl Stoffel; Lukas Zwicky; Martin Clauss
Introduction: During revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), the surgeon commonly faces deficient proximal femoral bone. In this situation, distal fixation of the prosthesis is required. The aim of the current retrospective study is to assess the clinical and radiographic mid-term outcome of revision total hip arthroplasty using a modular uncemented, tapered, grit-blasted, distal straight stem system. Methods: This retrospective study included 70 femoral revisions that were performed in 67 patients using the device of interest. All patients were operated on via an extended trochanteric osteotomy. 60 revisions were performed as 1-stage (12 infected) and 10 as 2-stage (all infected) revisions. At 3 months postoperatively and at final follow-up, patients were assessed radiographically for the presence of osteolysis and for distal integration. Results: The mean follow-up time was 4.3 (2.0-7.6) years. 4 patients had a removal of at least 1 prosthetic component. Stem survival for any reason was 92% after 5 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 83%-100%). With aseptic loosening of the stem as the endpoint of interest, survival after 5 years was 96% (95% CI, 88%-100%). A postoperative subsidence rate of 14.7% was found. No perioperative femoral fractures were found in the current patient series. Conclusions: This study showed excellent mid-term survival and good clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients who had undergone revision THA with a modular uncemented, tapered, straight design.
Injury-international Journal of The Care of The Injured | 2003
Karl Stoffel; Ulrich Dieter; Gwidon Stachowiak; A. Gächter; Markus S. Kuster
Clinical Chemistry | 2006
Karl Stoffel; Hanna Engler; Markus S. Kuster; Walter Riesen