Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Kathryn Beal is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Kathryn Beal.


Nature | 2011

A high-resolution map of human evolutionary constraint using 29 mammals

Kerstin Lindblad-Toh; Manuel Garber; Or Zuk; Michael F. Lin; Brian J. Parker; Stefan Washietl; Pouya Kheradpour; Jason Ernst; Gregory Jordan; Evan Mauceli; Lucas D. Ward; Craig B. Lowe; Alisha K. Holloway; Michele Clamp; Sante Gnerre; Jessica Alföldi; Kathryn Beal; Jean Chang; Hiram Clawson; James Cuff; Federica Di Palma; Stephen Fitzgerald; Paul Flicek; Mitchell Guttman; Melissa J. Hubisz; David B. Jaffe; Irwin Jungreis; W. James Kent; Dennis Kostka; Marcia Lara

The comparison of related genomes has emerged as a powerful lens for genome interpretation. Here we report the sequencing and comparative analysis of 29 eutherian genomes. We confirm that at least 5.5% of the human genome has undergone purifying selection, and locate constrained elements covering ∼4.2% of the genome. We use evolutionary signatures and comparisons with experimental data sets to suggest candidate functions for ∼60% of constrained bases. These elements reveal a small number of new coding exons, candidate stop codon readthrough events and over 10,000 regions of overlapping synonymous constraint within protein-coding exons. We find 220 candidate RNA structural families, and nearly a million elements overlapping potential promoter, enhancer and insulator regions. We report specific amino acid residues that have undergone positive selection, 280,000 non-coding elements exapted from mobile elements and more than 1,000 primate- and human-accelerated elements. Overlap with disease-associated variants indicates that our findings will be relevant for studies of human biology, health and disease.


Nature | 2012

Insights into hominid evolution from the gorilla genome sequence.

Aylwyn Scally; Julien Y. Dutheil; LaDeana W. Hillier; Gregory Jordan; Ian Goodhead; Javier Herrero; Asger Hobolth; Tuuli Lappalainen; Thomas Mailund; Tomas Marques-Bonet; Shane McCarthy; Stephen H. Montgomery; Petra C. Schwalie; Y. Amy Tang; Michelle C. Ward; Yali Xue; Bryndis Yngvadottir; Can Alkan; Lars Nørvang Andersen; Qasim Ayub; Edward V. Ball; Kathryn Beal; Brenda J. Bradley; Yuan Chen; Chris Clee; Stephen Fitzgerald; Tina Graves; Yong Gu; Paul Heath; Andreas Heger

Gorillas are humans’ closest living relatives after chimpanzees, and are of comparable importance for the study of human origins and evolution. Here we present the assembly and analysis of a genome sequence for the western lowland gorilla, and compare the whole genomes of all extant great ape genera. We propose a synthesis of genetic and fossil evidence consistent with placing the human–chimpanzee and human–chimpanzee–gorilla speciation events at approximately 6 and 10 million years ago. In 30% of the genome, gorilla is closer to human or chimpanzee than the latter are to each other; this is rarer around coding genes, indicating pervasive selection throughout great ape evolution, and has functional consequences in gene expression. A comparison of protein coding genes reveals approximately 500 genes showing accelerated evolution on each of the gorilla, human and chimpanzee lineages, and evidence for parallel acceleration, particularly of genes involved in hearing. We also compare the western and eastern gorilla species, estimating an average sequence divergence time 1.75 million years ago, but with evidence for more recent genetic exchange and a population bottleneck in the eastern species. The use of the genome sequence in these and future analyses will promote a deeper understanding of great ape biology and evolution.


