Kathryn A. Tunny

Mechanism of Activation of Protein Kinase JAK2 by the Growth Hormone Receptor

Introduction Class I cytokines regulate key processes such as growth, lactation, hematopoiesis, and immune function and contribute to oncogenesis. Although the extracellular domain structures of their receptors are well characterized, little is known about how the receptors activate their associated JAK (Janus kinase) protein kinases. We provide a mechanistic description for this process, focusing on the growth hormone (GH) receptor and its associated JAK2. Receptor-JAK2 activation process. (Top) Cartoons of the GH receptor basal state (state 1, left) and the active state (state 2, right) with (Bottom) transmembrane helix alignments for these states derived by modeling. GHR, GH receptor. Rationale We tested whether the receptor exists as a dimer in the inactive state by homo-FRET [fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between the proteins labeled with the same fluorophore] and other means. Then, to define receptor movements resulting from activation, we attached FRET reporters to the receptor below the cell membrane and correlated their movement with receptor activation, measured as increased cell proliferation. We controlled the position of the transmembrane helices with leucine zippers and mutagenesis, and we again monitored FRET and receptor activation. We used cysteine cross-linking data to define the faces of the transmembrane helices in contact in the basal state and verified this with molecular dynamics, which allowed us to model the activation process. We also used FRET reporters to monitor the movement of JAK2, and we matched this with molecular dynamics docking of the crystal structures of the kinase and its pseudokinase domains to derive a model for activation, which we then verified experimentally. Results We found that the GH receptor exists predominantly as a dimer in vivo, held together by its transmembrane helices. These helices are parallel in the basal state, and binding of the hormone converts them into a left-hand crossover state that induces separation of helices at the lower transmembrane boundary (hence, Box1 separation). This movement is triggered by increased proximity of the juxtamembrane sequences, a consequence of locking together of the lower module of the extracellular domain on hormone binding. This movement is triggered by increased proximity of the juxtamembrane sequences , a Both this locking and the helix state transition require rotation of the receptors, but the key outcome is separation of the Box1 sequences. Because these sequences are bound to the JAK2 FERM (4.1, ezrin, radixin, moesin) domains, this separation results in removal of the pseudokinase inhibitory domain of one JAK2, which is blocking the kinase domain of the other JAK2, and vice versa. This brings the two kinase domains into productive apposition, triggering JAK2 activation. We verified this mechanism by kinase-pseudokinase domain swap, by changes in JAK2 FRET signal on activation, by showing association of pseudokinase-kinase domain pairs, and by docking of the crystal structures. An animation of our complete model of GH receptor activation is provided at http://web-services.imb.uq.edu.au/waters/hgh.html. Conclusion The proposed mechanism will be useful in understanding the many actions of GH, which include altered growth, metabolism, and bone turnover. We expect that it may extend to other members of this important receptor family. The mechanism provides a molecular basis for understanding the oncogenic JAK2 mutations responsible for polycythemia vera and certain other hematologic disorders and may thus be of value in the design of small-molecule inhibitors of clinical applicability. Signaling from JAK (Janus kinase) protein kinases to STAT (signal transducers and activators of transcription) transcription factors is key to many aspects of biology and medicine, yet the mechanism by which cytokine receptors initiate signaling is enigmatic. We present a complete mechanistic model for activation of receptor-bound JAK2, based on an archetypal cytokine receptor, the growth hormone receptor. For this, we used fluorescence resonance energy transfer to monitor positioning of the JAK2 binding motif in the receptor dimer, substitution of the receptor extracellular domains with Jun zippers to control the position of its transmembrane (TM) helices, atomistic modeling of TM helix movements, and docking of the crystal structures of the JAK2 kinase and its inhibitory pseudokinase domain with an opposing kinase-pseudokinase domain pair. Activation of the receptor dimer induced a separation of its JAK2 binding motifs, driven by a ligand-induced transition from a parallel TM helix pair to a left-handed crossover arrangement. This separation leads to removal of the pseudokinase domain from the kinase domain of the partner JAK2 and pairing of the two kinase domains, facilitating trans-activation. This model may well generalize to other class I cytokine receptors. A molecular mechanism for transmembrane signaling by the growth hormone receptor is elucidated. [Also see Perspective by Wells and Kossiakoff] The Hormones Message The receptor for growth hormone is a well-studied representative of a family of cytokine receptors through which binding of hormone molecules at the cell surface is converted into a biochemical signal within the cell. Brooks et al. (10.1126/science.1249783; see the Perspective by Wells and Kossiakoff) used a combination of crystal structures, biophysical measurements, cell biology experiments with modified receptors, and molecular dynamics and modeling to decipher how the receptor actually transmits the information that a hormone molecule is bound. The results suggest that the receptors exist in inactive dimeric complexes in which two associated JAK2 protein kinase molecules interact in an inhibitory manner. Binding of growth hormone causes a structural change in the receptor that results in movement of the receptor intracellular domains apart from one another. This relieves the inhibition of the JAK2 molecules and allows them to activate one another, thus initiating the cellular response to the hormone.

TLR3 drives IRF6-dependent IL-23p19 expression and p19/EBI3 heterodimer formation in keratinocytes

Interferon regulatory factor (IRF) family members impart cell‐type specificity to toll‐like receptor (TLR) signalling, and we recently identified a role for IRF6 in TLR2 signalling in epithelial cells. TLR3 has a well‐characterized role in wound healing in the skin, and here, we examined TLR3‐dependent IRF6 functions in human keratinocytes. Primary keratinocytes responded robustly to the TLR3 agonist poly(IC) with upregulation of mRNAs for interferon‐β (IFN‐β), the interleukin‐12 (IL‐12) family member IL‐23p19 and the chemokines IL‐8 and chemokine (C–C motif) ligand 5 (CCL5). Silencing of IRF6 expression enhanced poly(IC)‐inducible IFN‐β mRNA levels and inhibited poly(IC)‐inducible IL‐23p19 mRNA expression in primary keratinocytes. Consistent with these data, co‐transfection of IRF6 increased poly(IC)‐inducible IL‐23p19 promoter activity, but inhibited poly(IC)‐inducible IFN‐β promoter activity in reporter assays. Surprisingly, poly(IC) did not regulate IL‐12p40 expression in keratinocytes, suggesting that TLR3‐inducible IL‐23p19 may have an IL‐23‐independent function in these cells. The only other IL‐12 family member that was strongly poly(IC) inducible was EBI3, which has not been shown to heterodimerize with IL‐23p19. Both co‐immunoprecipitation and proximity ligation assays revealed that IL‐23p19 and EBI3 interact in cells. Co‐expression of IL‐23p19 and EBI3, as compared with IL‐23p19 alone, resulted in increased levels of secreted IL‐23p19, implying a functional role for this heterodimer. In summary, we report that IRF6 regulates a subset of TLR3 responses in human keratinocytes, including the production of a novel IL‐12 family heterodimer (p19/EBI3). We propose that the TLR3‐IRF6‐p19/EBI3 axis may regulate keratinocyte and/or immune cell functions in the context of cell damage and wound healing in the skin.

20-kDa placental hGH-V has diminished diabetogenic and lactogenic activities compared with 22-kDa hGH-N while retaining antilipogenic activity

Placental human growth hormone-variant (hGH-V) and pituitary human growth hormone-N (hGH-N) are of identical size (22 kDa) but differ in 13 residues scattered throughout the protein. Several isoforms of GH are produced by the hGH-N and hGH-V genes including a 20-kDa hGH-V resulting from a 45-bp deletion caused by the use of an alternative acceptor site within exon 3. To date, the biological properties of the 20-kDa GH-V have not been characterized in vivo. Using young male Wistar rats fed either chow or a high-fat (HF) diet for 4 wk postweaning, we investigated the effect of 7 days treatment with either 22-kDa hGH-N, 20-kDa hGH-V (5 ug x g(-1) x day(-1) sc), or vehicle on body composition and endocrine and metabolic profiles. Total body growth (absolute weight gain and linear growth trajectory) in the 20-kDa hGH-V-treated animals was intermediary between that of control and hGH-N-treated animals. Both 22-kDa hGH-N and 20-kDa hGH-V significantly reduced total body fat mass compared with control animals, and there were no differences between the GH isoforms in anti-lipogenic activity in animals fed the HF diet. Fasting plasma insulin and C peptide were significantly increased in animals on the HF diet and further increased by hGH-N but were unchanged in 20-kDa hGH-V-treated animals compared with saline-treated controls. Plasma volume as assessed by hematocrit was increased in hGH-N-treated animals but was unchanged in 20-kDa hGH-V-treated animals compared with controls. Furthermore, 20-kDa hGH-V had reduced lactogenic (prolactin receptor mediated) activity characteristic of hGH-N as tested in vitro compared with the 20-kDa hGH-N and 22-kDa hGH-N variants. In summary, placental 20-kDa hGH-V retains some of the growth-promoting and all antilipogenic activities of pituitary 22-kDa hGH-N but has diminished diabetogenic and lactogenic properties compared with the native 22-kDa hGH-N.

A growth hormone receptor SNP promotes lung cancer by impairment of SOCS2-mediated degradation

Both humans and mice lacking functional growth hormone (GH) receptors are known to be resistant to cancer. Further, autocrine GH has been reported to act as a cancer promoter. Here we present the first example of a variant of the GH receptor (GHR) associated with cancer promotion, in this case lung cancer. We show that the GHRP495T variant located in the receptor intracellular domain is able to prolong the GH signal in vitro using stably expressing mouse pro-B-cell and human lung cell lines. This is relevant because GH secretion is pulsatile, and extending the signal duration makes it resemble autocrine GH action. Signal duration for the activated GHR is primarily controlled by suppressor of cytokine signalling 2 (SOCS2), the substrate recognition component of the E3 protein ligase responsible for ubiquitinylation and degradation of the GHR. SOCS2 is induced by a GH pulse and we show that SOCS2 binding to the GHR is impaired by a threonine substitution at Pro 495. This results in decreased internalisation and degradation of the receptor evident in TIRF microscopy and by measurement of mature (surface) receptor expression. Mutational analysis showed that the residue at position 495 impairs SOCS2 binding only when a threonine is present, consistent with interference with the adjacent Thr494. The latter is key for SOCS2 binding, together with nearby Tyr487, which must be phosphorylated for SOCS2 binding. We also undertook nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy approach for structural comparison of the SOCS2 binding scaffold Ile455-Ser588, and concluded that this single substitution has altered the structure of the SOCS2 binding site. Importantly, we find that lung BEAS-2B cells expressing GHRP495T display increased expression of transcripts associated with tumour proliferation, epithelial–mesenchymal transition and metastases (TWIST1, SNAI2, EGFR, MYC and CCND1) at 2 h after a GH pulse. This is consistent with prolonged GH signalling acting to promote cancer progression in lung cancer.