Kathryn S. Jones

Cell-free HTLV-1 infects dendritic cells leading to transmission and transformation of CD4 + T cells

Cell-free human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) virions are poorly infectious in vitro for their primary target cells, CD4+ T cells. Here, we show that HTLV-1 can efficiently infect myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (DCs). Moreover, DCs exposed to HTLV-1, both before and after being productively infected, can rapidly, efficiently and reproducibly transfer virus to autologous primary CD4+ T cells. This DC-mediated transfer of HTLV-1 involves heparan sulfate proteoglycans and neuropilin-1 and results in long-term productive infection and interleukin-2–independent transformation of the CD4+ T cells. These studies, along with observations of HTLV-1–infected DCs in the peripheral blood of infected individuals, indicate that DCs have a central role in HTLV-1 transmission, dissemination and persistence in vivo. In addition to altering the current paradigm concerning how HTLV-1 transmission occurs, these studies suggest that impairment of DC function after HTLV-1 infection plays a part in pathogenesis.

Heparan sulfate proteoglycans mediate attachment and entry of human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 virions into CD4+ T cells.

ABSTRACT Heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) are used by a number of viruses to facilitate entry into host cells. For the retrovirus human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1), it has recently been reported that HSPGs are critical for efficient binding of soluble HTLV-1 SU and the entry of HTLV pseudotyped viruses into non-T cells. However, the primary in vivo targets of HTLV-1, CD4+ T cells, have been reported to express low or undetectable levels of HSPGs. For this study, we reexamined the expression of HSPGs in CD4+ T cells and examined their role in HTLV-1 attachment and entry. We observed that while quiescent primary CD4+ T cells do not express detectable levels of HSPGs, HSPGs are expressed on primary CD4+ T cells following immune activation. Enzymatic modification of HSPGs on the surfaces of either established CD4+ T-cell lines or primary CD4+ T cells dramatically reduced the binding of both soluble HTLV-1 SU and HTLV-1 virions. HSPGs also affected the efficiency of HTLV-1 entry, since blocking the interaction with HSPGs markedly reduced both the internalization of HTLV-1 virions and the titer of HTLV-1 pseudotyped viral infection in CD4+ T cells. Thus, HSPGs play a critical role in the binding and entry of HTLV-1 into CD4+ T cells.

HTLV-1 uses HSPG and neuropilin-1 for entry by molecular mimicry of VEGF165

Human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) entry involves the interaction between the surface (SU) subunit of the Env proteins and cellular receptor(s). Previously, our laboratories demonstrated that heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) and neuropilin-1 (NRP-1), a receptor of VEGF(165), are essential for HTLV-1 entry. Here we investigated whether, as when binding VEGF(165), HSPGs and NRP-1 work in concert during HTLV-1 entry. VEGF(165) binds to the b domain of NRP-1 through both HSPG-dependent and -independent interactions, the latter involving its exon 8. We show that VEGF(165) is a selective competitor of HTLV-1 entry and that HTLV-1 mimics VEGF(165) to recruit HSPGs and NRP-1: (1) the NRP-1 b domain is required for HTLV-1 binding; (2) SU binding to target cells is blocked by the HSPG-binding domain of VEGF(165); (3) the formation of Env/NRP-1 complexes is enhanced by HSPGs; and (4) the HTLV SU contains a motif homologous to VEGF(165) exon 8. This motif directly binds to NRP-1 and is essential for HTLV-1 binding to, internalization into, and infection of CD4(+) T cells and dendritic cells. These findings demonstrate that HSPGs and NRP-1 function as HTLV-1 receptors in a cooperative manner and reveal an unexpected mimicry mechanism that may have major implications in vivo.

Human T-Cell Leukemia Virus Type 1 (HTLV-1) and HTLV-2 Use Different Receptor Complexes To Enter T Cells

ABSTRACT Studies using adherent cell lines have shown that glucose transporter-1 (GLUT-1) can function as a receptor for human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV). In primary CD4+ T cells, heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) are required for efficient entry of HTLV-1. Here, the roles of HSPGs and GLUT-1 in HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 Env-mediated binding and entry into primary T cells were studied. Examination of the cell surface of activated primary T cells revealed that CD4+ T cells, the primary target of HTLV-1, expressed significantly higher levels of HSPGs than CD8+ T cells. Conversely, CD8+ T cells, the primary target of HTLV-2, expressed GLUT-1 at dramatically higher levels than CD4+ T cells. Under these conditions, the HTLV-2 surface glycoprotein (SU) binding and viral entry were markedly higher on CD8+ T cells while HTLV-1 SU binding and viral entry were higher on CD4+ T cells. Binding studies with HTLV-1/HTLV-2 SU recombinants showed that preferential binding to CD4+ T cells expressing high levels of HSPGs mapped to the C-terminal portion of SU. Transfection studies revealed that overexpression of GLUT-1 in CD4+ T cells increased HTLV-2 entry, while expression of HSPGs on CD8+ T cells increased entry of HTLV-1. These studies demonstrate that HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 differ in their T-cell entry requirements and suggest that the differences in the in vitro cellular tropism for transformation and in vivo pathobiology of these viruses reflect different interactions between their Env proteins and molecules on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells involved in entry.

Pathways of cell-cell transmission of HTLV-1

The deltaretroviruses human T cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) and human T cell lymphotropic virus type 2 (HTLV-2) have long been believed to differ from retroviruses in other genera by their mode of transmission. While other retroviruses were thought to primarily spread by producing cell-free particles that diffuse through extracellular fluids prior to binding to and infecting target cells, HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 were believed to transmit the virus solely by cell–cell interactions. This difference in transmission was believed to reflect the fact that, relative to other retroviruses, the cell-free virions produced by HTLV-infected cells are very poorly infectious. Since HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 are primarily found in T cells in the peripheral blood, spread of these viruses was believed to occur between infected and uninfected, T cells, although little was known about the cellular and viral proteins involved in this interaction. Recent studies have revealed that the method of transmission of HTLV is not unique: other retroviruses including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are also transmitted from cell-to-cell, and this method is dramatically more efficient than cell-free transmission. Moreover, cell–cell transmission of HTLV-1, as well as HIV, can occur following interactions between dendritic cells and T cells, as well as between T cells. Conversely, other studies have shown that cell-free HTLV-1 is not as poorly infectious as previously thought, since it is capable of infecting certain cell types. Here we summarize the recent insights about the mechanisms of cell–cell transmission of HTLV-1 and other retroviruses. We also review in vitro and in vivo studies of infection and discuss how these finding may relate to the spread of HTLV-1 between individuals.

Current concepts regarding the HTLV-1 receptor complex

The identity of the Human T lymphotropic Virus type 1 (HTLV-1) receptor remained an unsolved puzzle for two decades, until the recent demonstration that three molecules, Glucose Transporter 1, Neuropilin-1 and Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycans are involved in HTLV-1 binding and entry. Despite these advances, several questions remain unanswered, including the precise role of each of these molecules during virus entry. In light of the most recent data, we propose a model of the HTLV-1 receptor complex and discuss its potential impact on HTLV-1 infection.

GLUT1 Is Not the Primary Binding Receptor but Is Associated with Cell-to-Cell Transmission of Human T-Cell Leukemia Virus Type 1

ABSTRACT GLUT1 has recently been suggested to be a binding receptor for human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1). We used a novel, short-term assay to define the role of GLUT1 in cell-to-cell transmission. Although increasing cell surface levels of GLUT1 enhanced HTLV-I transfer, efficient virus spread correlated largely with heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG) expression on target cells. Moreover, since activated CD4+ T cells and cord blood lymphocytes that are susceptible to HTLV-1 infection expressed undetectable levels of surface GLUT1, these results indicate that GLUT1 and HSPGs are important for efficient cell-to-cell transmission of HTLV-1 but raise concerns on the role of GLUT1 as the HTLV-1 primary binding receptor.

Induction of Human T Cell Leukemia Virus Type I Receptors on Quiescent Naive T Lymphocytes by TGF-β

The retrovirus human T cell leukemia virus (HTLV) type I (HTLV-I) is primarily transmitted by breast-feeding or sexual contact, by cell-to-cell contact between T cells. TGF-β, which has been shown to enhance transmission of HTLV-I in vitro, is found at high levels in breast milk and semen. In this study, the ability of TGF-β to regulate expression of molecules involved in HTLV-I binding and entry was examined. Previous studies using a soluble form of the HTLV-I envelope protein SU have shown that quiescent human T cells do not express cell surface molecules that specifically bind SU. After T cell activation, HTLV SU binding proteins are rapidly induced. In this study, we report that TGF-β induces expression of proteins that bind soluble HTLV SU and HTLV virions on naive CD4+ T lymphocytes. The induction of these proteins occurred without cell cycle entry or expression of activation markers, involved TGF-β-induced intracellular signaling, and required de novo transcription and translation. Treatment of naive CD4+ T lymphocytes with TGF-β induced expression of GLUT-1, which has recently been reported to function as a receptor for HTLV. Treatment of a TGF-β-sensitive human myeloid cell line increased the titer of both HTLV-I- and HTLV-II-pseudotyped viruses. Although earlier studies suggested that HTLV SU binding proteins might be an early marker of T cell activation and/or cell proliferation, we report in this study that TGF-β induces binding of HTLV virions and expression of glucose transporter type 1 in primary CD4+ T lymphocytes that remain quiescent.

Similar Regulation of Cell Surface Human T-Cell Leukemia Virus Type 1 (HTLV-1) Surface Binding Proteins in Cells Highly and Poorly Transduced by HTLV-1-Pseudotyped Virions

ABSTRACT Little is known about the requirements for human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) entry, including the identity of the cellular receptor(s). Previous studies have shown that although the HTLV receptor(s) are widely expressed on cell lines of various cell types from different species, cell lines differ dramatically in their susceptibility to HTLV-Env-mediated fusion. Human cells (293, HeLa, and primary CD4+ T cells) showed higher levels of binding at saturation than rodent (NIH 3T3 and NRK) cells to an HTLV-1 SU immunoadhesin. A direct comparison of the binding of the HTLV-1 surface glycoprotein (SU) immunoadhesin and transduction by HTLV-1 pseudotyped virus revealed parallels between the level of binding and the titer for various cell lines. When cells were treated with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA), which down-modulates a number of cell surface molecules, the level of SU binding was markedly reduced. However, PMA treatment only slightly reduced the titer of murine leukemia virus(HTLV-1) on both highly susceptible and poorly susceptible cells. Treatment of target cells with trypsin greatly reduced binding, indicating that the majority of HTLV SU binding is to proteins. Polycations, which enhance the infectivity of several other retroviruses, inhibited HTLV-1 Env-mediated binding and entry on both human and rodent cells. These results suggest that factors other than the number of primary binding receptors are responsible for the differences in the titers of HTLV-1 pseudotypes between highly susceptible cells and poorly susceptible cells.

Inserting a nuclear targeting signal into a replication-competent Moloney murine leukemia virus affects viral export and is not sufficient for cell cycle-independent infection.

ABSTRACT The effects of inserting reported nuclear localization signals (NLSs) into the Moloney murine leukemia virus (Mo-MuLV) integrase (IN) protein, within a replication-competent viral construct, were studied. In contrast to the virus harboring IN fused to the simian virus 40 (SV40) large T antigen NLS (SV40 NLS) (J. A. Seamon, M. Adams, S. Sengupta, and M. J. Roth, Virology 274:412-419, 2000), a codon-modified SV40 NLS was stably expressed during viral propagation. Incorporation of the codon-modified SV40 NLS into IN, however, altered the packaging of the Gag-Pol precursor in the virus; viral particles contained decreased levels of reverse transcriptase (RT) and IN. In addition, the virus showed delayed kinetics of viral DNA synthesis upon infection. A panel of infectious MuLVs containing alternative IN-NLS fusions was generated and assayed for cell cycle-independent infection. Viral infection with the NLS-tagged proteins, however, remained dependent on passage of the cells through mitosis. This finding has direct implications for engineering murine-based retroviral vectors for gene therapy.