Kathryn W. Tosney

Peanut agglutinin and chondroitin-6-sulfate are molecular markers for tissues that act as barriers to axon advance in the avian embryo

Axon outgrowth between the spinal cord and the hindlimb of the chick embryo is constrained by three tissues that border axon pathways. Growth cones turn to avoid the posterior sclerotome, perinotochordal mesenchyme, and pelvic girdle precursor during normal development and after experimental manipulation. We wanted to know if these functionally similar barriers to axon advance also share a common molecular composition. Since the posterior sclerotome differentially binds peanut agglutinin (PNA) and since PNA binding is also typical of prechondrogenic differentiation, we examined the pattern of expression of PNA binding sites and cartilage proteoglycan epitopes in relation to axon outgrowth. We found that all three barrier tissues preferentially express both PNA binding sites and chondroitin-6-sulfate (C-6-S) immunoreactivity at the time when growth cones avoid these tissues. Moreover, both epitopes are expressed in the roof plate of the spinal cord and in the early limb bud, two additional putative barriers to axon advance. In contrast, neither epitope is detected in peripheral axon pathways. In the somites, this dichotomous pattern of expression clearly preceded the invasion of the anterior sclerotome by either motor growth cones or neural crest cells. However, in the limb, barrier markers disappeared from presumptive axon pathways in concert with the invasion of axons. Since this coordinate pattern suggested that the absence of barrier markers in these axon pathways requires an interaction with growth cones, we analyzed the pattern of barrier marker expression following unilateral neural tube deletions. We found that PNA-negative axon pathways developed normally even in the virtual absence of axon outgrowth. We conclude that the absence of staining with carbohydrate-specific barrier markers is an independent characteristic of the cells that comprise axon pathways. These results identify two molecular markers that characterize known functional barriers to axon advance and suggest that barrier tissues may impose patterns on peripheral nerve outgrowth by virtue of their distinct molecular composition.

Development of the major pathways for neurite outgrowth in the chick hindlimb.

To elucidate mechanisms that may control development of the gross anatomical nerve pattern, motoneuron outgrowth into the chick hindlimb was examined using orthograde labeling, scanning and transmission electron microscopy, and Alcian blue staining. Results show that growth cones are not guided by contact with oriented extracellular fibrils, aligned mesenchyme cells, the myotome, or the vasculature. Pathways are not delineated by cell-free space or channels of lower cell density; however, densely packed mesenchyme may form barriers that channel outgrowth. In addition, abundant mesenchymal cell death was seen at the nerve front. This cell death may provide space that encourages growth cone advancement. Pathways often lie along interfaces between areas that stain darkly and lightly with Alcian blue, which specifically stains glycosaminoglycans, and growth cones never penetrate areas that stain intensely, such as the pelvic girdle, which is known to be a barrier to outgrowth. Leading growth cones form specialized contacts with mesenchyme cells, but the predominant contacts are interneuronal. It is proposed that the anatomical pattern of outgrowth is determined by the distribution of preferred substrata, the most preferred substratum being other neurites. Further, neurites tend to prefer loose mesenchyme to dense mesenchyme or areas rich in glycosaminoglycans.

The segregation and early migration of cranial neural crest cells in the avian embryo

Abstract The segregation of neural crest cells from the neural folds and their early migration along three cranial pathways in the avian embryo have been described on the ultrastructural level. Major findings are the following: First, before neural crest segregation, the basal lamina underlying the neural folds undergoes temporal changes in distribution that correlate with alterations in tissue geometry. Second, although the neural tube always becomes continuous at its lumenal surface as crest cells segregate, the time at which ectoderm fuses across the midline bears no constant temporal relationship to crest segregation. Third, a ridge on the dorsolateral neuroepithelium may inhibit ventral movement of crest cells in the mesencephalon. Fourth, cranial crest cells orient toward surfaces with an abundant extracellular matrix or basal lamina. Mesodermal cells do not appear to serve as substrata for migration. Fifth, interstitial bodies are more prominent along the pathways of migration than elsewhere in the embryo. Sixth, the direction of orientation of matrix fibers along anterior crest pathways is normal to the direction of migration of crest cells and appears not to guide migration.

The early migration of neural crest cells in the trunk region of the avian embryo: an electron microscopic study.

Abstract Four phases of neural crest migration characteristic of early avian trunk regions are described: (a) appearance, during which crest cells reside in the dorsal neural tube, but are separated from each other dorsally by large spaces; (b) condensation, during which large spaces between the crest cells become reduced, the cells elongate, flatten upon the surface of the neural tube, and become oriented tangentially (i.e., with their long axes perpendicular to the longitudinal axes of the neural tube); (c) early migration, during which the crest population expands uniformly to meet the dorsal apex of the somites; and (d) advanced migration, during which crest cells appear in the extracellular space dorsal to the somites. At the most advanced phases, the crest population at the dorsal midline decreased in number, with a concomitant loss of tangential orientation and the appearance of spaces between the cells. Extracellular components of the acellular spaces through which crest cells migrate are also described. The observations are discussed in terms of (1) those morphological changes undergone by crest cells during migration, and (2) possible factors that might delimit crest pathways. It is suggested that the operation of contact inhibition of movement within the crest population is sufficient to determine the direction of crest migration.

Analysis of migratory behavior of neural crest and fibroblastic cells in embryonic tissues

Abstract The precise migration of neural crest cells is apparently controlled by their environment. We have examined whether the embryonic tissue spaces in which crest cells normally migrate are sufficient to account for the pattern of crest cell distribution and whether other migratory cells could also distribute themselves along these pathways. To this end, we grafted a variety of cell types into the initial crest cell migratory pathway in chicken embryos. These cell types included (a) undifferentiated neural crest cells isolated from cultured neural tubes, intact crest from cranial neural folds, and crest derivatives (pigment cells and spinal ganglia); (b) normal embryonic fibroblastic cells from somite, limb bud, lateral plate, and heart ventricle; and (c) a transformed fibroblastic cell line (Sarcoma 180). Crest cells or their derivatives grafted into the crest migratory pathway all distributed normally, although in contrast to the result when neural tubes were grafted in situ , fewer cells were observed in the epithelium and few or none were localized in the nascent spinal ganglia. Grafted quail somite cells contributed to normal somitic structures and did not migrate extensively in the chicken host. Other fibroblasts did not migrate along cranial or trunk crest pathways, or invade adjacent tissues, but remained intact at the graft site. Sarcoma 180 cells, however, distributed themselves along the normal trunk crest pathway. Cranial and trunk crest cells and crest derivatives grafted ectopically in the limb bud or somite also dispersed, and were found along the ventral migratory pathway. Fibroblastic cells grafted into ectopic sites again remained intact and did not invade host tissue. We conclude (1) that neural crest cells and their derivatives are highly motile and invasive in their normal pathway, as well as in unfamiliar embryonic environments; and (2) that the crest pathway does not act solely to direct neural crest cells, since at least one transformed cell can follow the crest migratory route.

Descriptive and experimental analysis of the dispersion of neural crest cells along the dorsolateral path and their entry into ectoderm in the chick embryo

We have characterized the dispersion of neural crest cells along the dorsolateral path in the trunk of the chicken embryo and experimentally investigated the control of neural crest cell entry into this path. The distribution of putative neural crest cells was analyzed in plastic sections of embryos that had been incubated for 24 hr in HNK-1 antibody, a procedure that we show successfully labels neural crest cells in the dorsolateral path and ectoderm. In accord with earlier observations, crest cells delay entering the dorsolateral path until a day or more after their counterparts have colonized the ventral path. However, once crest cells enter, they disperse rapidly through the path dorsal to the somite but still delay migrating dorsal to the intersegmental space. During dispersion, crest cells invade the ectoderm at sites associated with local disruptions in the basal lamina which may be caused by crest cells. Finally, deleting the dermamyotome releases an inhibition of neural crest cell migration: crest cells enter the dorsolateral path precociously. We speculate that the epithelial dermatome may transiently produce inhibitory substances and that emerging dermis may provide a long-distance, stimulatory cue.

The distribution of NCAM in the chick hindlimb during axon outgrowth and synaptogenesis

We have determined the distribution and form of the neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) in the chick hindlimb from initial axon outgrowth (stage 17 1/2) until 3 days posthatching by immunohistological staining and sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis immunoblots. Axons stained intensely for NCAM at all ages, whereas nonneuronal limb components exhibited dynamic changes in staining. Mesenchymal cells in the sclerotome adjacent to the neural tube developed NCAM immunoreactivity in an anterior-posterior sequence which correlated with the sequence of axonal outgrowth. Low to moderate amounts of NCAM were detected within and surrounding presumptive nerve pathways, consistent with a permissive role for NCAM in axon extension, but not with a precise delineation of pathway boundaries. On myotubes immunoreactivity for NCAM remained low from stage 26 to 30 when it increased dramatically in both aneural and control limbs, indicating that its appearance is not triggered by nerve-dependent activity or trophic interactions. The increase was temporally associated with muscle cleavage and may encourage subsequent axon ramification as well as synaptogenesis. Staining remained high on muscle fibers during secondary myotube formation and only declined during the week before hatching when polyneuronal innervation is withdrawn and the mature synaptic pattern becomes stabilized. This loss of muscle NCAM occurred first on fast and then on slow muscle fibers. Together these results suggest that the timing of innervation may be controlled by the muscle, through NCAM expression, but that the subsequent suppression of muscle NCAM may occur as a result of nerve-mediated activity.

Ephrin-A5 Exerts Positive or Inhibitory Effects on Distinct Subsets of EphA4-Positive Motor Neurons

Eph receptor tyrosine kinases and ephrins are required for axon patterning and plasticity in the developing nervous system. Typically, Eph–ephrin interactions promote inhibitory events; for example, prohibiting the entry of neural cells into certain embryonic territories. Here, we show that distinct subsets of motor neurons that express EphA4 respond differently to ephrin-A5. EphA4-positive LMC(l) axons avoid entering ephrin-A5-positive hindlimb mesoderm. In contrast, EphA4-positive MMC(m) axons extend through ephrin-A5-positive rostral half-sclerotome. Blocking EphA4 activation in MMC(m) neurons or expanding the domain of ephrin-A5 expression in the somite results in the aberrant growth of MMC(m) axons into the caudal half-sclerotome. Moreover, premature expression of EphA4 in MMC(m) neurons leads to a portion of their axons growing into novel ephrin-A5-positive territories. Together, these results indicate that EphA4-ephrin-A5 signaling acts in a positive manner to constrain MMC(m) axons to the rostral half-sclerotome. Furthermore, we show that Eph activation localizes to distinct subcellular compartments of LMC(l) and MMC(m) neurons, consistent with distinct EphA4 signaling cascades in these neuronal subpopulations.

The perinotochordal mesenchyme acts as a barrier to axon advance in the chick embryo: Implications for a general mechanism of axonal guidance

To test the hypothesis that the perinotochordal mesenchyme (the sclerotome ventral to the spinal nerve pathway) is a barrier to axonal advance in the chick embryo, we determined whether axons directly confronted with perinotochordal mesenchyme would turn to avoid it. The initial direction of motor axon outgrowth was altered by rotating the right half of the neural tube after deleting the left half. Perinotochordal mesenchyme was identified histologically or by peanut agglutinin (PNA) binding. We found that axons turned to avoid the perinotochordal mesenchyme and traversed only the dorsal-anterior sclerotome at all stages of outgrowth. When the ventral root was positioned at the midline, axons projected around the perinotochordal mesenchyme and formed spinal nerves on both sides of the embryo. Furthermore, neural crest cells and sensory axons did not penetrate perinotochordal mesenchyme, even in the absence of motor axons. In contrast, perinotochordal mesenchyme did not exhibit inhibitory function and did not differentially bind PNA when the notochord was deleted; axons ramified widely within it. We conclude that the dorsal-anterior sclerotome is permissive and that the perinotochordal mesenchyme is relatively inhibitory for the advance of axons and neural crest cells. Two additional pairs of tissues provide similar permissive/inhibitory contrasts in the embryo, the anterior/posterior sclerotome and the plexus/pelvic girdle mesenchyme. We hypothesize that guidance by all three pairs is mediated by the same set of cellular interactions and has a common molecular basis. We further propose that the transient expression of substances characteristic of these contrasting tissue pairs could serve to guide axons elsewhere, in both the peripheral and the central nervous systems.

Proximal tissues and patterned neurite outgrowth at the lumbosacral level of the chick embryo: Partial and complete deletion of the somite

The development of patterned axon outgrowth and dorsal root ganglion (DRG) formation was examined after partially or totally removing chick somitic mesoderm. Since the dermamyotome is not essential and a full complement of limb muscles developed, alterations in neural patterns could be ascribed to deletion of sclerotome. When somitic tissue was completely removed, axons extended and DRG formed, but in an unsegmented pattern. Therefore the somite does not elicit outgrowth of axons or migration of DRG precursors, it is not a manditory substratum and it is not required for DRG condensation. These results suggest that posterior sclerotome is relatively inhibitory to invasion, an inhibition that is released when sclerotome is absent. When somites were partially deleted, axonal segmentation was not lost proportionally with the amount of sclerotome removed, suggesting that properties that may vary with sclerotome volume (such as diffusible cues) do not play a primary role. Instead, spinal nerves lost segmentation only when ventral sclerotome was deleted, regardless of whether dorsal sclerotome was or was not removed. This strongly suggests that axonal segmentation is imposed by direct interactions between growth cones and extracellular matrices or surfaces sclerotome cells. While DRG tended to be normally segmented when ventral sclerotome was deleted and to lose segmentation when dorsomedial sclerotome was absent, a coordinate loss of DRG segmentation with sclerotome volume could not be ruled out. However it is clear that axonal and DRG segmentation are independent. Observations on a subset of embryos in which the notochord was displaced relative to the spinal cord suggest that the ventromedial sclerotome surrounding the notochord inhibits axon advance. Posterior and ventromedial sclerotome are hypothesized to act as barriers to axon outgrowth due to some feature of their common cartilaginous development. Specific innervation patterns were also examined. When the notochord was displaced toward the control limb, axons on this side made and corrected projection errors, suggesting that the notochord can influence the precision of axonal pathway selection. In contrast, motor axons that entered the limb on all operated sides innervated muscle with their normal precision despite the absence of the somite and axonal segmentation. Therefore, the somite and the process of spinal nerve segmentation are largely irrelevant to the specificity of motoneuron projection.