Katerina Kopeckova
Charles University in Prague
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Katerina Kopeckova.
Clinical Colorectal Cancer | 2017
Young soo Rho; Marine Gilabert; Karol Polom; Archil Aladashvili; Katerina Kopeckova; Niamh Coleman; Megan Greally; Daniele Marrelli; Franco Roviello; Ray McDermott; Veneta Petrova; Zhasmina Mihaylova; Zbynek Bortlicek; Jana Prausová; Gerald Batist; Laurent Azoulay; Petr Kavan
Micro‐Abstract Colorectal cancer in young patients is often diagnosed late, at advanced stages. These patients have more resistant and aggressive disease, despite similar clinical treatment patterns compared with those with late‐onset disease. Background Compared with the general population, the incidence of young‐onset (YO) colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing. However, a significant knowledge gap exists in the clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes for these patients. Materials and Methods Six international tertiary cancer centers conducted a retrospective study. Patients with YO CRC (aged 18‐44 years) and LO CRC (aged > 44 years) diagnosed with histologically proven colorectal adenocarcinoma from June 2003 to June 2014 were enrolled. Patients were randomly chosen from each centers database, and the patient demographics and treatment information were collected. The data were then centralized, and the final analysis was performed at a single institution. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for progression‐free survival and mortality, and YO was compared with LO. Site‐specific HRs were pooled using a random‐effects meta‐analysis. Results Overall, 498 patients, including 224 with YO (129 men; mean age, 37 ± 5.5 years) and 274 with LO (167 men; mean age, 64.8 ± 9.5 years) CRC, were included. At the diagnosis, 137 patients (61.2%) and 122 patients (44.5%) with YO and LO CRC had metastatic disease, respectively. For both cohorts, the 3 most common presenting symptoms were pain, hematochezia, and weight loss. Surgery was performed in 141 YO (63.0%) and 219 LO (79.9%) patients. The longitudinal noncurative treatment patterns were similar, but more biologic therapy was used for these YO patients. The pooled progression‐free survival analysis results for first‐line noncurative treatment favored LO (HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.04‐3.68). The mortality analysis showed no significant differences between the 2 groups (YO: HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 0.91‐2.58). Conclusion Despite similar treatment patterns and survival outcomes, YO disease might be clinically more aggressive.
Clinical Genitourinary Cancer | 2017
Tomáš Büchler; Alexandr Poprach; Zbynek Bortlicek; Radek Lakomy; Renata Chloupková; Rostislav Vyzula; Milada Zemanová; Katerina Kopeckova; Marek Svoboda; Ondrej Slaby; Igor Kiss; Hana Študentová; Jana Hornova; Ondrej Fiala; Jindrich Kopecky; Jindrich Finek; Ladislav Dušek; Bohuslav Melichar
Micro‐Abstract Although targeted therapies are the mainstay of treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma there are limited data on the outcomes of patients with long‐term responses. We report the outcomes of a registry‐based study of patients continuously treated with first‐line targeted therapy for at least 24 months. There were clinically important differences in survival between patients who achieved complete response and those with partial response or stable disease. These differences had not been described before and are important for treatment optimization of this patient subgroup. Background: Although targeted therapies with inhibitors of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are the mainstay of treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma, there are limited data on the outcome of patients with long‐term response to this treatment. Patients and Methods: In a retrospective, registry‐based study, patients continuously treated with first‐line anti‐VEGF agents for at least 24 months were included. In total, 219 patients had evaluable data and were included in the outcome analysis. Results: Median progression‐free survival (PFS) after initiation of first‐line targeted therapy was 39.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 35.9‐43.5 months), with 5‐year PFS of 34.2% (95% CI, 27.2%‐41.2%). Median overall survival (OS) reached 79.1 months (95% CI, 65.2‐93.0 months) with the 5‐year OS of 62.1% (95% CI, 54.5%‐69.7%). In this cohort, 28, 103, and 88 patients achieved complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) as the best response, respectively. Median PFS and OS were comparable in patients with PR and SD, but significantly longer in patients with CR (log rank test P value for PFS difference < .001 and .009 for OS difference). Conclusion: There are marked differences in PFS and OS between patients who receive long‐term anti‐VEGF treatment, achieving CR and non‐CR as the best clinical response. Patients with non‐CR experienced a relatively high progression rate shortly after the landmark time point of 2 years.
Macromolecular Bioscience | 2018
Johana Plch; Kristyna Venclikova; Olga Janoušková; Jan Hrabeta; Tomas Eckschlager; Katerina Kopeckova; Zuzana Hampejsova; Zuzana Bosáková; Jakub Sirc; Radka Hobzova
Local application of anticancer agents prolongs the presence time and increases the concentration of drug in the target place and therefore may reduce serious side effects compared to drug systemic administration. The preparation of fibrous materials of polylactide (PLA) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) loaded with paclitaxel (PTX, 1 or 10 wt%) is presented. Scanning electron microscopy proves that PTX is homogeneously incorporated into the fibers. The addition of PEG of various molecular weights (6, 20, or 35 kDa) ensures the release of significantly higher amounts of hydrophobic PTX in a prolonged release time compared to the fibers containing PTX only. Present PLA-PEG fibrous carriers can serve as a drug depot for PTX since they exhibit significant toxicity for cancer cell lines in several-day experiment. They are promising for local recurrence therapy, where the initial release is efficient to kill tumor cells and continued release can prevent their subsequent proliferation.
British Journal of Cancer | 2018
Ian Chau; Joon Oh Park; Baek Yeol Ryoo; Chia Jui Yen; Ronnie Tung-Ping Poon; Davide Pastorelli; Jean Frédéric Blanc; Masatoshi Kudo; Tulio Pfiffer; Etsuro Hatano; Hyun Cheol Chung; Katerina Kopeckova; Jean Marc Phelip; Giovanni Brandi; Shinichi Ohkawa; Chung Pin Li; Takuji Okusaka; Yanzhi Hsu; Paolo B. Abada; Andrew X. Zhu
BackgroundPost-hoc analyses of AFP response and progression and their relationship with objective measures of response and survival were performed in patients from REACH.MethodsSerum AFP was measured at baseline and every 3 cycles (2 weeks/cycle). Associations between AFP and radiographic progression and efficacy end points were analysed.ResultsMedian percent AFP increase from baseline was smaller in the ramucirumab than in the placebo arm throughout treatment. Time to AFP progression (HR 0.621; P < 0.0001) and to radiographic progression (HR 0.613; P < 0.0001) favoured ramucirumab. Association between AFP and radiographic progression was shown at 6 (OR 6.44, 95% CI 4.03, 10.29; P < 0.0001) and 12 weeks (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.47, 3.53; P = 0.0002). AFP response was higher with ramucirumab compared with placebo (P < 0.0001). More patients in the ramucirumab arm experienced tumour shrinkage and AFP response compared with placebo. Survival was longer in patients with AFP response (13.6 months) than in patients without (6.2 months), irrespective of treatment (HR 0.457, P < 0.0001).ConclusionsTreatment with ramucirumab prolonged time to AFP progression, slowed AFP increase and was more likely to induce AFP response. Similar benefits in radiographic progression and response correlated with AFP changes.
Targeted Oncology | 2017
Katerina Kopeckova; Tomáš Büchler; Zbynek Bortlicek; Karel Hejduk; Renata Chloupková; Bohuslav Melichar; Petra Pokorná; Jiri Tomasek; Zdenek Linke; Lubos Petruzelka; Igor Kiss; Jana Prausová
BMC Cancer | 2017
Radek Lakomy; Alexandr Poprach; Zbynek Bortlicek; Bohuslav Melichar; Renata Chloupková; Rostislav Vyzula; Milada Zemanová; Katerina Kopeckova; Marek Svoboda; Ondrej Slaby; Igor Kiss; Hana Študentová; Jaroslav Juracek; Ondrej Fiala; Jindrich Kopecky; Jindrich Finek; Ladislav Dušek; Karel Hejduk; Tomáš Büchler
Targeted Oncology | 2018
Ondrej Fiala; Veronika Veskrnova; Renata Chloupková; Alexandr Poprach; Igor Kiss; Katerina Kopeckova; Ladislav Dušek; Lubomír Slavíček; Milan Kohoutek; Jindrich Finek; Marek Svoboda; Lubos Petruzelka; Ludmila Boublíková; Josef Dvorak; Bohuslav Melichar; Tomáš Büchler
Anticancer Research | 2018
Alexandr Poprach; Ondrej Fiala; Renata Chloupková; Bohuslav Melichar; Radek Lakomy; Katarína Petráková; Milada Zemanová; Katerina Kopeckova; Ondrej Slaby; Hana Študentová; Jindrich Kopecký; Igor Kiss; Jindrich Finek; Ladislav Dušek; Tomáš Büchler
Annals of Oncology | 2018
Jindrich Finek; Regina Demlová; Katerina Kopeckova; Tomáš Büchler; Bohuslav Melichar; Jana Prausová; Alexandr Poprach; T Hrnciarova; T Mlcoch; T Dolezal
Annals of Oncology | 2018
Katerina Kopeckova; Renata Chloupková; Bohuslav Melichar; Z Linke; Lubos Petruzelka; Jindrich Finek; O Fiala; Jiri Tomasek; Igor Kiss; Jana Prausová; Tomáš Büchler