Kate Grafton

The intra and inter-rater reliability of a modified weight-bearing lunge measure of ankle dorsiflexion

This study assessed the intra and inter-rater reliability of a modified weight-bearing lunge measure of ankle dorsiflexion range of movement. Thirteen healthy subjects were recruited. Each subject performed 3 repetitions of the lunging method with one rater and 3 more repetitions with a second rater within 30 min. The process was repeated within 3 h. Intra-rater reliability results indicated excellent correlation of measurements (intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of 0.98-0.99). Standard error of measurement (SEM), 95% limits of agreement (LOA) and coefficient of repeatability (CR) calculations indicated suitably low ranges of measurement variance (SEM = 0.4 cm, LOA = ± 1.28 to ± 1.47 cm and CR = 1.21-1.35 cm). Inter-rater reliability was also deemed excellent (ICC = 0.99, SEM = 0.3 cm, LOA = ± 0.83 to ± 1.47 cm, CR = 1.44 cm). The modified lunge technique therefore demonstrates excellent intra and inter-rater reliability.

Evaluation of the Test-retest Reliability of the Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire

Repository use policy Copyright

A survey on the use of outcome measures by musculoskeletal physiotherapist’s in India

Abstract In recent times, there has been great pressure on physiotherapists to become accountable for their practices and to provide evidence for effectiveness of their treatment. Therefore, it has become necessary to integrate standardised outcome measures (OMs) into clinical practice and boost evidence-based practice. The aim of this study was to determine the extent of use of outcome measures among physiotherapists in India and to identify the commonly used measures. A survey was conducted using a questionnaire consisting of 23 closed-ended questions. It was administered face-to-face and via email to Indian physiotherapists working with musculoskeletal patients. The response rate was 54% (n = 81). The results indicated 80% of the respondents used OMs with impairment-based measures being the most commonly used. Education qualifications, years of work experience and workplace setting were not significantly associated with utilisation of OMs. Various benefits and barriers to use of OMs were also identified. The findings of this study give insight into possible changes that could be incorporated in clinical practice and educational system for developing a standardised level of assessing patients and to tailor future implementation strategies.

A systematic review of grounded theory studies in physiotherapy

ABSTRACT Aim: This systematic review aimed at appraising the methodological rigor of grounded theory research published in the field of physiotherapy to assess how the methodology is understood and applied. A secondary aim was to provide research implications drawn from the findings to guide future grounded theory methodology (GTM) research. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, CINHAL, SPORT Discus, Science Direct, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify studies in the field of physiotherapy that reported using GTM and/or methods in the study title and/or abstract. The descriptive characteristics and methodological quality of eligible studies were examined using grounded theory methodology assessment guidelines. Findings: The review included 68 studies conducted between 1998 and 2017. The findings showed that GTM is becoming increasingly used by physiotherapy researchers. Thirty-six studies (53%) demonstrated a good understanding and appropriate application of GTM. Thirty-two studies (47%) presented descriptive findings and were considered to be of poor methodological quality. Conclusions: There are several key tenets of GTM that are integral to the iterative process of qualitative theorizing and need to be applied throughout all research practices including sampling, data collection, and analysis.