Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Katherine Hawley is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Katherine Hawley.


Synthese | 2006

Science as a Guide to Metaphysics

Katherine Hawley

1. Introduction Analytic metaphysics is in resurgence; there is renewed and vigorous interest in topics such as time, causation, persistence, parthood and possible worlds. We who share this interest often pay lip-service to the idea that metaphysics should be informed by modern science; some take this duty very seriously.


Australasian Journal of Philosophy | 2010

Mereology, Modality and Magic

Katherine Hawley

If the property being a methane molecule is a universal, then it is a structural universal: objects instantiate being a methane molecule just in case they have the right sorts of proper parts arranged in the right sort of way. Lewis argued that there can be no satisfactory account of structural universals; in this paper I provide a satisfactory account.


Australasian Journal of Philosophy | 2006

Principles of composition and criteria of identity1

Katherine Hawley

I argue that, despite van Inwagens pessimism about the task, it is worth looking for answers to his General Composition Question. Such answers or ‘principles of composition’ tell us about the relationship between an object and its parts. I compare principles of composition with criteria of identity, arguing that, just as different sorts of thing satisfy different criteria of identity, they may satisfy different principles of composition. Variety in criteria of identity is not taken to reflect ontological variety in the identity relation; I discuss whether variety in principles of composition should be taken to reflect ontological variety in the composition relation.


Synthese | 2014

Partiality and prejudice in trusting

Katherine Hawley

You can trust your friends. You should trust your friends. Not all of your friends all of the time: you can reasonably trust different friends to different degrees, and in different domains. Still, we often trust our friends, and it is often reasonable to do so. Why is this? In this paper I explore how and whether friendship gives us reasons to trust our friends, reasons which may outstrip or conflict with our epistemic reasons. In the final section, I will sketch some related questions concerning trust based on the trustee’s race, gender, or other social identity.


Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice | 2015

Trust and distrust between patient and doctor

Katherine Hawley

To trust someone is to have expectations of their behaviour; distrust often involves disappointed expectations. But healthy trust and distrust require a good understanding of which expectations are reasonable, and which are not. In this paper, I discuss the limits of trustworthiness by drawing on recent studies of trust in the context of defensive medicine, biobanking and cardiopulmonary resuscitation decisions.To trust someone is to have expectations of their behaviour; distrust often involves disappointed expectations. But healthy trust and distrust require a good understanding of which expectations are reasonable, and which are not. In this paper, I discuss the limits of trustworthiness by drawing on recent studies of trust in the context of defensive medicine, biobanking and cardiopulmonary resuscitation decisions.


International Studies in The Philosophy of Science | 2010

The Structure of Objects

Katherine Hawley

The main text aims to be non-technical and for all readers, while the footnotes give scientific references, clarifications, defences, and technical jargon. The appendix contains technical ideas relevant to the main chapters. This works to a certain extent, but I still think the main text may be a bit dense and dry for the general reader. Most of the book is written in a philosophical-scientific style, which is fine. But GodfreySmith has moments where there is integration of entertaining, fun, and intriguing examples with deep insights. I would have liked to see even more of that. Considering the fascinating subject, I think it would have been possible to make this book a notch wittier without losing the scientific weight. Still, this is definitely a well-written and well-argued original contribution that is a must-read for anyone interested in evolution.


Mind | 2009

Identity and Indiscernibility

Katherine Hawley


Noûs | 2014

Trust, distrust and commitment

Katherine Hawley


Philosophical Perspectives | 2011

What are Natural Kinds

Katherine Hawley; Alexander J Bird


Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society | 2002

VII—Vagueness and Existence

Katherine Hawley

Collaboration


Dive into the Katherine Hawley's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Don Ross

University of Cape Town

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge