Kate Orr
University of Glasgow
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Kate Orr.
Molecular Ecology | 1998
Richard Griffiths; Mike C. Double; Kate Orr; Robert J. G. Dawson
Birds are difficult to sex. Nestlings rarely show sex‐linked morphology and we estimate that adult females appear identical to males in over 50% of the worlds bird species. This problem can hinder both evolutionary studies and human‐assisted breeding of birds. DNA‐based sex identification provides a solution. We describe a test based on two conserved CHD (chromo‐helicase‐DNA‐binding) genes that are located on the avian sex chromosomes of all birds, with the possible exception of the ratites (ostriches, etc.; Struthioniformes). The CHD‐W gene is located on the W chromosome; therefore it is unique to females. The other gene, CHD‐Z, is found on the Z chromosome and therefore occurs in both sexes (female, ZW; male, ZZ). The test employs PCR with a single set of primers. It amplifies homologous sections of both genes and incorporates introns whose lengths usually differ. When examined on a gel there is a single CHD‐Z band in males but females have a second, distinctive CHD‐W band.
Molecular Ecology | 1999
Richard Griffiths; Kate Orr
Sex identification is a problem in research and conservation. It can often be solved using a DNA test but this is only an option if a sex‐specific marker is available. Such markers can be identified using the amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) technique. This is usually a taxonomic method, as it produces a DNA fingerprint of 50–100 PCR bands. However, if male and female AFLP products are compared, sex‐specific markers are confined to the heterogametic sex and can rapidly be identified. Once a marker is found, AFLP can be used to sex organisms directly or the marker can be sequenced and a standard PCR test designed.
Molecular Ecology | 2003
Kathryn E. Arnold; Kate Orr; Richard Griffiths
Sex allocation studies seek to ascertain whether mothers manipulate offspring sex ratio prior to ovulation. To do so, DNA for molecular sexing should be collected as soon after conception as possible, but instead neonates are usually sampled. Here, we aim to identify and quantify some of the problems associated with using molecular techniques to identify the sex of newly laid avian eggs. From both fertilized and unfertilized chicken (Gallus gallus) eggs, we sampled (1) the blastoderm/disc, (2) vitelline membrane and (3) a mixture of (1) and (2). Thus, we replicated scenarios under which contaminated samples are taken and/or unfertilized eggs are not identified as such and are sampled. We found that two commonly used molecular sexing tests, based on the CHD‐1 genes, differed in sensitivity, but this did not always predict their ability to sex egg samples. The vitelline membrane was a considerable source of maternal and probably paternal contamination. Fertile eggs were regularly assigned the wrong sex when vitelline membrane contaminated the blastoderm sample. The membrane of unfertilized eggs was always female, i.e. maternal DNA had been amplified. DNA was amplified from 47 to 63% of unfertilized blastodiscs, even though it was highly unlikely that DNA from a single haploid cell could be amplified reliably using these polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques. Surprisingly, the blastodiscs were identified as both males and females. We suggest that in these cases only maternal DNA was amplified, and that ‘false’ males, Z not ZZ, were detected. This was due to the reduced ability of both sets of primers to anneal to the W chromosome compared to the Z chromosome at low DNA concentrations. Overall, our data suggested that estimates of primary sex ratios based on newly laid eggs will be appreciably inaccurate.
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences | 2003
Kathryn E. Arnold; Richard Griffiths; David J. Stevens; Kate Orr; Aileen Adam; David C. Houston
Mothers are predicted to overproduce male or female eggs when the relative fitness gains from one sex are higher and outweigh the costs of manipulation. However, in birds such biases are often difficult to distinguish from differential embryo or chick mortality. Using a molecular technique to identify the sex of early embryos, we aim to determine the effect of maternal nutrition on zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) egg sex ratios after 2 days of incubation, which is as close to conception as is currently possible. We found no overall bias in the sex ratio of eggs laid and sex did not differ with relative laying order under any diet regime. However, mothers on a low-quality diet did produce a female bias in small clutches and a slight male bias in large clutches. On a high-quality diet, mothers produced a male bias in small clutches and a female bias in large clutches. Those on a standard diet produced a roughly even sex ratio, irrespective of clutch size. These observed biases in egg sex are partly in line with predictions that, in this species, daughters suffer disproportionately from poor rearing conditions. Thus, when relatively malnourished, mothers should only rear daughters in small broods and vice versa. Sex-ratio patterns in this species therefore appear to be subtle.
Comparative Haematology International | 1999
Stuart Bearhop; Richard Griffiths; Kate Orr; Robert W. Furness
Routine haematological investigations were carried out on 102 wild adult great skuasCatharacta skua. No sex- or age-related differences were detected in any of the parameters measured. There are very few sets of haematological reference ranges published for seabirds from the northeastern Atlantic. Given the recent pollution threats in this region, the reference ranges presented for this species could be a valuable tool in future conservation efforts.
Ibis | 2005
Sue Lewis; E. A. Schreiber; Francis Daunt; G. A. Schenk; Kate Orr; Aileen Adams; Sarah Wanless; Keith C. Hamer
Journal of Avian Biology | 2007
Kathryn E. Arnold; Jonathan D. Blount; Neil B. Metcalfe; Kate Orr; Aileen Adam; David C. Houston; Pat Monaghan
Behavioral Ecology | 2005
Alison N. Rutstein; Helen E. Gorman; Kathryn E. Arnold; Lucy Gilbert; Kate Orr; Aileen Adam; Ruedi G. Nager; Jeff A. Graves
Zoo Biology | 1998
Cristina Y. Miyaki; Richard Griffiths; Kate Orr; Laila A. Nahum; Sérgio Luiz Pereira; Anita Wajntal
Journal of Fish Biology | 2003
Kathryn E. Arnold; Aileen Adam; Kate Orr; Richard Griffiths; Iain Barber