Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Kathy L. Sharpe-Timms is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Kathy L. Sharpe-Timms.


Fertility and Sterility | 1998

Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-1 Concentrations are Attenuated in Peritoneal Fluid and Sera of Women with Endometriosis and Restored in Sera by Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Therapy

Kathy L. Sharpe-Timms; L W Keisler; Eric W. McIntush; D. H. Keisler

OBJECTIVEnTo establish tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) concentrations in peritoneal fluid (PF) and sera of women with endometriosis and compare them to disease-free controls.nnnDESIGNnProspective randomized study.nnnSETTINGnAcademic medical center.nnnPATIENT(S)nWomen with laparoscopically documented endometriosis and disease-free women of reproductive age.nnnINTERVENTION(S)nPeritoneal fluid and sera were collected, and some women received gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) therapy for endometriosis.nnnMAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)nPeritoneal fluid and sera TIMP-1 concentrations were measured with a specific RIA.nnnRESULT(S)nThe TIMP-1 concentrations were significantly lower in PF and sera of women with endometriosis compared with disease-free women. The GnRH-a therapy restored serum TIMP-1 concentrations.nnnCONCLUSION(S)nAberrant expression and localization of TIMP-1 may derange the proteolytic milieu of the peritoneal cavity and contribute to the etiology and underlying physiologic sequelae associated with endometriosis. Measurement of TIMP-1 in serum may aid in diagnosing endometriosis and assist with monitoring treatment efficacy in women with this disease.


Biology of Reproduction | 2001

Differential Regulation of Matrix Metalloproteinase-3 Gene Expression in Endometriotic Lesions Compared with Endometrium

Kathryn E. Cox; Marta Piva; Kathy L. Sharpe-Timms

Abstract In vivo levels of mRNA and the specificity of the extrauterine environment on matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-3, MMP-2, and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase (TIMP)-1 were evaluated in eutopic and ectopic endometrial tissue during the establishment of endometriosis in a rat model. Uteri and endometriotic implants were collected and frozen at 36 h, 2 wk, and 4 wk postsurgery to study in vivo mRNA levels. Intact uteri, uterine tissues implanted in the peritoneum or under the skin, and peritoneal adipose implants were collected at 2 wk, halved, and either frozen or cultured. Gene-specific reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction was performed to detect and quantify MMP-2, MMP-3, and TIMP-1 mRNA levels. The peritoneal endometriotic implants progressed from avascularized implants, to vascularized red lesions, to well-established encapsulated cysts. In vivo, MMP-3 mRNA was detectable at all times in ectopic tissues but not in eutopic uterine tissues, whereas MMP-2 and TIMP-1 were ubiquitously expressed at all times in both tissues. In vitro, only MMP-3 mRNA levels were elevated in endometrial tissues collected from the intact uterine and from under the skin, at levels similar to in vivo endometriotic implant MMP-3. In conclusion, ectopic endometrial MMP-3 may participate in the process of invasion and tissue remodeling that is hypothesized to occur in the pathogenesis of endometriosis.


Fertility and Sterility | 2014

World Endometriosis Research Foundation Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonization Project: III. Fluid biospecimen collection, processing, and storage in endometriosis research

Amelie Fassbender; Nilufer Rahmioglu; Allison F. Vitonis; Paola Viganò; Linda C. Giudice; Thomas D’Hooghe; Lone Hummelshoj; G. David Adamson; Christian M. Becker; Stacey A. Missmer; Krina T. Zondervan; G.D. Adamson; C. Allaire; R. Anchan; C.M. Becker; M.A. Bedaiwy; G.M. Buck Louis; C. Calhaz-Jorge; K. Chwalisz; Thomas D'Hooghe; A. Fassbender; T. Faustmann; A.T. Fazleabas; I. Flores; A. Forman; I. Fraser; L.C. Giudice; Martin Götte; P. Gregersen; S.-W. Guo

Objective To harmonize standard operating procedures (SOPs) and standardize the recording of associated data for collection, processing, and storage of human tissues relevant to endometriosis. Design An international collaboration involving 34 clinical/academic centers and three industry collaborators from 16 countries on five continents. Setting In 2013, two workshops were conducted followed by global consultation, bringing together 54 leaders in endometriosis research and sample processing from around the world. Patient(s) None. Intervention(s) Consensus SOPs were based on: 1) systematic comparison of SOPs from 24 global centers collecting tissue samples from women with and without endometriosis on a medium or large scale (publication on >100 cases); 2) literature evidence where available, or consultation with laboratory experts otherwise; and 3) several global consultation rounds. Main Outcome Measure(s) Standard recommended and minimum required SOPs for tissue collection, processing, and storage in endometriosis research. Result(s) We developed “recommended standard” and “minimum required” SOPs for the collection, processing, and storage of ectopic and eutopic endometrium, peritoneum, and myometrium, and a biospecimen data collection form necessary for interpretation of sample-derived results. Conclusion(s) The EPHect SOPs allow endometriosis research centers to decrease variability in tissue-based results, facilitating between-center comparisons and collaborations. The procedures are also relevant to research into other gynecologic conditions involving endometrium, myometrium, and peritoneum. The consensus SOPs are based on the best available evidence; areas with limited evidence are identified as requiring further pilot studies. The SOPs will be reviewed based on investigator feedback and through systematic triannual follow-up. Updated versions will be made available at: http://endometriosisfoundation.org/ephect.


Fertility and Sterility | 1995

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy reduces postoperative adhesion formation and reformation after adhesiolysis in rat models for adhesion formation and endometriosis

Jean A. Wright; Kathy L. Sharpe-Timms

OBJECTIVESnTo evaluate the effectiveness of GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) therapy on adhesion formation and reformation in established rat models for surgically induced adhesion formation and endometriosis.nnnDESIGNnBefore surgery, female Sprague-Dawley rats were injected with GnRH-a or control diluent. Six days later, rats were assigned to one of four surgical groups: [1] endometriosis, [2] endometriosis sham, [3] adhesion model, or [4] adhesion sham. Three weeks after surgery, a second-look laparotomy was performed, adhesions were scored (0 = no adhesions to 3 = severe adhesions) and mechanically disrupted, and rats received a second GnRH-a or diluent injection either analogous to their initial injection or in a crossover design. Three weeks after the second injection, rats were killed and adhesion reformation was scored. Data were evaluated using nonparameteric tests including Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, and Friedmans tests comparing GnRH-a treatments with diluent controls.nnnRESULTSnPreoperative GnRH-a therapy reduced adhesion scores in rats with surgically induced endometriosis (mean +/- SEM; GnRH-a 1.1 +/- 0.2 versus diluent 2.2 +/- 0.2) and adhesions (GnRH-a 0.3 +/- 0.1 versus diluent 0.6 +/- 0.1). Pretreatment GnRH-a therapy did not affect adhesion scores in the endometriosis sham procedure. Combined preoperative and postoperative GnRHa therapy (GnRH-a-GnRH-a) but not postoperative GnRH-a therapy alone (diluent-GnRH-a) reduced adhesion reformation after adhesiolysis in the endometriosis model (GnRH-a-GnRH-a 1.1 +/- 0.3, diluent-GnRH-a 1.6 +/- 0.7), the endometriosis sham (GnRH-a-GnRH-a 0.7 +/- 0.2, diluent-GnRHa 1.8 +/- 0.1), and the adhesion model (GnRH-a-GnRH-a 0.3 +/- 0.2, diluent-GnRHa 1.0 +/- 0.5). No adhesions were observed in the adhesion sham group.nnnCONCLUSIONSnGonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy was successful in reducing adhesion formation and reformation. These studies suggest that GnRH-a therapy for adhesion prevention in women should be explored.


Fertility and Sterility | 2002

Endometriotic haptoglobin binds to peritoneal macrophages and alters their function in women with endometriosis

Kathy L. Sharpe-Timms; Randy L. Zimmer; Emily A Ricke; Marta Piva; G.M Horowitz

OBJECTIVEnTo evaluate the effects of endometriotic haptoglobin on peritoneal macrophage function.nnnDESIGNnProspective laboratory study.nnnSETTINGnSchool of medicine.nnnPATIENT(S)nTwenty-three women with and without endometriosis.nnnINTERVENTION(S)nPeritoneal macrophages cultured without or with haptoglobin.nnnMAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)nPeritoneal macrophage haptoglobin immunoreactivity, adhesion, and interleukin-6 (IL-6) production.nnnRESULT(S)nIn vivo, significantly more peritoneal macrophages from women with endometriosis bound haptoglobin and exhibited reduced adhesion compared to women without endometriosis. In vitro, haptoglobin treatment significantly decreased peritoneal macrophage adherence only in women without endometriosis; this effect was not seen in women with endometriosis, probably owing to in vivo haptoglobin saturation. Conversely, haptoglobin treatment robustly increased IL-6 production only by macrophages from women with endometriosis, suggesting differential immune response in these women.nnnCONCLUSION(S)nEndometriotic lesions synthesize and secrete a unique form of haptoglobin (endometriosis protein-I) that is up-regulated by IL-6. This study shows that haptoglobin adheres to peritoneal macrophages; decreases adhesion, which may influence phagocytic function; and up-regulates IL-6 production. Hence, a feed-forward loop is proposed whereby endometriotic lesion haptoglobin decreases macrophage phagocytic function while increasing IL-6 production, which in turn increases endometriotic haptoglobin and promotes establishment of endometriosis.


Cell and Tissue Research | 2012

Cellular and molecular basis for endometriosis-associated infertility

Julie A.W. Stilley; Julie A. Birt; Kathy L. Sharpe-Timms

Endometriosis is a gynecological disease characterized by the presence of endometrial glandular epithelial and stromal cells growing in the extra-uterine environment. The disease afflicts 10%–15% of menstruating women causing debilitating pain and infertility. Endometriosis appears to affect every part of a woman’s reproductive system including ovarian function, oocyte quality, embryo development and implantation, uterine function and the endocrine system choreographing the reproductive process and results in infertility or spontaneous pregnancy loss. Current treatments are laden with menopausal-like side effects and many cause cessation or chemical alteration of the reproductive cycle, neither of which is conducive to achieving a pregnancy. However, despite the prevalence, physical and psychological tolls and health care costs, a cure for endometriosis has not yet been found. We hypothesize that endometriosis causes infertility via multifaceted mechanisms that are intricately interwoven thereby contributing to our lack of understanding of this disease process. Identifying and understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms responsible for endometriosis-associated infertility might help unravel the confounding multiplicities of infertility and provide insights into novel therapeutic approaches and potentially curative treatments for endometriosis.


Fertility and Sterility | 2014

World Endometriosis Research Foundation Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonisation Project: I. Surgical phenotype data collection in endometriosis research

Christian M. Becker; Marc R. Laufer; Pamela Stratton; Lone Hummelshoj; Stacey A. Missmer; Krina T. Zondervan; G. David Adamson; G.D. Adamson; C. Allaire; R. Anchan; C.M. Becker; M.A. Bedaiwy; G.M. Buck Louis; C. Calhaz-Jorge; K. Chwalisz; Thomas D'Hooghe; Amelie Fassbender; T. Faustmann; A.T. Fazleabas; I. Flores; A. Forman; I. Fraser; Linda C. Giudice; Martin Götte; P. Gregersen; S.-W. Guo; T. Harada; D. Hartwell; A.W. Horne; M.L. Hull

Objective To standardize the recording of surgical phenotypic information on endometriosis and related sample collections obtained at laparoscopy, allowing large-scale collaborative research into the condition. Design An international collaboration involving 34 clinical/academic centers and three industry collaborators from 16 countries. Setting Two workshops were conducted in 2013, bringing together 54 clinical, academic, and industry leaders in endometriosis research and management worldwide. Patient(s) None. Intervention(s) A postsurgical scoring sheet containing general and gynecological patient and procedural information, extent of disease, the location and type of endometriotic lesion, and any other findings was developed during several rounds of review. Comments and any systematic surgical data collection tools used in the reviewers centers were incorporated. Main Outcome Measure(s) The development of a standard recommended (SSF) and minimum required (MSF) form to collect data on the surgical phenotype of endometriosis. Result(s) SSF and MSF include detailed descriptions of lesions, modes of procedures and sample collection, comorbidities, and potential residual disease at the end of surgery, along with previously published instruments such as the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine and Endometriosis Fertility Index classification tools for comparison and validation. Conclusion(s) This is the first multicenter, international collaboration between academic centers and industry addressing standardization of phenotypic data collection for a specific disease. The Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonisation Project SSF and MSF are essential tools to increase our understanding of the pathogenesis of endometriosis by allowing large-scale collaborative research into the condition.


Fertility and Sterility | 2014

World Endometriosis Research Foundation Endometriosis Phenome and biobanking harmonization project: II. Clinical and covariate phenotype data collection in endometriosis research

Allison F. Vitonis; Katy Vincent; Nilufer Rahmioglu; Amelie Fassbender; Germaine M. Buck Louis; Lone Hummelshoj; Linda C. Giudice; Pamela Stratton; G. David Adamson; Christian M. Becker; Krina T. Zondervan; Stacey A. Missmer; G.D. Adamson; C. Allaire; R. Anchan; C.M. Becker; M.A. Bedaiwy; G.M. Buck Louis; C. Calhaz-Jorge; K. Chwalisz; Thomas D'Hooghe; A. Fassbender; T. Faustmann; Asgerally T. Fazleabas; I. Flores; A. Forman; I. Fraser; L.C. Giudice; Martin Götte; P. Gregersen

Objective To harmonize the collection of nonsurgical clinical and epidemiologic data relevant to endometriosis research, allowing large-scale collaboration. Design An international collaboration involving 34 clinical/academic centers and three industry collaborators from 16 countries on five continents. Setting In 2013, two workshops followed by global consultation, bringing together 54 leaders in endometriosis research. Patients None. Intervention(s) Development of a self-administered endometriosis patient questionnaire (EPQ), based on [1] systematic comparison of questionnaires from eight centers that collect data from endometriosis cases (and controls/comparison women) on a medium to large scale (publication on >100 cases); [2] literature evidence; and [3] several global consultation rounds. Main Outcome Measure(s) Standard recommended and minimum required questionnaires to capture detailed clinical and covariate data. Result(s) The standard recommended (EPHect EPQ-S) and minimum required (EPHect EPQ-M) questionnaires contain questions on pelvic pain, subfertility and menstrual/reproductive history, hormone/medication use, medical history, and personal information. Conclusion(s) The EPQ captures the basic set of patient characteristics and exposures considered by the WERF EPHect Working Group to be most critical for the advancement of endometriosis research, but is also relevant to other female conditions with similar risk factors and/or symptomatology. The instruments will be reviewed based on feedback from investigators, and–after a first review after 1 year–triannually through systematic follow-up surveys. Updated versions will be made available through http://endometriosisfoundation.org/ephect.


Human Reproduction | 2017

World Endometriosis Society consensus on the classification of endometriosis

Neil Johnson; Lone Hummelshoj; G. David Adamson; Jörg Keckstein; Hugh S. Taylor; Mauricio Simões Abrão; Deborah Bush; Ludwig Kiesel; Rulla M. Tamimi; Kathy L. Sharpe-Timms; Luk Rombauts; Linda C. Giudice

STUDY QUESTION What is the global consensus on the classification of endometriosis that considers the views of women with endometriosis? SUMMARY ANSWER We have produced an international consensus statement on the classification of endometriosis through systematic appraisal of evidence and a consensus process that included representatives of national and international, medical and non-medical societies, patient organizations, and companies with an interest in endometriosis. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Classification systems of endometriosis, developed by several professional organizations, traditionally have been based on lesion appearance, pelvic adhesions, and anatomic location of disease. One system predicts fertility outcome and none predicts pelvic pain, response to medications, disease recurrence, risks for associated disorders, quality of life measures, and other endpoints important to women and health care providers for guiding appropriate therapeutic options and prognosis. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A consensus meeting, in conjunction with pre- and post-meeting processes, was undertaken. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS A consensus meeting was held on 30 April 2014 in conjunction with the World Endometriosis Societys 12th World Congress on Endometriosis. Rigorous pre- and post-meeting processes, involving 55 representatives of 29 national and international, medical and non-medical organizations from a range of disciplines, led to this consensus statement. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE A total of 28 consensus statements were made. Of all, 10 statements had unanimous consensus, however none of the statements was made without expression of a caveat about the strength of the statement or the statement itself. Two statements did not achieve majority consensus. The statements covered womens priorities, aspects of classification, impact of low resources, as well as all the major classification systems for endometriosis. Until better classification systems are developed, we propose a classification toolbox (that includes the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine and, where appropriate, the Enzian and Endometriosis Fertility Index staging systems), that may be used by all surgeons in each case of surgery undertaken for women with endometriosis. We also propose wider use of the World Endometriosis Research Foundation Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonisation Project surgical and clinical data collection tools for research to improve classification of endometriosis in the future, of particular relevance when surgery is not undertaken. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION This consensus process differed from that of formal guideline development, although based on the same available evidence. A different group of international experts from those participating in this process may have yielded subtly different consensus statements. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS This is the first time that a large, global, consortium–representing 29 major stake-holding organizations, from 19 countries – has convened to systematically evaluate the best available evidence on the classification of endometriosis and reach consensus. In addition to 21 international medical organizations and companies, representatives from eight national endometriosis organizations were involved, including lay support groups, thus generating and including input from women who suffer from endometriosis in an endeavour to keep uppermost the goal of optimizing quality of life for women with endometriosis. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The World Endometriosis Society convened and hosted the consensus meeting. Financial support for participants to attend the meeting was provided by the organizations that they represented. There was no other specific funding for this consensus process. Mauricio Abrao is an advisor to Bayer Pharma, and a consultant to AbbVie and AstraZeneca; G David Adamson is the Owner of Advanced Reproductive Care Inc and Ziva and a consultant to Bayer Pharma, Ferring, and AbbVie; Deborah Bush has received travel grants from Fisher & Paykel Healthcare and Bayer Pharmaceuticals; Linda Giudice is a consultant to AbbVie, Juniper Pharmaceutical, and NextGen Jane, holds research grant from the NIH, is site PI on a clinical trial sponsored by Bayer, and is a shareholder in Merck and Pfizer; Lone Hummelshoj is an unpaid consultant to AbbVie; Neil Johnson has received conference expenses from Bayer Pharma, Merck-Serono, and MSD, research funding from AbbVie, and is a consultant to Vifor Pharma and Guerbet; Jörg Keckstein has received a travel grant from AbbVie; Ludwig Kiesel is a consultant to Bayer Pharma, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Gedeon Richter, and Shionogi, and holds a research grant from Bayer Pharma; Luk Rombauts is an advisor to MSD, Merck Serono, and Ferring, and a shareholder in Monash IVF. The following have declared that they have nothing to disclose: Kathy Sharpe Timms; Rulla Tamimi; Hugh Taylor. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A


Fertility and Sterility | 1998

Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist (GnRH-a) Therapy Alters Activity of Plasminogen Activators, Matrix Metalloproteinases, and Their Inhibitors in Rat Models for Adhesion Formation and Endometriosis: Potential GnRH-a–Regulated Mechanisms Reducing Adhesion Formation 11Supported in part by grants HD29026 (K.L.S.-T.) and HD 273995 (T.E.C.) from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. Additional support provided by TAP Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Deerfield, Illinois.

Kathy L. Sharpe-Timms; Randall L. Zimmer; Wendy J Jolliff; Jean A. Wright; Warren B. Nothnick; Thomas E. Curry

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the effects of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) on plasminogen activator (PA), matrix metalloproteinase (MMP), plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI) and matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor (MMPI) activities in peritoneal fluid relative to GnRH-a–induced reduction of adhesion formation. Design: Continuation of prospective randomized study using surgical models for adhesion formation. Setting: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology research laboratory at the University of Missouri School of Medicine. Patient(s): Forty reproductively cycling female Sprague-Dawley rats. Intervention(s): Female rats were injected with depot GnRH-a or diluent and randomly assigned to adhesion and endometriosis surgeries. Peritoneal fluid was collected prior to (time 1) and 7 weeks from (time 2) initial surgery. Main Outcome Measure(s): Peritoneal fluid was analyzed for PA, PAI, MMP, and MMPI activities. Result(s): At time 1, MMP and MMPI activities were similar in all rats; however, PA and PAI activities were less in rats pretreated with GnRH-a than with diluent. Between time 1 and time 2, GnRH-a–treated rats showed an increase in PAI and MMPI activities without significant changes in PA or MMP activities, whereas rats receiving diluent showed a significant increase in PAI and MMP activities but no significant changes in PA or MMPI activities. At time 2, rats receiving GnRH-a had less PA and MMP activities than those receiving diluent. Adhesion scores showed a positive correlation with MMP activity. Conclusion(s): In the absence of GnRH-a therapy, surgical tissue manipulation increased peritoneal fluid MMP and PAI activity. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy decreased PA and MMP activities and also increased PAI and MMPI activities. This GnRH-a–induced shift to a less invasive phenotype may alter fibrinolysis and extracellular matrix remodeling and thereby play a role in the mechanism of GnRH-a–induced reduction in adhesion formation.

Collaboration


Dive into the Kathy L. Sharpe-Timms's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

G. David Adamson

Palo Alto Medical Foundation

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marta Piva

University of Missouri

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

G.M. Buck Louis

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge