Kathryn J. Ruddy
Mayo Clinic
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Kathryn J. Ruddy.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2014
Kathryn J. Ruddy; Shari Gelber; Rulla M. Tamimi; Elizabeth S. Ginsburg; Lidia Schapira; Steven E. Come; Virginia F. Borges; Meghan E. Meyer; Ann H. Partridge
PURPOSE Most research regarding fertility in young women with breast cancer has focused on long-term survivors. Little is known about how fertility concerns affect treatment decisions or fertility preservation strategies at the time of initial cancer diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS As part of an ongoing prospective multicenter cohort study, we surveyed women with newly diagnosed early-stage breast cancer at age ≤ 40 years. The baseline survey included sociodemographic, medical, and treatment data as well as a modified Fertility Issues Survey, including fertility concern and preservation items. Univariable and multivariable modeling were used to investigate predictors of greater fertility concern. RESULTS Among the first 620 eligible respondents included in this analysis, median age was 37 years (range, 17 to 40 years); 425 women (68%) discussed fertility issues with their physicians before starting therapy, and 319 (51%) were concerned about becoming infertile after treatment. Because of concerns about fertility, four women (1%) chose not to receive chemotherapy, 12 (2%) chose one chemotherapy regimen over another, six (1%) considered not receiving endocrine therapy, 19 (3%) decided not to receive endocrine therapy, and 71 (11%) considered receiving endocrine therapy for < 5 years; 65 (10%) used fertility preservation strategies. Greater concern about fertility was associated with younger age, nonwhite race, not having children, and receipt of chemotherapy. CONCLUSION Many young women with newly diagnosed breast cancer have concerns about fertility, and for some, these substantially affect their treatment decisions. Only a minority of women currently pursue available fertility preservation strategies in this setting.
Fertility and Sterility | 2010
Ann H. Partridge; Kathryn J. Ruddy; Shari Gelber; Lidia Schapira; Mary E. Abusief; Meghan E. Meyer; Elizabeth S. Ginsburg
OBJECTIVE To compare markers of ovarian reserve between women exposed to cytotoxic chemotherapy for early stage breast cancer and matched controls. DESIGN Cross-sectional evaluation of markers of ovarian reserve. SETTING Dana-Farber/Brigham and Womens Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Faulkner Hospital in Boston, MA. PATIENT(S) Breast cancer survivors with continued menses after chemotherapy were compared with age-matched, gravidity-matched controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Antral follicle count (AFC), anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), FSH, inhibin B (InB), and E(2) on day 2, 3, or 4 of the menstrual cycle. A Bonferroni correction was performed to correct for multiple comparisons. RESULT(S) Twenty survivors and 20 controls were evaluated; 50% of survivors were currently on tamoxifen. Median AFC was 6 for survivors and 9.5 for controls. There were significant differences between the two groups in AFC, AMH, and nonsignificant differences in FSH and InB, all indicating better ovarian reserve in controls. The AFC and AMH levels were highly correlated (r = 0.72). Survivors on tamoxifen had lower AFC, AMH, InB, and higher E(2) than nontamoxifen-treated survivors. CONCLUSION(S) Premenopausal breast cancer survivors have diminished ovarian reserve compared with controls.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017
Saro H. Armenian; Christina Lacchetti; Ana Barac; Joseph R. Carver; Louis S. Constine; Neelima Denduluri; Susan Dent; Pamela S. Douglas; Jean Bernard Durand; Michael S. Ewer; Carol J. Fabian; Melissa M. Hudson; Mariell Jessup; Lee W. Jones; Bonnie Ky; Erica L. Mayer; Javid Moslehi; Kevin C. Oeffinger; Katharine Ray; Kathryn J. Ruddy; Daniel J. Lenihan
Purpose Cardiac dysfunction is a serious adverse effect of certain cancer-directed therapies that can interfere with the efficacy of treatment, decrease quality of life, or impact the actual survival of the patient with cancer. The purpose of this effort was to develop recommendations for prevention and monitoring of cardiac dysfunction in survivors of adult-onset cancers. Methods Recommendations were developed by an expert panel with multidisciplinary representation using a systematic review (1996 to 2016) of meta-analyses, randomized clinical trials, observational studies, and clinical experience. Study quality was assessed using established methods, per study design. The guideline recommendations were crafted in part using the Guidelines Into Decision Support methodology. Results A total of 104 studies met eligibility criteria and compose the evidentiary basis for the recommendations. The strength of the recommendations in these guidelines is based on the quality, amount, and consistency of the evidence and the balance between benefits and harms. Recommendations It is important for health care providers to initiate the discussion regarding the potential for cardiac dysfunction in individuals in whom the risk is sufficiently high before beginning therapy. Certain higher risk populations of survivors of cancer may benefit from prevention and screening strategies implemented during cancer-directed therapies. Clinical suspicion for cardiac disease should be high and threshold for cardiac evaluation should be low in any survivor who has received potentially cardiotoxic therapy. For certain higher risk survivors of cancer, routine surveillance with cardiac imaging may be warranted after completion of cancer-directed therapy, so that appropriate interventions can be initiated to halt or even reverse the progression of cardiac dysfunction.
The New England Journal of Medicine | 2016
Rudolph M. Navari; Rui Qin; Kathryn J. Ruddy; Heshan Liu; Steven Francis Powell; Madhuri Bajaj; Leah L. Dietrich; David D. Biggs; Jacqueline M. Lafky; Charles L. Loprinzi
BACKGROUND We examined the efficacy of olanzapine for the prevention of nausea and vomiting in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. METHODS In a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial, we compared olanzapine with placebo, in combination with dexamethasone, aprepitant or fosaprepitant, and a 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3-receptor antagonist, in patients with no previous chemotherapy who were receiving cisplatin (≥70 mg per square meter of body-surface area) or cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin. The doses of the three concomitant drugs administered before and after chemotherapy were similar in the two groups. The two groups received either 10 mg of olanzapine orally or matching placebo daily on days 1 through 4. Nausea prevention was the primary end point; a complete response (no emesis and no use of rescue medication) was a secondary end point. RESULTS In the analysis, we included 380 patients who could be evaluated (192 assigned to olanzapine, and 188 to placebo). The proportion of patients with no chemotherapy-induced nausea was significantly greater with olanzapine than with placebo in the first 24 hours after chemotherapy (74% vs. 45%, P=0.002), the period from 25 to 120 hours after chemotherapy (42% vs. 25%, P=0.002), and the overall 120-hour period (37% vs. 22%, P=0.002). The complete-response rate was also significantly increased with olanzapine during the three periods: 86% versus 65% (P<0.001), 67% versus 52% (P=0.007), and 64% versus 41% (P<0.001), respectively. Although there were no grade 5 toxic effects, some patients receiving olanzapine had increased sedation (severe in 5%) on day 2. CONCLUSIONS Olanzapine, as compared with placebo, significantly improved nausea prevention, as well as the complete-response rate, among previously untreated patients who were receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02116530.).
Psycho-oncology | 2013
Shoshana M. Rosenberg; Rulla M. Tamimi; Shari Gelber; Kathryn J. Ruddy; Sandra Kereakoglow; Virginia F. Borges; Steven E. Come; Lidia Schapira; Ann H. Partridge
To assess body image concerns among young women following a breast cancer diagnosis.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2015
Deirdre R. Pachman; Rui Qin; Drew K. Seisler; Ellen M. Lavoie Smith; Andreas S. Beutler; Lauren E. Ta; Jacqueline M. Lafky; Nina D. Wagner-Johnston; Kathryn J. Ruddy; Shaker R. Dakhil; Nathan P. Staff; Axel Grothey; Charles L. Loprinzi
PURPOSE Given that the clinical course of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy is not well defined, the current study was performed to better understand clinical parameters associated with its presentation. METHODS Acute and chronic neuropathy was evaluated in patients receiving adjuvant FOLFOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) on study N08CB (North Central Cancer Treatment Group, Alliance). Acute neuropathy was assessed by having patients complete daily questionnaires for 6 days with each cycle of FOLFOX. Before each dose of FOLFOX and as long as 18 months after chemotherapy cessation, chronic neurotoxicity was assessed with use of the 20-item, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. RESULTS Three hundred eight (89%) of the 346 patients had at least one symptom of acute neuropathy with the first cycle of FOLFOX; these symptoms included sensitivity to touching cold items (71%), sensitivity to swallowing cold items (71%), throat discomfort (63%), or muscle cramps (42%). Acute symptoms peaked at day 3 and improved, although they did not always resolve completely between treatments. These symptoms were about twice as severe in cycles 2 through 12 as they were in cycle 1. For chronic neurotoxicity, tingling was the most severe symptom, followed by numbness and then pain. During chemotherapy, symptoms in the hands were more prominent than they were in the feet; by 18 months, symptoms were more severe in the feet than they were in the hands. Patients with more severe acute neuropathy during the first cycle of therapy experienced more chronic sensory neurotoxicity (P < .0001). CONCLUSION Acute oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy symptoms do not always completely resolve between treatment cycles and are only half as severe on the first cycle as compared with subsequent cycles. There is a correlation between the severities of acute and chronic neuropathies.
Cancer | 2014
Shoshana M. Rosenberg; Rulla M. Tamimi; Shari Gelber; Kathryn J. Ruddy; Sharon L. Bober; Sandra Kereakoglow; Virginia F. Borges; Steven E. Come; Lidia Schapira; Ann H. Partridge
Sexual dysfunction is a known complication of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer and an important determinant of quality of life. However, few studies have explored how treatment and other factors affect sexual functioning in young breast cancer survivors.
Annals of Neurology | 2014
Andreas S. Beutler; Amit A. Kulkarni; Rahul Kanwar; Christopher J. Klein; Terry M. Therneau; Rui Qin; Michaela S. Banck; Ganesh K. Boora; Kathryn J. Ruddy; Yanhong Wu; Regenia L. Smalley; Julie M. Cunningham; Nguyet Anh Le-Lindqwister; Peter Beyerlein; Gary P. Schroth; Anthony J. Windebank; Stephan Züchner; Charles L. Loprinzi
Mutations in Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease (CMT) genes are the cause of rare familial forms of polyneuropathy. Whether allelic variability in CMT genes is also associated with common forms of polyneuropathy—considered “acquired” in medical parlance—is unknown. Chemotherapy‐induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) occurs commonly in cancer patients and is individually unpredictable. We used CIPN as a clinical model to investigate the association of non‐CMT polyneuropathy with CMT genes.
Cancer | 2014
Kathryn J. Ruddy; Shari Gelber; Rulla M. Tamimi; Lidia Schapira; Steven E. Come; Meghan E. Meyer; Ann H. Partridge
Young women may experience delays in diagnosis of breast cancer, and these delays may contribute to poorer outcomes.
Hematology-oncology Clinics of North America | 2013
Daniela L. Stan; Charles L. Loprinzi; Kathryn J. Ruddy
Survivors of breast cancer are confronted with a plethora of cancer treatment-related long-term symptoms, the most common being fatigue, hot flashes, sexual dysfunction, arthralgias, neuropathy, and cognitive dysfunction. Survivors of breast cancer also face cancer treatment-related disease states, such as osteoporosis, cardiac dysfunction, obesity, infertility, and secondary cancers. Evidence-based recommendations for screening, prevention, and early intervention should be implemented to improve quality of life and decrease comorbidities in this population.