Kathryn Moss
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Kathryn Moss.
Behavioral Sciences & The Law | 1999
Kathryn Moss; Michael Darren Ullman; Matthew Johnsen; Barbara E. Starrett; Scott Burris
Under Title I of the ADA, individuals who believe they have been subjected to disability-based employment discrimination may file an administrative charge. This article looks at who files charges; over what issues, and with what outcomes in both Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) field offices, and state and local fair employment practice agencies (FEPAs). The data for the article are computerized records of all ADA charges filed through March 31, 1998. The data indicate that individuals who rely on a FEPA to investigate their charge have a greater likelihood of obtaining a beneficial outcome than individuals who rely on the EEOC, but proportionately more individuals receiving a beneficial outcome are likely to receive monetary benefits from the EEOC than from a FEPA. Further, those who receive beneficial outcomes will probably receive greater monetary benefits from charges investigated by the EEOC than from those investigated by a FEPA.
Journal of Disability Policy Studies | 1998
Kathryn Moss; Matthew Johnsen; Michael Darren Ullman
This article presents findings from analyses of nationwide data on employment discrimination charges filed under the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA). In conducting the analyses, emphasis was placed on understanding the extent to which the ADA charge process differentially affects individuals with psychiatric disabilities. We found that 16.3% of individuals whose charges were closed as of June 30, 1995, received benefits from filing charges; individuals with psychiatric disabilities were only somewhat less likely to experience benefits from filing charges than were individuals with nonpsychiatric disabilities; individuals with schizophrenia had a strikingly lower benefit rate than all other individuals with other types of psychiatric disorders; and there was considerable variation among individuals with different kinds of nonpsychiatric disabilities in benefit rates.
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics | 2006
Scott Burris; Kathryn Moss
Psychiatric Services | 1999
Kathryn Moss; Michael Darren Ullman; Barbara E. Starrett; Scott Burris; Matthew Johnsen
Psychiatric Services | 2001
Michael Darren Ullman; Matthew Johnsen; Kathryn Moss; Scott Burris
Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal | 2007
Scott Burris; Kathryn Moss
Archive | 2006
Kathryn Moss; Scott Burris; Michael Darren Ullman; Matthew Johnsen; Jeffrey W. Swanson
Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal | 1997
Kathryn Moss; Matthew Johnsen
Psychiatric Services | 2002
Kathryn Moss; Jeffrey W. Swanson; Michael Darren Ullman; Scott Burris
Mental and physical disability law reporter | 2005
Kathryn Moss; Michael Darren Ullman; Jeffrey W. Swanson; Leah M. Ranney; Scott Burris