Kate Haddley

Regulation and role of REST and REST4 variants in modulation of gene expression in in vivo and in vitro in epilepsy models.

Repressor element-1 silencing transcription factor (REST) is a candidate modulator of gene expression during status epilepticus in the rodent. In such models, full-length REST and the truncated REST4 variant are induced and can potentially direct differential gene expression patterns. We have addressed the regulation of these REST variants in rodent hippocampal seizure models and correlated this with expression of the proconvulsant, substance P encoding, PPT-A gene. REST and REST4 were differentially regulated following kainic acid stimulus both in in vitro and in vivo models. REST4 was more tightly regulated than REST in both models and its transient expression correlated with that of the differential regulation of PPT-A. Consistent with this, overexpression of a truncated REST protein (HZ4, lacking the C-terminal repression domain) increased expression of the endogenous PPT-A gene. Similarly the proximal PPT-A promoter reporter gene construct was differentially regulated by the distinct REST isoforms in hippocampal cells with HZ4 being the major inducer of increased reporter expression. Furthermore, REST and REST4 proteins were differentially expressed and compartmentalized within rat hippocampal cells in vitro following noxious stimuli. This differential localization of the REST isoforms was confirmed in the CA1 region following perforant path and kainic acid induction of status epilepticus in vivo. We propose that the interplay between REST and REST4 alter the expression of proconvulsant genes, as exemplified by the PPT-A gene, and may therefore regulate the progression of epileptogenesis.

Molecular Genetics of Monoamine Transporters: Relevance to Brain Disorders

We have demonstrated in both the human serotonin transporter gene (5HTT) and the dopamine transporter gene (DAT1) that specific polymorphic variants termed Variable Number Tandem Repeats (VNTRs), which correlate with predisposition to a number of neurological and psychiatric disorders, act as transcriptional regulatory domains. We have demonstrated that these domains can act as both tissue-specific and stimulus-inducible regulators of gene expression. As such they can act to be mechanistically associated with the progression or initiation of a behavioural disorder by altering the level of transporter mRNA, which in turn regulates the concentration of transporter in specific cells or in response to a challenge; chemical, environmental or physiological. The synergistic actions of such transcriptional domains will modulate gene expression. Our hypothesis is that these VNTR variants are one mechanism by which nurture can modify concentrations of neurotransmitters in a differential manner.

Combinatorial interaction between two human serotonin transporter gene variable number tandem repeats and their regulation by CTCF.

J. Neurochem. (2010) 112, 296–306.

NO‐cGMP mediated galanin expression in NGF‐deprived or axotomized sensory neurons

Leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF) and nerve growth factor (NGF) are well characterized regulators of galanin expression. However, LIF knockout mice containing the rat galanin 5′ proximal promoter fragment (− 2546 to + 15 bp) driving luciferase responded to axotomy in the same way as control mice. Also, LIF had no effect on reporter gene expression in vitro, neither in the presence or absence of NGF, suggesting that other factors mediate an axotomy response from the galanin promoter. We then addressed the role of nitric oxide (NO) using NGF‐deprived rat dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neuron cultures infected with viral vectors containing the above‐mentioned construct, and also studied endogenous galanin expression in axotomized DRG in vivo. Blocking endogenous NO in NGF‐deprived DRG cultures suppressed galanin promoter activity. Consistent with this, axotomized/NGF‐deprived DRG neurons expressed high levels of neuronal NO synthase (nNOS) and galanin. Further, using pharmacological NOS blockers, or adenoviral vectors expressing dominant‐negative either for nNOS or soluble guanylate cyclase in vivo and in vitro, we show that the NO‐cGMP pathway induces endogenous galanin in DRG neurons. We propose that both LIF and NO, acting at different promoter regions, are important for the up‐regulation of galanin, and for DRG neuron survival and regeneration after axotomy.

The SLC6A4 VNTR genotype determines transcription factor binding and epigenetic variation of this gene in response to cocaine in vitro

We demonstrated that the genotype of the variable number tandem repeats (VNTRs) in the linked polymorphic region (LPR) of the 5′ promoter and in the intron 2 (Stin2) transcriptional regulatory domains of the serotonin transporter SLC6A4 gene determined its promoter interactions with transcription factors and co‐activators in response to cocaine in the JAr cell line. The LPR variants contain 14 (short, s) or 16 (long, l) copies of a 22–23 bp repeat element, whereas the Stin2 VNTR exists as three variants containing 9, 10 or 12 copies of a 16–17 bp repeat. We observed a differential effect of cocaine on the association of the promoter with the transcription factor CTCF, which bound to both LPR alleles prior to cocaine exposure but only to the l‐allele following exposure. Significantly, this differential effect of cocaine was correlated with the binding of the transcriptional regulator MeCP2 specifically to the s‐allele and recruiting the histone deacetylase complex (HDAC). Concurrently, cocaine increased the association of positive histone marks over the SLC6A4 gene locus. At the Stin2 domain, we lost binding of the transcription factor YB‐1, while CTCF remained bound. Our biochemical data are consistent with differential reporter gene activity directed by the individual or dual domains in response to cocaine in an Epstein–Barr virus‐based episome model of stable transfections. These observations suggest that exposure of JAr cells to cocaine may result in differential binding of transcription factors and activators based on a specific genotype that might alter epigenetic parameters affecting gene expression after the initial challenge.

The human neurokinin B gene, TAC3, and its promoter are regulated by Neuron Restrictive Silencing Factor (NRSF) transcription factor family

We have previously shown that one of the major determinants directing the expression of the preprotachykinin-A (TAC1) gene, which encodes the neuropeptide substance P, is the transcription factor Neuronal Restrictive Silencer Factor (NSRF), which is also termed Repressor Element-1 Silencing Factor (REST). In rodent models of epilepsy, NRSF and its truncated isoform short NRSF (sNRSF), also termed REST4, are increased as an immediate response to seizure. In similar models the neurokinin B (NKB) gene (TAC3) is also induced and NKB has also been shown to be proconvulsant. In this communication we have demonstrated that both the TAC3 endogenous gene and its promoter are regulated, directly or indirectly, by the NRSF transcription factors resulting in both the increased expression of the endogenous gene and increased reporter gene activity. We demonstrate by chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis that NRSF and sNRSF will bind to the NKB promoter in vivo. Consistent with a model in which NRSF modulation of TAC3 gene expression is a mechanism that operates during epilepsy, the observed increases in both the level of the endogenous gene and the activity of the NKB promoter by these NRSF variants, were diminished by the action of the anticonvulsant drug, carbamazepine.

Behavioural Genetics of the Serotonin Transporter

The serotonin transporter is a key regulator of the bioavailability of serotonin and therefore any modulation in the expression or action of the transporter would be expected to have consequences on behaviour. The transporter has therefore become a target for pharmaceutical intervention in behavioural and mood disorders. The search for polymorphic variants in the transporter that would associate with neurological disorders has been extensive but has become focused on two domains which are both termed variable number tandem repeat (VNTR)polymorphisms. Both of these VNTRs are in non-coding DNA and therefore proposed to be mechanistically involved in a disorder through their ability to modulate transcriptional or post-transcriptional regulation of the transporter. The most extensively studied is in the promoter and is a bi-allelic insertion/deletion found in the 50 promoter region of the gene 1.2 kb upstream of the transcriptional start site. This VNTR, termed, 5-HTTLPR was initially identified as two variants containing either, 14 (short/deletion) or 16 (long/insertion) copies of a 22 bp repeat. A second widely studied VNTR found in the non-coding region of the transporter is located within intron 2 and comprises 9, 10 or 12 copies of a16–17 bp repeat termed, STin2.9, STin2.10 and STin2.12, respectively. These VNTR polymorphisms have been associated with a range of behavioural and psychiatric disorders including depression, OCD, anxiety and schizophrenia, however often the lack of reproducibility in different cohorts has led to debate on the actual association of the polymorphisms with this extensive range of neurological conditions. Here we review these two polymorphic VNTRs in depth and relate that to pharmaceutical response, their ability to regulate differential transporter expression, their core involvement in gene-environment interaction and their genetic association with specific disorders.

Mood-stabilizers differentially affect housekeeping gene expression in human cells

Recent studies have revealed that antidepressants affect the expression of constitutively expressed “housekeeping genes” commonly used as normalizing reference genes in quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) experiments. There has yet to be an investigation however on the effects of mood‐stabilizers on housekeeping gene stability. The current study utilized lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) derived from patients with mood disorders to investigate the effects of a range of doses of lithium (0, 1, 2 and 5 mM) and sodium valproate (0, 0.06, 0.03 and 0.6 mM) on the stability of 12 housekeeping genes. RNA was extracted from LCLs and qPCR was used to generate cycle threshold (Ct) values which were input into RefFinder analyses. The study revealed drug‐specific effects on housekeeping gene stability. The most stable housekeeping genes in LCLs treated: acutely with sodium valproate were ACTB and RPL13A; acutely with lithium were GAPDH and ATP5B; chronically with lithium were ATP5B and CYC1. The stability of GAPDH and B2M were particularly affected by duration of lithium treatment. The study adds to a growing literature that the selection of appropriate housekeeping genes is important for the accurate normalization of target gene expression in experiments investigating the molecular effects of mood disorder pharmacotherapies. Copyright

Activity-Dependent Neuroprotective Protein Modulates Its Own Gene Expression

We investigated whether activity-dependent neuroprotective protein (ADNP) could autoregulate its own expression. Both the endogenous ADNP gene and reporter gene constructs were analysed in response to overexpression of ADNP, supplied either as wild-type ADNP or a mutant form lacking the NAP motif, a motif which has neuroprotective properties. Overexpression of these two forms of ADNP resulted in both decreased endogenous ADNP expression and repressed ADNP promoter-directed reporter gene activity. Chromatin immunoprecipitation demonstrated the ability of ADNP to bind to its own promoter which is consistent with its action as a repressor of both promoter-supported and endogenous ADNP expression.

A proximal E-box modulates NGF effects on rat PPT-A promoter activity in cultured dorsal root ganglia neurones.

The rat preprotachykinin A (rtPPTA) promoter fragment spanning -865+92, relative to the major transcriptional start, has previously been demonstrated to be nerve growth factor (NGF) responsive in primary cultures of rat dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurones [Harrison, P.T., Dalziel, R.G., Ditchfield, N.A., Quinn, J.P., 1999. Neuronal-specific and nerve growth factor-inducible expression directed by the preprotachykinin-A promoter delivered by an adeno-associated virus vector. Neuroscience 94, 997-1003]. In this communication, we demonstrate that an E box element at -60, in part, regulates the activity of this rtPPT-A promoter fragment in DRG neurones in response to NGF. Differential regulation of the promoter is observed in the presence or absence of NGF when the E Box site is present. Under basal conditions binding of proteins to this -60 element may antagonise promoter activity. Hence, in the absence of NGF, mutation of the -60 E box increased reporter gene expression. Further, comparison of levels of reporter gene expression supported by both WT and mutated promoter indicate that in the presence of NGF the -60 E box element also plays a role as an activator domain. This represents a novel mechanism for NGF regulation of rtPPT-A. Similarly, an important role for this signalling pathway was observed in neonate rat DRG neuronal cultures, which require NGF for their survival, namely mutation of the -60 element resulted in higher levels of reporter gene expression.