Katie O’Hearn

Primary Outcome Measures in Pediatric Septic Shock Trials: A Systematic Review*

Objective: To evaluate all published pediatric randomized controlled trials of patients with septic shock from any cause to examine the outcome measures used, the strengths and limitations of these measurements and whether the trial outcomes met feasibility criteria. Data Sources: We used a previously published database of pediatric critical care randomized controlled trials (PICUtrials.net) derived from searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and CENTRAL. Study Selection: We included randomized controlled trials of interventions to children admitted to a PICU with septic or dengue hemorrhagic shock which were published in English. Data Extraction: Study characteristics and outcomes were retrieved by two independent reviewers with disagreement being resolved by a third reviewer. We defined feasibility as 1) recruitment of at least 90% of the targeted sample size and agreement of the observed outcome rate in the control group with the rate used for the sample size calculation to within 10% or 2) finding of a statistically significant difference in an interim or final analysis. Data Synthesis: Nineteen of 321 identified articles were selected for review. Fourteen of 19 studies (74%) provided an a priori definition of their primary outcome measure in their “Methods section.” Mortality rate was the most commonly reported primary outcome (8/14; 57%), followed by duration of shock (4/14; 29%) followed by organ failure (1/14; 7%). Only three of 19 included trials met feasibility criteria. Conclusions: Our review found that use of mortality alone as a primary outcome in pediatric septic shock trials was associated with significant limitations and that long-term patient-centered outcomes were not used in this setting. Composite outcomes incorporating mortality and long-term outcomes should be explored for use in future pediatric septic shock trials.

A systematic review of pediatric clinical trials of high dose vitamin D

Background. Due to inadequate UV exposure, intake of small quantities of vitamin D is recommended to prevent musculoskeletal disease. Both basic science and observational literature strongly suggest that higher doses may benefit specific populations and have non-musculoskeletal roles. Evaluating the evidence surrounding high dose supplementation can be challenging given a relatively large and growing body of clinical trial evidence spanning time, geography, populations and dosing regimens. Study objectives were to identify and summarize the clinical trial literature, recognize areas with high quality evidence, and develop a resource database that makes the literature more immediately accessible to end users. Methods. Medline (1946 to January 2015), Embase (1974 to January 2015), and Cochrane databases (January 2015), were searched for trials. All pediatric (0–18 years) trials administering doses higher than 400 IU (<1 year) or 600 IU (≥1 year) were included. Data was extracted independently by two of the authors. An online searchable database of trials was developed containing relevant extracted information (http://www.cheori.org/en/pedvitaminddatabaseOverview). Sensitivity and utility were assessed by comparing the trials in the database with those from systematic reviews of vitamin D supplementation including children. Results. A total of 2,579 candidate papers were identified, yielding 169 trials having one or more arms meeting eligibility criteria. The publication rate has increased significantly from 1 per year (1970–1979) to 14 per year (2010–2015). Although 84% of the total trials focused on healthy children or known high risk populations (e.g., renal, prematurity), this proportion has declined in recent years due to the rise in trials evaluating populations and outcomes not directly related to the musculoskeletal actions of vitamin D (27% in 2010s). Beyond healthy children, the only pediatric populations with more than 50 participants from low risk of bias trials evaluating a clinically relevant outcome were prematurity and respiratory illness. Finally, we created and validated the online searchable database using 13 recent systematic reviews. Of the 38 high dose trials identified by the systematic review, 36 (94.7%) could be found within the database. When compared with the search strategy reported in each systematic review, use of the database reduced the number of full papers to assess for eligibility by 85.2% (±13.4%). Conclusion. The pediatric vitamin D field is highly active, with a significant increase in trials evaluating non-classical diseases and outcomes. Despite the large overall number there are few high quality trials of sufficient size to provide answers on clinical efficacy of high-dose vitamin D. An open access online searchable data should assist end users in the rapid and comprehensive identification and evaluation of trials relevant to their population or question of interest.

A pilot validation study of crowdsourcing systematic reviews: update of a searchable database of pediatric clinical trials of high-dose vitamin D

BACKGROUND Completing large systematic reviews and maintaining them up to date poses significant challenges. This is mainly due to the toll required of a small group of experts to screen and extract potentially eligible citations. Automated approaches have failed so far in providing an accessible and adaptable tool to the research community. Over the past decade, crowdsourcing has become attractive in the scientific field, and implementing it in citation screening could save the investigative team significant work and decrease the time to publication. METHODS Citations from the 2015 update of a pediatrics vitamin D systematic review were uploaded to an online platform designed for crowdsourcing the screening process (http://www.CHEORI.org/en/CrowdScreenOverview). Three sets of exclusion criteria were used for screening, with a review of abstracts at level one, and full-text eligibility determined through two screening stages. Two trained reviewers, who participated in the initial systematic review, established citation eligibility. In parallel, each citation received four independent assessments from an untrained crowd with a medical background. Citations were retained or excluded if they received three congruent assessments. Otherwise, they were reviewed by the principal investigator. Measured outcomes included sensitivity of the crowd to retain eligible studies, and potential work saved defined as citations sorted by the crowd (excluded or retained) without involvement of the principal investigator. RESULTS A total of 148 citations for screening were identified, of which 20 met eligibility criteria (true positives). The four reviewers from the crowd agreed completely on 63% (95% CI: 57-69%) of assessments, and achieved a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 88-100%) and a specificity of 99% (95% CI: 96-100%). Potential work saved to the research team was 84% (95% CI: 77-89%) at the abstract screening stage, and 73% (95% CI: 67-79%) through all three levels. In addition, different thresholds for citation retention and exclusion were assessed. With an algorithm favoring sensitivity (citation excluded only if all four reviewers agree), sensitivity was maintained at 100%, with a decrease of potential work saved to 66% (95% CI: 59-71%). In contrast, increasing the threshold required for retention (exclude all citations not obtaining 3/4 retain assessments) decreased sensitivity to 85% (95% CI: 65-96%), while improving potential workload saved to 92% (95% CI: 88-95%). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the accuracy of crowdsourcing for systematic review citations screening, with retention of all eligible articles and a significant reduction in the work required from the investigative team. Together, these two findings suggest that crowdsourcing could represent a significant advancement in the area of systematic review. Future directions include further study to assess validity across medical fields and determination of the capacity of a non-medical crowd.

Prevention of vitamin D deficiency in children following cardiac surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BackgroundVitamin D is a pleiotropic hormone important for the recovery of organ systems after critical illness. Recent observational studies have suggested that three out of every four children are vitamin D deficient following cardiac surgery, with inadequate preoperative intake and surgical losses playing important contributory roles. Observed associations between postoperative levels, cardiovascular dysfunction and clinical course suggest that perioperative optimization of vitamin D status could improve outcome. With this two-arm, parallel, double blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT), we aim to compare immediate postoperative vitamin D status in children requiring cardiopulmonary bypass for congenital heart disease who receive preoperative daily high dose vitamin D supplementation (high-dose arm) with those who receive usual intake (low-dose arm).Methods/DesignEligibility requirements include age (>36 weeks, <18 years) and a congenital heart defect requiring cardiopulmonary bypass surgical correction. Enrollment of 62 participants will take place at a single Canadian tertiary care center over a period of 2 years. Children randomized to the high-dose group will receive age-based dosing that was informed by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) daily tolerable upper intake level (<1 year old = 1,600 IU/day, >1 year old = 2,400 IU/day). Children in the low-dose arm will receive usual care based on IOM recommendations (<1 year old = 400 IU, >1 year old = 600 IU). The primary outcome measure is immediate postoperative vitamin D status, using blood 25(OH)D.DiscussionMaintaining adequate postoperative vitamin D levels following surgery could represent an effective therapy to speed recovery following CHD surgery. The proposed research project will determine whether preoperative supplementation with a dosing regimen based on the IOM recommended daily upper tolerable intake will prevent postoperative vitamin-D deficiency in the majority of children. The results will then be used to inform the design of a large international RCT exploring whether preoperative optimization of vitamin D status might improve short and long-term outcomes in this vulnerable population.Trial RegistrationClinicaltrials.gov Identifier - NCT01838447Date of registration: 11 April 2013

Calcitriol trend following pediatric cardiac surgery and association with clinical outcome

BackgroundConsistent with accepted practice in stable ambulatory populations, the majority of ICU research has evaluated vitamin D status using a single blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) level. Only a limited number of ICU studies have measured the active hormone, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (calcitriol) and none have used change in calcitriol levels to evaluate axis functioning. The objective of this study was to describe the impact of Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) surgery on calcitriol levels and evaluate the relationship between change in postoperative levels and clinical course.MethodsSecondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of 56 children undergoing surgery for CHD.ResultsMean calcitriol levels dropped from 122.3 ± 69.1 pmol/L preoperatively to 65.3 ± 36.5 pmol/L (p < 0.0001) at PICU admission. The majority (61%, n = 34) were unable to increase calcitriol levels in the 48 h immediately following surgery. Post operative trend in calcitriol was inversely related to cardiovascular dysfunction, fluid requirements, ventilatory support and PICU length of stay (p < 0.01).ConclusionCHD patients had significant dysfunction of the vitamin D axis immediately postoperatively, demonstrated by both a significant intraoperative decline in calcitriol and inability to increase levels. Interventional research will be required to determine whether the use of calcitriol, in addition to cholecalciferol, reduces postoperative illness severity.

Abstract PD-049: PREVENTION OF POST-CARDIAC SURGERY VITAMIN D DEFICIENCY IN CHILDREN WITH CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE

PREVENTION OF POST-CARDIAC SURGERY VITAMIN D DEFICIENCY IN CHILDREN WITH CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE: RESULTS OF A PILOT DOSE EVALUATION RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL D. McNally1, K. O’Hearn2, J. Lougheed1, D. Fergusson3, G. Maharajh4, H. Weiler5, G. Jones6, A. Khamessan7, S. Redpath1, P. Geier1, L. McIntyre8, D.R. Doherty9, M. Lawson1, K. Menon1 1Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Pediatrics, Ottawa, Canada 2Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Research, Ottawa, Canada 3Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Clinical Epidemiology, Ottawa, Canada 4University of Ottawa, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ottawa, Canada 5McGill University, School of Human Nutrition, Montreal, Canada 6Queen’s University, Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Kingston, Canada 7Euro-Pharm International Canada Inc., Euro-Pharm International Canada Inc., Ottawa, Canada 8The Ottawa Hospital, Critical Care, Ottawa, Canada 9The Children’s University Hospital, Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Dublin, Ireland