Katherine M. Prioli
Thomas Jefferson University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Katherine M. Prioli.
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society | 2014
Laura T. Pizzi; Eric Jutkowitz; Kevin D. Frick; Dong Churl Suh; Katherine M. Prioli; Laura N. Gitlin
To test the cost‐effectiveness of a home‐based depression program: Beat the Blues (BTB).
Journal of Geriatric Oncology | 2017
Ginah Nightingale; Emily R. Hajjar; Laura T. Pizzi; Margaret Wang; Elizabeth Pigott; Shannon Doherty; Katherine M. Prioli; Kristine Swartz; Andrew E. Chapman
OBJECTIVES Medication-related problems (MRP) affecting older adults are a significant healthcare concern and account for billions in medication-related morbidity. Cancer therapies can increase the prevalence of MRP. The objective of this study was to test the feasibility and effectiveness of implementing a pharmacist-led individualized medication assessment and planning (iMAP) intervention on the number and prevalence of MRP. MATERIALS AND METHODS This prospective pilot study enrolled oncology outpatients aged ≥65years. Intervention feasibility encompassed recommendation acceptance rate and intervention delivery time. The intervention was facilitated by pharmacists where patients received comprehensive medication management at baseline and at the 30- and 60-day follow-up. RESULTS Forty-eight eligible patients enrolled and 41 patients (85.4%) were included in the analysis. Mean age was 79.1years [range 65-101]; 66% women, 83% Caucasian, mean comorbidity count was 7.76. Forty-six percent of the pharmacist recommendations were accepted and the prevalence of MRP at baseline versus 60-day follow-up decreased by 20.5%. The average time to conduct the initial session was 22min versus 15min for the follow-up sessions. Resources needed included a tracking system for scheduling follow-up calls and a database for tracking acceptance of recommendations. A total of 123 MRP were identified in 95% of patients (N=39) with a mean of 3 MRP per patient. The mean reduction in number of MRP (3 at baseline versus 1.6 at 60-day follow-up) was 45.5%. CONCLUSIONS The pharmacist-led iMAP intervention was feasible and effective at reducing MRP. Additional inter-professional medication safety based interventions measuring patient-reported outcomes are still needed.
Annals of Pharmacotherapy | 2018
Laura T. Pizzi; Katherine M. Prioli; Lynn Fields Harris; Elizabeth Cannon-Dang; Marie Marthol-Clark; Matt Alcusky; Megan McCoy; Jason J. Schafer
Background: Vaccination is the best way to prevent pneumococcal disease (PD), but 40% of older adults remain unvaccinated nationwide, with even greater nonvaccination rates among African Americans (AAs). Prior studies suggest that insufficient knowledge contributes to low vaccination rates. The Pharmacists’ Pneumonia Prevention Program (PPPP) was designed to improve older adults’ knowledge about PD and pneumococcal vaccination (PV). Objective: To measure PPPP’s effect on knowledge and activation in a predominantly AA population and determine program costs. Methods: PPPP uses a senior center model with a pharmacist presentation, actors’ skit, and small-group action planning. Knowledge about PD risk, transmission, symptoms, and PV side effects was assessed at baseline (BL), postintervention (PT), and 3 months (M3) and analyzed using an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach. Actions taken (got vaccinated, spoke to doctor or pharmacist, discussed with family/friends) were assessed at M3. PPPP costs (
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy | 2016
Katherine M. Prioli; Laura T. Pizzi; Julie Katz Karp; Taki Galanis; Jay H. Herman
US 2013) included staff time, PV, actor, and site fees. Results: Of 276 attending PPPP, 190 consented and were included in the ITT sample, which was largely black (80.5%) and female (76.3%) and had a mean age of 74.4 years. Knowledge improved by 46.8% (BL vs PT), with significant gains in all domains. At M3, knowledge improved by 54.2% vs BL, indicating sustained gains; 37.2% of previously unvaccinated participants reported receiving PV by M3. Program cost was
Value in Health | 2016
Katherine M. Prioli; Nm Lyons; Laura T. Pizzi
119 per attendee. Conclusion: PPPP significantly improved PD and PV knowledge. It could be delivered more efficiently by holding larger events on fewer dates, staffing with volunteers where appropriate, and utilizing a local pharmacy to manage the vaccine supply.
Value in Health | 2013
Katherine M. Prioli; Jason J. Schafer; L. Fields Harris; Megan McCoy; E. Barber; M. Marthol-Clark; Laura T. Pizzi
BackgroundPlasma is used to treat acquired coagulopathy or thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, or to reverse warfarin effect. Scant data are available, however, about its costs.ObjectiveTo estimate total costs of plasma from production through administration, from the perspective of a US hospital blood donor center (BDC).Study Design and MethodsSix sequential decision analytic models were constructed and informed by primary and secondary data on time, tasks, personnel, and supplies for donation, processing, and administration. Expected values of the models were summed to yield the BDC’s total cost of producing, preparing, and transfusing plasma. Costs (
Value in Health | 2018
Katherine M. Prioli; Nm Lyons; Jk Karp; Jh Herman; Laura T. Pizzi
US 2015) are reported for a typical patient using three units of plasma. Models assume plasma was obtained from whole blood donation and transfused in an inpatient setting. Univariate sensitivity analyses were performed to test the impact of changing inputs for personnel costs and adverse event (AE) rates and costs.ResultsBDC production cost of plasma was
Value in Health | 2018
Katherine M. Prioli; R Formal; Jason J. Schafer; L. Fields Harris; F Jackson; R Vertsman; Laura T. Pizzi
91.24/patient (
Ethnicity & Health | 2018
Jason J. Schafer; Jacquelyn McRae; Katherine M. Prioli; Lynn Fields Harris; Megan McCoy; Elizabeth Cannon-Dang; Laura T. Pizzi
30.41/unit), a
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy | 2018
Katherine M. Prioli; Julie Katz Karp; Nina M. Lyons; Vera Chrebtow; Jay H. Herman; Laura T. Pizzi
30.16/patient savings versus purchased plasma. Administration and monitoring costs totaled