Katia Dyrda

Clinical Experience With a Novel Electromyographic Approach to Preventing Phrenic Nerve Injury During Cryoballoon Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation

Background—Phrenic nerve palsy remains the most frequent complication associated with cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein (PV) isolation. We sought to characterize our experience using a novel monitoring technique for the prevention of phrenic nerve palsy. Methods and Results—Two hundred consecutive cryoballoon-based PV isolation procedures between October 2010 and October 2013 were studied. In addition to standard abdominal palpation during right phrenic nerve pacing from the superior vena cava, all patients underwent diaphragmatic electromyographic monitoring using surface electrodes. Cryoablation was terminated on any perceived reduction in diaphragmatic motion or a 30% decrease in the compound motor action potential (CMAP). During right-sided ablation, a ≥30% reduction in CMAP amplitude occurred in 49 patients (24.5%). Diaphragmatic motion decreased in 30 of 49 patients and was preceded by a 30% reduction in CMAP amplitude in all. In 82% of cases, this reduction in CMAP amplitude occurred during right superior PV isolation. The baseline CMAP amplitude was 946.5±609.2 mV and decreased by 13.8±13.8% at the end of application. This decrease was more marked in the 33 PVs with a reduction in diaphragmatic motion than in those without (40.9±15.3% versus 11.3±10.5%; P<0.001). In 3 cases, phrenic nerve palsy persisted beyond the end of the procedure, with all cases recovering within 6 months. Despite the shortened application all veins were isolated. At repeat procedure the right-sided PVs reconnected less frequently than the left-sided PVs in those with phrenic nerve palsy. Conclusions—Electromyographic phrenic nerve monitoring using the surface CMAP is reliable, easy to perform, and offers an early warning to impending phrenic nerve injury.

New Directions in Cardiac Arrhythmia Management: Present Challenges and Future Solutions

Cardiac arrhythmias are a major contributor to population morbidity and mortality. Enormous advances in arrhythmia management have occurred over the 60 years since the founding of the Montreal Heart Institute, but important challenges remain. The purpose of this article is to identify the areas of cardiac arrhythmia therapy that need improvement and to discuss the evolving approaches that promise solutions. Challenges in diagnosis, detection, and risk-stratification include difficulties in separating benign from high-risk syncope and pinpointing the underlying causes, the detection of silent atrial fibrillation in patients at risk of stroke, and inadequate identification of sudden-death risk. Implantable devices are limited by the need for battery and device replacements, device complications like infection and dysfunction, and lead complications like fracture, infection, or displacement. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy, although widely used, is plagued by a very limited range of available agents, supply issues, insufficient efficacy, and significant adverse effect risk. Health economic concerns include the high cost of new technologies, challenges in establishing cost effectiveness, and restrictive practices of government or third-party payers. Major improvements in arrhythmia management can be expected from new discoveries and technological developments in genetics, innovative diagnostic tools for arrhythmia monitoring, imaging and analysis, new approaches to antiarrhythmic drug development, biological therapies, and continuing improvement in implantable device technology like further miniaturization, leadless technology, and use of novel energy sources. As exciting as the developments in arrhythmia management have been in the past, we can look forward to exponential improvement in our ability to manage arrhythmia patients in the near future.

Implantable rhythm devices and electromagnetic interference: myth or reality?

Current medical guidelines have prompted implementation of increasing numbers of implantable rhythm devices, be they pacemakers, internal cardioverter–defibrillators or loop recorders. These devices rely on complex microcircuitry and use electromagnetic waves for communication. They are, therefore, susceptible to interference from surrounding electromagnetic radiation and magnetic energy. Hermetic shielding in metallic cases, filters, interference rejection circuits and bipolar sensing have contributed to their relative resistance to electromagnetic interference (EMI) in household and workplace environments. Device interactions have occurred in hospitals where EMI sources are ubiquitous, including radiation, electrocautery and MRI exposures. However, with rapidly evolving technology, devices and potential sources of EMI continue to change. This review provides a contemporary overview of the current state of knowledge regarding risks attributable to EMI; highlights current limitations of implantable rhythm devices; and attempts to distinguish myths from realities.

Electrocardiographic and electrophysiological predictors of atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND Electrophysiological predictors of atrioventricular (AV) block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are unknown. OBJECTIVE We sought to assess the value of electrophysiology study before and after TAVR. METHODS Seventy-five consecutive pacemaker-free patients undergoing TAVR at the Montreal Heart Institute were prospectively studied. RESULTS Eleven patients (14.7%) developed AV block during the index hospitalization and 3 (4.0%) after hospital discharge over a median follow-up of 1.4 years (interquartile range 0.6-2.1 years). AV block developed in 5 of 6 patients with preprocedural right bundle branch block (83.3%), 8 of 30 patients with new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB; 26.7%), and 1 of 7 patients with preexisting LBBB (14.3%). In multivariate analysis that considered all patients, the delta-HV interval (HV interval after TAVR minus HV interval before TAVR) was the only factor independently associated with AV block. In the subgroup of patients with new-onset LBBB, the postprocedural HV interval was strongly associated with AV block. By receiver operating characteristic analysis, a delta-HV interval of ≥13 ms predicted AV block with 100.0% sensitivity and 84.4% specificity and an HV interval of ≥65 ms predicted AV block with 83.3% sensitivity and 81.6% specificity. In multivariate analysis, the HV interval after TAVR (hazard ratio 1.073 per ms; 95% confidence interval 1.029-1.119; P = .001) was also independently associated with all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION A prolonged delta-HV interval (≥13 ms) is strongly associated with AV block after TAVR. In patients with new-onset LBBB after TAVR, a postprocedural HV interval of ≥65 ms is likewise predictive of AV block.

Redefining the Blanking Period After Catheter Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Insights From the ADVICE (Adenosine Following Pulmonary Vein Isolation to Target Dormant Conduction Elimination) Trial.

Background— Early recurrences (ERs) of atrial tachyarrhythmia are common after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. A 3-month blanking period is recommended by current guidelines. This study sought to investigate the significance of ER during the first 3 months post ablation in predicting late recurrences and determine whether it varies according to timing. Methods and Results— A total of 401 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing pulmonary vein isolation were followed for 12 months with transtelephonic monitoring in the ADVICE (Adenosine Following Pulmonary Vein Isolation to Target Dormant Conduction Elimination) trial. Patients with atrial tachyarrhythmia ≥30 s within the 3-month blanking period were stratified according to the timing of ER. A total of 179 patients (44.6%) experienced their last episode of ER during the first (n=53), second (n=44), or third (n=82) month of the 3-month blanking period. One-year freedom from symptomatic atrial tachyarrhythmia was 77.2% in patients without ER compared with 62.6%, 36.4%, and 7.8% in patients with ER 1, 2, and 3 months post ablation, respectively (P<0.0001). Receiver operating curve analyses revealed a strong correlation between the timing of ER and late recurrence (area under the curve 0.82, P<0.0001). Corresponding hazard ratios for ER during the first, second, and third months were 1.84, 4.45, and 9.64, respectively. Conclusions— This study validates the use of a blanking period after catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation but calls into question the 90-day cut-off value. In particular, >90% of patients with ER during the third month post ablation experience late recurrence by 1 year. However, pending further study, repeat ablation before 90 days cannot be routinely advocated. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01058980.

Design of an acute dP/dt hemodynamic measurement protocol to isolate cardiac effect of pacing.

BACKGROUND Invasively measured maximum increase in left ventricular pressure (LV dP/dtmax) has been used to assess biventricular (BiV) pacing. We quantified extracardiac factors contributing to its variability, and developed a protocol to minimize these effects in an acute pacing experiment. METHODS AND RESULTS Continuous pressure was recorded by a guidewire sensor placed in the LV. Four to six test pacing interventions were performed, each repeated 3 times and followed by a baseline pacing configuration. Maximum increase in LV dP/dtmax from any measurement of BiV pacing was median 20.3% in 25 patients, compared with BiV pacing off. When directly comparing sequential measurements with BiV pacing on and off, median increase was 7.4%. Noncardiac sources of modulation included respiratory variation (6.4%), drift from first to last baseline measurement (5.0%), and discrepancy among repeated recordings of the same pacing intervention (3.3%). Comparing test interventions to interleaved baseline measurements reduced discrepancy among recordings to 2.1%; P < .001. CONCLUSIONS With repeated measurements of baseline state, and by comparing test interventions only to baseline measurements performed before and after, it is possible to minimize extracardiac factors and focus on the effects of test pacing interventions.

Impact of revascularization in patients with sustained ventricular arrhythmias, prior myocardial infarction, and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND The impact of revascularization on recurrent ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in patients with coronary artery disease and relatively preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is unknown. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of revascularization on recurrent VAs or death. METHODS A cohort study was conducted on consecutive patients with prior myocardial infarction and LVEF ≥40% presenting with a first clinical sustained VA in the absence of an acute coronary syndrome. The impact of revascularization on recurrent VAs and all-cause mortality was assessed. RESULTS A total of 274 patients (mean age 66.1 ± 9.7 years, 85.4% male, mean LVEF 48.3% ± 7.2%) were included in the study. Eight-eight patients (32.1%) underwent coronary revascularization. During mean follow-up of 6.2 ± 5.1 years, 140 (51.1%) died or had recurrent sustained VAs or appropriate implantable-cardioverter defibrillator therapy. Revascularization was not associated with a significantly lower rate of recurrent VAs or death (multivariable hazard ratio [HR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60-1.24, P = .43) regardless of whether it was complete or incomplete (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.25-1.69, P = .37) or was performed by percutaneous or surgical means (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.53-1.94, P = .96). An implantable-cardioverter defibrillator was associated with a significant reduction in mortality (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.09-0.55, P = .001). CONCLUSION Patients with prior myocardial infarction and LVEF ≥40% who present with sustained VAs in the absence of an acute coronary syndrome remain at high risk for recurrent VAs and all-cause death. Coronary revascularization does not systemically mitigate this risk.

Corticosteroid use during pulmonary vein isolation is associated with a higher prevalence of dormant pulmonary vein conduction

BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is associated with PV to left atrium reconduction. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to prospectively determine if the use of intraprocedural corticosteroids to limit the extent of tissue edema and/or inflammation alters the prevalence of spontaneous and adenosine-induced acute PV reconnection after PVI. METHODS Prior to wide circumferential PVI, 45 patients received a single intravenous (IV) bolus of hydrocortisone 250 mg immediately after transseptal access (steroid group). Another 45 consecutive patients underwent standard PVI without IV hydrocortisone (nonsteroid group). After PVI, all patients underwent adenosine testing to unmask dormant conduction. Patients were followed at 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS Dormant conduction was unmasked in a significantly higher proportion of PVs in the steroid group compared with the nonsteroid group (32.8% of PVs [60/183] vs 21.1% of PVs [37/175], P = .03). On multivariate generalized estimating equation analysis, steroid use remained independently associated with dormant PV conduction (P = .03). There was no difference in the segmental distribution of reconnection between the 2 groups. The 1-year freedom from recurrent AF did not differ between groups (P = .37). Radiofrequency time was significantly longer in the steroid group (58 ± 21 minutes vs 48 ± 18 minutes, P <.01), whereas procedure duration and fluoroscopy time were comparable (P = .55 and P = .44, respectively). CONCLUSION A single bolus of hydrocortisone 250 mg IV prior to PVI results in greater radiofrequency requirements for PVI and a higher prevalence of dormant PV conduction unmasked by adenosine. The utility of these approaches requires evaluation in a long-term prospective randomized study.

Heart rate and adverse outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: A combined AFFIRM and AF-CHF substudy.

BACKGROUND An elevated resting heart rate has been associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Its prognostic value has not specifically been examined in patients with atrial fibrillation. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between resting heart rate measured in sinus rhythm and in atrial fibrillation and subsequent hospitalizations and death. METHODS An analysis of individual patient-level data from subjects enrolled in the AFFIRM and AF-CHF trials was conducted to determine the impact of resting heart rate on hospitalizations and mortality. Separate analyses were performed in atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm. A total of 7159 baseline ECGs (4848 in atrial fibrillation, 2311 in sinus rhythm) were analyzed in 5164 patients (34.8% female, age 68.2 ± 8.3 years). RESULTS During mean follow-up of 40.8 ± 16.3 months, 1016 patients died (668 cardiovascular deaths), and 3150 required at least 1 hospitalization (2215 cardiovascular). An elevated baseline heart rate in sinus rhythm was associated with increased all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.24 per 10 bpm increase, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14-1.36, P < .0001]. In contrast, a baseline heart rate in atrial fibrillation was not associated with mortality. However, compared to heart rates 90-114 bpm in atrial fibrillation, a heart rate >114 bpm was independently associated with all-cause (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.06-1.31, P = .0018) and cardiovascular (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.10-1.42, P = .0005) hospitalizations. CONCLUSION In patients with a history of atrial fibrillation, an elevated baseline heart rate in sinus rhythm is independently associated with mortality. In contrast, the baseline heart rate in atrial fibrillation is not associated with mortality but predicts hospitalizations.

Focal Transcatheter Cryoablation: Is a Four-Minute Application Still Required?: Focal Transcatheter Cryoablation

The standard 4‐minute application time for transcatheter cryoablation was determined in the 1990s when the system employed less potent chlorofluorocarbon refrigerants. The current refrigerant, nitrous oxide, generates substantially colder temperatures, with a faster cooling rate.