Katherine Rowley
University College London
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Katherine Rowley.
British Journal of Development Psychology | 2010
Kathryn Mason; Katherine Rowley; Chloe Marshall; Joanna Atkinson; Rosalind Herman; Bencie Woll; Gary Morgan
This paper presents the first ever group study of specific language impairment (SLI) in users of sign language. A group of 50 children were referred to the study by teachers and speech and language therapists. Individuals who fitted pre-determined criteria for SLI were then systematically assessed. Here, we describe in detail the performance of 13 signing deaf children aged 5-14 years on normed tests of British Sign Language (BSL) sentence comprehension, repetition of nonsense signs, expressive grammar and narrative skills, alongside tests of non-verbal intelligence and fine motor control. Results show these children to have a significant language delay compared to their peers matched for age and language experience. This impaired development cannot be explained by poor exposure to BSL, or by lower general cognitive, social, or motor abilities. As is the case for SLI in spoken languages, we find heterogeneity within the group in terms of which aspects of language are affected and the severity of the impairment. We discuss the implications of the existence of language impairments in a sign language for theories of SLI and clinical practice.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research | 2014
Chloe Marshall; Katherine Rowley; Joanna Atkinson
We used fluency tasks to investigate lexical organisation in Deaf adults who use British sign language (BSL). The number of responses produced to semantic categories did not differ from reports in spoken languages. However, there was considerable variability in the number of responses across phonological categories, and some signers had difficulty retrieving items. Responses were richly clustered according to semantic and/or phonological properties. With respect to phonology, there was significantly more clustering around the parameters “handshape” and “location” compared to “movement”. We conclude that the BSL lexicon is organised in similar ways to the lexicons of spoken languages, but that lexical retrieval is characterised by strong links between semantics and phonology; movement is less readily retrieved than handshape and location; and phonological fluency is difficult for signers because they have little metaphonological awareness in BSL and because signs do not display the onset salience that characterises spoken words.
Language Learning and Development | 2015
Chloe Marshall; Kathryn Mason; Katherine Rowley; Rosalind Herman; Joanna Atkinson; Bencie Woll; Gary Morgan
Children with specific language impairment (SLI) perform poorly on sentence repetition tasks across different spoken languages, but until now, this methodology has not been investigated in children who have SLI in a signed language. Users of a natural sign language encode different sentence meanings through their choice of signs and by altering the sequence and inflections of these signs. Grammatical information is expressed through movement and configurational changes of the hands and face. The visual modality thus influences how grammatical morphology and syntax are instantiated. How would language impairment impact on the acquisition of these types of linguistic devices in child signers? We investigated sentence repetition skills in a group of 11 deaf children who display SLI in British Sign Language (BSL) and 11 deaf controls with no language impairment who were matched for age and years of BSL exposure. The SLI group was significantly less accurate on an overall accuracy score, and they repeated lexical items, overall sentence meaning, sign order, facial expressions, and verb morphological structures significantly less accurately than controls. This pattern of language deficits is consistent with the characterization of SLI in spoken languages even though expression is in a different modality. We conclude that explanations of SLI, and of poor sentence repetition by children with this disorder, must be able to account for both the spoken and signed modalities.
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders | 2014
Ros Herman; Katherine Rowley; Kathryn Mason; Gary Morgan
This study details the first ever investigation of narrative skills in a group of 17 deaf signing children who have been diagnosed with disorders in their British Sign Language development compared with a control group of 17 deaf child signers matched for age, gender, education, quantity, and quality of language exposure and non-verbal intelligence. Children were asked to generate a narrative based on events in a language free video. Narratives were analysed for global structure, information content and local level grammatical devices, especially verb morphology. The language-impaired group produced shorter, less structured and grammatically simpler narratives than controls, with verb morphology particularly impaired. Despite major differences in how sign and spoken languages are articulated, narrative is shown to be a reliable marker of language impairment across the modality boundaries.
Journal of Child Language | 2013
Chloe Marshall; Katherine Rowley; Kathryn Mason; Rosalind Herman; Gary Morgan
language resources and evaluation | 2012
Kearsy Cormier; Jordan Fenlon; Trevor Johnston; R Rentelis; Adam Schembri; Katherine Rowley; R Adam; Bencie Woll
Archive | 2016
Tobias Haug; Wolfgang Mann; Eveline Boers-Visker; Jessica Contreras; Charlotte Enns; Ros Herman; Katherine Rowley
Archive | 2014
Jordan Fenlon; Kearsy Cormier; R Rentelis; Adam Schembri; Katherine Rowley; R Adam; Bencie Woll
Archive | 2014
Rosalind Herman; Katherine Rowley; Chloe Marshall; Kathryn Mason; Joanna Atkinson; Bencie Woll; Gary Morgan
Archive | 2014
Chloe Marshall; Kathryn Mason; Katherine Rowley; Joanna Atkinson; Bencie Woll; Gary Morgan