Kathy Shire

The EBNA1 Protein of Epstein-Barr Virus Functionally Interacts with Brd4

ABSTRACT The EBNA1 protein of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is essential for EBV latent infection in ensuring the replication and stable segregation of the EBV genomes and in activating the transcription of other EBV latency genes. We have tested the ability of four host proteins (Brd2, Brd4, DEK, and MeCP2) implicated in the segregation of papillomavirus and Kaposis sarcoma-associated herpesvirus to support EBNA1-mediated segregation of EBV-based plasmids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We found that Brd4 enabled EBNA1-mediated segregation while Brd2 and MeCP2 had a general stimulatory effect on plasmid maintenance. EBNA1 interacted with Brd4 in both yeast and human cells through N-terminal sequences previously shown to mediate transcriptional activation but not segregation. In keeping with this interaction site, silencing of Brd4 in human cells decreased transcriptional activation by EBNA1 but not the mitotic chromosome attachment of EBNA1 that is required for segregation. In addition, Brd4 was found to be preferentially localized to the FR enhancer element regulated by EBNA1, over other EBV sequences, in latently EBV-infected cells. The results indicate that EBNA1 can functionally interact with Brd4 in native and heterologous systems and that this interaction facilitates transcriptional activation by EBNA1 from the FR element.

Reconstitution of Epstein-Barr virus-based plasmid partitioning in budding yeast.

The EBNA1 protein of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) mediates the partitioning of EBV episomes and EBV‐based plasmids during cell division by a mechanism that appears to involve binding to the cellular EBP2 protein on human chromosomes. We have investigated the ability of EBNA1 and the EBV segregation element (FR) to mediate plasmid partitioning in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EBNA1 expression alone did not enable the stable segregation of FR‐containing plasmids in yeast, but segregation was rescued by human EBP2. The reconstituted segregation system required EBNA1, human EBP2 and the FR element, and functionally replaced a CEN element. An EBP2 binding mutant of EBNA1 and an EBNA1 binding mutant of EBP2 each failed to support FR‐plasmid partitioning, indicating that an EBNA1–EBP2 interaction is required. The results provide direct evidence of the role of hEBP2 in EBNA1‐mediated segregation and demonstrate that heterologous segregation systems can be reconstituted in yeast.

The Role of BiP in Endoplasmic Reticulum-associated Degradation of Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Heavy Chain Induced by Cytomegalovirus Proteins

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV1) US11 and US2 proteins cause rapid degradation of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules, apparently by ligating cellular endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-associated degradation machinery. Here, we show that US11 and US2 bind the ER chaperone BiP. Four related HCMV proteins, US3, US7, US9, and US10, which do not promote degradation of MHC proteins, did not bind BiP. Silencing BiP reduced US11- and US2-mediated degradation of MHC class I heavy chain (HC) without altering the synthesis or translocation of HC into the ER or the stability of HC in the absence of US11 or US2. Induction of the unfolded protein response (UPR) did not affect US11-mediated HC degradation and could not explain the stabilization of HC when BiP was silenced. Unlike in yeast, BiP did not act by maintaining substrates in a retrotranslocation-competent form. Our studies go beyond previous observations in mammalian cells correlating BiP release with degradation, demonstrating that BiP is functionally required for US2- and US11-mediated HC degradation. Further, US2 and US11 bound BiP even when HC was absent and degradation of US2 depended on HC. These data were consistent with a model in which US2 and US11 bridge HC onto BiP promoting interactions with other ER-associated degradation proteins.

Regulation of the EBNA1 Epstein-Barr Virus Protein by Serine Phosphorylation and Arginine Methylation

ABSTRACT The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) EBNA1 protein is important for the replication and mitotic segregation of EBV genomes in latently infected cells and also activates the transcription of some of the viral latency genes. A Gly-Arg-rich region between amino acids 325 and 376 is required for both the segregation and transcriptional activation functions of EBNA1. Here we show that this region is modified by both arginine methylation and serine phosphorylation. Mutagenesis of the four potentially phosphorylated serines in this region indicated that phosphorylation of multiple serines contributes to the efficient segregation of EBV-based plasmids by EBNA1, at least in part by increasing EBNA1 binding to hEBP2. EBNA1 was also found to bind the arginine methyltransferases PRMT1 and PRMT5. Multiple arginines in the 325-376 region were methylated in vitro by PRMT1 and PRMT5, as was an N-terminal Gly-Arg-rich region between amino acids 41 and 50. EBNA1 was also shown to be methylated in vivo, predominantly in the 325-376 region. Treatment of cells with a methylation inhibitor or down-regulation of PRMT1 altered EBNA1 localization, resulting in the formation of EBNA1 rings around the nucleoli. The results indicate that EBNA1 function is influenced by both serine phosphorylation and arginine methylation.

Identification and Characterization of a Novel Component of the Human Minichromosome Maintenance Complex

ABSTRACT Minichromosome maintenance (MCM) complex replicative helicase complexes play essential roles in DNA replication in all eukaryotes. Using a tandem affinity purification-tagging approach in human cells, we discovered a form of the MCM complex that contains a previously unstudied protein, MCM binding protein (MCM-BP). MCM-BP is conserved in multicellular eukaryotes and shares limited homology with MCM proteins. MCM-BP formed a complex with MCM3 to MCM7, which excluded MCM2; and, conversely, hexameric complexes of MCM2 to MCM7 lacked MCM-BP, indicating that MCM-BP can replace MCM2 in the MCM complex. MCM-BP-containing complexes exhibited increased stability under experimental conditions relative to those containing MCM2. MCM-BP also formed a complex with the MCM4/6/7 core helicase in vitro, but, unlike MCM2, did not inhibit this helicase activity. A proportion of MCM-BP bound to cellular chromatin in a cell cycle-dependent manner typical of MCM proteins, and, like other MCM subunits, preferentially associated with a cellular origin in G1 but not in S phase. In addition, down-regulation of MCM-BP decreased the association of MCM4 with chromatin, and the chromatin association of MCM-BP was at least partially dependent on MCM4 and cdc6. The results indicate that multicellular eukaryotes contain two types of hexameric MCM complexes with unique properties and functions.

Mitotic chromosome interactions of Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1) and human EBNA1-binding protein 2 (EBP2).

The Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1) protein enables the stable persistence of Epstein-Barr virus episomal genomes during latent infection, in part by tethering the episomes to the cellular chromosomes in mitosis. A host nucleolar protein, EBNA1-binding protein 2 (EBP2), has been shown to be important for interactions between EBNA1 and chromosomes in metaphase and to associate with metaphase chromosomes. Here, we examine the timing of the chromosome associations of EBNA1 and EBP2 through mitosis and the regions of EBNA1 that mediate the chromosome interactions at each stage of mitosis. We show that EBP2 is localized to the nucleolus until late prophase, after which it relocalizes to the chromosome periphery, where it remains throughout telophase. EBNA1 is associated with chromosomes early in prophase through to telophase and partially colocalizes with chromosomal EBP2 in metaphase through to telophase. Using EBNA1 deletion mutants, the chromosome association of EBNA1 at each stage of mitosis was found to be mediated mainly by a central glycine-arginine region, and to a lesser degree by N-terminal sequences. These sequence requirements for chromosome interaction mirrored those for EBP2 binding. Our results suggest that interactions between EBNA1 and chromosomes involve at least two stages, and that the contribution of EBP2 to these interactions occurs in the second half of mitosis.

Two Domains of the Epstein-Barr Virus Origin DNA-binding Protein, EBNA1, Orchestrate Sequence-specific DNA Binding

The EBNA1 (for Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen 1) protein of Epstein-Barr virus governs the replication and partitioning of the viral genomes during latent infection by binding to specific recognition sites in the viral origin of DNA replication. The crystal structure of the DNA binding portion of the EBNA1 protein revealed that this region comprises two structural motifs; a core domain, which mediates protein dimerization and is structurally homologous to the DNA binding domain of the papillomavirus E2 protein, and a flanking domain, which mediated all the observed sequence-specific contacts. To test the possibility that the EBNA1 core domain plays a role in sequence-specific DNA binding not revealed in the crystal structure, we examined the effects of point mutations in potential hydrogen bond donors located in an α-helix of the EBNA1 core domain whose structural homologue in E2 mediates sequence-specific DNA binding. We show that these mutations severely reduce the affinity of EBNA1 for its recognition site, and that the core domain, when expressed in the absence of the flanking domain, has sequence-specific DNA binding activity. Flanking domain residues were also found to contribute to the DNA binding activity of EBNA1. Thus, both the core and flanking domains of EBNA1 play direct roles in DNA recognition.

Identification of a novel protein interaction motif in the regulatory subunit of casein kinase 2.

ABSTRACT Casein kinase 2 (CK2) regulates multiple cellular processes and can promote oncogenesis. Interactions with the CK2β regulatory subunit of the enzyme target its catalytic subunit (CK2α or CK2α′) to specific substrates; however, little is known about the mechanisms by which these interactions occur. We previously showed that by binding CK2β, the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) EBNA1 protein recruits CK2 to promyelocytic leukemia (PML) nuclear bodies, where increased CK2-mediated phosphorylation of PML proteins triggers their degradation. Here we have identified a KSSR motif near the dimerization interface of CK2β as forming part of a protein interaction pocket that mediates interaction with EBNA1. We show that the EBNA1-CK2β interaction is primed by phosphorylation of EBNA1 on S393 (within a polyserine region). This phosphoserine is critical for EBNA1-induced PML degradation but does not affect EBNA1 functions in EBV replication or segregation. Using comparative proteomics of wild-type (WT) and KSSR mutant CK2β, we identified an uncharacterized cellular protein, C18orf25/ARKL1, that also binds CK2β through the KSSR motif and show that this involves a polyserine sequence resembling the CK2β binding sequence in EBNA1. Therefore, we have identified a new mechanism of CK2 interaction used by viral and cellular proteins.

Identification of RNF168 as a PML nuclear body regulator.

ABSTRACT Promyelocytic leukemia (PML) protein forms the basis of PML nuclear bodies (PML NBs), which control many important processes. We have screened an shRNA library targeting ubiquitin pathway proteins for effects on PML NBs, and identified RNF8 and RNF168 DNA-damage response proteins as negative regulators of PML NBs. Additional studies confirmed that depletion of either RNF8 or RNF168 increased the levels of PML NBs and proteins, whereas overexpression induced loss of PML NBs. RNF168 partially localized to PML NBs through its UMI/MIU1 ubiquitin-interacting region and associated with NBs formed by any PML isoform. The association of RNF168 with PML NBs resulted in increased ubiquitylation and SUMO2 modification of PML. In addition, RNF168 was found to associate with proteins modified by SUMO2 and/or SUMO3 in a manner dependent on its ubiquitin-binding sequences, suggesting that hybrid SUMO–ubiquitin chains can be bound. In vitro assays confirmed that RNF168, preferentially, binds hybrid SUMO2–K63 ubiquitin chains compared with K63–ubiquitin chains or individual SUMO2. Our study identified previously unrecognized roles for RNF8 and RNF168 in the regulation of PML, and a so far unknown preference of RNF168 for hybrid SUMO–ubiquitin chains. Summary: RNF168 was identified as a negative regulator of PML nuclear bodies, and shown to associate with PML nuclear bodies and hybrid SUMO2–ubiquitin chains.

Interactions of the human MCM-BP protein with MCM complex components and Dbf4.

MCM-BP was discovered as a protein that co-purified from human cells with MCM proteins 3 through 7; results which were recapitulated in frogs, yeast and plants. Evidence in all of these organisms supports an important role for MCM-BP in DNA replication, including contributions to MCM complex unloading. However the mechanisms by which MCM-BP functions and associates with MCM complexes are not well understood. Here we show that human MCM-BP is capable of interacting with individual MCM proteins 2 through 7 when co-expressed in insect cells and can greatly increase the recovery of some recombinant MCM proteins. Glycerol gradient sedimentation analysis indicated that MCM-BP interacts most strongly with MCM4 and MCM7. Similar gradient analyses of human cell lysates showed that only a small amount of MCM-BP overlapped with the migration of MCM complexes and that MCM complexes were disrupted by exogenous MCM-BP. In addition, large complexes containing MCM-BP and MCM proteins were detected at mid to late S phase, suggesting that the formation of specific MCM-BP complexes is cell cycle regulated. We also identified an interaction between MCM-BP and the Dbf4 regulatory component of the DDK kinase in both yeast 2-hybrid and insect cell co-expression assays, and this interaction was verified by co-immunoprecipitation of endogenous proteins from human cells. In vitro kinase assays showed that MCM-BP was not a substrate for DDK but could inhibit DDK phosphorylation of MCM4,6,7 within MCM4,6,7 or MCM2-7 complexes, with little effect on DDK phosphorylation of MCM2. Since DDK is known to activate DNA replication through phosphorylation of these MCM proteins, our results suggest that MCM-BP may affect DNA replication in part by regulating MCM phosphorylation by DDK.