PLOS Biology | 2010

Multi-platform next-generation sequencing of the domestic Turkey (Meleagris gallopavo): Genome assembly and analysis

Rami A. Dalloul; Julie A Long; Aleksey V. Zimin; Luqman Aslam; Kathryn Beal; Le Ann Blomberg; Pascal Bouffard; David W. Burt; Oswald Crasta; R.P.M.A. Crooijmans; Kristal L. Cooper; Roger A. Coulombe; Supriyo De; Mary E. Delany; Jerry B. Dodgson; Jennifer J Dong; Clive Evans; Karin M. Frederickson; Paul Flicek; Liliana Florea; Otto Folkerts; M.A.M. Groenen; Tim Harkins; Javier Herrero; Steve Hoffmann; Hendrik-Jan Megens; Andrew Jiang; Pieter J. de Jong; Peter K. Kaiser; Heebal Kim

The combined application of next-generation sequencing platforms has provided an economical approach to unlocking the potential of the turkey genome.


Nucleic Acids Research | 2010

Ensembl’s 10th year

Paul Flicek; Bronwen Aken; Benoit Ballester; Kathryn Beal; Eugene Bragin; Simon Brent; Yuan Chen; Peter Clapham; Guy Coates; Susan Fairley; Stephen Fitzgerald; Julio Fernandez-Banet; Leo Gordon; Stefan Gräf; Syed Haider; Martin Hammond; Kerstin Howe; Andrew M. Jenkinson; Nathan Johnson; Andreas Kähäri; Damian Keefe; Stephen Keenan; Rhoda Kinsella; Felix Kokocinski; Gautier Koscielny; Eugene Kulesha; Daniel Lawson; Ian Longden; Tim Massingham; William M. McLaren

Ensembl (http://www.ensembl.org) integrates genomic information for a comprehensive set of chordate genomes with a particular focus on resources for human, mouse, rat, zebrafish and other high-value sequenced genomes. We provide complete gene annotations for all supported species in addition to specific resources that target genome variation, function and evolution. Ensembl data is accessible in a variety of formats including via our genome browser, API and BioMart. This year marks the tenth anniversary of Ensembl and in that time the project has grown with advances in genome technology. As of release 56 (September 2009), Ensembl supports 51 species including marmoset, pig, zebra finch, lizard, gorilla and wallaby, which were added in the past year. Major additions and improvements to Ensembl since our previous report include the incorporation of the human GRCh37 assembly, enhanced visualisation and data-mining options for the Ensembl regulatory features and continued development of our software infrastructure.


Science | 2013

Integrative annotation of variants from 1092 humans: application to cancer genomics.

Ekta Khurana; Yao Fu; Vincenza Colonna; Xinmeng Jasmine Mu; Hyun Min Kang; Tuuli Lappalainen; Andrea Sboner; Lucas Lochovsky; Jieming Chen; Arif Harmanci; Jishnu Das; Alexej Abyzov; Suganthi Balasubramanian; Kathryn Beal; Dimple Chakravarty; Daniel Challis; Yuan Chen; Declan Clarke; Laura Clarke; Fiona Cunningham; Uday S. Evani; Paul Flicek; Robert Fragoza; Erik Garrison; Richard A. Gibbs; Zeynep H. Gümüş; Javier Herrero; Naoki Kitabayashi; Yong Kong; Kasper Lage

Introduction Plummeting sequencing costs have led to a great increase in the number of personal genomes. Interpreting the large number of variants in them, particularly in noncoding regions, is a current challenge. This is especially the case for somatic variants in cancer genomes, a large proportion of which are noncoding. Prioritization of candidate noncoding cancer drivers based on patterns of selection. (Step 1) Filter somatic variants to exclude 1000 Genomes polymorphisms; (2) retain variants in noncoding annotations; (3) retain those in “sensitive” regions; (4) prioritize those disrupting a transcription-factor binding motif and (5) residing near the center of a biological network; (6) prioritize ones in annotation blocks mutated in multiple cancer samples. Methods We investigated patterns of selection in DNA elements from the ENCODE project using the full spectrum of variants from 1092 individuals in the 1000 Genomes Project (Phase 1), including single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), short insertions and deletions (indels), and structural variants (SVs). Although we analyzed broad functional annotations, such as all transcription-factor binding sites, we focused more on highly specific categories such as distal binding sites of factor ZNF274. The greater statistical power of the Phase 1 data set compared with earlier ones allowed us to differentiate the selective constraints on these categories. We also used connectivity information between elements from protein-protein-interaction and regulatory networks. We integrated all the information on selection to develop a workflow (FunSeq) to prioritize personal-genome variants on the basis of their deleterious impact. As a proof of principle, we experimentally validated and characterized a few candidate variants. Results We identified a specific subgroup of noncoding categories with almost as much selective constraint as coding genes: “ultrasensitive” regions. We also uncovered a number of clear patterns of selection. Elements more consistently active across tissues and both maternal and paternal alleles (in terms of allele-specific activity) are under stronger selection. Variants disruptive because of mechanistic effects on transcription-factor binding (i.e. “motif-breakers”) are selected against. Higher network connectivity (i.e. for hubs) is associated with higher constraint. Additionally, many hub promoters and regulatory elements show evidence of recent positive selection. Overall, indels and SVs follow the same pattern as SNVs; however, there are notable exceptions. For instance, enhancers are enriched for SVs formed by nonallelic homologous recombination. We integrated these patterns of selection into the FunSeq prioritization workflow and applied it to cancer variants, because they present a strong contrast to inherited polymorphisms. In particular, application to ~90 cancer genomes (breast, prostate and medulloblastoma) reveals nearly a hundred candidate noncoding drivers. Discussion Our approach can be readily used to prioritize variants in cancer and is immediately applicable in a precision-medicine context. It can be further improved by incorporation of larger-scale population sequencing, better annotations, and expression data from large cohorts. Identifying Important Identifiers Each of us has millions of sequence variations in our genomes. Signatures of purifying or negative selection should help identify which of those variations is functionally important. Khurana et al. (1235587) used sequence polymorphisms from 1092 humans across 14 populations to identify patterns of selection, especially in noncoding regulatory regions. Noncoding regions under very strong negative selection included binding sites of some chromatin and general transcription factors (TFs) and core motifs of some important TF families. Positive selection in TF binding sites tended to occur in network hub promoters. Many recurrent somatic cancer variants occurred in noncoding regulatory regions and thus might indicate mutations that drive cancer. Regions under strong selection in the human genome identify noncoding regulatory elements with possible roles in disease. Interpreting variants, especially noncoding ones, in the increasing number of personal genomes is challenging. We used patterns of polymorphisms in functionally annotated regions in 1092 humans to identify deleterious variants; then we experimentally validated candidates. We analyzed both coding and noncoding regions, with the former corroborating the latter. We found regions particularly sensitive to mutations (“ultrasensitive”) and variants that are disruptive because of mechanistic effects on transcription-factor binding (that is, “motif-breakers”). We also found variants in regions with higher network centrality tend to be deleterious. Insertions and deletions followed a similar pattern to single-nucleotide variants, with some notable exceptions (e.g., certain deletions and enhancers). On the basis of these patterns, we developed a computational tool (FunSeq), whose application to ~90 cancer genomes reveals nearly a hundred candidate noncoding drivers.


Genome Research | 2008

Enredo and Pecan: Genome-wide mammalian consistency-based multiple alignment with paralogs

Benedict Paten; Javier Herrero; Kathryn Beal; Stephen Fitzgerald; Ewan Birney

Pairwise whole-genome alignment involves the creation of a homology map, capable of performing a near complete transformation of one genome into another. For multiple genomes this problem is generalized to finding a set of consistent homology maps for converting each genome in the set of aligned genomes into any of the others. The problem can be divided into two principal stages. First, the partitioning of the input genomes into a set of colinear segments, a process which essentially deals with the complex processes of rearrangement. Second, the generation of a base pair level alignment map for each colinear segment. We have developed a new genome-wide segmentation program, Enredo, which produces colinear segments from extant genomes handling rearrangements, including duplications. We have then applied the new alignment program Pecan, which makes the consistency alignment methodology practical at a large scale, to create a new set of genome-wide mammalian alignments. We test both Enredo and Pecan using novel and existing assessment analyses that incorporate both real biological data and simulations, and show that both independently and in combination they outperform existing programs. Alignments from our pipeline are publicly available within the Ensembl genome browser.


Nature Genetics | 2013

The draft genomes of soft-shell turtle and green sea turtle yield insights into the development and evolution of the turtle-specific body plan

Zhuo Wang; Juan Pascual-Anaya; Amonida Zadissa; Wenqi Li; Yoshihito Niimura; Zhiyong Huang; Chunyi Li; Simon White; Zhiqiang Xiong; Dongming Fang; Bo Wang; Yao Ming; Yan Chen; Yuan Zheng; Shigehiro Kuraku; Miguel Pignatelli; Javier Herrero; Kathryn Beal; Masafumi Nozawa; Qiye Li; Juan Wang; Hongyan Zhang; Lili Yu; Shuji Shigenobu; Wang J; Jiannan Liu; Paul Flicek; Steve Searle; Jun Wang; Shigeru Kuratani

The unique anatomical features of turtles have raised unanswered questions about the origin of their unique body plan. We generated and analyzed draft genomes of the soft-shell turtle (Pelodiscus sinensis) and the green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas); our results indicated the close relationship of the turtles to the bird-crocodilian lineage, from which they split ∼267.9–248.3 million years ago (Upper Permian to Triassic). We also found extensive expansion of olfactory receptor genes in these turtles. Embryonic gene expression analysis identified an hourglass-like divergence of turtle and chicken embryogenesis, with maximal conservation around the vertebrate phylotypic period, rather than at later stages that show the amniote-common pattern. Wnt5a expression was found in the growth zone of the dorsal shell, supporting the possible co-option of limb-associated Wnt signaling in the acquisition of this turtle-specific novelty. Our results suggest that turtle evolution was accompanied by an unexpectedly conservative vertebrate phylotypic period, followed by turtle-specific repatterning of development to yield the novel structure of the shell.The unique anatomical features of turtles have raised unanswered questions about the origin of their unique body plan. We generated and analyzed draft genomes of the soft-shell turtle (Pelodiscus sinensis) and the green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas); our results indicated the close relationship of the turtles to the bird-crocodilian lineage, from which they split ∼267.9-248.3 million years ago (Upper Permian to Triassic). We also found extensive expansion of olfactory receptor genes in these turtles. Embryonic gene expression analysis identified an hourglass-like divergence of turtle and chicken embryogenesis, with maximal conservation around the vertebrate phylotypic period, rather than at later stages that show the amniote-common pattern. Wnt5a expression was found in the growth zone of the dorsal shell, supporting the possible co-option of limb-associated Wnt signaling in the acquisition of this turtle-specific novelty. Our results suggest that turtle evolution was accompanied by an unexpectedly conservative vertebrate phylotypic period, followed by turtle-specific repatterning of development to yield the novel structure of the shell.


Nature | 2014

Gibbon genome and the fast karyotype evolution of small apes.

Lucia Carbone; R. Alan Harris; Sante Gnerre; Krishna R. Veeramah; Belen Lorente-Galdos; John Huddleston; Thomas J. Meyer; Javier Herrero; Christian Roos; Bronwen Aken; Fabio Anaclerio; Nicoletta Archidiacono; Carl Baker; Daniel Barrell; Mark A. Batzer; Kathryn Beal; Antoine Blancher; Craig Bohrson; Markus Brameier; Michael S. Campbell; Claudio Casola; Giorgia Chiatante; Andrew Cree; Annette Damert; Pieter J. de Jong; Laura Dumas; Marcos Fernandez-Callejo; Paul Flicek; Nina V. Fuchs; Ivo Gut

Gibbons are small arboreal apes that display an accelerated rate of evolutionary chromosomal rearrangement and occupy a key node in the primate phylogeny between Old World monkeys and great apes. Here we present the assembly and analysis of a northern white-cheeked gibbon (Nomascus leucogenys) genome. We describe the propensity for a gibbon-specific retrotransposon (LAVA) to insert into chromosome segregation genes and alter transcription by providing a premature termination site, suggesting a possible molecular mechanism for the genome plasticity of the gibbon lineage. We further show that the gibbon genera (Nomascus, Hylobates, Hoolock and Symphalangus) experienced a near-instantaneous radiation ∼5 million years ago, coincident with major geographical changes in southeast Asia that caused cycles of habitat compression and expansion. Finally, we identify signatures of positive selection in genes important for forelimb development (TBX5) and connective tissues (COL1A1) that may have been involved in the adaptation of gibbons to their arboreal habitat.


Database | 2016

Ensembl comparative genomics resources.

Javier Herrero; Matthieu Muffato; Kathryn Beal; Stephen Fitzgerald; Leo Gordon; Miguel Pignatelli; Albert J. Vilella; Stephen M. J. Searle; M. Ridwan Amode; Simon Brent; William Spooner; Eugene Kulesha; Andrew Yates; Paul Flicek

Evolution provides the unifying framework with which to understand biology. The coherent investigation of genic and genomic data often requires comparative genomics analyses based on whole-genome alignments, sets of homologous genes and other relevant datasets in order to evaluate and answer evolutionary-related questions. However, the complexity and computational requirements of producing such data are substantial: this has led to only a small number of reference resources that are used for most comparative analyses. The Ensembl comparative genomics resources are one such reference set that facilitates comprehensive and reproducible analysis of chordate genome data. Ensembl computes pairwise and multiple whole-genome alignments from which large-scale synteny, per-base conservation scores and constrained elements are obtained. Gene alignments are used to define Ensembl Protein Families, GeneTrees and homologies for both protein-coding and non-coding RNA genes. These resources are updated frequently and have a consistent informatics infrastructure and data presentation across all supported species. Specialized web-based visualizations are also available including synteny displays, collapsible gene tree plots, a gene family locator and different alignment views. The Ensembl comparative genomics infrastructure is extensively reused for the analysis of non-vertebrate species by other projects including Ensembl Genomes and Gramene and much of the information here is relevant to these projects. The consistency of the annotation across species and the focus on vertebrates makes Ensembl an ideal system to perform and support vertebrate comparative genomic analyses. We use robust software and pipelines to produce reference comparative data and make it freely available. Database URL: http://www.ensembl.org.


Genome Biology | 2012

Analysis of variation at transcription factor binding sites in Drosophila and humans

Mikhail Spivakov; Junaid Akhtar; Pouya Kheradpour; Kathryn Beal; Charles Girardot; Gautier Koscielny; Javier Herrero; Manolis Kellis; Eileen E. M. Furlong; Ewan Birney

BackgroundAdvances in sequencing technology have boosted population genomics and made it possible to map the positions of transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) with high precision. Here we investigate TFBS variability by combining transcription factor binding maps generated by ENCODE, modENCODE, our previously published data and other sources with genomic variation data for human individuals and Drosophila isogenic lines.ResultsWe introduce a metric of TFBS variability that takes into account changes in motif match associated with mutation and makes it possible to investigate TFBS functional constraints instance-by-instance as well as in sets that share common biological properties. We also take advantage of the emerging per-individual transcription factor binding data to show evidence that TFBS mutations, particularly at evolutionarily conserved sites, can be efficiently buffered to ensure coherent levels of transcription factor binding.ConclusionsOur analyses provide insights into the relationship between individual and interspecies variation and show evidence for the functional buffering of TFBS mutations in both humans and flies. In a broad perspective, these results demonstrate the potential of combining functional genomics and population genetics approaches for understanding gene regulation.

Collaboration


Dive into the Kathryn Beal's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Javier Herrero

European Bioinformatics Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul Flicek

European Bioinformatics Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stephen Fitzgerald

European Bioinformatics Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Benedict Paten

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ewan Birney

European Bioinformatics Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Miguel Pignatelli

European Bioinformatics Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Albert J. Vilella

European Bioinformatics Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew Yates

European Bioinformatics Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eugene Kulesha

European Bioinformatics Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Leo Gordon

European Bioinformatics Institute

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge