Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Karthinathan Thangavelu is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Karthinathan Thangavelu.


Neurology | 2017

Alemtuzumab CARE-MS II 5-year follow-up: Efficacy and safety findings

Alasdair Coles; Jeffrey A. Cohen; Edward Fox; Gavin Giovannoni; Hans-Peter Hartung; Eva Havrdova; Sven Schippling; Krzysztof Selmaj; Anthony Traboulsee; D Alastair S Compston; David Margolin; Karthinathan Thangavelu; Madalina Chirieac; Darlene Jody; Panos Xenopoulos; Richard J. Hogan; Michael Panzara; Douglas L. Arnold

Objective: To evaluate 5-year efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab in patients with active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and inadequate response to prior therapy. Methods: In the 2-year Comparison of Alemtuzumab and Rebif Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis (CARE-MS) II study (NCT00548405), alemtuzumab-treated patients received 2 courses (baseline and 12 months later). Patients could enter an extension (NCT00930553), with as-needed alemtuzumab retreatment for relapse or MRI activity. Annualized relapse rate (ARR), 6-month confirmed disability worsening (CDW; ≥1-point Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score increase [≥1.5 if baseline EDSS = 0]), 6-month confirmed disability improvement (CDI; ≥1-point EDSS decrease [baseline score ≥2.0]), no evidence of disease activity (NEDA), brain volume loss (BVL), and adverse events (AEs) were assessed. Results: Most alemtuzumab-treated patients (92.9%) who completed CARE-MS II entered the extension; 59.8% received no alemtuzumab retreatment. ARR was low in each extension year (years 3–5: 0.22, 0.23, 0.18). Through 5 years, 75.1% of patients were free of 6-month CDW; 42.9% achieved 6-month CDI. In years 3, 4, and 5, proportions with NEDA were 52.9%, 54.2%, and 58.2%, respectively. Median yearly BVL remained low in the extension (years 1–5: −0.48%, −0.22%, −0.10%, −0.19%, −0.07%). AE exposure-adjusted incidence rates in the extension were lower than in the core study. Thyroid disorders peaked at year 3, declining thereafter. Conclusions: Alemtuzumab provides durable efficacy through 5 years in patients with an inadequate response to prior therapy in the absence of continuous treatment. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class III evidence that alemtuzumab provides efficacy and slowing of brain atrophy through 5 years.


Neurology | 2016

Long-term safety and efficacy of teriflunomide: Nine-year follow-up of the randomized TEMSO study

Paul O'Connor; Giancarlo Comi; Mark Freedman; Aaron E. Miller; Ludwig Kappos; Jean-Pierre Bouchard; Christine Lebrun-Frenay; Jan Mareš; Myriam Benamor; Karthinathan Thangavelu; Jinjun Liang; Philippe Truffinet; Victoria J. Lawson; Jerry S. Wolinsky

Objective: To report safety and efficacy outcomes from up to 9 years of treatment with teriflunomide in an extension (NCT00803049) of the pivotal phase 3 Teriflunomide Multiple Sclerosis Oral (TEMSO) trial (NCT00134563). Methods: A total of 742 patients entered the extension. Teriflunomide-treated patients continued the original dose; those previously receiving placebo were randomized 1:1 to teriflunomide 14 mg or 7 mg. Results: By June 2013, median (maximum) teriflunomide exposure exceeded 190 (325) weeks per patient; 468 patients (63%) remained on treatment. Teriflunomide was well-tolerated with continued exposure. The most common adverse events (AEs) matched those in the core study. In extension year 1, first AEs of transient liver enzyme increases or reversible hair thinning were generally attributable to patients switching from placebo to teriflunomide. Approximately 11% of patients discontinued treatment owing to AEs. Twenty percent of patients experienced serious AEs. There were 3 deaths unrelated to teriflunomide. Soon after the extension started, annualized relapse rates and gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesion counts fell in patients switching from placebo to teriflunomide, remaining low thereafter. Disability remained stable in all treatment groups (median Expanded Disability Status Scale score ≤2.5; probability of 12-week disability progression ≤0.48). Conclusions: In the TEMSO extension, safety observations were consistent with the core trial, with no new or unexpected AEs in patients receiving teriflunomide for up to 9 years. Disease activity decreased in patients switching from placebo and remained low in patients continuing on teriflunomide. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class III evidence that long-term treatment with teriflunomide is well-tolerated and efficacy of teriflunomide is maintained long-term.


Neurology | 2017

Alemtuzumab CARE-MS I 5-year follow-up: Durable efficacy in the absence of continuous MS therapy

Eva Havrdova; Douglas L. Arnold; Jeffrey A. Cohen; Hans-Peter Hartung; Edward J. Fox; Gavin Giovannoni; Sven Schippling; Krzysztof Selmaj; Anthony Traboulsee; D Alastair S Compston; David Margolin; Karthinathan Thangavelu; C. E. Rodriguez; Darlene Jody; Richard J. Hogan; Panos Xenopoulos; Michael Panzara; Alasdair Coles

Objective: To evaluate 5-year efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab in treatment-naive patients with active relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) (CARE-MS I; NCT00530348). Methods: Alemtuzumab-treated patients received treatment courses at baseline and 12 months later; after the core study, they could enter an extension (NCT00930553) with as-needed alemtuzumab retreatment for relapse or MRI activity. Assessments included annualized relapse rate (ARR), 6-month confirmed disability worsening (CDW; ≥1-point Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score increase [≥1.5 if baseline EDSS = 0]), 6-month confirmed disability improvement (CDI; ≥1-point EDSS decrease [baseline score ≥2.0]), no evidence of disease activity (NEDA), brain volume loss (BVL), and adverse events (AEs). Results: Most alemtuzumab-treated patients (95.1%) completing CARE-MS I enrolled in the extension; 68.5% received no additional alemtuzumab treatment. ARR remained low in years 3, 4, and 5 (0.19, 0.14, and 0.15). Over years 0–5, 79.7% were free of 6-month CDW; 33.4% achieved 6-month CDI. Most patients (61.7%, 60.2%, and 62.4%) had NEDA in years 3, 4, and 5. Median yearly BVL improved over years 2–4, remaining low in year 5 (years 1–5: −0.59%, −0.25%, −0.19%, −0.15%, and −0.20%). Exposure-adjusted incidence rates of most AEs declined in the extension relative to the core study. Thyroid disorder incidences peaked at year 3 and subsequently declined. Conclusions: Based on these data, alemtuzumab provides durable efficacy through 5 years in the absence of continuous treatment, with most patients not receiving additional courses. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00530348; NCT00930553. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class III evidence that alemtuzumab durably improves efficacy outcomes and slows BVL in patients with RRMS.


Multiple sclerosis and related disorders | 2016

Comparing outcomes from clinical studies of oral disease-modifying therapies (dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, and teriflunomide) in relapsing MS: Assessing absolute differences using a number needed to treat analysis

Mark Freedman; Xavier Montalban; Aaron E. Miller; Catherine Dive-Pouletty; Steven Hass; Karthinathan Thangavelu; Thomas Leist

Dimethyl fumarate (DMF), fingolimod, and teriflunomide are oral disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) indicated for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Despite well-established limitations of cross-trial comparisons, DMTs are still frequently compared in terms of relative reductions in specific endpoints, most commonly annualized relapse rate. Consideration of absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat (NNT) provides an alternative approach to assess the magnitude of treatment effect and can provide valuable additional information on therapeutic gain. Using data from pivotal studies of DMF (DEFINE, NCT00420212; CONFIRM, NCT00451451), fingolimod (FREEDOMS, NCT00289978; FREEDOMS II, NCT00355134), and teriflunomide (TEMSO, NCT00134563; TOWER, NCT00751881), we calculated NNTs to prevent any relapse, more severe relapses (such as those leading to hospitalization or requiring intravenous corticosteroids), and disability worsening. Higher relative reductions were reported for DMF and fingolimod vs placebo on overall relapse and relapses requiring intravenous corticosteroids in both individual and pooled studies (pooled data unavailable for fingolimod). However, NNTs for each outcome were similar for DMF and teriflunomide, with marginally lower NNTs observed with fingolimod. By contrast, for relapses requiring hospitalization, relative reductions were higher and NNTs were substantially lower for teriflunomide compared with DMF. For fingolimod, there were inconsistent outcomes between the two studies for relapses requiring hospitalization; thus, comparative conclusions against DMF or teriflunomide cannot be clearly established. The risk of disability worsening was significantly reduced in both teriflunomide studies, but only in a single study for DMF (DEFINE) and fingolimod (FREEDOMS). NNTs to prevent one patient from experiencing disability worsening were similar in DEFINE, FREEDOMS, and TEMSO and TOWER but were higher in CONFIRM and FREEDOMS II. This NNT analysis demonstrates broadly comparable effects for DMF, fingolimod, and teriflunomide across key clinical outcomes. These observations are clinically relevant and may help to inform treatment decisions by providing additional information on therapeutic gain beyond informal assessments of relative reductions alone.


Neuroimmunology and Neuroinflammation | 2017

Teriflunomide slows BVL in relapsing MS

Ernst Wilhelm Radue; Till Sprenger; Laura Gaetano; Nicole Mueller-Lenke; Steve Cavalier; Karthinathan Thangavelu; Michael Panzara; Jessica E. Donaldson; Fiona M. Woodward; Jens Wuerfel; Jerry S. Wolinsky; Ludwig Kappos

Objective: To assess, using structural image evaluation using normalization of atrophy (SIENA), the effect of teriflunomide, a once-daily oral immunomodulator, on brain volume loss (BVL) in patients with relapsing forms of MS enrolled in the phase 3 TEMSO study. Methods: TEMSO MR scans were analyzed (study personnel masked to treatment allocation) using SIENA to assess brain volume changes between baseline and years 1 and 2 in patients treated with placebo or teriflunomide. Treatment group comparisons were made via rank analysis of covariance. Results: Data from 969 patient MRI visits were included in this analysis: 808 patients had baseline and year 1 MRI; 709 patients had baseline and year 2 MRI. Median percentage BVL from baseline to year 1 and year 2 for placebo was 0.61% and 1.29%, respectively, and for teriflunomide 14 mg, 0.39% and 0.90%, respectively. BVL was lower for teriflunomide 14 mg vs placebo at year 1 (36.9% relative reduction, p = 0.0001) and year 2 (30.6% relative reduction, p = 0.0001). Teriflunomide 7 mg was also associated with significant reduction in BVL vs placebo over the 2-year study. The significant effects of teriflunomide 14 mg on BVL were observed in both patients with and without on-study disability worsening. Conclusions: The significant reduction of BVL vs placebo over 2 years achieved with teriflunomide is consistent with its effects on delaying disability worsening and suggests a neuroprotective potential. Classification of evidence: Class II evidence shows that teriflunomide treatment significantly reduces BVL over 2 years vs placebo. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00134563.


Multiple Sclerosis Journal | 2018

The efficacy of teriflunomide in patients who received prior disease-modifying treatments: Subgroup analyses of the teriflunomide phase 3 TEMSO and TOWER studies:

Mark Freedman; Jerry S. Wolinsky; Giancarlo Comi; Ludwig Kappos; Tomas Olsson; Aaron E. Miller; Karthinathan Thangavelu; Myriam Benamor; Philippe Truffinet; Paul O’Connor; Tower Study Groups

Teriflunomide is a once-daily oral immunomodulator approved for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). The objective of this post hoc analysis of the phase 3, pooled TEMSO (NCT00134563) and TOWER (NCT00751881) dataset is to evaluate the effect of teriflunomide treatment on annualised relapse rate and disability worsening across patient subgroups defined according to prior disease-modifying therapy exposure. This analysis provides further supportive evidence for a consistent effect of teriflunomide across a broad range of patients with relapsing MS, including patients who have used and discontinued other disease-modifying therapies.


Multiple Sclerosis Journal – Experimental, Translational and Clinical | 2018

Clinical efficacy of teriflunomide over a fixed 2-year duration in the TOWER study:

Mark Freedman; Julia Morawski; Karthinathan Thangavelu

Patients enrolled in the phase 3 TOWER study (NCT00751881) of teriflunomide had variable treatment durations (48–173 weeks). This has led to challenges when interpreting results in the context of other phase 3 trials of disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis, which typically have a fixed 2-year duration. This communication reports clinical outcomes in TOWER over a fixed 2-year period. Reductions in annualised relapse rates and 12-week confirmed disability worsening associated with teriflunomide were comparable between overall intent-to-treat and fixed 2-year study populations in TOWER. Consistency in outcomes supports the inclusion of TOWER data in comparative analyses with other disease-modifying therapies. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00751881.


Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry | 2018

068 Evaluation of the long-term treatment effect of teriflunomide on cognitive outcomes and association with brain volume change: data from temso and its extension study

Till Sprenger; Jeannette Lechner-Scott; Maria Pia Sormani; Jerry S. Wolinsky; Jens Wuerfel; Karthinathan Thangavelu; Steven J. Cavalier; Matt Mandel; Ludwig Kappos

Introduction In a blinded SIENA (Structural Image Evaluation using Normalisation of Atrophy) analysis of TEMSO (NCT00134563), teriflunomide significantly reduced brain volume loss (BVL) over 2 years vs placebo. Further analysis indicated a strong correlation between 2 year BVL and disability worsening, showing better disability outcomes for patients with lower rates of BVL. Here, we explore the relationship between BVL and long-term changes in cognitive function in TEMSO and its extension (NCT00803049). Methods The effect of teriflunomide on cognitive function was assessed by change from baseline in Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT)−3 scores in the TEMSO core (n=1086) and extension (n=740) studies. To evaluate change in PASAT-3 scores over 5 years, the TEMSO population was categorised into groups defined by percentage brain volume change from baseline to Year 2 (assessed by SIENA). Results Adjusted mean changes from baseline to Week 96 in PASAT-3 raw/Z-scores were –0.265/–0.022 and 0.870/0.073 for placebo and teriflunomide 14 mg, respectively (difference vs placebo, p=0.0435 in both instances). Long-term improvements in PASAT-3 Z-scores were observed with teriflunomide 14 mg treatment: mean (SD) changes from baseline at Weeks 156 and 276 were 0.194 (0.634) and 0.200 (0.677), respectively. Mean (SD) units of change from baseline in raw PASAT-3 scores for teriflunomide 14 mg–treated patients at Weeks 156 and 276 were 2.36 (7.73) and 2.43 (8.24), respectively. In an association analysis, the group with least BVL from baseline to Year 2 demonstrated a significant improvement in PASAT-3 score with teriflunomide treatment over 5 years vs the group with most BVL. Conclusion Teriflunomide significantly improved PASAT-3 performance vs placebo over 5 years in the TEMSO core and extension studies. Slower rates of BVL over 2 years correlated with better long-term PASAT-3 improvement. This study suggests that BVL earlier in the disease course predicts longer-term cognitive function. Study support Sanofi.


Journal of Clinical Neuroscience | 2018

Efficacy and safety of teriflunomide in Asian patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis: A subgroup analysis of the phase 3 TOWER study.

Aaron E. Miller; Xianhao Xu; Richard A.L. Macdonell; Steve Vucic; Philippe Truffinet; Myriam Benamor; Karthinathan Thangavelu; Mark S. Freedman

In the phase 3 TOWER (NCT00751881) study, teriflunomide 14 mg significantly reduced annualized relapse rate (ARR) and risk of 12-week confirmed disability worsening (12-w CDW) vs placebo in patients with relapsing forms of MS (RMS). The TOWER population included an appreciable proportion of Asian patients. Reductions in ARR and 12-w CDW associated with teriflunomide 14 mg were comparable between the Asian and overall populations, as were the rates for adverse events and serious adverse events, with no new or unexpected safety findings. These observations provide further evidence to support the clinical benefits and safety profile of teriflunomide in a broad range of patients with RMS.


Neuroimmunology and Neuroinflammation | 2017

Predicting long-term disability outcomes in patients with MS treated with teriflunomide in TEMSO

Maria Pia Sormani; Philippe Truffinet; Karthinathan Thangavelu; Pascal Rufi; Catherine Simonson; Nicola De Stefano

Objective: To predict long-term disability outcomes in TEMSO core (NCT00134563) and extension (NCT00803049) studies in patients with relapsing forms of MS treated with teriflunomide. Methods: A post hoc analysis was conducted in a subgroup of patients who received teriflunomide in the core study, had MRI and clinical relapse assessments at months 12 (n = 552) and 18, and entered the extension. Patients were allocated risk scores for disability worsening (DW) after 1 year of teriflunomide treatment: 0 = low risk; 1 = intermediate risk; and 2–3 = high risk, based on the occurrence of relapses (0 to ≥2) and/or active (new and enlarging) T2-weighted (T2w) lesions (≤3 or >3) after the 1-year MRI. Patients in the intermediate-risk group were reclassified as responders or nonresponders (low or high risk) according to relapses and T2w lesions on the 18-month MRI. Long-term risk (7 years) of DW was assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Results: In patients with a score of 2–3, the risk of 12-week–confirmed DW over 7 years was significantly higher vs those with a score of 0 (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.96, p = 0.0044). Patients reclassified as high risk at month 18 (18.6%) had a significantly higher risk of DW vs those in the low-risk group (81.4%; HR = 1.92; p = 0.0004). Conclusions: Over 80% of patients receiving teriflunomide were classified as low risk (responders) and had a significantly lower risk of DW than those at increased risk (nonresponders) over 7 years of follow-up in TEMSO. Close monitoring of relapses and active T2w lesions after short-term teriflunomide treatment predicts a differential rate of subsequent DW long term. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: TEMSO, NCT00134563; TEMSO extension, NCT00803049.

Collaboration


Dive into the Karthinathan Thangavelu's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eva Havrdova

Charles University in Prague

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Krzysztof Selmaj

Medical University of Łódź

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark Freedman

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Edward Fox

Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Douglas L. Arnold

Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gavin Giovannoni

Queen Mary University of London

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge