Karl T. Mueller
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Karl T. Mueller.
Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology | 2013
Donald R. Baer; Mark H. Engelhard; Grant E. Johnson; Julia Laskin; Jinfeng Lai; Karl T. Mueller; Prabhakaran Munusamy; Suntharampillai Thevuthasan; Hong-fei Wang; Nancy M. Washton; Alison Elder; Brittany L. Baisch; Ajay S. Karakoti; Satyanarayana V N T Kuchibhatla; Dae Won Moon
This review examines characterization challenges inherently associated with understanding nanomaterials and the roles surface and interface characterization methods can play in meeting some of the challenges. In parts of the research community, there is growing recognition that studies and published reports on the properties and behaviors of nanomaterials often have reported inadequate or incomplete characterization. As a consequence, the true value of the data in these reports is, at best, uncertain. With the increasing importance of nanomaterials in fundamental research and technological applications, it is desirable that researchers from the wide variety of disciplines involved recognize the nature of these often unexpected challenges associated with reproducible synthesis and characterization of nanomaterials, including the difficulties of maintaining desired materials properties during handling and processing due to their dynamic nature. It is equally valuable for researchers to understand how characterization approaches (surface and otherwise) can help to minimize synthesis surprises and to determine how (and how quickly) materials and properties change in different environments. Appropriate application of traditional surface sensitive analysis methods (including x-ray photoelectron and Auger electron spectroscopies, scanning probe microscopy, and secondary ion mass spectroscopy) can provide information that helps address several of the analysis needs. In many circumstances, extensions of traditional data analysis can provide considerably more information than normally obtained from the data collected. Less common or evolving methods with surface selectivity (e.g., some variations of nuclear magnetic resonance, sum frequency generation, and low and medium energy ion scattering) can provide information about surfaces or interfaces in working environments (operando or in situ) or information not provided by more traditional methods. Although these methods may require instrumentation or expertise not generally available, they can be particularly useful in addressing specific questions, and examples of their use in nanomaterial research are presented.
Other Information: PBD: 1 Jun 2001 | 2001
Jon Chorover; Karl T. Mueller; K. G. Karthikeyan; A. Vairavamurthy; R. Jeff Serne
A number of previous studies focused on dissolution and precipitation rates of clay systems in acidic to neutral conditions without the presence of radionuclides (1-5). However, there is lack of information concerning sorption, dissolution and precipitation kinetics of clays at high pH and ionic strength with radionuclides present, which is representative of the actual conditions in the study area. We are focusing on the behavior of clays and sediments under these geochemical conditions by: (1) investigating dynamics of Cs and Sr uptake over time during the reaction of synthetic tank waste leachate (STWL) with specimen clays and Hanford sediments through batch experiments (2) studying the weathering behavior of clays and Hanford sediments under the extreme geochemical conditions imposed by STWL (3) investigating the dissolution and precipitation behavior of layer silicates using XRD, SEM/EDS, FTIR, TG/DTA, AFM and HRTEM and (4) investigating the surface chemistry and sorption sites of clay minerals using XPS, NMR and XAFS.
Environmental Science & Technology | 2017
Guohui Wang; Wooyong Um; Zheming Wang; Estela Reinoso-Maset; Nancy M. Washton; Karl T. Mueller; Nicolas Perdrial; Peggy A. O'Day; Jon Chorover
The reaction of acidic radioactive waste with sediments can induce mineral transformation reactions that, in turn, control contaminant fate. Here, sediment weathering by synthetic uranium-containing acid solutions was investigated using bench-scale experiments to simulate waste disposal conditions at Hanfords cribs (Hanford, WA). During acid weathering, the presence of phosphate exerted a strong influence over uranium mineralogy and a rapidly precipitated, crystalline uranium phosphate phase (meta-ankoleite [K(UO2)(PO4)·3H2O]) was identified using spectroscopic and diffraction-based techniques. In phosphate-free system, uranium oxyhydroxide minerals such as K-compreignacite [K2(UO2)6O4(OH)6·7H2O] were formed. Single-pass flow-through (SPFT) and column leaching experiments using synthetic Hanford pore water showed that uranium precipitated as meta-ankoleite during acid weathering was strongly retained in the sediments, with an average release rate of 2.67 × 10-12 mol g-1 s-1. In the absence of phosphate, uranium release was controlled by dissolution of uranium oxyhydroxide (compreignacite-type) mineral with a release rate of 1.05-2.42 × 10-10 mol g-1 s-1. The uranium mineralogy and release rates determined for both systems in this study support the development of accurate U-release models for the prediction of contaminant transport. These results suggest that phosphate minerals may be a good candidate for uranium remediation approaches at contaminated sites.
Archive | 2012
Jon Chorover; Nico Perdrial; Karl T. Mueller; Caleb Strepka; Peggy OÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂDay; Nelson Rivera; Wooyong Um; Hyun-Shik Chang; Carl I. Steefel; Aaron Thompson
Hanford sediments impacted by hyperalkaline high level radioactive waste have undergone incongruent silicate mineral weathering concurrent with contaminant uptake. In this project, we studied the impact of background pore water (BPW) on strontium, cesium and iodine desorption and transport in Hanford sediments that were experimentally weathered by contact with simulated hyperalkaline tank waste leachate (STWL) solutions. Using those lab-weathered Hanford sediments (HS) and model precipitates formed during nucleation from homogeneous STWL solutions (HN), we (i) provided thorough characterization of reaction products over a matrix of field-relevant gradients in contaminant concentration, partial pressure of carbon dioxide, and reaction time; (ii) improved molecular-scale understanding of how sorbate speciation controls contaminant desorption from weathered sediments upon removal of caustic sources; and (iii) developed a mechanistic, predictive model of meso- to field-scale contaminant reactive transport under these conditions. In this final report, we provide detailed descriptions of our results from this three-year study, completed in 2012 following a one-year no cost extension.
Archive | 2011
Gordon E. Brown; Anne M. Chaka; David K. Shuh; Eric E. Roden; Charles J. Werth; Nancy J. Hess; Andrew R. Felmy; Kevin M. Rosso; Donald R. Baer; Vanessa L. Bailey; Mark E. Bowden; Jay W. Grate; David W. Hoyt; Laura R. Kuprat; Alan S. Lea; Karl T. Mueller; Martinus Oostrom; Galya Orr; Ljiljana Paša-Tolić; Charity Plata; Errol W. Robinson; Raymond G. Teller; Suntharampillai Thevuthasan; Hong-fei Wang; H. S. Wiley; Michael J. Wilkins
This report covers the topics of discussion and the recommendations of the panel members. On December 8 and 9, 2010, the Geochemistry, Biogeochemistry, and Subsurface Science (GBSS) Science Theme Advisory Panel (STAP) convened for a more in-depth exploration of the five Science Theme focus areas developed at a similar meeting held in 2009. The goal for the fiscal year (FY) 2011 meeting was to identify potential topical areas for science campaigns, necessary experimental development needs, and scientific members for potential research teams. After a review of the current science in each of the five focus areas, the 2010 STAP discussions successfully led to the identification of one well focused campaign idea in pore-scale modeling and five longer-term potential research campaign ideas that would likely require additional workshops to identify specific research thrusts. These five campaign areas can be grouped into two categories: (1) the application of advanced high-resolution, high mass accuracy experimental techniques to elucidate the interplay between geochemistry and microbial communities in terrestrial ecosystems and (2) coupled computation/experimental investigations of the electron transfer reactions either between mineral surfaces and outer membranes of microbial cells or between the outer and inner membranes of microbial cells.
Archive | 2011
Birgitte Kiær Ahring; Nitin S. Baliga; James R. Frederickson; Samuel Kaplan; Himadri B. Pakrasi; Joel G. Pounds; Imran shah; Steven Slater; Gary Stacey; Kenneth J. Auberry; Donald R. Baer; David Ml Brown; David E. Cowley; David W. Hoyt; David W. Koppenaal; Bryan E. Linggi; Karl T. Mueller; Galya Orr; Errol W. Robinson; Raymond G. Teller; H. S. Wiley; Nancy J. Hess; Ljiljana Paša-Tolić; Katrina M. Waters; Karin D. Rodland
This report contains the charge to the panel, the panels discussions and panel recommendations.
Archive | 2009
Peggy A. O'Day; Jon Chorover; Karl T. Mueller; Carl I. Steefel; R. Jeff Serne
This project aimed for a predictive-mechanistic understanding of the coupling between mineral weathering and contaminant (Cs, Sr, I) transport/fate in caustic waste-impacted sediments. Based on our prior studies of model clay mineral systems, we postulated that contaminant uptake to Hanford sediments would reflect concurrent adsorption and co-precipitation effects. Our specific objectives were: (1) to assess the molecular-scale mechanisms responsible for time-dependent sequestration of contaminants (Cs, Sr and I) during penetration of waste-induced weathering fronts; (2) to determine the rate and extent of contaminant release from the sorbed state; (3) to develop a reactive transport model based on molecular mechanisms and macroscopic flow experiments [(1) and (2)] that simulates adsorption, aging, and desorption dynamics. Progress toward achieving each of these objectives is discussed in this Final Report.
Materials Today | 2013
Stéphane Gin; Abdessalam Abdelouas; Louise J. Criscenti; W. L. Ebert; Karine Ferrand; Thorsten Geisler; Mike T. Harrison; Yaohiro Inagaki; Seiichiro Mitsui; Karl T. Mueller; James C. Marra; Carlo G. Pantano; Eric M. Pierce; Joseph V. Ryan; James M. Schofield; Carl I. Steefel; John D. Vienna
Nature Energy | 2016
Huilin Pan; Yuyan Shao; Pengfei Yan; Yingwen Cheng; Kee Sung Han; Zimin Nie; Chongmin Wang; Jihui Yang; Xiaolin Li; Priyanka Bhattacharya; Karl T. Mueller; Jun Liu
Nano Energy | 2016
Ruiguo Cao; Kuber Mishra; Xiaolin Li; Jiangfeng Qian; Mark H. Engelhard; Mark E. Bowden; Kee Sung Han; Karl T. Mueller; Wesley A. Henderson; Ji-Guang Zhang