Kathryn M. Greven

Definitions for response and progression in ovarian cancer clinical trials incorporating RECIST 1.1 and CA 125 agreed by the Gynecological Cancer Intergroup (GCIG)

The Gynecological Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) has previously reached consensus regarding the criteria that should be used in clinical trial protocols to define progression-free survival after first-line therapy as well as the criteria to define response to treatment in recurrent disease using the serum marker CA 125 and has specified the situations where these criteria should be used. However, the publications did not include detailed definitions, nor were they written to accommodate the new version of Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria (version 1.1) now available. Thus, we recommend that the definitions described later in detail are incorporated into clinical trial protocols to maintain consistency. The criteria for defining progression are now acceptable in clinical trials of recurrent disease as they have since been validated (Pujade-Lauraine, personal communication, 2010). The GCIG requests that data from all clinical trials using these definitions are made available to GCIG trial centers so that continual validation and improvement can be accomplished. These definitions were developed from analyzing patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy and have not yet been validated in patients receiving molecular targeting agents.

A comparative diagnostic study of head and neck nodal metastases using positron emission tomography

A prospective study was conducted to compare the accuracy of clinical examination, computed tomography (CT), and positron emission tomography (PET) in identifying head and neck squamous cell carcinoma metastatic to cervical lymph nodes. The findings in the necks of 49 patients evaluated by clinical examination and CT were compared to the findings in the same necks by PET, a newly available metabolic imaging modality. Pathology specimens were available for 45 of the necks. The findings of PET and CT correlated in 84% of cases. In the cases that did not correlate, CT proved correct in four of five cases. PET (82%) and CT (84%) were comparable and were both better than clinical examination (71%) in correctly identifying the presence or absence of metastatic disease.

Pet scanning in head and neck oncology: A review

The objective of this study was to review and describe the usage of fluorine‐labeled deoxyglucose (FDG) and positron emission tomography (PET) in the diagnosis and management of head and neck cancer.

Can post RT neck dissection be omitted for patients with head and neck cancer who have a negative PET scan after definitive radiation therapy

PURPOSE A prospective, single institution study was conducted to evaluate the role of positron emission tomography with fluoro-deoxyglucose (FDG) before and after definitive radiation therapy for patients with head-and-neck cancer. Correlation with CT or MRI imaging and pathologic findings at the time of planned neck dissection was made. METHODS AND MATERIALS Twelve patients with AJCC Stages III-IV cancer of the head and neck received CT or MRI and PET imaging before treatment with definitive radiation therapy. One month after completion of treatment, repeat CT or MRI and PET imaging was obtained. All images were reviewed independently by radiologists who were blind to the results of the other modality. Patients then underwent planned neck dissection. Pathologic correlation with posttreatment scans allowed calculation of the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and the positive predictive value for both CT/MRI and PET. RESULTS Comparison of CT/MRI to PET obtained before definitive RT revealed both primary tumor and nodal disease were detected by both modalities in all cases where primary tumor was known. After RT, comparison of CT/MRI imaging to findings of neck dissection revealed a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, and negative predictive value of 50%. Comparison of PET imaging with pathologic findings demonstrated sensitivity of 45%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, and a negative predictive value of 14%. CONCLUSIONS In this small series of patients, the presence of a positive PET 1 month after RT accurately indicated the presence of residual disease in all cases; however, a negative PET indicated absence of disease in only 14%. Further investigation is warranted before FDG-PET should be used to determine whether post-RT neck dissection should be omitted.

Prognostic factors and treatment outcome for patients with locally recurrent endometrial cancer

Background. Women who do not receive adjuvant irradiation after hysterectomy for endometrial carcinoma (EC) are at risk for developing a pelvic recurrence. Disease‐ and treatment‐related factors were examined for their impact on disease‐specific survival (DSS) and pelvic control (PC) in patients with locoregional recurrences to whom salvage radiotherapy was administered.

Distinguishing tumor recurrence from irradiation sequelae with positron emission tomography in patients treated for larynx cancer.

PURPOSE Distinguishing persistent or recurrent tumor from postradiation edema, or soft tissue/cartilage necrosis in patients treated for carcinoma of the larynx can be difficult. Because recurrent tumor is often submucosal, multiple deep biopsies may be necessary before a diagnosis can be established. Positron emission tomography with 18F-2fluoro-2deoxyglucose (FDG) was studied for its ability to aid in this problem. METHODS AND MATERIALS Positron emission tomography (18FDG) scans were performed on 11 patients who were suspected of having persistent or recurrent tumor after radiation treatment for carcinoma of the larynx. Patients underwent thorough history and physical examinations, scans with computerized tomography, and pathologic evaluation when indicated. Standard uptake values were used to quantitate the FDG uptake in the larynx. RESULTS The time between completion of radiation treatment and positron emission tomography examination ranged from 2 to 26 months with a median of 6 months. Ten patients underwent computed tomography (CT) of the larynx, which revealed edema of the larynx (six patients), glottic mass (four patients), and cervical nodes (one patient). Positron emission tomography scans revealed increased FDG uptake in the larynx in five patients and laryngectomy confirmed the presence of carcinoma in these patients. Five patients had positron emission tomography results consistent with normal tissue changes in the larynx, and one patient had increased FDG uptake in neck nodes. This patient underwent laryngectomy, and no cancer was found in the primary site, but nodes were pathologically positive. One patient had slightly elevated FDG uptake and negative biopsy results. The remaining patients have been followed for 11 to 14 months since their positron emission studies and their examinations have remained stable. In patients without tumor, average standard uptake values of the larynx ranged from 2.4 to 4.7, and in patients with tumor, the range was 4.9 to 10.7. CONCLUSION Positron emission tomography with labeled FDG appears to be useful in distinguishing benign from malignant changes in the larynx after radiation treatment. This noninvasive technique may be preferable to biopsy, which could traumatize radiation-damaged tissues and precipitate necrosis.

The role of postoperative radiation therapy for endometrial cancer: Executive summary of an American society for radiation oncology evidence-based guideline

PURPOSE To present evidence-based guidelines for adjuvant radiation in the treatment of endometrial cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Key clinical questions to be addressed in this evidence-based guideline on endometrial cancer were identified. A comprehensive literature review was performed to identify studies that included no adjuvant therapy, or pelvic radiation or vaginal brachytherapy with or without systemic chemotherapy. Outcomes included local control, survival rates, and overall assessment of quality of life. RESULTS Patients with grade 1 or 2 cancers with either no invasion or <50% myometrial invasion (MI), especially when no other high risk features are present, can be safely observed after hysterectomy. Vaginal cuff brachytherapy is as effective as pelvic radiation therapy at preventing vaginal recurrence for patients with grade 1 or 2 cancers with ≥50% MI or grade 3 tumors with <50% MI. Patients with grade 3 cancer with ≥50% MI or cervical stroma invasion may benefit from pelvic radiation to reduce the risk of pelvic recurrence. There is limited evidence for a benefit to vaginal cuff brachytherapy following pelvic radiation. Multimodality treatment is recommended for patients with positive nodes or involved uterine serosa, ovaries or fallopian tubes, vagina, bladder, or rectum. CONCLUSIONS External beam and vaginal brachytherapy remain integral aspects of adjuvant therapy for endometrial cancer.

Role of intracavitary cuff boost after adjuvant external irradiation in early endometrial carcinoma.

Management of early endometrial carcinoma often consists of surgicopathologic staging followed by adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) for patients at risk of local recurrence. While an intracavitary vaginal cuff boost (VCB) is commonly given after external beam radiation therapy, its effects on local control and complication rates are unknown. To assess these effects, we reviewed 157 patients with FIGO Stage I (n = 134) or incidentally diagnosed (n = 23) endometrial adenocarcinomas. After surgery and external radiation therapy, 103 patients (65.6%) received a vaginal cuff boost of 3000-5000 cGy surface dose (Group I) and 54 (34.4%) did not (Group II). One hundred and two Group I and 52 Group II patients were evaluable for analysis. Median follow-up was 78.0 months for Group I and 60.0 months for Group II. Despite a preponderance of poor prognostic factors in Group II, no significant difference in local failure was seen. A component of local failure was seen in 6 Group I patients (6.0%) and 4 Group II patients (7.7%), p = 0.74. Distant failure, reflecting more advanced disease, was higher in Group II (19.2%) than in Group I (9.0%). Late complications included rectal bleeding/proctitis in 18.6% of Group I patients and 3.8% of Group II patients (p = 0.01). Overall, grade 2 complications occurred in 27.5% and 15.4% of Group I and II patients, respectively (p = 0.09). No difference in frequency of grade 3 complications was evident. Based on this retrospective study, intracavitary vaginal cuff boost after surgery and postoperative external beam radiation therapy does not appear to improve local control in early endometrial adenocarcinoma. Its possible effect on complication rates is uncertain.

Isolated vaginal recurrences of endometrial adenocarcinoma and their management

Eighteen patients with isolated vaginal recurrence of their previously treated endometrial carcinoma were treated with radiation therapy at North Carolina Baptist Hospital, Winston‐Salem between 1971 and 1982. Most patients received external beam irradiation which was followed by boost treatments that were delivered with external beam (two patients) or intravaginal ovoid (11 patients). A local control rate of 44.4% with a 3‐year minimum follow‐up was obtained. Currently 33% are alive without evidence of disease 3 to 10 years following treatment. The most important prognostic indicator of outcome was size of vaginal recurrence. Of seven evaluable patients with tumors smaller than 2 cm there was one local failure. In contrast there were eight local failures in ten patients treated for tumors larger than 2 cm. Close follow‐up and prompt diagnosis will enhance the chance of cure in endometrial cancer patients who do have recurrences.

Preoperative identification of benign versus malignant parotid masses: A comparative study including positron emission tomography

Various diagnostic tools were used in 26 patients with parotid masses to determine their value in preoperative malignant or benign categorization. These tools were positron emission tomography (PET), clinical examination, fine‐needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). PET identified all 26 lesions and all 12 malignant lesions, but made the correct categorization in only 69% of cases. Thus, it was not as good as the more conventional diagnostic methods, their correct categorizations being 85% (clinical), 87% (CT/MRI), and 78% (FNAB) in the same patients.