Katherine M. Mullaugh
University of North Carolina at Wilmington
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Katherine M. Mullaugh.
Chemosphere | 2015
Katherine M. Mullaugh; Joanna M. Hamilton; G. Brooks Avery; J. David Felix; Ralph N. Mead; Joan D. Willey; Robert J. Kieber
This study presents the first detailed concentration profile of trace VOCs in atmospheric waters. Analytes were detected and quantified in 111 unique rain events in Wilmington, NC, USA over a one-year period. Headspace solid phase microextraction was optimized for detection of these compounds at sub-nanomolar levels. Distinct seasonality in both the occurrence and concentration of compounds was observed with the lowest abundance occurring during low irradiance winter months. In contrast to other rainwater components studied at this location, VOCs did not show any correlation between rainfall amount and concentrations. There was significant spatial variation with regards to air-mass back-trajectory for methyfuran with higher concentrations observed in terrestrial events during the growing season. Air mass back trajectory also impacted CCl4 concentrations in rainwater with evidence of a possible oceanic input. However there was no significant impact of air-mass back-trajectory on the concentration of BTEX observed in rain indicating that storm origin is not the controlling factor driving concentrations of these analytes in precipitation. Members of the BTEX family did, however, have significant correlations with each other occurring in ratios aligned closely with ratios reported in the literature for gas-phase BTEX. Using available gas-phase data from locations with similar anthropogenic sources and Henrys Law constants, calculated concentrations agreed with VOC levels found in Wilmington rain. Results of this study indicate local gas-phase scavenging is the major source of VOCs in rain and wet deposition is not an efficient removal mechanism (<0.1%) of VOCs from the atmosphere.
Chemosphere | 2014
Katherine M. Mullaugh; Jade N. Byrd; G. Brooks Avery; Ralph N. Mead; Joan D. Willey; Robert J. Kieber
Carbohydrates have been widely reported in atmospheric aerosols, but have not previously been quantified in rainwater. We have identified and quantified a series of 11 specific compounds including monosaccharides (glucose, fructose, arabinose, galactose and pinitol), disaccharides (sucrose and trehalose), sugar alcohols (arabitol, dulcitol and mannitol) and the anhydrosaccharide levoglucosan. Rainwater analyzed in this study includes 52 distinct precipitation events in Wilmington, NC between June 2011 and October 2012. Our analysis indicates carbohydrates typically contribute <1% of total dissolved organic carbon in rain, but can account for as much as 10-35% during periods of high pollen or local fires. Concentrations of individual carbohydrates reached as high as 5.8 μM, with glucose and sucrose typically being the predominant species. The distribution of carbohydrates exhibited a distinct seasonal pattern, with higher concentrations of most carbohydrates, especially sucrose, in spring and summer, driven primarily by increased biogenic inputs during the growing season. Concentrations of carbohydrates were an order of magnitude higher in storms of terrestrial origin compared to marine events, further supporting a terrestrial biogenic origin of most species. Sequential sampling of Hurricane Irene showed significant quantities of carbohydrates present at the end of the storm when air mass back trajectories traversed over land. The highest level of levoglucosan, a compound associated with biomass burning, was detected in rain with an air mass back trajectory that traveled over a region affected by wildfires. When compared to aerosol concentrations reported by others, the sugar concentrations in rain demonstrate wet deposition is an important removal mechanism of this water-soluble and bioavailable fraction of atmospheric particulate organic matter.
Chemosphere | 2016
G. Brooks Avery; Laura Foley; Angela L. Carroll; Jesse Alan Roebuck; Amanda Guy; Ralph N. Mead; Robert J. Kieber; Joan D. Willey; Stephen A. Skrabal; J. David Felix; Katherine M. Mullaugh; John R. Helms
This study reports the first ethanol concentrations in fresh and estuarine waters and greatly expands the current data set for coastal ocean waters. Concentrations for 153 individual measurements of 11 freshwater sites ranged from 5 to 598 nM. Concentrations obtained for one estuarine transect ranged from 56 to 77 nM and levels in five coastal ocean depth profiles ranged from 81 to 334 nM. Variability in ethanol concentrations was high and appears to be driven primarily by photochemical and biological processes. 47 gas phase concentrations of ethanol were also obtained during this study to determine the surface water degree of saturation with respect to the atmosphere. Generally fresh and estuarine waters were undersaturated indicating they are not a source and may be a net sink for atmospheric ethanol in this region. Aqueous phase ethanol is likely converted rapidly to acetaldehyde in these aquatic ecosystems creating the undersaturated conditions resulting in this previously unrecognized sink for atmospheric ethanol. Coastal ocean waters may act as either a sink or source of atmospheric ethanol depending on the partial pressure of ethanol in the overlying air mass. Results from this study are significant because they suggest that surface waters may act as an important vector for the uptake of ethanol emitted into the atmosphere including ethanol from biofuel production and usage.
Global Biogeochemical Cycles | 2017
J. David Felix; Joan D. Willey; Rachel K. Thomas; Katherine M. Mullaugh; G. Brooks Avery; Robert J. Kieber; Ralph N. Mead; John R. Helms; Fernanda F. Giubbina; M. Lucia A. M. Campos; John Cala
The global wet deposition flux of ethanol is estimated to be 2.4 ± 1.6 Tg/yr with a conservative range of 0.2–4.6 Tg/yr based upon analyses of 219 wet deposition samples collected at 12 locations globally. This estimate calculated by using observed wet deposition ethanol concentrations is in agreement with previous models (1.4–5 Tg/yr) predicting the wet deposition sink using Henrys law coefficients and atmospheric ethanol concentrations. Wet deposition is estimated to remove between 6 and 17% of the total ethanol emitted to the atmosphere on an annual basis. The concentration of ethanol in marine rain (25 ± 6 nM) is an order of magnitude less than in the majority of terrestrial rains (345 ± 280 nM). Terrestrial rain samples collected in locations impacted by high local sources of biofuel usage and locations downwind from ethanol distilleries were an order of magnitude higher in ethanol concentration (3090 ± 448 nM) compared to rain collected in terrestrial locations not impacted by these sources. These results indicate that wet deposition of ethanol is heavily influenced by local sources. Results of this study are important because they suggest that as biofuel production and usage increase, the concentration of ethanol in the atmosphere will increase as well the wet deposition flux. Additional research constraining the sources, sinks, and atmospheric impacts of ethanol is necessary to better assist in the debate as whether or not to increase consumption of the alcohol as a biofuel.
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2012
Ralph N. Mead; Katherine M. Mullaugh; G. Brooks Avery; Robert J. Kieber; Joan D. Willey; David C. Podgorski
Atmospheric Environment | 2013
G. Brooks Avery; K. Farhana Biswas; Ralph N. Mead; Melissa W. Southwell; Joan D. Willey; Robert J. Kieber; Katherine M. Mullaugh
Atmospheric Environment | 2015
J. David Felix; Emily M. Elliott; G. Brooks Avery; Robert J. Kieber; Ralph N. Mead; Joan D. Willey; Katherine M. Mullaugh
Atmospheric Environment | 2012
Robert J. Kieber; Mary Beth Adams; Joan D. Willey; Robert F. Whitehead; G. Brooks Avery; Katherine M. Mullaugh; Ralph N. Mead
Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry | 2009
Robert J. Kieber; Jeremy Smith; Katherine M. Mullaugh; Melissa W. Southwell; G. Brooks Avery; Joan D. Willey
Journal of Nanoparticle Research | 2017
Katherine M. Mullaugh; Olivia M. Pearce