Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Katherine S. Judge is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Katherine S. Judge.


American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias | 2000

Use of Montessori-based activities for clients with dementia in adult day care: Effects on engagement:

Katherine S. Judge; Cameron J. Camp; Silvia Orsulic-Jeras

Clients with dementia in an adult day care center were observed taking part in regular activities programming or Montessori-based activities developed for persons with dementia. During the nine-month study, clients in Montessori-based activities exhibited greater amounts of constructive engagement, defined as motor or verbal behavior exhibited in response to the activity in which the client was taking part, than clients in regular programming. Montessori-based activities also elicited less passive engagement, defined as listening and/or looking behavior exhibited in response to the activity the clients were participating in, than regular programming. Implications of these results and ways to implement Montessori-based programming in settings serving persons with dementia are discussed.


Psychology and Aging | 2002

Age differences in overlapping-task performance: Evidence for efficient parallel processing in older adults.

Philip A. Allen; Lien Mei-Ching; Martin D. Murphy; Raymond E. Sanders; Katherine S. Judge; Robert S. McCann

Two psychological refractory period (PRP) experiments were conducted to examine overlapping processing in younger and older adults. A shape discrimination task (triangle or rectangle) for Task 1 (T1) and a lexical-decision task (word or nonword) for Task 2 (T2) were used. PRP effects, response time for T2 increasing as stimulus onset synchrony (SOA) decreased, were obtained for both age groups. The effect of word frequency on T2 was smaller at the short SOA than at the long SOA, reflecting slack effects, which were larger for older than younger adults in both experiments. These results suggest that older adults can perform lexical access of T2 in parallel with the processing of T1 at least as efficiently as younger adults.


Gerontologist | 2011

Partners in Dementia Care: A Care Coordination Intervention for Individuals With Dementia and Their Family Caregivers

Katherine S. Judge; David M. Bass; A. Lynn Snow; Nancy Wilson; Robert O. Morgan; Wendy J. Looman; Catherine A. McCarthy; Mark E. Kunik

PURPOSE This article provides a detailed description of a telephone-based care coordination intervention, Partners in Dementia Care (PDC), for veterans with dementia and their family caregivers. Essential features of PDC included (a) formal partnerships between Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers and Alzheimers Association Chapters; (b) a multidimensional assessment and treatment approach, (c) ongoing monitoring and long-term relationships with families, and (d) a computerized information system to guide service delivery and fidelity monitoring. DESIGN AND METHODS Data illustrating the use of the intervention were displayed for 93 veterans and their caregivers after 12 months in PDC. Descriptive data were provided for each major component of the intervention protocol, including: initial assessment, goals, action steps, and on-going monitoring. Care coordinators completed a 12-item questionnaire ascertaining the acceptability and feasibility of implementing PDC. RESULTS Data from the assessments and goals indicated areas of need were not limited to any one issue or subset of issues, but were widely distributed across a variety of domains. Findings for action steps suggested a primary focus on getting/giving information and action-oriented tasks to access services and programs. Most action steps were assigned and completed by veterans spouses and the majority were successfully accomplished. On average, families had two contacts per month with care coordinators. Few barriers were indicated by care coordinators in implementing PDC, highlighting the acceptability and feasibility of the PDC protocol. IMPLICATIONS PDC addressed the diverse needs of individuals with dementia and their caregivers, including important non-medical care issues, such as understanding VA benefits, accessing community resources, and addressing caregiver strain. PDC proved to be a feasible model that was complementary to the existing programs of the 2 partnering organizations.


Gerontologist | 2010

Stress Process Model for Individuals With Dementia

Katherine S. Judge; Heather L. Menne; Carol J. Whitlatch

PURPOSE Individuals with dementia (IWDs) face particular challenges in managing and coping with their illness. The experience of dementia may be affected by the etiology, stage, and severity of symptoms, preexisting and related chronic conditions, and available informal and formal supportive services. Although several studies have examined particular features of IWDs illness experience, few draw upon a conceptual model that outlines the global illness experience and the resulting stressors that commence with symptom onset, proliferate over time, and continue through the later stages of cognitive loss. Building on the work of Pearlin and colleagues (1990, Caregiving and the stress process: An overview of concepts and their measures. The Gerontologist, 30, 583-594), this article proposes a stress process model (SPM) for IWDs that conceptualizes and examines the illness experience of IWDs. IMPLICATIONS The proposed SPM for IWDs serves as a guide to (a) consider and understand the short- and long-term complexities of the illness experience for IWDs, (b) investigate specific hypotheses by outlining key stressors in the illness experience and by positing relationships among stressors and outcomes, and (c) help inform the development of interventions to prevent or reduce the negative stressors and enhance the positive experiences of living with a dementing illness.


Gerontologist | 2013

Improved Strain and Psychosocial Outcomes for Caregivers of Individuals with Dementia: Findings from Project ANSWERS

Katherine S. Judge; Sarah J. Yarry; Wendy J. Looman; David M. Bass

PURPOSE This study examined the efficacy of a newly developed intervention, Acquiring New Skills While Enhancing Remaining Strengths (ANSWERS), for family caregivers of individuals with dementia. ANSWERS was designed for dyads comprised of an individual with dementia and his/her family caregiver. Using a strength-based approach, ANSWERS combined educational skills (traditionally used with caregivers) and cognitive rehabilitation skills training (traditionally used with individuals with dementia) into a single protocol for addressing the dyads care issues and needs. Key domains addressed by the intervention included: education about dementia and memory loss; effective communication; managing memory; staying active; and recognizing emotions and behaviors. This analysis focused on outcomes for caregivers. DESIGN & METHODS The Stress Process Model guided the studys hypotheses and design. Caregiving dyads were randomly assigned to the control or intervention conditions. Intervention dyads received 6-curriculum guided sessions with an intervention specialist. Data came from in-person baseline interviews with caregivers conducted prior to randomization and follow-up interviews conducted approximately 14.56 weekspost-baseline. RESULTS Intervention caregivers, compared to controls, had decreased care-related strain as indicated by lower emotional health strain, dyadic relationship strain, role captivity, and higher caregiving mastery. Additionally, intervention caregivers had improved well-being as indicated by fewer symptoms of depression and anxiety. IMPLICATIONS ANSWERS was efficacious in improving key strain and psychosocial outcomes for caregivers. Features essential to the success of ANSWERS included a strength-based approach for selecting, developing, and implementing care goals, as well as teaching caregivers educational and cognitive rehabilitation skills for addressing care needs.


Journal of the American Geriatrics Society | 2013

Caregiver outcomes of partners in dementia care: effect of a care coordination program for veterans with dementia and their family members and friends.

David M. Bass; Katherine S. Judge; A. Lynn Snow; Nancy Wilson; Robert O. Morgan; Wendy J. Looman; Catherine A. McCarthy; Katie Maslow; Jennifer Moye; Ronda Randazzo; Maurilio Garcia-Maldonado; Richard Elbein; Germaine Odenheimer; Mark E. Kunik

The objective is to test the effectiveness of Partners in Dementia Care (PDC), a care‐coordination program that integrates and improves access to medical and nonmedical services, while strengthening the informal care network and providing information, coaching, and emotional support. PDC was delivered via a partnership between Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Centers (VAMCs) and Alzheimers Association chapters, for caregivers of veterans with dementia living in the community and receiving primary care from the VA. The initial sample was 486 caregivers of 508 veterans with diagnosed dementia. Outcomes were evaluated for 394 and 324 caregivers who completed 6‐ and 12‐ month follow‐up, respectively. PDC had a standardized protocol that included assessment and reassessment, action planning, and ongoing monitoring. It was delivered by telephone and e‐mail for cost efficiency and the ability to handle caseloads of 100 to 125. Care coordinators from VAMCs and Alzheimers Association chapters worked as a team using a shared computerized record. A variety of caregiver outcomes was measured after 6 and 12 months. Intervention group caregivers had significant improvements in outcomes representing unmet needs, three types of caregiver strains, depression, and two support resources. Most improvements were evident after 6 months, with more‐limited improvements from Months 6 to 12. Some outcomes improved for all caregivers, whereas some improved for caregivers experiencing more initial difficulties or caring for veterans with more‐severe impairments. PDC is a promising model that improves linkages between healthcare services and community services, which is a goal of several new national initiatives such as the National Plan to Address Alzheimers Disease and a proposed amendment to the Older Americans Act.


Gerontologist | 2010

Acceptability and Feasibility Results of a Strength-Based Skills Training Program for Dementia Caregiving Dyads

Katherine S. Judge; Sarah J. Yarry; Silvia Orsulic-Jeras

PURPOSE The current article provides an in-depth description of a dyadic intervention for individuals with dementia and their family caregivers. Using a strength-based approach, caregiving dyads received skills training across 5 key areas: (a) education regarding dementia and memory loss, (b) effective communication, (c) managing memory loss, (d) staying active, and (e) recognizing emotions and behaviors. Results of the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention protocols are also presented. DESIGN AND METHODS Caregiving dyads were randomly assigned to participate in the intervention. Participants in the treatment condition were asked to complete a series of evaluation questions after each intervention session and an overall evaluation of the program. Data were also collected from the intervention specialists who implemented the protocols. RESULTS Overall, the evaluation data indicated that the content and process of the intervention were viewed as highly acceptable and feasible by both participants and intervention specialists. IMPLICATIONS This article highlights the merit of using a strength-based approach for working with caregiving dyads with dementia and how a single intervention protocol can be used to address the goals of both care partners. Furthermore, the intervention program was found to be highly acceptable and feasible, which is an important aspect of developing dyadic protocols.


Dementia | 2009

Predictors of quality of life for individuals with dementia Implications for intervention

Heather L. Menne; Katherine S. Judge; Carol J. Whitlatch

Although a growing number of investigations examine the lived experience of individuals with dementia (IWDs), few draw upon a conceptual model to explore inter-relationships among background characteristics, stressors, and outcomes (Menne, 2006). This study is guided by a conceptual model that draws upon the broader stress literature to examine predictors of IWD quality of life. Relying primarily on IWD self-reported data (n = 211), multivariate ordinary least squares regression analysis was used to determine the predictors of IWDs’ quality of life. Results indicate that IWDs who report poorer quality of life are more likely to be African-American, have a non-spousal caregiver, have more depressive symptoms, be less involved in daily decision-making, and have more negative strain with their caregiver. These findings are discussed in the context of current and practical interventions that address the strengths and needs of IWDs and their family caregivers.


American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias | 2011

Knowledge of documented dementia diagnosis and treatment in veterans and their caregivers

Andrea Bradford; Christina Upchurch; David M. Bass; Katherine S. Judge; A. Lynn Snow; Nancy Wilson; Mark E. Kunik

We studied perceptions of dementia diagnosis and treatment in patient-caregiver dyads enrolled in a care coordination intervention trial for veterans with dementia. We compared patient and caregiver perceptions of diagnosis and treatment to information in the medical record and assessed concordance between patient and caregiver perceptions. Data were derived from medical record abstraction and structured interviews with 132 patients and 183 caregivers. Most caregivers, but only about one fourth of patients, reported having received information about a diagnosis related to memory loss. Caregivers were more accurate than patients in recalling the patient’s use of memory-enhancing medications. Within dyads there was poor agreement regarding a diagnosis of dementia. Our findings suggest that there is substantial room for improvement in disclosure and education of dementia diagnosis, especially at the level of the patient-caregiver dyad.


Alzheimer's Research & Therapy | 2014

A controlled trial of Partners in Dementia Care: veteran outcomes after six and twelve months

David M. Bass; Katherine S. Judge; ALynn Snow; Nancy Wilson; Robert O. Morgan; Katie Maslow; Ronda Randazzo; Jennifer Moye; Germaine Odenheimer; Elizabeth Archambault; Richard Elbein; Paul A. Pirraglia; Thomas A. Teasdale; Catherine A. McCarthy; Wendy J. Looman; Mark E. Kunik

Introduction“Partners in Dementia Care” (PDC) tested the effectiveness of a care-coordination program integrating healthcare and community services and supporting veterans with dementia and their caregivers. Delivered via partnerships between Veterans Affairs medical centers and Alzheimer’s Association chapters, PDC targeted both patients and caregivers, distinguishing it from many non-pharmacological interventions. Hypotheses posited PDC would improve five veteran self-reported outcomes: 1) unmet need, 2) embarrassment about memory problems, 3) isolation, 4) relationship strain and 5) depression. Greater impact was expected for more impaired veterans. A unique feature was self-reported research data collected from veterans with dementia.Methods and FindingsFive matched communities were study sites. Two randomly selected sites received PDC for 12 months; comparison sites received usual care. Three structured telephone interviews were completed every 6 months with veterans who could participate.ResultsOf 508 consenting veterans, 333 (65.6%) completed baseline interviews. Among those who completed baseline interviews, 263 (79.0%) completed 6-month follow-ups and 194 (58.3%) completed 12-month follow-ups. Regression analyses showed PDC veterans had significantly less adverse outcomes than those receiving usual care, particularly for more impaired veterans after 6 months, including reduced relationship strain (B = −0.09; p = 0.05), depression (B = −0.10; p = 0.03), and unmet need (B = −0.28; p = 0.02; and B = −0.52; p = 0.08). PDC veterans also had less embarrassment about memory problems (B = −0.24; p = 0.08). At 12 months, more impaired veterans had further reductions in unmet need (B = −0.96; p < 0.01) and embarrassment (B = −0.05; p = 0.02). Limitations included use of matched comparison sites rather than within-site randomization and lack of consideration for variation within the PDC group in amounts and types of assistance provided.ConclusionsPartnerships between community and health organizations have the potential to meet the dementia-related needs and improve the psychosocial functioning of persons with dementia.Trial RegistryNCT00291161

Collaboration


Dive into the Katherine S. Judge's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David M. Bass

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark E. Kunik

Baylor College of Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nancy Wilson

Baylor College of Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert O. Morgan

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Wendy J. Looman

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Catherine A. McCarthy

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nicole Dawson

Cleveland State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cameron J. Camp

University of New Orleans

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sarah J. Yarry

VA Palo Alto Healthcare System

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge