Katarina Petrovićová

Martianus Capella’s interpretation of Juno

The goddess Juno is traditionally represented as a very powerful entity in Roman literature, caring for stable human relationships, especially between men and women; and, at the same time, she is o...

Improved Ass? Apuleius’ metamorphoses in his novel Metamorphoses

Apuleius’ novel Metamorphoses has always been open to various, often contradictory, interpretations of scholars. One of the most discussed issues has been the novel’s disruption into two seemingly dissimilar parts – the first ten books containing frivolous stories with comical elements and the Book XI (called also Isis-Book) written in more serious tone and supposed to convey a religious or, at least, moral message. The authors of this paper argue against such simplified assumption and regard the dividing line between the two parts a mere illusion. This opinion is manifested through the figure of the main protagonist, Lucius, who experiences a religious initiation into the Isiac cult in the last book. The aim of the paper is to show that, although he is finally re-transformed into human shape and even leads a prosperous life afterwards, inside he undergoes no change whatsoever and remains the same “ass” as in the beginning of the story, i.e. he is not improved in the end. This rules out the possibility that the novel conveyed any deeper religious message and rather points to another interpretation, namely that Apuleius wrote the novel for educated readership in the spirit of Platonic dialogues. Thus, the authors are convinced that the novel can be fully enjoyed only after a scrupulous and thoughtful reading.

Augustusbild im rhetorischen Werk von Seneca Rhetor

In diesem Beitrag wird das literarische Bild von Augustus im rhetorischen Werk von Seneca Rhetor analysiert. Anhand der direkten sowie auch indirekten Erwahnungen in der Senecas Sammlung der unterschiedlichsten rednerischen Mittel Oratorum et rhetorum sententiae, divisiones, colores, die bekannter als Controversiae und Suasoriae ist, wird die Senecas angebliche Bewunderung von Augustus und seiner Regierung uberpruft. Auch wenn Augustus als eine nachsichtige und groszugige Personlichkeit in der Senecas Beschreibung anscheinend wirkt, durch diese Idealisierung dringt Angst und Spannung ein, welche die kaiserliche Macht in den Rendnern weckt. Es zeigt sich, dass Seneca Rhetor die Augusteische Regierung als den Verlust der Demokratie und die Bedrohung der Rechte bewertet hat.