Kathleen J. Propert

A Randomized Trial of Induction Chemotherapy plus High-Dose Radiation versus Radiation Alone in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND For patients with locally or regionally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer radiation is the standard treatment, but survival remains poor. We therefore conducted a randomized trial to determine whether induction chemotherapy before irradiation improves survival. METHODS All the patients had documented non-small-cell cancer of the lung with Stage III disease established by clinical or surgical staging. Eligibility requirements included excellent performance status, minimal weight loss, and visible disease on radiography. Patients randomly assigned to group 1 received cisplatin (100 mg per square meter of body-surface area given intravenously on days 1 and 29) and vinblastine (5 mg per square meter given intravenously on days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29) and then began radiation therapy on day 50 (60 Gy over a 6-week period). Patients assigned to group 2 received the same radiation therapy but began it immediately and received no chemotherapy. RESULTS The eligible patients in group 1 (n = 78) and group 2 (n = 77) were comparable in terms of age (median, 60 years), sex, performance status, histologic features, stage of disease, and completeness of radiation therapy. The median survival was greater for those in group 1-13.8 versus 9.7 months (P = 0.0066 by log-rank test). Rates of survival in group 1 were 55 percent after one year, 26 percent after two years, and 23 percent after three years, as compared with 40, 13, and 11 percent, respectively, in group 2. Those in group 1 had a higher incidence of serious infections requiring hospitalization (7 percent, vs. 3 percent in group 2) and severe weight loss (14 percent vs. 6 percent), but there were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS In patients with Stage III non-small-cell lung cancer, induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and vinblastine before radiation significantly improves median survival (by about four months) and doubles the number of long-term survivors, as compared with radiation therapy alone. Since three quarters of the patients still die within three years, however, further improvements in systemic and local therapy are needed.

Chemotherapy of Advanced Hodgkin's Disease with MOPP, ABVD, or MOPP Alternating with ABVD

BACKGROUND AND METHODS MOPP (mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone) has been the standard treatment for Hodgkins disease for almost 20 years. In a randomized, multicenter trial, we compared three regimens of primary systemic therapy for newly diagnosed advanced Hodgkins disease in Stages IIIA2, IIIB, and IVA or IVB: (1) MOPP alone given for 6 to 8 cycles, (2) MOPP alternating with ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) for 12 cycles, and (3) ABVD alone for 6 to 8 cycles. Patients in a first relapse after radiation therapy were eligible. No additional radiation therapy was given. Patients who did not have a complete response or who had a relapse with either MOPP alone or ABVD alone were switched to the opposite regimen. RESULTS Of 361 eligible patients, 123 received MOPP, 123 received MOPP alternating with ABVD, and 115 received ABVD alone. The patients were stratified according to age, stage, previous radiation, histologic features, and performance status. The overall response rate was 93 percent, with complete responses in 77 percent: 67 percent in the MOPP group, 82 percent in the ABVD group, and 83 percent in the MOPP-ABVD group (P = 0.006 for the comparison of MOPP with the other two regimens, both of which contained doxorubicin). The rates of failure-free survival at five years were 50 percent for MOPP, 61 percent for ABVD, and 65 percent for MOPP-ABVD. Age, stage (III vs. IV), and regimen influenced failure-free survival significantly. Overall survival at five years was 66 percent for MOPP, 73 percent for ABVD, and 75 percent for MOPP-ABVD (P = 0.28 for the comparison of MOPP with the doxorubicin regimens). MOPP had more severe toxic effects on bone marrow than ABVD and was associated with greater reductions in the prescribed dose. CONCLUSIONS In this trial, ABVD therapy for 6 to 8 months was as effective as 12 months of MOPP alternating with ABVD, and both were superior to MOPP alone in the treatment of advanced Hodgkins disease. ABVD was less myelotoxic than MOPP or ABVD alternating with MOPP.

Immune responses to adenovirus and adeno-associated virus in humans

Vectors based on human adenovirus (Ad) and adeno-associated virus (AAV) are being evaluated for human gene therapy. The response of the host to the vector, in terms of antigen-specific immunity, will play a substantial role in clinical outcome. We have surveyed cohorts of normal subjects and cystic fibrosis patients for pre-existing immunity to these viruses, caused by naturally acquired infections. A number of humoral and cellular assays to adenovirus serotype 5 (Ad5) and adeno-associated virus serotype 2 (AAV2) were performed from serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Virtually all subjects had Ig to Ad5 although only 55% of these antibodies neutralized virus (NAB). Approximately two of three patients demonstrated CD4+ T cells that proliferated to Ad antigens of which most were of the TH1 subset, based on cytokine secretion. A substantially different pattern of immune responses was observed to AAV2. Although virtually all patients had Ig to AAV2, most of these antibodies were not neutralizing (32% NAB) and only 5% of patients had peripheral blood lymphocytes that proliferated in response to AAV2 antigens. These studies demonstrate marked heterogeneity in pre-existing immunity to Ad5 and AAV2 in human populations. The impact of these findings on outcome following gene therapy will require further study.

Long-term follow-up of a phase III intergroup study of cisplatin alone or in combination with methotrexate, vinblastine, and doxorubicin in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a cooperative group study.

PURPOSE A previously reported randomized intergroup trial demonstrated that combination chemotherapy with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (M-VAC) was superior to single-agent cisplatin in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. We conducted a long-term analysis of patients included in the intergroup trial to examine factors associated with long-term survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two-hundred fifty-five assessable patients with urothelial carcinoma were randomized to receive either single-agent cisplatin (70 mg/m2 on day 1) or combination chemotherapy with methotrexate (30 mg/m2 on days 1, 15, and 22), vinblastine (3 mg/m2 on days 2, 15, and 22), doxorubicin (30 mg/m2 on day 2), and cisplatin (70 mg/m2 on day 2). Courses were repeated every 28 days. The association between patient characteristics and survival was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS With long-term follow-up evaluation, survival in the M-VAC arm continues to be superior to cisplatin (P = .00015, log-rank test). Predictors of survival include performance status, histology, and the presence of liver or bone metastasis. Only 3.7% of the patients randomized to M-VAC are alive and continuously disease-free at 6 years. CONCLUSION Long-term follow-up evaluation of the intergroup trial confirms that M-VAC is superior to single-agent cisplatin in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma; however, durable progression-free survival is rare. Patients with non-transitional-cell histology, poor performance status, and/or bone or visceral involvement fare poorly and are unlikely to benefit significantly from M-VAC chemotherapy.

Efficacy and safety of a microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: a single-arm, open-label, phase 3 study

BACKGROUND Patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia respond inadequately to existing drugs. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor lomitapide in adults with this disease. METHODS We did a single-arm, open-label, phase 3 study of lomitapide for treatment of patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Current lipid lowering therapy was maintained from 6 weeks before baseline through to at least week 26. Lomitapide dose was escalated on the basis of safety and tolerability from 5 mg to a maximum of 60 mg a day. The primary endpoint was mean percent change in levels of LDL cholesterol from baseline to week 26, after which patients remained on lomitapide through to week 78 for safety assessment. Percent change from baseline to week 26 was assessed with a mixed linear model. FINDINGS 29 men and women with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia, aged 18 years or older, were recruited from 11 centres in four countries (USA, Canada, South Africa, and Italy). 23 of 29 enrolled patients completed both the efficacy phase (26 weeks) and the full study (78 weeks). The median dose of lomitapide was 40 mg a day. LDL cholesterol was reduced by 50% (95% CI -62 to -39) from baseline (mean 8·7 mmol/L [SD 2·9]) to week 26 (4·3 mmol/L [2·5]; p<0·0001). Levels of LDL cholesterol were lower than 2·6 mmol/L in eight patients at 26 weeks. Concentrations of LDL cholesterol remained reduced by 44% (95% CI -57 to -31; p<0·0001) at week 56 and 38% (-52 to -24; p<0·0001) at week 78. Gastrointestinal symptoms were the most common adverse event. Four patients had aminotransaminase levels of more than five times the upper limit of normal, which resolved after dose reduction or temporary interruption of lomitapide. No patient permanently discontinued treatment because of liver abnormalities. INTERPRETATION Our study suggests that treatment with lomitapide could be a valuable drug in the management of homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. FUNDING FDA Office of the Orphan Product Development, Aegerion Pharmaceuticals.

A Pilot Study of In Vivo Liver-Directed Gene Transfer with an Adenoviral Vector in Partial Ornithine Transcarbamylase Deficiency

Ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency (OTCD) is an inborn error of urea synthesis that has been considered as a model for liver-directed gene therapy. Current treatment has failed to avert a high mortality or morbidity from hyperammonemic coma. Restoration of enzyme activity in the liver should suffice to normalize metabolism. An E1- and E4-deleted vector based on adenovirus type 5 and containing human OTC cDNA was infused into the right hepatic artery in adults with partial OTCD. Six cohorts of three or four subjects received 1/2 log-increasing doses of vector from 2 x 10(9) to 6 x 10(11) particles/kg. This paper describes the experience in all but the last subject, who experienced lethal complications. Adverse effects included a flu-like episode and a transient rise in temperature, hepatic transaminases, thrombocytopenia, and hypophosphatemia. Humoral responses to the vector were seen in all research subjects and a proliferative cellular response to the vector developed in apparently naive subjects. In situ hybridization studies showed transgene expression in hepatocytes of 7 of 17 subjects. Three of 11 subjects with symptoms related to OTCD showed modest increases in urea cycle metabolic activity that were not statistically significant. The low levels of gene transfer detected in this trial suggest that at the doses tested, significant metabolic correction did not occur.

Prognostic Factors in Neuroblastoma

Known prognostic factors in neuroblastoma were analyzed in 124 children to determine which were independent and which were most useful in predicting outcome. The following factors were analyzed: age, sex, stage of disease, serum neuron‐specific enolase (NSE), serum ferritin, E‐rosette inhibition, urinary catecholamines, and histologic type according to the criteria of Shimada. Estimates of survival were calculated using the method of Kaplan and Meier. The overall survival for 124 patients was 60% at 2 years. There were significant differences in survival by pathology, age, NSE, ferritin, vanilmandelic acid (VMA): homovanillic acid (HVA) ratio, and stage. There was a strong association among NSE, age, stage, and ferritin. Using the recursive partitioning approach, it was possible to subdivide patients into three groups (based on diagnostic values of ferritin, age, and stage) with a good, intermediate, and poor prognosis and estimated 2‐year survival of 100%, 62%, and 19%, respectively. Further analysis could not be done because of small numbers in the subgroups, but the results suggest that combinations of age, stage, serum ferritin, and histologic type may be able to define two populations: favorable with 80% + 2‐year survival and unfavorable with less than 20%.

Phase III Study of Interferon Alfa-NL as Adjuvant Treatment for Resectable Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Intergroup Trial

PURPOSE To evaluate the role of adjuvant interferon alfa after complete resection of locally extensive renal cell carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 283 eligible patients with pT3-4a and/or node-positive disease were randomly assigned after radical nephrectomy and lymphadenectomy to observation or to interferon alfa-NL (Wellferon, Burroughs-Wellcome, Research Park, NC) given daily for 5 days every 3 weeks for up to 12 cycles. Patients were stratified on the basis of pathologic stage. Patients remained on treatment until documented recurrence, excessive toxicity, or patient/physician preference deemed removal appropriate. RESULTS At median follow-up of 10.4 years, median survival was 7.4 years in the observation arm and 5.1 year in the treatment arm (log-rank P =.09). Median recurrence-free survival was 3.0 years in the observation arm and 2.2 years in the interferon arm (P =.33). Performance status (P =.003), nodal status (N2 v N0, P <.0001), and tumor stage (P =.0002) were significant prognostic factors in multivariate analysis. A proportional hazards model examining the effects of treatment arm and time to recurrence on survival after recurrence among patients who recurred found that random assignment to interferon treatment (P =.009) and shorter time to recurrence (P <.0001) were independent predictors of shorter survival after recurrence. Although no lethal toxicities were observed, severe (grade 4) toxicities including neutropenia, myalgia, fatigue, depression, and other neurologic toxicities occurred in 11.4% of those randomly assigned to interferon treatment. CONCLUSION Adjuvant treatment with interferon did not contribute to survival or relapse-free survival in this group of patients.

Barriers to influenza immunization in a low-income urban population

BACKGROUND Although influenza immunization significantly reduces mortality from influenza, over one third of elderly Americans are not immunized each year. Low rates of immunization are particularly concerning among African-American low-income populations. Preliminary interviews suggested that fear of undisclosed ingredients in the influenza vaccine may impede vaccine acceptance in this vulnerable population. OBJECTIVES To assess the role of concern about vaccine contents and other factors in the use of influenza immunization among a predominantly African-American low-income urban population. METHODS Cross-sectional, health-system-population-based, telephone survey of a random sample of West Philadelphia residents aged > or =65 years. RESULTS Of 659 eligible individuals, 486 (73.8%) were successfully interviewed. Concern about undisclosed shot contents was reported by 132 (20%) respondents and was inversely associated with vaccine receipt (OR 0. 49, 95% CI 0.26-0.91). This association was similar among African Americans and Caucasians. In addition, receipt of influenza vaccine was inversely associated with belief that immunization is inconvenient (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.05-0.36), belief that immunization is painful (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.08-0.54), and history of previous side effects (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.18-0.60), and positively associated with physician recommendation (OR 3.22, 95% CI 1.76-5.93). CONCLUSIONS In a low-income urban population, concern about undisclosed vaccine contents appears to impede acceptance of influenza immunization among both African Americans and Caucasians. Directly addressing this concern offers a new approach to increasing immunization in this vulnerable population.

Ciprofloxacin or Tamsulosin in Men with Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial

Context Although the cause of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) is unknown, physicians sometimes try to treat it with antibiotics or -receptor blockers. Contribution In this multicenter, double-blind factorial trial, 196 men with moderately severe CP/CPPS were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of treatment with ciprofloxacin, tamsulosin, both drugs, or placebo. Neither ciprofloxacin nor tamsulosin substantively reduced symptoms. Implications Ciprofloxacin and tamsulosin were not effective treatments for CP/CPPS. Cautions Patients had long-standing, refractory CP/CPPS and received trial treatments for only 6 weeks. Patients with new diagnoses who are given longer courses of the trial treatments might respond differently. The Editors Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) is a common disorder and accounts for approximately 2 million visits to physicians annually in the United States (1). The substantial impact of CP/CPPS includes bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms, sexual dysfunction, reduced quality of life (2-5), and increased health care expenditures (6). The syndrome is diagnosed only on the basis of symptoms, principally pain or discomfort in the pelvic region. No objective measures can help define the disease. Although bacteria can infect the prostate, most men with prostatitis have a negative midstream urine culture, indicating that bacteria may not be the cause of their symptoms (2). Such men are classified as having National Institutes of Health (NIH) category III prostatitis, the most common of the clinically defined prostatitis syndromes (7). It is by no means clear that the disease is characterized by inflammation of the prostate or that the prostate is responsible for symptoms in a substantial proportion of patients. Because of this uncertainty, the term CP/CPPS is used. Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome is commonly seen by primary care practitioners, internists, and urologists. In the Olmsted County Study of Urinary Symptoms and Health Status Among Men (8), a population-based study in Olmstead County, Minnesota, the overall prevalence rate of a physician-assigned diagnosis of prostatitis was 9%. Population-based surveys of symptoms have estimated that the prevalence of the syndrome ranges from 9% to 12% among men (9, 10). It is difficult to estimate the proportion of patients with symptoms lasting longer than 3 months whose disorder remains refractory to empirical therapy. These patients are commonly seen by urologists, but whether they represent a minor subpopulation of the overall symptomatic group or make up the majority of patients is unknown. We chose to study these patients because they present with a troubling, long-standing problem and are usually treated with agents of unclear benefit. Even if a relatively large number of men whose symptoms last 3 months or more are cured by standard empirical therapy and the clinical scenario we describe is uncommon, men with refractory symptoms still present a substantial problem to internists and urologists who have little information to guide therapy. Because the cause of CP/CPPS is unknown, affected men receive many empirical therapies. The 2 most common treatments prescribed by physicians are antimicrobial agents and -adrenergic receptor antagonists (2), although there is little objective evidence to support their use (11). Quinolones, such as ciprofloxacin, are commonly used to treat CP/CPPS because of their excellent penetration into the prostate and broad spectrum of coverage for uropathogens and other organisms traditionally believed to be associated with the syndrome (12). Tamsulosin, an -blocker, is an effective treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia, and it has been hypothesized that tamsulosin may improve these symptoms in men with CP/CPPS. This randomized clinical trial was designed to evaluate whether ciprofloxacin or tamsulosin reduces symptoms of long-standing CP/CPPS of at least moderate severity, typical of the 488 men in our Chronic Prostatitis Cohort Study (2). The primary purpose of the trial was to test the most common prescription treatments given to men with CP/CPPS, who are commonly seen in our referral-based urologic practices. Methods Organization The Chronic Prostatitis Collaborative Research Network, a consortium sponsored by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), conducted the trial. Urologists and their clinical associates recruited patients at 10 sites in the United States and 1 site in Canada. The NIDDK established an independent data and safety monitoring board to review the progress, safety, and final analysis of the trial. The individual institutional review boards at each of the 10 participating clinical centers approved the study, and all men gave written informed consent. Participants The design of this trial has been described in detail previously (13). Participating urologists recruited both newly referred patients and patients with established CP/CPPS from their referral-based clinical practices at 10 tertiary medical centers in North America. Trial referrals came from primary care providers, internists, and other urologists. The primary diagnostic criterion was pain or discomfort in the pelvic region for at least 3 months in the previous 6 months. Severity of symptoms was assessed by using the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) (14, 15). This instrument is a validated questionnaire, completed by the patient, consisting of 4 questions about pain, 3 about voiding symptoms, and 2 about quality of life. The scores in these 3 individual domains (pain, voiding, and quality of life) are combined without weighting to yield the NIH-CPSI total score. Eligible men were required to have at least moderate symptoms, defined as an NIH-CPSI score of at least 15 of 43 possible points, at the time of randomization. We excluded men who had a documented urinary tract infection (midstream urine culture > 100000 colonies/mL) within the past 3 months, a history of active genital herpes within the previous year, a history of genitourinary cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, active urethral stricture, prostate or bladder surgery, or neurologic disease affecting the bladder. We used ligase chain reaction to screen for Chlamydia in urethral urine samples and excluded men whose tests yielded positive results. Previous treatment with antimicrobial agents or -adrenergic receptor blockers, including the study drugs, had to be completed at least 4 weeks before eligibility screening. Additional details of the eligibility criteria are available elsewhere (13). Study Design and Interventions Men were randomly assigned in equal proportions within a 2 2 factorial design to receive placebo; ciprofloxacin alone, 500 mg twice daily; tamsulosin alone, 0.4 mg once daily; or a combination of both drugs (Table 1). Patients were treated for 6 weeks, at which time the primary end point was assessed. Symptoms at 9 and 12 weeks after randomization (6 weeks after completion of treatment) were also assessed to evaluate longer-term treatment response. The 2 baseline screening contacts and the primary end point contact at 6 weeks were clinic visits; interim contacts at 3, 9, and 12 weeks were conducted by telephone. Table 1. Study Design Each patient was randomly assigned by computer. A permuted block randomization schedule with varying block sizes was used, stratified by clinical site. The research pharmacist at each site provided the blinded study drugs in 2 tamper-evident bottles. All clinical investigators, research nurses, and patients were blinded to treatment assignments until all patients had completed follow-up. Outcomes The primary outcome was the change in the NIH-CPSI total score from baseline to 6 weeks. The NIH-CPSI was administered at each of the 2 baseline screening visits, 1 to 3 weeks apart, and every 3 weeks thereafter until 12 weeks. The average of the 2 scores before randomization was used as the baseline score. Evaluation of the responsiveness of the NIH-CPSI indicates that a 4-point change on a scale of 0 to 43 points represents a difference detectable by the patient. Secondary outcomes included changes in the pain, voiding, and quality-of-life subscales of the NIH-CPSI; physical and mental summary scores on the Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (16); and a 7-point patient-reported global response assessment. Responders for the global response assessment were defined as men reporting that they were markedly improved or moderately improved at 6 weeks compared with baseline. Men for whom the global response assessment was missing were considered nonresponders and were included in the denominator for the assessment of response rates. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study and graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (ctep.cancer.gov/reporting/ctc.html). Patients were asked at each contact to report any adverse events that had occurred since the previous contact. The questions were open-ended, and researchers did not ask about any specific categories of adverse events. All events, regardless of whether they were expected reactions to the study drugs, were recorded. Attribution to treatment was also assessed. However, because it was difficult to determine whether certain adverse events, such as pain, were related to treatment or to CP/CPPS, all events were analyzed. Statistical Analysis For each of the 2 primary treatment comparisons, the recruitment goal of 184 patients provided 80% power, at a 2-sided significance level of 5%, to detect a 4-point treatment difference in the NIH-CPSI total score between baseline and 6 weeks. We recognized that although patients could detect this difference, most might not perceive it as a major improvement. However, we did not want to miss even a minor change in