Kathleen S. Curtis

Estrogen and the central control of body fluid balance.

Body fluid volume and electrolyte concentration are maintained at optimal levels by complex behavioral and physiological mechanisms that are integrated and coordinated by the central nervous system. From initial studies of estrogen effects on salt and water intake in the 1970s and later investigations of the role of estrogen in cardiovascular and neuroendocrine function, it has become increasingly clear that body fluid volume and osmotic regulation are affected by estrogen. In the early 1990s, estrogen receptors were identified throughout the central nervous system, in areas including circumventricular organs that detect humoral signals associated with body fluid challenges, and hypothalamic and hindbrain nuclei involved in behavioral, neuroendocrine, and cardiovascular responses to body fluid challenges. Taken together, the body of evidence amassed from more than 40 years of investigations suggests that the central actions of estrogen influence body fluid regulation and, more specifically, compensatory responses to perturbations of osmotic or volume balance in two interrelated ways. Estrogen alter the detection of signals by the central nervous system and, at the same time, act within central pathways to modify neurotransmitter systems that mediate specific responses to osmotic or volume challenges. This review focuses on the central actions of estrogen in influencing the cardiovascular, neuroendocrine, and behavioral processes that subserve body fluid regulation.

Time course of behavioral, physiological, and morphological changes after estradiol treatment of ovariectomized rats

Previous studies showed that treatment with 17-β-estradiol-3-benzoate (EB) reduces isoproterenol (ISOP) stimulated water intake by ovariectomized rats. This effect was observed 48h after the second of two EB injections, suggesting that the attenuation is attributable to classic EB actions to alter gene expression. However, in addition to classic, slowly-occurring, genomic effects, estrogens have more rapidly-occurring effects that may be nongenomic or nonclassical genomic effects. Thus, it is possible that the EB attenuation of water intake stimulated by ISOP is genomic, nongenomic, or both. Accordingly, we measured ISOP-induced water intake by OVX rats at different times after EB injections, using time points likely to indicate classic genomic effects (48h or 24h) or nonclassical genomic or nongenomic effects (90min). We also examined EB effects on body weight, uterine weight, and plasma volume and Na(+) concentration in the same animals using the same time points and EB dose. EB treatment decreased water intake stimulated by ISOP in both the 24-h and 48-h groups; however, water intake in the 90-min group was not affected by EB. Uterine weight was unchanged 90min after EB, but was increased 24h after the first injection of EB. In contrast, body weight decreased after EB, but not until 48h after the second EB injection. Finally, EB did not alter plasma Na(+) concentration or hematocrit, though plasma protein concentration increased transiently 24h after EB treatment. Taken together, these findings suggest that the behavioral, morphological, and physiological effects of EB likely are attributable to slowly-occurring, classic genomic actions of estrogens. Moreover, the time course of the observed effects varied, suggesting tissue-specific differences in estrogen receptor density or subtype, or in co-activators or co-repressors that, ultimately, determine the timing and direction of EB effects.

Differential effects of estradiol on drinking by ovariectomized rats in response to hypertonic nacl or isoproterenol: implications for hyper- vs. Hypo-osmotic stimuli for water intake

We examined the effects of estradiol on behavioral responses to osmotic challenges in ovariectomized (OVX) rats to test the hypothesis that estradiol enhances sensitivity to gradual changes in plasma osmolality (pOsm) in stimulating water intake. Despite comparably elevated pOsm after a slow infusion of 2 M NaCl, the latency to begin water intake was significantly less in estradiol-treated OVX rats compared to that in oil vehicle-treated rats. Other groups of OVX rats were injected with isoproterenol, which increases circulating angiotensin II. These rats then were given 0.15 M NaCl to drink instead of water, to prevent decreased pOsm associated with water ingestion. Isoproterenol stimulated 0.15 M NaCl intake by both groups; however, estradiol-treated rats consumed less 0.15 M NaCl than did oil-treated rats, findings that are similar to those reported when estradiol-treated rats consumed water. The estradiol enhancement of sensitivity to increased, but not to decreased, pOsm suggests that estradiol has directionally-specific effects on osmoregulatory drinking. Moreover, the estradiol attenuation of 0.15 M NaCl intake after isoproterenol suggests that estradiol effects on osmoregulatory drinking are independent of those on volume regulatory drinking.

Estradiol selectively reduces central neural activation induced by hypertonic NaCl infusion in ovariectomized rats.

We recently reported that the latency to begin drinking water during slow, intravenous infusion of a concentrated NaCl solution was shorter in estradiol-treated ovariectomized rats compared to oil vehicle-treated rats, despite comparably elevated plasma osmolality. To test the hypothesis that the decreased latency to begin drinking is attributable to enhanced detection of increased plasma osmolality by osmoreceptors located in the CNS, the present study used immunocytochemical methods to label fos, a marker of neural activation. Increased plasma osmolality did not activate the subfornical organ (SFO), organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis (OVLT), or the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) in either oil vehicle-treated rats or estradiol-treated rats. In contrast, hyperosmolality increased fos labeling in the area postrema (AP), the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVN) and the rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM) in both groups; however, the increase was blunted in estradiol-treated rats. These results suggest that estradiol has selective effects on the sensitivity of a population of osmo-/Na(+)-receptors located in the AP, which, in turn, alters activity in other central areas associated with responses to increased osmolality. In conjunction with previous reports that hyperosmolality increases blood pressure and that elevated blood pressure inhibits drinking, the current findings of reduced activation in AP, PVN, and RVLM-areas involved in sympathetic nerve activity-raise the possibility that estradiol blunts HS-induced blood pressure changes. Thus, estradiol may eliminate or reduce the initial inhibition of water intake that occurs during increased osmolality, and facilitate a more rapid behavioral response, as we observed in our recent study.

Estradiol and osmolality: Behavioral responses and central pathways.

Regulation of appropriate osmolality of body fluid is critical for survival, yet there are sex differences in compensatory responses to osmotic challenges. Few studies have focused on the role of sex hormones such as estradiol in behavioral responses to increases or decreases in systemic osmolality, and even fewer studies have investigated whether central actions of estrogens contribute to these responses. This overview integrates findings from a series of ongoing and completed experiments conducted in my laboratory to assess estradiol effects on water and NaCl intake in response to osmotic challenges, and on activity in central pathways that mediate such responses.

Estrogen and voluntary exercise interact to attenuate stress-induced corticosterone release but not anxiety-like behaviors in female rats

The beneficial effects of physical exercise to reduce anxiety and depression and to alleviate stress are increasingly supported in research studies. The role of ovarian hormones in interactions between exercise and anxiety/stress has important implications for womens health, given that women are at increased risk of developing anxiety-related disorders, particularly during and after the menopausal transition. In these experiments, we tested the hypothesis that estrogen enhances the positive impact of exercise on stress responses by investigating the combined effects of exercise and estrogen on anxiety-like behaviors and stress hormone levels in female rats after an acute stressor. Ovariectomized female rats with or without estrogen were given access to running wheels for one or three days of voluntary running immediately after or two days prior to being subjected to restraint stress. We found that voluntary running was not effective at reducing anxiety-like behaviors, whether or not rats were subjected to restraint stress. In contrast, stress-induced elevations of stress hormone levels were attenuated by exercise experience in estrogen-treated rats, but were increased in rats without estrogen. These results suggest that voluntary exercise may be more effective at reducing stress hormone levels if estrogen is present. Additionally, exercise experience, or the distance run, may be important in reducing stress.

Regional differences in estradiol effects on numbers of HSD2-containing neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract of rats

Estrogens affect body fluid balance, including sodium ingestion. Recent findings of a population of neurons in the hindbrain nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) of rats that are activated during sodium need suggest a possible central substrate for this effect of estrogens. We used immunohistochemistry to label neurons in the NTS that express 11-β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 (HSD2), an enzyme that promotes aldosterone binding, in male rats, and in ovariectomized (OVX) rats given estradiol benzoate (EB) or oil vehicle (OIL). During baseline conditions, the number of HSD2 immunoreactive neurons in the NTS immediately rostral to the area postrema was greater in EB-treated OVX rats compared to those in OIL-treated OVX and male rats. A small number of HSD2 immunoreactive neurons was also labeled for dopamine-β-hydroxylase (DBH), an enzyme involved in norepinephrine biosynthesis. Double-labeled neurons in the NTS were located primarily in the more lateral portion of the HSD2 population, at the level of the area postrema in all three groups, with no sex or estrogen-mediated differences in the number of double-labeled neurons. These results suggest that two subpopulations of HSD2 neurons are present in the NTS. One subpopulation, which does not colocalize with DBH and is increased during conditions of elevated estradiol, may contribute to the effects of estrogens on sodium ingestion. The role of the other, smaller subpopulation, which colocalizes with DBH and is not affected by estradiol, remains to be determined, but one possibility is that these latter neurons are part of a larger network of catecholaminergic input to neuroendocrine neurons in the hypothalamus.

Neuroanatomical association of hypothalamic HSD2-containing neurons with ERα, catecholamines, or oxytocin: implications for feeding?

This study used immunohistochemical methods to investigate the possibility that hypothalamic neurons that contain 11-β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 (HSD2) are involved in the control of feeding by rats via neuroanatomical associations with the α subtype of estrogen receptor (ERα), catecholamines, and/or oxytocin (OT). An aggregate of HSD2-containing neurons is located laterally in the hypothalamus, and the numbers of these neurons were greatly increased by estradiol treatment in ovariectomized (OVX) rats compared to numbers in male rats and in OVX rats that were not given estradiol. However, HSD2-containing neurons were anatomically segregated from ERα-containing neurons in the Ventromedial Hypothalamus and the Arcuate Nucleus. There was an absence of OT-immunolabeled fibers in the area of HSD2-labeled neurons. Taken together, these findings provide no support for direct associations between hypothalamic HSD2 and ERα or OT neurons in the control of feeding. In contrast, there was catecholamine-fiber labeling in the area of HSD2-labeled neurons, and these fibers occasionally were in close apposition to HSD2-labeled neurons. Therefore, we cannot rule out interactions between HSD2 and catecholamines in the control of feeding; however, given the relative sparseness of the appositions, any such interaction would appear to be modest. Thus, these studies do not conclusively identify a neuroanatomical substrate by which HSD2-containing neurons in the hypothalamus may alter feeding, and leave the functional role of hypothalamic HSD2-containing neurons subject to further investigation.

Regional differences in serotonin content in the nucleus of the solitary tract of male rats after hypovolemia produced by polyethylene glycol

Serotonin (5-HT) has been implicated in centrally mediated compensatory responses to volume loss in rats. Accordingly, we hypothesized that slowly developing, non-hypotensive hypovolemia increases serotonin in the hindbrain nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS). We produced volume loss in adult male rats by administering hyperoncotic polyethylene glycol (PEG) and then assessed 5-HT levels in the NTS using measurements of tissue 5-HT content or 5-HT immunohistochemistry. The results show selective increases of 5-HT in the caudal NTS after PEG treatment, but no change in the primary 5-HT metabolite, 5-HIAA. Moreover, the intensity of 5-HT immunolabeled fibers in the caudal NTS was increased after PEG treatment. These findings suggest that, after PEG-induced hypovolemia, 5-HT accumulates in neural elements in the caudal NTS. We propose that this accumulation is attributable to an initial release of 5-HT that then acts at presynaptic autoreceptors to inhibit subsequent 5-HT release.

Sex differences in physiology and behavior: focus on central actions of ovarian hormones.

Fig. 1. Percentage of total publications (left axis, solid bars) and number of publications (right axis, line) identified by a search of PubMed database conducted for each of six decades beginning with the 1950s using “sex differences OR estrogen” as search terms. Note that the final decade (2000–2008) consists of nine years. During the 1950s, less than 0.5% of the total papers published in scientific journals reported on studies investigating estrogen or sex differences. After that modest amount, research addressing sex differences or estrogen began to increase; publications steadily climbed each decade and continue to increase in the 2000s. In fact, of approximately 5 million scientific papers published during the period spanning 2000–2008, more than 2% (i.e., ~105,000 manuscripts; see Fig. 1) focus on sex differences or estrogen. To put these statistics in perspective, the numbers compare favorably with those of publications related to learning or the hippocampus, an area that been the subject of much research attention (2000–2008: ~139,000 manuscripts; ~3% of total publications). More importantly, however, it isnt only the number of publications about sex differences or estrogen that is increasing. The ‘classic’ focus on reproduction and reproductive behaviors remains an integral and vital part of research about estrogen and sex differences, but increasing public awareness of womens health issues has expanded research into additional areas, such as breast cancer and hypertension. Research on regulated physiological processes has promoted understanding about increased hypertension in postmenopausal women and, in addition, has provided insight into sex differences in the incidence of obesity. Despite comprising a comparatively small proportion of scientific publications, remarkable strides are being made in understanding sex differences and the role of estrogen in processes as fundamental as how individuals learn, respond to stress, and detect and process sensory information about the world inwhich they live. We are beginning to understand how the central effects of estrogen may protect against devastating diseases such as Alzheimers but, at the same time, may contribute to drug abuse or to other psychological disorders. Clearly, investigations about sex differences and estrogen are not confined to reproduction and reproductive behaviors, but encompass a broad range of topics from reproduction to cognition, from fluid balance to feeding, from sensation and perception to depression. In short, sex differences arent only about sex. Accordingly, the goal of this special issue, “Sex differences in physiology and behavior: focus on central actions of ovarian hormones” is to illustrate the breadth of behaviors and physiological processes that exhibit sex differences, with a particular concentration on ovarian hormones and the central nervous system. Our aimwas to showcase innovative studies and insightful reviews of the literature in demonstrating the importance of sex differences and ovarian hormones, not only in reproductive behavior and physiology, but also in other behaviors and other systems. We begin with an introductory overview from Dr. Bruce McEwen, followed by reports about sex differences and the role of ovarian hormones in reproduction (A.E. Kudwa, N. Harada, S.I. Honda, and E.F. Rissman; and G.D. Griffin and L.M.