Kathryn Lancaster
University of North Dakota
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Kathryn Lancaster.
Obesity Surgery | 2002
Martina de Zwaan; Kathryn Lancaster; James E. Mitchell; L. Michael Howell; Nancy Monson; James L. Roerig; Ross D. Crosby
Background: The effect of gastric bypass on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of morbidly obese patients was investigated in a cross-sectional study. Methods: A postoperative group of 78 patients on average 13.8 years after gastric bypass was compared with a preoperative control group of 110 patients. The SF-36 was used to assess HRQoL. In preoperative patients, the SF-36 was self-administered, while in the postoperative group, telephone interviews were conducted. In the postoperative sample, multiple stepwise linear regression analyses were carried out to examine putative predictors of the physical (PCS) and the mental (MCS) composite scores of the SF-36. Results: Significant differences between the preand postoperative group were found for all subscales except Mental Health, in favor of the postoperative group. On average 13.8 years after gastric bypass, most of the sub-scales were similar to the US norm values. However, the Bodily Pain and the overall Physical Composite scale (PCS) scores were lower (more impaired) in the postoperative group compared with the US norms. Female patients, patients who were hospitalized since the surgery, and those who had lost less weight had more impaired values on the PCS and patients who reported binge-eating disorder (BED) at follow-up had more impaired values on the Mental Composite Scale (MCS) of the SF-36. Conclusion: HRQoL was significantly better in postoperative gastric bypass patients in comparison to a sample of preoperative patients. However, HRQoL, specifically the physical domain of the SF-36, was more impaired in long-term follow-up patients compared with US norm values. The reoccurrence of BED after surgery negatively influenced the mental domain of the SF-36.
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases | 2008
Troy W. Ertelt; James E. Mitchell; Kathryn Lancaster; Ross D. Crosby; Kristine J. Steffen; Joanna M. Marino
BACKGROUND To review the published data on alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence after bariatric surgery and to assess the prevalence of alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence in a sample of bariatric surgery patients, both before and after surgery. All participant data were collected from patients who had undergone gastric bypass at a Midwestern hospital. METHODS The participants were contacted by mail 6-10 years after surgery and asked to complete the Post-Bariatric Surgery Appearance Questionnaire. RESULTS The results of the analysis indicated that a small percentage of the sample appeared to spontaneously develop alcohol abuse or dependence after bariatric surgery. CONCLUSION The results of the present study will be useful in understanding the likelihood of bariatric surgery patients developing alcohol abuse and dependence after surgery. However, additional research is needed to fully understand the risk of this outcome.
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases | 2014
Eva Conceição; James E. Mitchell; Scott G. Engel; Paulo P. P. Machado; Kathryn Lancaster; Stephen A. Wonderlich
BACKGROUND Grazing, characterized by a repetitive eating pattern, has received increased attention among bariatric surgery patients. However, different definitions and terminology have been used, preventing the accurate measurement of this phenomenon and comparison of data across studies. OBJECTIVE To review existing definitions and associated clinical features of grazing among different samples and to propose a standardized definition that will allow for consistency in future work. SETTING University and Clinical Research Institute. METHODS Of the 39 studies found, 9 provided an original definition and 12 provided data of its association with weight outcomes. Six were studies of nonbariatric surgery populations. Based on this literature review, the most common criteria used in previous studies to define grazing were included in a survey that was sent to 24 individuals who have published work in the field. These experts were asked to provide their opinion on what should constitute grazing. RESULTS Grazing is a frequent behavior in the bariatric surgery population as well as in eating disordered and community samples. Its association with psychopathology is not clear, but its negative impact on weight outcomes after bariatric surgery generally has been supported. Survey data provided a consensus regarding the definition of grazing as an eating behavior characterized by the repetitive eating (more than twice) of small/modest amounts of food in an unplanned manner, with what we characterize as compulsive and noncompulsive subtypes. CONCLUSIONS Given the clinical relevance of grazing among bariatric surgery patients, a unique definition is crucial to better study its associated features and impact on different populations.
Obesity Surgery | 2001
James E. Mitchell; Kathryn Lancaster; Melissa Burgard; L. Michael Howell; Dean D. Krahn; Ross D. Crosby; Stephen A. Wonderlich; Blake A. Gosnell
Obesity Surgery | 2008
James E. Mitchell; Ross D. Crosby; Troy W. Ertelt; Joanna M. Marino; David B. Sarwer; J. Kevin Thompson; Kathryn Lancaster; Heather Simonich; L. Michael Howell
International Journal of Eating Disorders | 2007
Kristine J. Steffen; James E. Mitchell; James L. Roerig; Kathryn Lancaster
International Journal of Eating Disorders | 2001
Blake A. Gosnell; James E. Mitchell; Kathryn Lancaster; Melissa Burgard; S. Wonderlich; Ross D. Crosby
International Journal of Eating Disorders | 2003
James L. Roerig; James E. Mitchell; Martina de Zwaan; Stephen A. Wonderlich; Shehzad Kamran; Sara Engbloom; Melissa Burgard; Kathryn Lancaster
Comprehensive Psychiatry | 2004
John Glass; James E. Mitchell; Martina de Zwaan; S. Wonderlich; Ross D. Crosby; James L. Roerig; Melissa Burgard; Kathryn Lancaster; Janeen Voxland
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey | 2014
David B. Sarwer; Jacqueline C. Spitzer; Thomas A. Wadden; James E. Mitchell; Kathryn Lancaster; Anita P. Courcoulas; William Gourash; Raymond C. Rosen; Nicholas J. Christian