Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Katherine L. Gross is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Katherine L. Gross.


Ecology | 2001

What is the observed relationship between species richness and productivity

Gary G. Mittelbach; Christopher F. Steiner; Samuel M. Scheiner; Katherine L. Gross; Heather L. Reynolds; Robert B. Waide; Michael R. Willig; Stanley I. Dodson; Laura Gough

Understanding the relationship between species richness and productivity is fundamental to the management and preservation of biodiversity. Yet despite years of study and intense theoretical interest, this relationship remains controversial. Here, we present the results of a literature survey in which we examined the relationship between species richness and productivity in 171 published studies. We extracted the raw data from published tables and graphs and subjected these data to a standardized analysis, using ordinary least-squares (OLS) regression and generalized linear-model (GLIM) regression to test for significant positive, negative, or curvilinear relationships between productivity and species diversity. If the relationship was curvilinear, we tested whether the maximum (or minimum) of the curve occurred within the range of productivity values observed (i.e., was there evidence of a hump?). A meta-analysis conducted on the distribution of standardized quadratic regression coefficients showed that ...


Journal of Ecology | 1984

Effects of seed size and growth form on seedling establishment of six monocarpic perennial plants

Katherine L. Gross

(1) Effects of seed size and seedling morphology on the establishment of six monocarpic perennials were examined in glasshouse experiments. Both withinand between-species comparisons of seed-size effects were made as seed weight varied by more than two orders of magnitude among species and by 3 to 20-fold within a species. Experiments were conducted in four ground-cover types: bare soil, litter cover, vegetated, and vegetated plus litter. (2) In vegetated cover, emergence of the two small-seeded species, Verbascum thapsus and Oenothera biennis, was significantly lower than in litter and bare soil. In contrast, emergence of the medium (Dacus carota and Dipsacus sylvestris) and large-seeded species (Tragopogon dubius and Arctium minus), was not significantly reduced in the presence of vegetation. Although the rate of emergence of all six species was significantly reduced in vegetated cover, there were no between species differences in seedling emergence rates in any cover type. (3) Relative growth rates of all six species were significantly lower in vegetated cover compared with litter and bare soil and the effect was greatest on the small-seeded species. At the end of the experiment, seedling weight in vegetated cover was positively correlated with seed weight. In non-competitive cover types (litter and bare soil), seedling weight was independent of initial seed weight. (4) Relative growth rates of seedlings in non-competitive cover types were inversely related to seed size. In bare soil and litter, the small-seeded species had relative growth rates twice those of the large-seeded species. In vegetated cover this pattern was reversed; the species with large seeds had the highest relative growth rates. (5) The growth form of a seedling did not have any effect on its probability of establishment in any cover type. Species with different growth forms and similar seed sizes had equal emergence, survival, and relative growth rates in all four cover types. (6) Within species differences in seed size had a significant effect on seedling growth in non-competitive cover, but had no effect on seedling growth in competitive cover. Thus, both withinand between-species differences in seed size had similar effects on seedling establishment success in different types of ground cover.


Ecology | 1998

SPECIES RICHNESS IN A SUCCESSIONAL GRASSLAND: EFFECTS OF NITROGEN ENRICHMENT AND PLANT LITTER

Bryan L. Foster; Katherine L. Gross

We conducted a field experiment in a successional grassland to investigate the short-term effects of nitrogen enrichment and plant litter on plant species richness and on the establishment of a native grass (Andropogon gerardi) that was experimentally introduced to the study site as seed. Additions of nitrogen fertilizer to experimental plots over two growing seasons increased plant production as indicated by increases in both living plant biomass and litter biomass. Increased productivity reduced species richness by effectively preventing the seedling establishment of the subordinate forb species and reduced the recruitment of Andropogon gerardi by inhibiting both germination and survival. Litter removals carried out at each of two levels of nitrogen enrichment (no nitrogen, nitrogen added) showed that litter significantly reduced species richness by the same amount in fertilized and unfertilized plots, suggesting that living biomass and litter were purely additive, rather than interactive in their effects. In contrast, the results of litter additions suggested that the declines in richness associated with fertilization could largely be due to the suppressive effects of increased litter biomass alone. As a whole, the results indicate that litter and living biomass are largely substitutable in their inhibitory effects on species richness in highly productive successional grasslands due to their independent and equivalent capacities to attenuate light to very low levels. This study highlights the combined roles of competition and plant litter in influencing the diversity of grasslands through effects on seedling establishment.


Nature | 2013

Sustainable bioenergy production from marginal lands in the US Midwest

Ilya Gelfand; Ritvik Sahajpal; Xuesong Zhang; Roberto C. Izaurralde; Katherine L. Gross; G. P. Robertson

Legislation on biofuels production in the USA and Europe is directing food crops towards the production of grain-based ethanol, which can have detrimental consequences for soil carbon sequestration, nitrous oxide emissions, nitrate pollution, biodiversity and human health. An alternative is to grow lignocellulosic (cellulosic) crops on ‘marginal’ lands. Cellulosic feedstocks can have positive environmental outcomes and could make up a substantial proportion of future energy portfolios. However, the availability of marginal lands for cellulosic feedstock production, and the resulting greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, remains uncertain. Here we evaluate the potential for marginal lands in ten Midwestern US states to produce sizeable amounts of biomass and concurrently mitigate GHG emissions. In a comparative assessment of six alternative cropping systems over 20 years, we found that successional herbaceous vegetation, once well established, has a direct GHG emissions mitigation capacity that rivals that of purpose-grown crops (−851 ± 46 grams of CO2 equivalent emissions per square metre per year (gCO2e m−2 yr−1)). If fertilized, these communities have the capacity to produce about 63 ± 5 gigajoules of ethanol energy per hectare per year. By contrast, an adjacent, no-till corn–soybean–wheat rotation produces on average 41 ± 1 gigajoules of biofuel energy per hectare per year and has a net direct mitigation capacity of −397 ± 32 gCO2e m−2 yr−1; a continuous corn rotation would probably produce about 62 ± 7 gigajoules of biofuel energy per hectare per year, with 13% less mitigation. We also perform quantitative modelling of successional vegetation on marginal lands in the region at a resolution of 0.4 hectares, constrained by the requirement that each modelled location be within 80 kilometres of a potential biorefinery. Our results suggest that such vegetation could produce about 21 gigalitres of ethanol per year from around 11 million hectares, or approximately 25 per cent of the 2022 target for cellulosic biofuel mandated by the US Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, with no initial carbon debt nor the indirect land-use costs associated with food-based biofuels. Other regional-scale aspects of biofuel sustainability, such as water quality and biodiversity, await future study.


Journal of Ecology | 1990

A comparison of methods for estimating seed numbers in the soil.

Katherine L. Gross

(1) Seed-bank species composition and seed density were determined in an annually ploughed field at the Kellogg Biological Station in south-western Michigan, U.S.A. using three different methods: direct germination, germination following cold-stratification, and washing using a modified elutriation system. A fourth method, flotation on a salt-density gradient was abandoned after preliminary trials showed it was inefficient and inaccurate. (2) Twenty soil cores (2 5 cm in diameter, 15 cm deep) were taken from each of twentyfive sampling points in the field. Cores were divided into three depth intervals (0-2 cm, 2-5 cm and 5-15 cm) and five cores from each quarter of a sampling quadrat were combined and randomly assigned to one of the four methods for estimating the seed bank. (3) A total of fifty species was detected in the seed bank of this community. Overall, more species were detected with cold-stratification (forty-two species) than with direct germination (thirty-seven) or elutriation (thirty-five). Plots of species-sampling-area curves showed that fifteen to twenty sampling locations were sufficient to determine the number of species present in the seed bank with any of these methods. (4) Seed-density estimates were significantly higher in the elutriated samples. This was due primarily to the inclusion of inviable seeds in the counts from the elutriated samples. (5) There were significant differences in seed viability among species recovered in the elutriated samples. Both Ambrosia artemisiifolia and Chenopodium album, seeds of which were common in the samples, had low viability (25% and 3%, respectively). (6) Germination methods (particularly when more than one pre-treatment method is used) provide a more complete listing of species present in the soil seed bank of a community than elutriation. However, elutriation methods may be more useful for documenting variation in seed distributions on a large spatial scale or in quantifying the distribution of species with unique, easily identifiable seeds. Elutriation seems particularly well-suited for quantifying the distribution of plants that are considered weeds in agricultural systems, because many of these species have seeds that are easily identified and retain viability when dried.


BioScience | 2006

Linking Ecology and Economics for Ecosystem Management

Stephen Farber; Robert Costanza; Daniel L. Childers; Jon D. Erickson; Katherine L. Gross; J. Morgan Grove; Charles S. Hopkinson; James R. Kahn; Stephanie Pincetl; Austin Troy; Paige S. Warren; Matthew A. Wilson

Abstract This article outlines an approach, based on ecosystem services, for assessing the trade-offs inherent in managing humans embedded in ecological systems. Evaluating these trade-offs requires an understanding of the biophysical magnitudes of the changes in ecosystem services that result from human actions, and of the impact of these changes on human welfare. We summarize the state of the art of ecosystem services–based management and the information needs for applying it. Three case studies of Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites—coastal, urban, and agricultural—illustrate the usefulness, information needs, quantification possibilities, and methods for this approach. One example of the application of this approach, with rigorously established service changes and valuations taken from the literature, is used to illustrate the potential for full economic valuation of several agricultural landscape management options, including managing for water quality, biodiversity, and crop productivity.


Journal of Ecology | 1995

Spatial Variation in Nitrogen Availability in Three Successional Plant Communities

Katherine L. Gross; Kurt S. Pregitzer; Andrew J. Burton

1 Spatial variability in soil nitrogen and moisture levels was determined using a geostatistical analysis in a newly abandoned field, a mid-late successional field and a second-growth forest in south-western Michigan. 2 A greater proportion of the total variation for all variates associated with nitrogen availability was spatially dependent in the mid-successional field; the newly abandoned field and forest had similar patterns of spatial dependence in these variates. 3 The distance (range) over which there was spatial dependence was greater in the mid-successional field than the other two communities, indicating a more coarsegrained pattern of spatial heterogeneity in soil nitrogen, particularly in the surface soils (0-5 cm), than in the other two sites. 4 Examination of patterns of spatial dependence using different lag intervals generally gave similar results; though a nested pattern of N03-N availability in the midsuccessional field was detected at a finer scale of analysis, indicating spatial variation at multiple scales. 5 The results suggest that patterns of spatial variation in soil nitrogen change over time in successional plant communities, perhaps reflecting changes in the species composition or size of individual plants in these communities.


Oecologia | 1981

Predictions of fate from rosette size in four "biennial" plant species: Verbascum thapsus, Oenothera biennis, Daucus carota, and Tragopogon dubius

Katherine L. Gross

SummaryIndividual plants were marked in field populations of four biennial plant species, Verbascum thapsus L., Oenothera biennis L., Daucus carota L., and Tragopogon dubius Scop., and followed for 2 or 3 years. The relationship of both rosette size and age to the probability of an individual dying, remaining vegetative, or flowering was determined for each species. In all four species, a minimum size must be reached before flowering can be induced and above that minimum the probability of flowering increases directly with rosette size. Conversely, the probability of dying decreases with increasing rosette size. In general, the fate of a rosette appears to be independent of its age although in populations where the probability of death is high for individuals above the minimum size for flowering, the age of a rosette may influence its fate to some extent.


Ecological Applications | 2001

WEED ABOVEGROUND AND SEEDBANK COMMUNITY RESPONSES TO AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

Fabian D. Menalled; Katherine L. Gross; Mark Hammond

The development of integrated weed management programs requires a clear understanding of the factors and mechanisms conditioning weed community dynamics in agroecosystems. This study evaluated the effect of different agricultural management systems on the aboveground and seedbank weed communities in annual row crops at the Long Term Ecological Research project in agricultural ecology at the W. K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan, USA. Weed biomass and species composition were sampled for six years over two corn–soybean–wheat sequence cycles in four agricultural management systems: (1) conventional (high external chemical input, moldboard plowed); (2) no-till (high external chemical input, no tillage); (3) low-input (low external chemical input, moldboard plowed); and (4) organic (no external chemical input, moldboard plowed). A greenhouse germination study assessed variation in the abundance and composition of the weed seedbank across the studied systems in the first and sixth year of this study. Abov...


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2014

Perennial grasslands enhance biodiversity and multiple ecosystem services in bioenergy landscapes

Ben P. Werling; Timothy L. Dickson; Rufus Isaacs; Hannah R. Gaines; Claudio Gratton; Katherine L. Gross; Heidi Liere; Carolyn M. Malmstrom; Timothy D. Meehan; Leilei Ruan; Bruce A. Robertson; G. Philip Robertson; Thomas M. Schmidt; Abbie C. Schrotenboer; Tracy K. Teal; Julianna K. Wilson; Douglas A. Landis

Significance Science-based polices are needed to inform sustainable bioenergy landscape design. Our key finding is that the linkage between biodiversity and ecosystem services is dependent not only on the choice of bioenergy crop but also on its location relative to other habitats. The implication is that careful design of bioenergy landscapes has the potential to enhance multiple services in food and energy crops, leading to important synergies that have not yet informed the ongoing bioenergy debate. This study is especially timely as high commodity prices are driving conversion of marginal lands to annual crop production, reducing future flexibility. Agriculture is being challenged to provide food, and increasingly fuel, for an expanding global population. Producing bioenergy crops on marginal lands—farmland suboptimal for food crops—could help meet energy goals while minimizing competition with food production. However, the ecological costs and benefits of growing bioenergy feedstocks—primarily annual grain crops—on marginal lands have been questioned. Here we show that perennial bioenergy crops provide an alternative to annual grains that increases biodiversity of multiple taxa and sustain a variety of ecosystem functions, promoting the creation of multifunctional agricultural landscapes. We found that switchgrass and prairie plantings harbored significantly greater plant, methanotrophic bacteria, arthropod, and bird diversity than maize. Although biomass production was greater in maize, all other ecosystem services, including methane consumption, pest suppression, pollination, and conservation of grassland birds, were higher in perennial grasslands. Moreover, we found that the linkage between biodiversity and ecosystem services is dependent not only on the choice of bioenergy crop but also on its location relative to other habitats, with local landscape context as important as crop choice in determining provision of some services. Our study suggests that bioenergy policy that supports coordinated land use can diversify agricultural landscapes and sustain multiple critical ecosystem services.

Collaboration


Dive into the Katherine L. Gross's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Laura Gough

University of Texas at Arlington

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Katharine N. Suding

University of Colorado Boulder

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christopher M. Clark

United States Environmental Protection Agency

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Timothy L. Dickson

University of Nebraska Omaha

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard G. Smith

University of New Hampshire

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge