Kate Filia

A longitudinal study of patient- and observer-rated quality of life in schizophrenia

Patient-rated life satisfaction and observer-rated quality of life (ORQOL) appear to have different determinants in patients with schizophrenia, although most studies conducted to date have used cross-sectional methods or related clinical dimensions at one time point with quality of life (QOL) measured at another. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between changes in patient-rated QOL (PRQOL) and ORQOL over time and changes in clinical variables. Two hundred and thirty-one patients taking part in the Schizophrenia Care Assessment Program (SCAP) study at Dandenong in Australia were included in this analysis. Subjective ratings of several domains of social functioning and life satisfaction were taken from the SCAP instrument and comparisons made with data from the QOL Scale rated by research staff, as well as several psychopathology measures. Changes in these scores over 1 year were correlated to investigate relationships between measures. Weak correlations were seen between changes in PRQOL and ORQOL domains. Patient-rated domains related most closely to depressive symptoms (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale scores) whereas observer-rated domains related to both negative symptoms and depressive symptoms. Positive psychotic symptoms had little effect on either domain. Longitudinal data appear to confirm that PRQOL and ORQOL are not closely related and may have differing determinants in patients with schizophrenia. They should be considered as separate and complementary outcome variables and utilized accordingly.

Victimization of patients with schizophrenia and related disorders

BACKGROUND Previous research has predominately focused on patients with mental illness as the instigators, rather than the victims, of violence and criminal activity. However, patients with schizophrenia appear to experience a higher degree of victimization compared to general community samples. We aimed to establish the 1-month prevalence of violent and non-violent victimization in a sample of patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and to investigate the determinants of victimization. METHOD Reports of violent and non-violent victimization were recorded in 348 patients in Dandenong, an outer metropolitan suburb of Melbourne, Australia along with the subjective perception of patients as to their degree of protection from being robbed or attacked. Patients reporting victimization were compared with those who did not, across a range of clinical and psychosocial variables. RESULTS 11.2% of the sample reported being the victim of non-violent crime and 4.3% the victim of violent crime in the 1-month period. 23.2% reported dissatisfaction with their protection against being attacked or robbed. The major determinant of victimization was the lack of any meaningful daily activity. CONCLUSIONS Patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders are at increased risk of victimization, both of the violent and non-violent type. Further research is required to understand the pathways through which victimization occurs and to understand whether psychosocial interventions can reduce victimization in this patient population.

A prospective study of the impact of smoking on outcomes in bipolar and schizoaffective disorder

BACKGROUND Tobacco smoking is more prevalent among people with mental illnesses, including bipolar disorder, than in the general community. Most data are cross-sectional, and there are no prospective trials examining the relationship of smoking to outcome in bipolar disorder. The impact of tobacco smoking on mental health outcomes was investigated in a 24-month, naturalistic, longitudinal study of 240 people with bipolar disorder or schizoaffective disorder. METHOD Participants were interviewed and data recorded by trained study clinicians at 9 interviews during the study period. RESULTS Comparisons were made between participants who smoked daily (n = 122) and the remaining study participants (n = 117). During the 24-month study period, the daily smokers had poorer scores on the Clinical Global Impressions-Depression (P = .034) and Clinical Global Impressions-Overall Bipolar (P = .026) scales and had lengthier stays in hospital (P = .012), compared with nonsmokers. LIMITATIONS Smoking status was determined by self-report. Nicotine dependence was not measured. CONCLUSION These findings suggest that smoking is associated with poorer mental health outcomes in bipolar and schizoaffective disorder.

A prospective study of the impact of subthreshold mixed states on the 24-month clinical outcomes of bipolar I disorder or schizoaffective disorder.

OBJECTIVES The clinical significance of subthreshold mixed states is unclear. This study investigated the clinical outcomes in participants with bipolar I disorder or schizoaffective disorder, using the Cassidy and Benazzi criteria for manic and depressive mixed states, respectively. METHODS Participants (N=239) in a prospective observational study of treatment and outcomes in bipolar I or schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, were grouped based on study entry clinical presentation as having pure depression (n=63) if they satisfied DSM-IV-TR criteria for a Major Depressive Episode (MDE), depressive mixed state if they also had at least three concurrent hypomanic symptoms (n=33), or not depressed (n=143) if they did not satisfy the criteria for MDE. Participants were similarly grouped as having pure mania (n=3) if they satisfied DSM-IV criteria for a Manic Episode, manic mixed state if they also had at least two concurrent depressive symptoms (n=33), or not manic (n=203). Clinical data were collected by interview every 3 months over a 24-month period. RESULTS Measures of quality of life, mental and physical health over the 24-month period were significantly worse for participants who were classified as having mixed states at study entry on most outcome measures compared to participants who were not in an illness episode at study entry. A depressive mixed state was predictive of greater manic symptomatology over the 24 months compared to participants with pure depression. CONCLUSION In participants with a current episode of mood disorder, the presence of subthreshold symptoms of opposite polarity was associated with poorer clinical outcomes over a 24-month period.

Depressive, Positive, Negative and Parkinsonian Symptoms in Schizophrenia

Objective: Depressive symptoms are common in schizophrenia but their relationship to the positive and negative symptoms of the disorder and to extrapyramidal side-effects remains unclear. Considerable overlap exists between these symptom clusters when rated with traditional clinical rating scales. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship of depressive to positive, negative and parkinsonian symptoms using the recent adaptation of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Method: The study involved the cross-sectional measurement of symptoms in a sample of community-treated and hospitalized patients with schizophrenia. Structured assessment included the PANSS, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Extrapyramidal Side Effects Rating Scale (ESRS). Results: Depressive symptoms were common and correlated with positive and negative symptoms. These correlations were of a similar magnitude using either the original PANSS factor structure or the newer pentagonal model. The overlap between depressive and negative symptoms was limited to certain items in the rating scales and there was a clear separation between these symptom clusters and the other items. Parkinsonian symptoms also correlated with negative symptoms rated with either PANSS model. Conclusion: Use of the pentagonal PANSS model does not improve its capacity to distinguish between depressive and negative symptoms. Positive, negative, parkinsonian and depressive symptoms overlap using common rating scales but there appears to be some separation between these symptom domains when rated with individual scale items rather than total scale scores.

Australian Schizophrenia Care and Assessment Programme: real-world schizophrenia: economics

OBJECTIVE The treatment of patients with schizophrenia consumes a considerable proportion of health service budgets, yet there have been few attempts to prospectively analyse the costs associated with this condition. Amid the current debate about where to invest scarce treatment resources to achieve optimal outcomes, real-world studies, such as the Schizophrenia Care and Assessment Programme (SCAP) contrast with hypothetically based models and provide comprehensive and broad-ranging data. METHOD Direct health-care costs were prospectively studied in a cohort of 347 patients with schizophrenia in Dandenong, Australia over 3 years. Indirect costs were estimated from patient self-reported information. RESULTS The average annual societal cost was AU

Treatment and outcomes of an Australian cohort of outpatients with bipolar I or schizoaffective disorder over twenty-four months: implications for clinical practice.

32,160 per participant in the first year of the study, AU

Men’s perceived barriers to help seeking for depression: Longitudinal findings relative to symptom onset and duration

27,190 in the second year and AU

Predictors of functional status at service entry and discharge among young people with first episode psychosis

29,181 in the third year. Indirect costs accounted for 46% of the total costs in the first year, 52% of the total costs in the second year and 50% of the total costs in the third year. The most expensive component of treatment was inpatient hospital care, which accounted for 42%, 34% and 36% of the total costs in the first, second and third year, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Considerable resources are required for the provision of treatment for patients with schizophrenia. But for the majority of people in this cohort, funding assertive treatment programmes and measures to reduce hospitalization was accompanied with enhanced functioning and quality of life, as well as a reduction in long-term societal and government costs. The distribution of health-care costs is highly skewed, with a relatively small proportion of patients (39%) consuming the majority of resources (80%). Improving rates of employment for this patient group could hold substantial benefits in reducing the overall economic and personal impact of this disorder.

Early psychosis research at Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health

BackgroundThe Bipolar Comprehensive Outcomes Study (BCOS) is a 2-year, prospective, non-interventional, observational study designed to explore the clinical and functional outcomes associated with ‘real-world’ treatment of participants with bipolar I or schizoaffective disorder. All participants received treatment as usual. There was no study medication.MethodsParticipants prescribed either conventional mood stabilizers (CMS; n = 155) alone, or olanzapine with, or without, CMS (olanzapine ± CMS; n = 84) were assessed every 3 months using several measures, including the Young Mania Rating Scale, 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Clinical Global Impressions Scale – Bipolar Version, and the EuroQol Instrument. This paper reports 24-month longitudinal clinical, pharmacological, functional, and socioeconomic data.ResultsOn average, participants were 42 (range 18 to 79) years of age, 58%; were female, and 73%; had a diagnosis of bipolar I. Polypharmacy was the usual approach to pharmacological treatment; participants took a median of 5 different psychotropic medications over the course of the study, and spent a median proportion of time of 100%; of the study on mood stabilizers, 90%; on antipsychotics, 9%; on antidepressants, and 5%; on benzodiazepines/hypnotics. By 24 months, the majority of participants had achieved both symptomatic and syndromal remission of both mania and depression. Symptomatic relapse rates were similar for both the CMS alone (65%;) and the olanzapine ± CMS (61%;) cohorts.ConclusionsParticipants with bipolar I or schizoaffective disorder in this study were receiving complex medication treatments that were often discordant with recommendations made in contemporary major treatment guidelines. The majority of study participants demonstrated some clinical and functional improvements, but not all achieved remission of symptoms or syndrome.