Kate E. Allstadt
United States Geological Survey
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Kate E. Allstadt.
Geosphere | 2016
Jeffrey A. Coe; Rex L. Baum; Kate E. Allstadt; Bernard Kochevar; Robert G. Schmitt; Matthew L. Morgan; Jonathan L. White; Benjamin T. Stratton; Timothy A. Hayashi; Jason W. Kean
On 25 May 2014, a rain-on-snow–induced rock avalanche occurred in the West Salt Creek valley on the northern flank of Grand Mesa in western Colorado (United States). The avalanche mobilized from a preexisting rock slide in the Green River Formation and traveled 4.6 km down the confined valley, killing three people. The avalanche was rare for the contiguous United States because of its large size (54.5 Mm 3 ) and high mobility (height/length = 0.14). To understand the avalanche failure sequence, mechanisms, and mobility, we conducted a forensic analysis using large-scale (1:1000) structural mapping and seismic data. We used high-resolution, unmanned aircraft system imagery as a base for field mapping, and analyzed seismic data from 22 broadband stations (distances
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2017
Hakan Tanyas; Cees J. van Westen; Kate E. Allstadt; M. Anna Nowicki Jessee; Tolga Gorum; Randall W. Jibson; Jonathan W. Godt; Hiroshi Sato; Robert G. Schmitt; Odin Marc; Niels Hovius
Earthquake-induced landslide (EQIL) inventories are essential tools to extend our knowledge of the relationship between earthquakes and the landslides they can trigger. Regrettably, such inventories are difficult to generate and therefore scarce, and the available ones differ in terms of their quality and level of completeness. Moreover, access to existing EQIL inventories is currently difficult because there is no centralized database. To address these issues, we compiled EQIL inventories from around the globe based on an extensive literature study. The database contains information on 363 landslide-triggering earthquakes and includes 66 digital landslide inventories. To make these data openly available, we created a repository to host the digital inventories that we have permission to redistribute through the U.S. Geological Survey ScienceBase platform. It can grow over time as more authors contribute their inventories. We analyze the distribution of EQIL events by time period and location, more specifically breaking down the distribution by continent, country and mountain region. Additionally, we analyze frequency distributions of EQIL characteristics, such as the approximate area affected by landslides, total number of landslides, maximum distance from fault rupture zone, and distance from epicenter when the fault plane location is unknown. For the available digital EQIL inventories, we examine the underlying characteristics of landslide size, topographic slope, roughness, local relief, distance to streams, peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and Modified Mercalli Intensity. Also, we present an evaluation system to help users assess the suitability of the available inventories for different types of EQIL studies and model development.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2018
M. A. Nowicki Jessee; Michael W. Hamburger; Kate E. Allstadt; David J. Wald; S. M. Robeson; Hakan Tanyas; Mike Hearne; Eric M. Thompson
Earthquake‐triggered landslides are a significant hazard in seismically active regions, but our ability to assess the hazard they pose in near real‐time is limited. In this study, we present a new globally applicable model for seismically induced landslides based on the most comprehensive global dataset available; we use 23 landslide inventories that span a range of earthquake magnitudes and climatic and tectonic settings. We use logistic regression to relate the presence and distribution of earthquake‐triggered landslides with spatially distributed estimates of ground shaking, topographic slope, lithology, land cover type, and a topographic index designed to estimate variability in soil wetness to provide an empirical model of landslide distribution. We tested over 100 combinations of independent predictor variables to find the best‐fitting model, using a diverse set of statistical tests. Blind validation tests show the model accurately estimates the distribution of available landslide inventories. The results indicate that the model is reliable and stable, with high “balanced accuracy” (correctly vs. incorrectly classified pixels) for the majority of test events. A cross validation analysis shows high balanced accuracy for a majority of events as well. By combining near‐real time estimates of ground shaking with globally available landslide susceptibility data, this model provides a tool to estimate the distribution of coseismic landslide hazard within minutes of the occurrence of any earthquake worldwide for which a U.S. Geological Survey ShakeMap is available.
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms | 2018
Hakan Tanyas; Kate E. Allstadt; C.J. van Westen
Summary statistics derived from the frequency–area distribution (FAD) of inventories of triggered landslides allows for direct comparison of landslides triggered by one event (e.g. earthquake, rainstorm) with another. Such comparisons are vital to understand links between the landslide‐event and the environmental characteristics of the area affected. This could lead to methods for rapid estimation of landslide‐event magnitude, which in turn could lead to estimates of the total triggered landslide area. Previous studies proposed that the FAD of landslides follows an inverse power‐law, which provides the basis to model the size distribution of landslides and to estimate landslide‐event magnitude (mLS), which quantifies the severity of the event. In this study, we use a much larger collection of earthquake‐induced landslide (EQIL) inventories (n=45) than previous studies to show that size distributions are much more variable than previously assumed. We present an updated model and propose a method for estimating mLS and its uncertainty that better fits the observations and is more reproducible, robust, and consistent than existing methods. We validate our model by computing mLS for all of the inventories in our dataset and comparing that with the total landslide areas of the inventories. We show that our method is able to estimate the total landslide area of the events in this larger inventory dataset more successfully than the existing methods.
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America | 2018
Chris Massey; Dougal B. Townsend; Ellen M. Rathje; Kate E. Allstadt; Biljana Lukovic; Yoshihiro Kaneko; Brendon A. Bradley; Joseph Wartman; Randall W. Jibson; D. N. Petley; Nick Horspool; Ian Hamling; J. Carey; Simon C. Cox; John Davidson; Sally Dellow; Jonathan W. Godt; Christopher Holden; Katherine D. Jones; Anna Kaiser; Michael V. Little; Barbara Lyndsell; Samuel T. McColl; R. Morgenstern; Francis K. Rengers; David A. Rhoades; Brenda Rosser; Delia Strong; C. Singeisen; M.C. Villeneuve
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America | 2018
Kate E. Allstadt; Randall W. Jibson; Eric M. Thompson; Chris Massey; David J. Wald; Jonathan W. Godt; Francis K. Rengers
16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering | 2017
Kate E. Allstadt; Eric M. Thompson; Mike Hearne; M. Anna Nowicki Jessee; Jing Zhu; David J. Wald; Hakan Tanyas
Open-File Report | 2016
Kate E. Allstadt; Eric M. Thompson; David J. Wald; Michael W. Hamburger; Jonathan W. Godt; Keith L. Knudsen; Randall W. Jibson; M. Anna Nowicki Jessee; Jing Zhu; Michael Hearne; Laurie G. Baise; Hakan Tanyas; Kristin D. Marano
Data Series | 2017
Robert G. Schmitt; Hakan Tanyas; M. Anna Nowicki Jessee; Jing Zhu; Katherine M. Biegel; Kate E. Allstadt; Randall W. Jibson; Eric M. Thompson; Cees van Westen; Hiroshi Sato; David J. Wald; Jonathan W. Godt; Tolga Gorum; Chong Xu; Ellen M. Rathje; Keith L. Knudsen
Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering | 2017
Sally Dellow; Chris Massey; Simon C. Cox; Garth Archibald; John Begg; Zane Bruce; J Carey; J Davidson; F. Della Pasqua; Phil J. Glassey; Matt Hill; Katie E. Jones; Barbara Lyndsell; Biljana Lukovic; S McColl; Mark S. Rattenbury; Stuart Read; Brenda Rosser; C Singeisen; Dougal B. Townsend; Pilar Villamor; M.C. Villeneuve; Jonathan W. Godt; R Jibson; Kate E. Allstadt; Francis K. Rengers; J. Wartman; Ellen M. Rathje; N Sitar; Az Adda