Katherine Riester

Daclizumab high-yield process in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (SELECT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND Daclizumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody, modulates interleukin-2 signalling by blocking the α subunit (CD25) of the interleukin-2 receptor. We assessed whether daclizumab high-yield process (HYP) would be effective when given as monotherapy for a 1 year treatment period in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. METHODS We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at 76 centres in the Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, India, Poland, Russia, Ukraine, Turkey, and the UK between Feb 15, 2008, and May 14, 2010. Patients aged 18-55 years with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis were randomly assigned (1:1:1), via a central interactive voice response system, to subcutaneous injections of daclizumab HYP 150 mg or 300 mg, or placebo, every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. Patients and study personnel were masked to treatment assignment, except for the site pharmacist who prepared the study drug for injection, but had no interaction with the patient. The primary endpoint was annualised relapse rate. Analysis was by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00390221. FINDINGS 204 patients were assigned to receive placebo, 208 to daclizumab HYP 150 mg, and 209 to daclizumab HYP 300 mg, of whom 188 (92%), 192 (92%), and 197 (94%), respectively, completed follow-up to week 52. The annualised relapse rate was lower for patients given daclizumab HYP 150 mg (0·21, 95% CI 0·16-0·29; 54% reduction, 95% CI 33-68%; p<0·0001) or 300 mg (0·23, 0·17-0·31, 50% reduction, 28-65%; p=0·00015) than for those given placebo (0·46, 0·37-0·57). More patients were relapse free in the daclizumab HYP 150 mg (81%) and 300 mg (80%) groups than in the placebo group (64%; p<0·0001 in the 150 mg group and p=0·0003 in the 300 mg group). 12 (6%) patients in the placebo group, 15 (7%) of those in the daclizumab 150 mg group, and 19 (9%) in the 300 mg group had serious adverse events excluding multiple sclerosis relapse. One patient given daclizumab HYP 150 mg who was recovering from a serious rash died because of local complication of a psoas abscess. INTERPRETATION Subcutaneous daclizumab HYP administered every 4 weeks led to clinically important effects on multiple sclerosis disease activity during 1 year of treatment. Our findings support the potential for daclizumab HYP to offer an additional treatment option for relapsing-remitting disease. FUNDING Biogen Idec and AbbVie Biotherapeutics Inc.

Daclizumab HYP versus Interferon Beta-1a in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND Daclizumab high-yield process (HYP) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to CD25 (alpha subunit of the interleukin-2 receptor) and modulates interleukin-2 signaling. Abnormalities in interleukin-2 signaling have been implicated in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis and other autoimmune disorders. METHODS We conducted a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 3 study involving 1841 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis to compare daclizumab HYP, administered subcutaneously at a dose of 150 mg every 4 weeks, with interferon beta-1a, administered intramuscularly at a dose of 30 μg once weekly, for up to 144 weeks. The primary end point was the annualized relapse rate. RESULTS The annualized relapse rate was lower with daclizumab HYP than with interferon beta-1a (0.22 vs. 0.39; 45% lower rate with daclizumab HYP; P<0.001). The number of new or newly enlarged hyperintense lesions on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) over a period of 96 weeks was lower with daclizumab HYP than with interferon beta-1a (4.3 vs. 9.4; 54% lower number of lesions with daclizumab HYP; P<0.001). At week 144, the estimated incidence of disability progression confirmed at 12 weeks was 16% with daclizumab HYP and 20% with interferon beta-1a (P=0.16). Serious adverse events, excluding relapse of multiple sclerosis, were reported in 15% of the patients in the daclizumab HYP group and in 10% of those in the interferon beta-1a group. Infections were more common in the daclizumab HYP group than in the interferon beta-1a group (in 65% vs. 57% of the patients, including serious infection in 4% vs. 2%), as were cutaneous events such as rash or eczema (in 37% vs. 19%, including serious events in 2% vs. <1%) and elevations in liver aminotransferase levels that were more than 5 times the upper limit of the normal range (in 6% vs. 3%). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, daclizumab HYP showed efficacy superior to that of interferon beta-1a with regard to the annualized relapse rate and lesions, as assessed by means of MRI, but was not associated with a significantly lower risk of disability progression confirmed at 12 weeks. The rates of infection, rash, and abnormalities on liver-function testing were higher with daclizumab HYP than with interferon beta-1a. (Funded by Biogen and AbbVie Biotherapeutics; DECIDE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01064401.).

Intramuscular interferon beta-1a in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

Objective: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) shares immunologic features with multiple sclerosis (MS). Because IM interferon beta-1a (IM IFNβ-1a) is an effective and safe treatment for MS, we conducted a dose-ranging efficacy study of IFNβ-1a in patients with CIDP. Methods: Adults with IV immunoglobulin (IVIg)-dependent CIDP (n = 67) were enrolled in this 32-week double-blind trial and randomized to IM IFNβ-1a. Patients received 30 μg once weekly plus placebo (n = 12), IM IFNβ-1a 60 μg once weekly plus placebo (n = 11), IM IFNβ-1a 30 μg twice weekly (n = 11), IM IFNβ-1a 60 μg twice weekly (n = 11), or placebo twice weekly (n = 22). Participants were maintained on IVIg through week 16, when IVIg was discontinued. Patients who worsened were restarted on IVIg. The primary outcome was total IVIg dose (g/kg) administered from week 16 to 32. Results: There was no difference in total IVIg dose administered after week 16 for patients treated with IFNβ-1a (1.20 g/kg) compared with placebo (1.34 g/kg; p = 0.75). However, exploratory analyses suggested IFNβ-1a significantly reduced total dose of IVIg compared with placebo for participants who required either high-dose IVIg (>0.95 g/kg per month) or had greater weakness at baseline (Medical Research Council sum score <51). Adverse events included flu-like symptoms, headache, and fatigue in the IFNβ-1a groups. Conclusions: Interferon beta-1a (IFNβ-1a) therapy did not provide significant benefit over IV immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy alone for patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. However, IFNβ-1a might be beneficial for patients with more severe disability or those needing high doses of IVIg. Level of evidence: This study was designed to provide Class I evidence for the safety and efficacy of IM IFNβ-1a in the treatment of CIDP but has been subsequently classified as Class II due to a >20% patient dropout rate. Thus, this randomized, controlled clinical trial provides Class II evidence of no effect on primary and secondary endpoints of 4 dosage regimens of IM IFNβ-1a added to IVIg in persons with CIDP.

Eight-year immunogenicity and safety of interferon beta-1a-Avonex treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis.

An open-label extension study of the phase III trial of intramuscular interferon beta-1a (IFNβ-1a-Avonex) was conducted to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of IFNβ-1a-Avonex over six years in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). Patients who participated in the pivotal phase III study were offered enrolment; entry was also open to patients who had not participated. All patients received IFNβ-1a-Avonex 30 mg intramuscularly once weekly for six years, for a treatment duration of up to eight years in patients who received IFNβ-1a-Avonex in the phase III trial. Serum levels of IFNβ antibodies were measured every six months using a screening enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) followed by an antiviral cytopathic effect assay to detect neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) in serum samples positive on ELISA. The incidence of adverse events and laboratory test results assessed safety. Of 382 total patients, 218 had participated in the phase III study (103 placebo, 115 IFNβ-1a-Avonex) and 164 had not participated; 24 of the 164 were IFNβ-naïve. At baseline, 281 patients were negative for IFNβ antibodies (NAb-). NAbs (titre≥ 20) developed at any time over six years in 5% of these patients. Of 140 patients who had been on IFNβ-1b-Betaseron, 49 were positive for NAbs (NAb+) at baseline; 11 of 115 who had been on IFNβ-1a-Avonex were NAb+ at baseline. Thirty-nine of 49 patients who had been on Betaseron and were NAb+ had titres <100; 36 of these 39 seroconverted to NAb-while on IFNβ-1a-Avonex, with a median time of approximately six months. Ten patients who had been on Betaseron had NAb titres ≥ 100; five remained NAb+ during six years on IFNβ-1a-Avonex and five seroconverted to NAb-, but only after at least two years. Five patients who had been on IFNβ-1a-Avonex during the clinical trial were NAb+ with titres <100 at baseline; four seroconverted to NAb-, with a median time of two to three years. Six patients who had been on IFNβ-1a-Avonex had NAb titres ≥100; five of these remained NAb+ at six years. No patient with a NAb titre >1000 seroconverted to NAb-, whether initially treated with IFNβ-1a-Avonex or -Betaseron. Adverse events were similar to those observed in the pivotal phase III trial. Results from this trial indicated that IFNβ-1a-Avonex was associated with a low incidence of NAbs and was well tolerated for up to eight years. Further, the results indicate that persistence of NAbs is dependent on titre and IFNβ product.

Intermediate-affinity interleukin-2 receptor expression predicts CD56bright natural killer cell expansion after daclizumab treatment in the CHOICE study of patients with multiple sclerosis

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate whether interleukin-2 (IL-2) receptor expression on CD56bright natural killer (NK) cells predicted CD56bright NK cell expansion and therapeutic response to daclizumab (DAC) in multiple sclerosis (MS). Methods: DAC exposure, CD56bright NK cell counts, IL-2 receptor alpha (CD25) and beta (CD122) subunits, and new or enlarged lesions on brain MRI were measured in 64 subjects in a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic substudy of the phase 2 CHOICE trial at multiple time points. Peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples were obtained from healthy subjects to assess the relationship among DAC treatment, intermediate affinity IL-2 signaling, and CD56bright NK cell expansion. Results: Increased CD56bright NK cell counts in DAC/interferon beta (IFNβ)-treated subjects were observed by day 14, the first post-dosing time point (mean [SD] ln{CD56bright NK cell count}: DAC high/IFNβ, 2.01 [1.25]; DAC low/IFNβ, 2.29 [1.06]; placebo/IFNβ, 1.01 [1.03]; adjusted p = 0.003), and persisted throughout the treatment period. Higher DAC dose predicted a faster rate of CD56bright NK cell expansion (p < 0.001), but individual subjects’ increases in CD56bright NK cells from baseline levels were only weakly correlated with DAC exposure (r2 = 0.167). Higher expression of the intermediate-affinity IL-2 receptor subunit (CD122) on CD56bright NK cells at baseline predicted fewer new gadolinium-enhanced (Gd+) lesions during the treatment period (1.77 vs. 0.62 adjusted mean new Gd+ lesions during weeks 8–24, lowest vs. highest quartile of percentage CD122+ CD56bright NK cells; p = 0.033) and a greater increase in CD56bright NK cell counts at the end of DAC dosing (p = 0.029). Conclusion: CD56bright NK cell expansion after DAC treatment appears to reflect individual differences in the capacity for intermediate-affinity IL-2 signaling and could provide a basis for predicting clinical response to DAC in MS.

Relapse rates and enhancing lesions in a phase II trial of natalizumab in multiple sclerosis.

Background: Natalizumab, a humanized monoclonal IgG4 antibody, is an a4-integrin antagonist, which inhibits the migration of inflammatory cells into the central nervous system, a key pathogenic mechanism in multiple sclerosis (MS). In a six month, phase II clinical trial of patients with relapsing MS, natalizumab significantly reduced the formation of new gadolinium-enhanced (Gd +) lesions and the number of clinical relapses. Objective: To investigate the relationship of historical relapse rate and new Gd+ lesion number with subsequent MS disease activity and natalizumab treatment in the phase II study. Methods: Patients who participated in the phase II study were stratified into subgroups according to: (i) the number of relapses in the two years prior to entry into the study: 2 relapses (n=108), 3 relapses (n=57), and-3 relapses (n=48); (ii) the number of new Gd+ lesions at baseline (Month 0): 0 (n=129), 1-2(n=50), and >2(n=33). Relapses and new Gd+ lesions during the treatment phase of the trial were determined and compared for each subgroup. Results: Both the prestudy relapse rate and number of new Gd+ lesions at baseline were related to the subsequent risk of a relapse; baseline number of Gd+ lesions was related to the likelihood of subsequent new Gd+ lesion formation. There was a lower proportion of subjects with an on-study relapse and fewer new Gd+ lesions in all natalizumab-treated subgroups when compared with their placebo counterpart; the difference was most apparent in the subgroups of patients with >3 relapses in the two years prior to study entry and >2 new Gd+ lesions at Month 0. Conclusions: There was a lower proportion of subjects with an on-study relapse in natalizumab-treated patients, particularly in those with a more active disease at study entry. Larger ongoing phase III studies will allow more definitive investigation of these preliminary subgroup findings.

In Vivo Maintenance of Human Regulatory T Cells during CD25 Blockade

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) mediate immune tolerance to self and depend on IL-2 for homeostasis. Treg deficiency, dysfunction, and instability are implicated in the pathogenesis of numerous autoimmune diseases. There is considerable interest in therapeutic modulation of the IL-2 pathway to treat autoimmunity, facilitate transplantation tolerance, or potentiate tumor immunotherapy. Daclizumab is a humanized mAb that binds the IL-2 receptor α subunit (IL-2Rα or CD25) and prevents IL-2 binding. In this study, we investigated the effect of daclizumab-mediated CD25 blockade on Treg homeostasis in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. We report that daclizumab therapy caused an ∼50% decrease in Tregs over a 52-wk period. Remaining FOXP3+ cells retained a demethylated Treg-specific demethylated region in the FOXP3 promoter, maintained active cell cycling, and had minimal production of IL-2, IFN-γ, and IL-17. In the presence of daclizumab, IL-2 serum concentrations increased and IL-2Rβγ signaling induced STAT5 phosphorylation and sustained FOXP3 expression. Treg declines were not associated with daclizumab-related clinical benefit or cutaneous adverse events. These results demonstrate that Treg phenotype and lineage stability can be maintained in the face of CD25 blockade.

Improved cognitive outcomes in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis treated with daclizumab beta: Results from the DECIDE study:

Background: Cognitive impairment is common in multiple sclerosis (MS), with cognitive processing speed being the most frequently affected domain. Objective: Examine the effects of daclizumab beta versus intramuscular (IM) interferon (IFN) beta-1a on cognitive processing speed as assessed by Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). Methods: In DECIDE, patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) (age: 18–55 years; Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score 0–5.0) were randomized to daclizumab beta (n = 919) or IM IFN beta-1a (n = 922) for 96–144 weeks. SDMT was administered at baseline and at 24-week intervals. Results: At week 96, significantly greater mean improvement from baseline in SDMT was observed with daclizumab beta versus IM IFN beta-1a (p = 0.0274). Significantly more patients treated with daclizumab beta showed clinically meaningful improvement in SDMT (increase from baseline of ⩾3 points (p = 0.0153) or ⩾4 points (p = 0.0366)), and significantly fewer patients showed clinically meaningful worsening (decrease from baseline of ⩾3 points (p = 0.0103)). Odds representing risk of worsening versus stability or improvement on SDMT were significantly smaller for daclizumab beta (p = 0.0088 (3-point threshold); p = 0.0267 (4-point threshold)). In patients completing 144 weeks of treatment, the effects of daclizumab beta were generally sustained. Conclusion: These results provide evidence for a benefit of daclizumab beta versus IM IFN beta-1a on cognitive processing speed in RRMS. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01064401 (Efficacy and Safety of BIIB019 (Daclizumab High Yield Process) Versus Interferon β 1a in Participants With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (DECIDE)): https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01064401.

Impact of daclizumab versus interferon beta-1a on patient-reported outcomes in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide information on treatment effects from the patients perspective that complement outcomes on clinical measures. In DECIDE, daclizumab demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing relapses, 24-week confirmed disability progression, and brain lesions (assessed by magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) versus intramuscular interferon beta-1a in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. OBJECTIVE To examine the impact of daclizumab versus interferon beta-1a on PROs in DECIDE. METHODS DECIDE was a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 3 study comparing daclizumab 150mg subcutaneous every 4 weeks with interferon beta-1a 30mcg intramuscular once weekly. The 29-item Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) and EuroQoL 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) were assessed at baseline and every 24 weeks. Mean changes from baseline were analyzed using analysis of covariance models. Individual items for the MSIS-29 physical (PHYS) and psychological (PSYCH) subscales were analyzed post hoc. RESULTS Daclizumab treatment resulted in greater mean improvements relative to baseline in MSIS-29 PHYS and PSYCH scores starting at week 24 that persisted over 96 weeks. Mean improvements from baseline in MSIS-29 PHYS and PSYCH scores were significantly greater for daclizumab versus intramuscular interferon beta-1a at week 96. Daclizumab-treated patients showed steady improvements in EQ-5D health utility index and EQ-5D visual analog scale scores over the study period, with significantly greater improvements versus intramuscular interferon beta-1a at week 96 (p=0.0048 and p=0.0006, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Improvements in patient-reported physical and psychological functioning and general health status with daclizumab compared with intramuscular interferon beta-1a are consistent with outcomes on clinical and brain MRI lesion measures in DECIDE (NCT01064401).

Consistent efficacy of daclizumab beta across patient demographic and disease activity subgroups in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND Daclizumab beta is a humanized monoclonal antibody specific for the human interleukin-2 receptor alpha chain (CD25). In two pivotal studies in relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS), patients treated with daclizumab beta exhibited lower annualized relapse rates (ARR) when compared with placebo or with intramuscular (IM) interferon beta-1a. OBJECTIVES To determine if the efficacy of daclizumab beta demonstrated in the phase 2 SELECT study and the phase 3 DECIDE study was consistent in patient subgroups. METHODS In the SELECT study, patients received daclizumab beta 150 or 300mg administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 52 weeks, and were compared with patients who received placebo. In the DECIDE study, patients received daclizumab beta 150mg administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 96-144 weeks, and were compared with patients who received IM interferon beta-1a 30µg. Subgroups were defined by sex, age, the number of relapses in the year before the study, disease duration, baseline disability measured by EDSS, presence of Gd-enhancing lesions, T2 hyperintense lesion volume at baseline, and previous interferon beta-1a use. RESULTS Treatment with daclizumab beta was associated with relative lower ARR, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) below 1 in 13 of 15 subgroups (SELECT study) compared with placebo and in all 17 subgroups compared with interferon beta-1a (DECIDE study). In 2 subgroups in the SELECT study (patients who were older than 35 years of age or who had a disease duration of 10 or more years), the rate ratio point estimate for the ARR was in favor of daclizumab beta but the 95% CI overlapped with 1. The clinical benefits in ARR achieved with daclizumab beta treatment compared with placebo or interferon beta-1a across subgroups were similarly supported by reductions in lesion activity on magnetic resonance images (MRIs). CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that treatment with daclizumab beta is consistently effective among clinically important patient subgroups and support its potential as a viable therapeutic option across the spectrum of relapsing MS.