Katherine E. Whitaker
University of Massachusetts Amherst
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Katherine E. Whitaker.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2010
Pieter G. van Dokkum; Katherine E. Whitaker; Gabriel Brammer; Marijn Franx; Mariska Kriek; Ivo Labbé; Danilo Marchesini; Ryan F. Quadri; Rachel Bezanson; Garth D. Illingworth; Adam Muzzin; Gregory Rudnick; Tomer Tal; David A. Wake
We study the growth of massive galaxies from z = 2 to the present using data from the NOAO/Yale NEWFIRM Medium Band Survey. The sample is selected at a constant number density of n = 2 ? 10?4?Mpc?3, so that galaxies at different epochs can be compared in a meaningful way. We show that the stellar mass of galaxies at this number density has increased by a factor of 2 since z = 2, following the relation log Mn (z) = 11.45 ? 0.15z. In order to determine at what physical radii this mass growth occurred, we construct very deep stacked rest-frame R-band images of galaxies with masses near Mn (z), at redshifts z = 0.6, 1.1, 1.6, and 2.0. These image stacks of typically 70-80 galaxies enable us to characterize the stellar distribution to surface brightness limits of ~28.5 mag?arcsec?2. We find that massive galaxies gradually built up their outer regions over the past 10 Gyr. The mass within a radius of r = 5?kpc is nearly constant with redshift, whereas the mass at 5 kpc < r < 75?kpc has increased by a factor of ~4 since z = 2. Parameterizing the surface brightness profiles, we find that the effective radius and Sersic n parameter evolve as re (1 + z)?1.3 and n (1 + z)?1.0, respectively. The data demonstrate that massive galaxies have grown mostly inside-out, assembling their extended stellar halos around compact, dense cores with possibly exponential radial density distributions. Comparing the observed mass evolution to the average star formation rates of the galaxies we find that the growth is likely dominated by mergers, as in situ star formation can only account for ~20% of the mass buildup from z = 2 to z = 0. A direct consequence of these results is that massive galaxies do not evolve in a self-similar way: their structural profiles change as a function of redshift, complicating analyses which (often implicitly) assume self-similarity. The main uncertainties in this study are possible redshift-dependent systematic errors in the total stellar masses and the conversion from light-weighted to mass-weighted radial profiles.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2014
Katherine E. Whitaker; Marijn Franx; Joel Leja; Pieter G. van Dokkum; Alaina Henry; Rosalind E. Skelton; Mattia Fumagalli; Ivelina Momcheva; Gabriel B. Brammer; Ivo Labbé; Erica J. Nelson; Jane R. Rigby
We constrain the slope of the star formation rate (
Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 2014
Rosalind E. Skelton; Katherine E. Whitaker; Ivelina Momcheva; Gabriel B. Brammer; Pieter G. van Dokkum; Ivo Labbé; Marijn Franx; Arjen van der Wel; Rachel Bezanson; Elisabete da Cunha; Mattia Fumagalli; Natascha M. Foerster Schreiber; Mariska Kriek; Joel Leja; Britt Lundgren; D. Magee; Danilo Marchesini; Michael V. Maseda; Erica J. Nelson; P. A. Oesch; Camilla Pacifici; Shannon G. Patel; Sedona H. Price; Hans-Walter Rix; Tomer Tal; David A. Wake; Stijn Wuyts
\log\Psi
The Astrophysical Journal | 2011
Katherine E. Whitaker; Ivo Labbé; Pieter G. van Dokkum; Gabriel Brammer; Mariska Kriek; Danilo Marchesini; Ryan F. Quadri; Marijn Franx; Adam Muzzin; Rik J. Williams; Rachel Bezanson; Garth D. Illingworth; Kyoung-Soo Lee; Britt Lundgren; Erica J. Nelson; Gregory Rudnick; Tomer Tal; David A. Wake
) to stellar mass (
The Astrophysical Journal | 2011
David A. Wake; Katherine E. Whitaker; Ivo Labbé; Pieter G. van Dokkum; Marijn Franx; Ryan F. Quadri; Gabriel Brammer; Mariska Kriek; Britt Lundgren; Danilo Marchesini; Adam Muzzin
\log\mathrm{M_{\star}}
The Astrophysical Journal | 2012
Katherine E. Whitaker; Mariska Kriek; Pieter G. van Dokkum; Rachel Bezanson; Gabriel B. Brammer; Marijn Franx; Ivo Labbé
) relation down to
The Astrophysical Journal | 2014
P. Lang; Stijn Wuyts; Rachel S. Somerville; Natascha M. Förster Schreiber; R. Genzel; Eric F. Bell; Gabe Brammer; Avishai Dekel; Sandra M. Faber; Henry C. Ferguson; Norman A. Grogin; Dale D. Kocevski; Anton M. Koekemoer; D. Lutz; Elizabeth J. McGrath; Ivelina Momcheva; Erica J. Nelson; Joel R. Primack; D. Rosario; Rosalind E. Skelton; L. J. Tacconi; Pieter G. van Dokkum; Katherine E. Whitaker
\log(\mathrm{M_{\star}/M_{\odot}})=8.4
Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 2016
Ivelina Momcheva; Gabriel B. Brammer; Pieter G. van Dokkum; Rosalind E. Skelton; Katherine E. Whitaker; Erica J. Nelson; Mattia Fumagalli; Michael V. Maseda; Joel Leja; Marijn Franx; H.-W. Rix; Rachel Bezanson; Elisabete da Cunha; Claire Mackay Dickey; Natascha M. Förster Schreiber; Garth D. Illingworth; Mariska Kriek; Ivo Labbé; Johannes U. Lange; Britt Lundgren; D. Magee; Danilo Marchesini; P. A. Oesch; Camilla Pacifici; Shannon G. Patel; Sedona H. Price; Tomer Tal; David A. Wake; Arjen van der Wel; Stijn Wuyts
(
The Astrophysical Journal | 2011
Jesse van de Sande; Mariska Kriek; Marijn Franx; Pieter G. van Dokkum; Rachel Bezanson; Katherine E. Whitaker; Gabriel B. Brammer; Ivo Labbé; Paul J. De Groot; L. Kaper
\log(\mathrm{M_{\star}/M_{\odot}})=9.2
The Astrophysical Journal | 2015
Pieter G. van Dokkum; Erica J. Nelson; Marijn Franx; P. A. Oesch; Ivelina Momcheva; Gabriel B. Brammer; Natascha M. Förster Schreiber; Rosalind E. Skelton; Katherine E. Whitaker; Arjen van der Wel; Rachel Bezanson; Mattia Fumagalli; Garth D. Illingworth; Mariska Kriek; Joel Leja; Stijn Wuyts
) at